I actually deleted my original comment, as I went and double checked, and sure enough I was able to determine where they are getting this data from, and while I have not checked out the specific statistics, it is quite alarming.
The 2023 data, I would consider suspect, "as that is estimated". Hmm, all the data says estimated. By why would the numbers double from one year to the next?
Just tried downloading the 2023-cancer-facts-and-figures.pdf from their website and it's password protected...
Same for breast cancer facts & figures.
The twat author @texaslindsay says she screwed up and used the all ages figure for 2023 vs below fifty which is still close to double the previous years except for 2022. She'll repost corrected figures.
Only 6 months into 2023 so time will draw the real picture anyways.
Good God! Health insurance costs are going to go through the roof! So many people with so many expensive cancer treatments.
And you know what's being reported is to be believed these things are very fast aggressive cancers unlike typical cancers so unfortunately I think a lot more of these people will die much faster from their cancer than have in the past as well that's really striking 40,000 and 2022 and now 200 something thousand in 2023.
Wow!
I guess the five-year predictions are going to be true
Wonder if all cancers are going to see that much of a rise this year. And I wonder if heart attacks are also doing a similar rise. If that's true man they are going to be a bunch of deaths this year next year and the year after and if it progresses parabolically like has been projected man it's going to be like a science fiction movie with everybody dying
You may also find do to medical tyranny people forwent seeing medical specialist during the plandemic because they would have been forced to inject themselves with the bioweapon in order to be seen by a doctor and that's why now you're seeing the increase.
But I still wouldn't rule out the bioweapon as the cause.
I know that's going to be the excuse they use but I don't think that's true because if you look at the numbers they didn't get lower for a few years which they would have if people were not getting diagnosed.
They won't, though, at least not right away. It will be a slow, lingering decline for many, and that is by design. Did you know that for a long time, now, the military has employed ammo that maims as much as it kills? The idea being that killing an enemy soldier takes him out of the battle while leaving two of his companions to keep fighting, but wounding him would require his 2 companions to carry him back to receive medical treatment. (Of course, this relies on the enemy having basic, human compassion, not being soulless, commie bugs, but you get the idea.) With 1 bullet, you could eliminate 3 combatants, and the jab is going to be just like that: while the unvaxxed are busy tending to the vaxxed, the army of fighting-age-males they imported will be even busier getting ready for and engaged in war with them, political, demographically, economically, and, finally, militarily.
They're going to try to say that this is because people weren't going to the doctor with the clover lockdowns.
But that can't be true because if that was the reason then the 2020 numbers would have been lower because people would have been staying home and not being diagnosed. But the numbers are the same so they were being diagnosed at the same rate during the lockdown. So that means all the higher numbers later are from the shot.
[ + ] ParnellsUprising
[ - ] ParnellsUprising 4 points 1.8 yearsJul 3, 2023 17:37:10 ago (+4/-0)*
The 2023 data, I would consider suspect, "as that is estimated". Hmm, all the data says estimated. By why would the numbers double from one year to the next?
For your own perusal:
Look at the breast cancer statistics:
2023:
https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/annual-cancer-facts-and-figures/2023/sd1-cases-4-cancers-2023-cff.pdf
https://archive.is/XZm1e
2022:
https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/annual-cancer-facts-and-figures/2022/2022-case-estimates-by-age.pdf
https://archive.is/kLFZL
2021:
https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/annual-cancer-facts-and-figures/2021/2021-case-estimates-by-age.pdf
https://archive.is/yivFG
2019:
https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/annual-cancer-facts-and-figures/2019/estimated-new-cases-for-the-four-major-cancers-by-sex-and-age-group-2019.pdf
https://archive.is/tGEKV
2015:
It's a download from the site, so here is the catbox link
https://files.catbox.moe/7g4zd5.pdf
All the data is available at https://www.cancer.org/research/cancer-facts-statistics/all-cancer-facts-figures/2023-cancer-facts-figures.html
[ + ] Rotteuxx
[ - ] Rotteuxx [op] 2 points 1.8 yearsJul 3, 2023 18:33:44 ago (+2/-0)
Same for breast cancer facts & figures.
