Sign into an existing account

Alcohol is alot like crack. Would you prefer if I compared booze to another addictive depressant? Fine. Alcohhol is like heroin or opium. If I make my own and smoke it, is it a problem? It is absolutley comparable. You are normalized and acculturated to booze. Most people dont know anything different.

Do you know 7 or 8 hundred years ago, no one ever drank hard alcohol? All people had was very weak wine and beer. The drug dealers have refined their product to make it more potent over time. It’s like that episode of Next Generation: the Ornarans don’t even know they are being exploited because they have no knowlege of life without this drug. Alcohol is a trillion dollar a year industry. What could we do with that amount of resources if they werent thrown away on a useless, destructive behavior?

All the most based societies forbid alcohol like they they forbid other inefficient behaviors like money lending and gambling and insurance : most amish, mormons, puritans, quakers for example. Its a purely pleasure seeking behavior, like porn. Anyone that can sell such a commodity is then incentivized monitarily to exploit his fellow white. This creates an economic niche for the most selfish exploitive individulas to get rich off addiction.

But even if you only brew booze for yourself you are wasting resources that could be better allocated to the community. The societies which ban the most vices are the most efficient and most cooperative ones.

Its a question of how white you want to be. Its a question of group efficiency. You can continue to negotiate over just how many negative consequences of booze we should reasonably tolerate with “muh not so bad” —which is a nigger argument—or you can accept the logical conclusion: no one needs it, it benefits no one except parasites, it is a misallocation of labor and it reduces productivity, it shortens lifespan, it make people bad parents, neighbors, workers, etc.

There is no sane argument for alcohol use. Its the nigger choice.

This is a general rule of thumb but it doesnt apply to everything.


Doesnt always work


I dont go around slapping wine glasses out of people’s hands. But if the opportunity arises, I tell people why they should quit even moderate drinking as it is the logical choice and it benefits not only the drinker but all of society.


I only care about Whites. If others want to drink themselves to death or ruin or poverty, let them


Nigger cope.


It’s just jewy reasoning. Its a slippery slope. The more booze you drink, the worse off you are, and the adverse effects start with any alcohol consumption whatsoever. You are trying to argue that behavior that causes small harm should not be eliminated. But logic dictates that no harm is better than low harm.

Why are places like Italy and Spain more corrupt and less efficient that countries like Germany and England? Its because they are more “negotiable ” on a thousand little issues like this one that lead to lower efficiency. Moral flexibility make a difference.

The more permissiveness you give toward useless, pleasure seeking, addictive behaviors like this one, the less efficient your society will be. You will incentivize people in your culture to get rich by exploiting each other rather than being constructively employed, and those people will become reproductively successful. Its dysgenic.

Our people survived the ice age by being stoic and puritan-like which equates to highly efficient behavior. Meanwhile niggers and other shitskins lived sustainably in the tropics with an “it’s all good” type of attitude, fucking who they want, eating what they want, killing who they want. Vive la difference.

When you understand that “killjoy” uptight moral regimes all lead to highly cooperative awesome countries (because eliminating selfish wasteful behaviors incentivizes higher group trust and productivity) then you will understand that eliminating booze from White culture is low hanging fruit that will help us achieve next level awesomeness as a society.


None of my “issues” are relevant. You only need prove that my logic is wrong. But it’s not. You are trying to argue that supporting a trillion dollar industry which only benefits social parasites like jews and is a massive misallocation of resources is “not so bad”. Its bad, and not drinking is clearly better.


Naive notion that comes from a lack of coprehension of how alcohol works. It releases prostaglandin E1 which initially causes pleasure but overall it impairs your ability to make prostaglandin E1, so you feel more depressed in general. The “edge” that you need to take off is caused by regular alcohol consumption. If you never drink, you will have less “edge”


This is some sort of jewish psychobabble. All human can be addicted to alcohol. Genetic variation makes som more addictive than others, and we know that one of those genetic risks is in people with blue eyes. Melanotan 2 has been shown to reduce alcoholism in lab animals. It is very likely that higher vulnerability to alcohol is linked to the melanocortin system and melanin production. So maybe its just our fate for the whitest people to be X’ed out of the human race ‘cause we need booze not killjoys. But I say fuck that. Whites have too many stressors on the white population already. The prescription for a healthy white society is clear: no homo, no usury, no porn, no jews, no niggers, no porn, no polygamy, and no booze.


Free will is fake and gay. Would you give booze to a dog? Your livestock? Your kids? Adult humans work exactly the same way as all these other categories of beings. Booze tricks the brain. If you are using alcohol you have been parasitized and are a host organism that is enslaved. It works the same for every addictive behavior. Our evolutionary biology has a vulnerability and is being hacked by someone who is exploiting us for profit.


That is the natural evolved response of the pleasure center from doing things that are good for our bodies.

Harmful addictions hijack this facility to trick us into doing something that is not good for us.