☰
×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules
40

600,000 Americans Per Year Are Dying From COVID Shots Says Top Insurance Analyst

submitted by dosvydanya_freedomz to Health 11 monthsJun 18, 2023 22:29:54 ago (+40/-0)     (www.theflstandard.com)

https://www.theflstandard.com/top-insurance-analyst-600-000-americans-per-year-are-dying-from-covid-shots/

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Those vaccinated against COVID-19 have a 26 percent higher mortality rate on average compared to those who declined the jab – and the death toll is even more staggering for vaccinated people under 50 years old, where mortality is 49 percent higher than for those unvaccinated.

The shocking numbers are based on government data from the United Kingdom and were brought to Senator Ron Johnson’s (R-WI) attention by Josh Stirling, one of the nation’s top insurance analysts and formerly Senior Research Analyst for U.S. nonlife insurance at Sanford C. Bernstein & Co.


18 comments block

sort by: hot new top old low

[ - ] FacelessOne 8 points 11 monthsJun 19, 2023 00:56:03 ago (+8/-0)

Continuous brain cell degeneration until the mycarditus drops um.

[ - ] PotatoWhisperer2 4 points 11 monthsJun 19, 2023 09:11:19 ago (+4/-0)

Continuous brain cell degeneration

To be fair, they weren't using them anyway.

[ - ] NoRefunds 4 points 11 monthsJun 19, 2023 05:40:08 ago (+4/-0)

They should get a refund

[ - ] dosvydanya_freedomz [op] 2 points 11 monthsJun 19, 2023 06:34:17 ago (+2/-0)

They should get a refund

name checks out, too late mate. there's nothing stopping this train

[ - ] TheYiddler 3 points 11 monthsJun 19, 2023 06:42:05 ago (+3/-0)

That's the joke.

[ - ] TheYiddler 2 points 11 monthsJun 19, 2023 06:43:20 ago (+2/-0)

I will support the Karens going after the pharmaceutical companies.

[ - ] Leveraction 1 point 11 monthsJun 19, 2023 10:53:25 ago (+1/-0)

Analysists/actuarials job depend on correct numbers to determine premiums. I guarantee they are re-thinking life insurance for the clot shotted customers. They're not in the business to lose money. Numbers don't lie.

[ - ] RMGoetbbels 1 point 11 monthsJun 19, 2023 04:32:38 ago (+1/-0)

It's really not enough. I need 40 million dead niggers and a 135 million dead democrats.

I NEED SOME PEOPLE DYING! NOW!

[ - ] TheYiddler 0 points 11 monthsJun 19, 2023 06:44:53 ago (+0/-0)

Not enough niggers got the shot. Or they wouldn't have to talk about jab equity.

[ - ] HeyJames -1 points 11 monthsJun 19, 2023 08:01:03 ago (+0/-1)

Nothings happening

[ - ] Laputois 0 points 11 monthsJun 19, 2023 20:52:00 ago (+0/-0)

I would think that they would use a two part mechanism. The first cannot kill them too quickly because it would have a dampening effect. The second trigger should kill them quickly before they realize it.

[ - ] Nosferatjew 0 points 11 monthsJun 19, 2023 10:52:30 ago (+0/-0)

Multiply that by 10...

[ - ] carnold03 0 points 11 monthsJun 19, 2023 06:45:23 ago (+0/-0)

Is there any overlap in narcotics death?

[ - ] totes_magotes -3 points 11 monthsJun 19, 2023 09:06:07 ago (+0/-3)*

None of that says anything about whether or not they're comparing people who have/had COVID with people who have never had it. Normal common sense says that it's a lot easier to find people who were vaccinated AND had COVID than otherwise.

In other words, for this claim to be reasonable, they would need to compare:

1. People who were vaccinated but never had COVID.
2. People who were vaccinated and had COVID (and how many times)
3. People who were unvaccinated and never had COVID (control group and also ostensibly the pre-covid comparison)
4. People who were unvaccinated and had COVID (and how many times).

No, I don't care if you think COVID isn't fatal. If the "vaccines" were made from any part of COVID (which I have yet to see anyone disprove, only show that it has other junk in it) and they have a notable fatality rate, then COVID should also have a notable fatality rate. Therefore, if the COVID vaccine is fatal to a notable percentage of the population, so is COVID.

Without these numbers and proof, the statement is meaningless.

Wow, bunch of fucking retards on this site that are nothing more than the right wing equivalent of radical left retards who only want to hear what they want to hear. Maybe the whole plan to purge humanity of stupidity isn't such a bad idea after all. It sure the fuck could use it.

[ - ] Peleg 1 point 11 monthsJun 19, 2023 12:04:08 ago (+2/-1)

"If the "vaccines" were made from any part of COVID..."

Seeing as how none of the pharmaceutical companies have a sample of the "covid virus" to make a "vaccine" out of it is quite impossible for them to use any part of it to make their clot shot poison.

When you are going down your list there of people who "had it" and people who didn't, just who all are you going to count? Are you going to count the people that had the flu and a cold? Are you counting the people that died in car wrecks or were shot? Most of those were added to the "official" numbers! Are you figuring in the old folks that were murdered by the remdesivir and the ventilators?

I'm going to be more inclined to believe the numbers that insurance agencies use. They keep very accurate statistics. They have to. It's how they turn a profit.

[ - ] totes_magotes 0 points 11 monthsJun 19, 2023 13:02:06 ago (+0/-0)

The samples ALL came from china. This has been posted about repeatedly on this site.

[ - ] Leveraction 0 points 11 monthsJun 19, 2023 10:54:45 ago (+1/-1)

Ha ha,ha. Except you used this same argument in reverse two years ago.

[ - ] taoV 0 points 11 monthsJun 19, 2023 12:00:53 ago (+1/-1)

Obvious fallacy of composition. Part of a thing need not have the same seffect as the whole. Twice actually, because the shots are not typical vaccines and contain more than just weakened COVID.