Is that part of oyvey.lose and Qtard.wwgagoga.awokening? Or are they separate from scored? I go through Scored but have managed to dodge most of the BoomerCon faggotry.
Site is controlled effectively by the feds both in manipulation of the voting system and in highly upvoted lynch mobs calling for bans. See the same kinda shit here. Wouldn't surprise me if some of the staffers are infiltrators. One Great Awakening mod said 'no Trump supporter wants civil war' - which is so laughable it's hard to believe he would believe that genuinely.
I won't blame feds for most of my bans there though. Just one of them.
The upshot is that the gatekeepers are very active there as they are here. And as Helena recently said, sarcastically but in a sense that should have been said seriously, the government will spare no expense to stop me.
And it could be Jews. Sometimes. They have less resources than the US government though. Though also occasionally more inclination to disrupt.
If you look at the history of Iron March, probably the most prominent case study here, that place was being disrupted by multiple hats. In other words activists, governments, and NGOs. These various platforms are also confirmed to cooperate with US intelligence to fight terrorism.
Is it laughable because there's always an exception? A normally abled Trump supporter (I know, but pretend) would be holding two contradictory ideas if he also supported civil war.
Don't have the data right at my fingertips but over the last 18 months I know large numbers of Republicans surveyed have expectations variously of the need for violence to save the American way of life or a breakdown of law and order. Then there's just observing Trump supporters. This ain't Ronnie's Republican Party.
Their ideas on how to get there are very underdeveloped though, granted. They don't know what they are doing. And vested interests very much intend to keep it that way.
[ + ] Hoobeejoo
[ - ] Hoobeejoo 0 points 10 monthsJun 27, 2023 05:44:06 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Conspirologist
[ - ] Conspirologist [op] 0 points 10 monthsJun 27, 2023 07:04:10 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy -1 points 10 monthsJun 27, 2023 04:36:48 ago (+2/-3)
I won't blame feds for most of my bans there though. Just one of them.
The upshot is that the gatekeepers are very active there as they are here. And as Helena recently said, sarcastically but in a sense that should have been said seriously, the government will spare no expense to stop me.
[ + ] Conspirologist
[ - ] Conspirologist [op] 2 points 10 monthsJun 27, 2023 04:53:06 ago (+3/-1)
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy -1 points 10 monthsJun 27, 2023 04:58:54 ago (+1/-2)*
And it could be Jews. Sometimes. They have less resources than the US government though. Though also occasionally more inclination to disrupt.
If you look at the history of Iron March, probably the most prominent case study here, that place was being disrupted by multiple hats. In other words activists, governments, and NGOs. These various platforms are also confirmed to cooperate with US intelligence to fight terrorism.
[ + ] HelenHighwater
[ - ] HelenHighwater 2 points 10 monthsJun 27, 2023 09:03:35 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Sector7
[ - ] Sector7 2 points 10 monthsJun 27, 2023 14:58:18 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy -2 points 10 monthsJun 27, 2023 15:28:42 ago (+0/-2)
Don't have the data right at my fingertips but over the last 18 months I know large numbers of Republicans surveyed have expectations variously of the need for violence to save the American way of life or a breakdown of law and order. Then there's just observing Trump supporters. This ain't Ronnie's Republican Party.
Their ideas on how to get there are very underdeveloped though, granted. They don't know what they are doing. And vested interests very much intend to keep it that way.