The twat author @texaslindsay says she screwed up and used the all ages figure for 2023 vs below fifty which is still close to double the previous years except for 2022. She'll repost corrected figures.
Only 6 months into 2023 so time will draw the real picture anyways.
[ + ] ParnellsUprising
[ - ] ParnellsUprising 2 points 1.8 yearsJul 3, 2023 18:53:05 ago (+2/-0)
BTW, here is the 2021 archive that I forgot to post:
https://archive.is/yivFG
[ + ] Crackinjokes
[ - ] Crackinjokes 0 points 1.8 yearsJul 3, 2023 22:31:41 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Crackinjokes
[ - ] Crackinjokes 1 point 1.8 yearsJul 3, 2023 22:30:20 ago (+1/-0)
And you know what's being reported is to be believed these things are very fast aggressive cancers unlike typical cancers so unfortunately I think a lot more of these people will die much faster from their cancer than have in the past as well that's really striking 40,000 and 2022 and now 200 something thousand in 2023.
Wow!
I guess the five-year predictions are going to be true
Wonder if all cancers are going to see that much of a rise this year. And I wonder if heart attacks are also doing a similar rise. If that's true man they are going to be a bunch of deaths this year next year and the year after and if it progresses parabolically like has been projected man it's going to be like a science fiction movie with everybody dying
[ + ] Clubberlang
[ - ] Clubberlang 1 point 1.8 yearsJul 3, 2023 20:46:30 ago (+1/-0)
But I still wouldn't rule out the bioweapon as the cause.
[ + ] Crackinjokes
[ - ] Crackinjokes 3 points 1.8 yearsJul 3, 2023 22:32:25 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] RMGoetbbels
[ - ] RMGoetbbels 1 point 1.8 yearsJul 3, 2023 18:13:04 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] La_Chalupacabra
[ - ] La_Chalupacabra 1 point 1.8 yearsJul 3, 2023 18:47:53 ago (+1/-0)
It will be a slow, lingering decline for many, and that is by design.
Did you know that for a long time, now, the military has employed ammo that maims as much as it kills?
The idea being that killing an enemy soldier takes him out of the battle while leaving two of his companions to keep fighting, but wounding him would require his 2 companions to carry him back to receive medical treatment.
(Of course, this relies on the enemy having basic, human compassion, not being soulless, commie bugs, but you get the idea.)
With 1 bullet, you could eliminate 3 combatants, and the jab is going to be just like that: while the unvaxxed are busy tending to the vaxxed, the army of fighting-age-males they imported will be even busier getting ready for and engaged in war with them, political, demographically, economically, and, finally, militarily.
[ + ] totes_magotes
[ - ] totes_magotes 2 points 1.8 yearsJul 3, 2023 20:10:52 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Clubberlang
[ - ] Clubberlang 1 point 1.8 yearsJul 3, 2023 20:48:05 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Crackinjokes
[ - ] Crackinjokes 0 points 1.8 yearsJul 3, 2023 22:34:13 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Clubberlang
[ - ] Clubberlang 0 points 1.8 yearsJul 6, 2023 23:10:58 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug 0 points 1.8 yearsJul 4, 2023 00:52:21 ago (+0/-0)
Climate change/Current thingTMIf only there was a group of people that warned the normies about such potentiality.
[ + ] Crackinjokes
[ - ] Crackinjokes 0 points 1.8 yearsJul 3, 2023 22:33:27 ago (+0/-0)
But that can't be true because if that was the reason then the 2020 numbers would have been lower because people would have been staying home and not being diagnosed. But the numbers are the same so they were being diagnosed at the same rate during the lockdown. So that means all the higher numbers later are from the shot.
[ + ] totes_magotes
[ - ] totes_magotes 0 points 1.8 yearsJul 3, 2023 20:09:31 ago (+0/-0)
- (Abraham Lincoln)
Anyone can say anything and put some org's name on it. Doesn't make it true. Show me the fuckin' numbers.
[ + ] GottaGasEmAll
[ - ] GottaGasEmAll 0 points 1.8 yearsJul 3, 2023 18:48:01 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] In_Cog_Nito
[ - ] In_Cog_Nito 1 point 1.8 yearsJul 3, 2023 23:35:55 ago (+1/-0)