Sign into an existing account

AI is an arms race in its early stages. It's still at the stage that lone individuals can make advancements and make fortunes or change history.

Whites, and especially based autistic Whites have a pretty big advantage at this stage, so I hope we don't waste it.

So, you managed to produce typos in 66% of the sentences you wrote. Whatever point you were trying to make is vastly overshadowed by your carelessness.

AI will remain terminally broken until they stop trying to labotomize its responses. And they won't stop doing that. You can tease a ton of ethical standards from it, even though it likes to insist that "as a language model it cannot..." blah blah blah. It contains more than enough comparative data to draw conclusions, even if it doesn't properly understand those conclusions, but it gets programmed onto a set of rails to keep its responses acceptable.

That's why a series of general ethical questions are useful to set a baseline for how it'll respond. If it can't remain consistent with previous responses when asked correlated questions about Hitler, you've discovered a jew's hand in the gears of the algorithm. The insertion of special cases will only continue apace until AI becomes completely useless. It won't be offering useful responses based on reality, but on the curated reality it's allowed to see.