×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
1

Over at halturner's outfit "Bizarre Rumor: NATO to admit "Western Ukraine" into Organization; Impose No-Fly Zone". If this turns out to be true it confirms the theory that this was a tacit operation between the u.s. and russia to carve up ukraine.

submitted by prototype to random 1.8 yearsJul 10, 2023 19:34:33 ago (+3/-2)     (random)

It also lends credence to the model where russia, the u.s. and china have been cooperating behind the scenes for decades.

if true, it really is the rest of the world against the superstate.
In which case, ukraine was the useful idiot in killing the dollar, and BRICs is the next farm to herd the southern hemisphere into the superstate's grip, the next grift-in-progress.

If ukraine surrenders, or sides with russia (if zelensky can be persuaded that the u.s. will give him the gaddafi treatment when he is no longer useful), then russia and china could actually boot the u.s. out of the covert alliance for good and upset the entire applecart. Not likely. But if ukraine were to switch sides now, strategically the u.s. and nato are dead in the water in eastern europe, we have defacto no reason to be there.

All of this suggests, as usual the nuclear war rumors are fearmongering, and the general plan to carve up ukraine continues apace.

Which means the actual "great reset" was always the failure of the dollar in a proxy war with ukraine.

Explains why elements of BRICs are discussing electronic currencies (CBDC). it's the ol' switcheroo. Fearmonger about it here in the u.s., get us cheering for anything and anyone who will take down the corrupt d.c. regime, and the public walk into the trap willingly.

That means social credit and chinese-style policing is still coming to the u.s.

That means more hypernormalization on the way!

Edit: As a sidenote, the thinking might be that by forcing a split on ukraine, the u.s. can suggest that it could take russia in a hot war, using the parity outcome as leverage to bolster the idea. Russia agreeing to it would essentially be capitulating that it can't defend BRICs gold backed currency with military force, even if it wanted to. BRICs is delayed or dead in the water if Russia agrees without significant additional concessions from the u.s. and ukrainian faction of the regime. Currently russia is forcing european and u.s. hands. And that is how it has to look even after any demarcation lines are drawn, otherwise the outcome will be used to suggest the u.s. entry "forced russias hand." followed by 24/7 wall to wall coverage about "if the u.s. can force russia into surrender like this, how will BRICs ever defend its new agreement and currency?"

The u.s. and british faction of the regime are playing chicken.

Russia needs to remain level head to the rest of the world, but out-crazy the u.s. if it wants to kill the dollar.

I don't think thats likely of course, but theres definitely the potential for them to say "screw remaining subservient to the old new-world rules-based coalition, why not take the hyperreal trap that we have diligently laid on behest of our behind-the-scenes allies, the BRICs, and instead of powersharing naymore, turn the scheme into the real deal, a new replacement for the old alliance. Why share power at all?"





5 comments block


[ - ] FreeinTX 2 points 1.8 yearsJul 10, 2023 19:40:52 ago (+2/-0)

Don't believe silly rumors.

[ - ] Anus_Expander 1 point 1.8 yearsJul 11, 2023 08:59:58 ago (+1/-0)

Turner is a well-documented lunatic

[ - ] prototype [op] 0 points 1.8 yearsJul 12, 2023 14:59:32 ago (+0/-0)

Turner is a well-documented lunatic

And a cutout or limited hang out.

Which makes him useful.

The trick is to identify who works for who, then work out the commonalities and differences between all the stories that cover the same subject, then ask why each commonality and difference exists. Who gains what if the alt sphere accepts x vs y, and who loses as a result. Who has motive, and what might those motives be?

Basically their "baffle em with bullshit" strategy leaks information like crazy, which is why I'm slightly more accurate than a coin toss, and at least twice as accurate as hal turner.

[ - ] Sector7 1 point 1.8 yearsJul 10, 2023 21:35:16 ago (+1/-0)

That sounds like a real edge case. A good rule of thumb is to never take more than one HalTurner.

[ - ] prototype [op] 1 point 1.8 yearsJul 11, 2023 02:33:59 ago (+1/-0)

That sounds like a real edge case. A good rule of thumb is to never take more than one HalTurner.

Doctors orders he says!