Sign into an existing account

And Nicolai Tesla wasnt high IQ because he didnt forsee his discoveries would power device ps that spread jewish propagnda and shitty rap music. Thats just stupid.

Lots of high IQ men took the jab including Robert Malone. He still has a high IQ.

If a woman scores over 130 on an IQ test and spent her 20s on her career, she’s reproductively a better bet than a woman with a 105 IQ that decided she wanted babies at 23. If you dont understand why that is, you are not smart.

Yeah Im not nit picking. Im just suggesting how the real life distribution might look.


We can debate what is “smart” all day and never agree on a definition. You and @usedoilanalysis are free to do so. Using your or his bar, I can claim that every genius in history a moron because they didnt forsee some future event. That kind of definition of intelligence is meaningless because then nobody qualifies as smart. The Greeks should have known Mount Olympus was fake and gay. Christopher Columbus should have predicted latinos and cocaine cartels and Oprah and turned around.

The fact is, it is critical for white men to reproduce with women with high IQs. Its not really up for debate. The future of our race absolutely depends upon it. If the smartest women who are otherwise suitable for reproduction, marriage, motherhood are delaying marriage and having few or no children, you should find out why that is and fix the problem, not whine about sour grapes and argue the semantics of intelligence while the race goes down the toilet.

You will never have high IQ white men without high IQ white women. That is where they come from.

Youve never used the spare? One day you might have to use the spare, thats why you have it. You know your keyhole might really need that second key one day. Will enjoy watching that spare slide in your kehole on that day? Knowing the decision to make that spare was just so right? The day you use that spare you will appreciate turning that lock more than all the times you used it with the usual key. True?


My lock needs as many keys as people who need access to my home or business. And maybe some or all of those people will need a spare as well. Maybe I have a large family. Maybe I have many employees.

It dosent fucking matter because its a dumb metaphor.

In nigger world, any old key works in any old lock. Everybodys got a master key. Then the master keys start murdering and stealing from each other in order to access more locks. How’s your metaphor holding up? Thieving, killer master keys, Doug. Keys that build shithole countries

Can you imagine some guy regaling his exploits with a woman and his buddies are just: omg you were both virgins? How romantic! I praise you ? It beggars belief. XD


Because when they talk about us it’s to praise our virginity! Betcha didnt know that.

I can feel Im getting into trouble already for having too much fun on this post. ;)

I went out with some nice boys too btw. But back in the 80s and 90s, I was not hearing to much praise for virgins from guys.

I dont think that. We are the same people so we evolved sexual strategies together. If you dont like the way men behave women are implicated and vice versa. One sex exerts sexual pressure on the other, so its pretty futile to engage in endless finger pointing. Im happy to dispense with these debates entirely. Have you ever seen me make a post about how white men suck?

Yet Im constantly confronted with these MGTOW-esque posts implying that all white women are shallow manipulative hypergamous divorce raping soul vampires, or that we all love riding the “cock-go-round” and we all fuck black guys and hate white men and have only fan accounts. These threads are full of lies and distortions and they lay all the blame of societal collapse solely on white wahmen while handily avoid white men’s role there.

It’s incumbent upon me to point out in these threads: up until fairly recently, men totally dominated the political and economic spheres of society and most of the tragic decisions that adversly effect us now were made in that time by white men, and that most of the sexual vice and economically opportunistic behavior women are engaging in lately are mostly just copycatting what men have been doing for a while now.

I said non-virgins have no expectation of getting virgins. Statements like this always trigger the reeees here. Its just logic. Its absolutely fair.


This is just bulverism. In an hones debate you would try to prove me wrong but all you are doing is trying to mock my supposed emotional state or intellectual ability. Just prove me wrong. Otherwise we’ll just be having a “dangus” argument. Which I can do, but neither of us will be using our intellect at that point.

You say men are exagerating their body counts. I say , so are women. I did. I didnt want people to know I was inexperienced mot of my friends wre the same way. You say men really value virginity and arent acting against their own interests to goad girls into having casual sex. I call bullshit. You characterize male behaviors and motives with a fairy-story like naivety while presenting women as constantly trying to destroy each other or corrupt each other. Infamously, you say. Men are “exactly the opposite,” you say. Don’t you think I’m going to point out all the destructive male competition in the world at that point? Is that really out of line?

I will “hurr durr but men tho” all day if you exhibit hypocrisy in selectively impugning women for bad behavior while giving men a pass. Because this is a debate and its a fair point. Im not the one denying accountability for my sex while dumping the blame on somebody else. Youve shown a lack of awareness of selfish males behaviors.


This is not true. How could it be? Men invented legal systems and they created the no rape law. And they enforce it. Why would they create and enforce a law that never benefitted them? Its not in the interest of men to have their wives, daughters, sisters raped.

I can’t force sex or a relationship or reproduction on a man that doesnt want me. He has control of that. I don’t have all the power, that’s ridiculous. You are going to have to do a better job of explaining why women control all sexual relationships because you can’t rape them at any time,

Males have cheap reproduction. Women have expensive reproduction. This explains why women are choosier about mates generally. It explains differences in sexually strategies. Theres no point in railing about the iniquities that result from this on both sexes. As I’ve told many a feminist.

There are many unfairnesses about being a woman which are not collectively men’s fault. The reverse is also true. You seem angry over differences which women have no control over and you are anxious to paint all women with a broad brush because you’ve observed one thing that some women do.

Women’s opportunistic approaches are going to look different than men’s opportunistic approaches. To say that all women are opportunistic because female opportunistic behavior exists is dishonest. To deny that male opportunistic behavior exists is dishonest. Hence my hurr durr but men tho. Its not retarded to expect a debater to apply his own standards to his own side.


I’m confused. Are you saying women don’t do this? Are you saying this couldn’t also characterize interactions between women? It’s almost as if sometimes men mock and devalue virginity but also sometimes see the value in it. EXACTLY. LIKE. WOMEN. “But on the job site I heard once....” You are cherry picking.

You’re just kicking the can down the road. Where are you going to send them? Theyll just take over China and Japan and use those people to attack us. This is another debate.


What does that even mean? Can any man rape and murder any women with impunity? Hows that going to work? Even animals have rights in modern society. Your statemnt is empty. You need to delineate the rights of men and women explicitly. I doubt I’ll agree with your policies because you can’t acknowlege the need to limit men from exploiting women and each other.

Here’s my plan: monogamy. Enforced. Virtually all corruption, violence, theft, rent seeking behavior, war, economic disparity is fuelled by the ability of males to impregnate more than one female. Males have virtually limitless reproductive potential which is was fuels destructive male competition. That’s what drives these billionaire bastards, many of whom are white. That’s what drives the exploitve authoritarian surveillance state. Its what brought them into existence. It was the main problem of society 100 years ago and 1000 years ago and 5000 years ago.

Monogamous societies eugenically limit destructive and exploitive behaviors of opportunistic males, which are the main obstacle to building efficient stable coopeative societies. The redistribution of wealth to economically unproductive demographics like niggers and foreigners and women is a secondary problem— a tool used by the elites to control “democracy”

The more ability you give to males to exploit women as livestock, the more your nation will resemble the middle east. See my ten thousand other rants on why polygyny and age disparity in marriages drive high wealth disparity and corruption and war. Males fuck each ther over more than females— a biological fact due to reproductive assymetry. You have not solved that problem at all with the “Fuck wahmen” policy. Monogamy does.