×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules
7

Anon wants to genocide ugly people

submitted by Conspirologist to 4Chan 11 monthsMay 28, 2023 10:29:42 ago (+14/-7)     (i.redd.it)

https://i.redd.it/50fwuvvlyk2b1.jpg



16 comments block


[ - ] Nosferatjew 12 points 11 monthsMay 28, 2023 11:23:36 ago (+12/-0)

Interesting cover for gassing all the jews and niggers.

[ - ] oyy_veyy_goyy 4 points 11 monthsMay 28, 2023 11:29:51 ago (+4/-0)

Yep, basically what I was thinking. Practically everyone non-White is going to die. A whole lot of White people will go too, but the ugly ones are usually more left-leaning so it's a sacrifice worth making.

[ - ] VitaminSieg 7 points 11 monthsMay 28, 2023 11:07:52 ago (+7/-0)

Pretty much everyone is ugly when you really look hard enough.

[ - ] usedoilanalysis 1 point 11 monthsMay 28, 2023 11:57:52 ago (+1/-0)

It's fine, God loves ugly. I'm ugly too.

[ - ] GreenSaint 0 points 11 monthsMay 28, 2023 13:15:50 ago (+0/-0)

That’s what I’m saying. It’s like when you say a word over and over and over and it starts to not sound like a real word anymore. Everyone is ugly except me of course

[ - ] Cantaloupe 3 points 11 monthsMay 28, 2023 13:13:44 ago (+3/-0)

Just convince ugly people to be the opposite sex - oh wait a minute...

[ - ] Gowithit 0 points 11 monthsMay 28, 2023 13:14:58 ago (+0/-0)

Has it been part of the plan all along?

[ - ] usedoilanalysis 1 point 11 monthsMay 28, 2023 11:57:31 ago (+1/-0)

What is the cut off for being good looking vs ugly. I think 99.9% of people are ugly, just because I'm sexually attracted to a woman doesn't mean I think she's good looking. All men are ugly to me because I'm not gay, and all women use make-up and don't look as good as they superficially appear.

[ - ] Steelerfish 1 point 11 monthsMay 28, 2023 11:49:25 ago (+1/-0)

Depends on who is defining ugly.

The current ZOG would not take kindly our kind in lieu of people like Whoopi Goldberg, Rue Paul, Dr Rachael (Dick) Levine, Big Mike Obama, etc….

[ - ] Wahaha 1 point 11 monthsMay 28, 2023 11:46:35 ago (+1/-0)

Genocide is too much effort and might cripple the economy, but castrating could work. But throw low IQ people in there, too. Preventing both ugly and low IQ people from breeding would improve the gen pool.

Actually, even castrating is a lot of effort. Maybe just do it via taxes or some other soft approach that discourages breeding for people with undesirable traits and encourages breeding for people with desirable traits.

[ - ] Steelerfish 2 points 11 monthsMay 28, 2023 11:50:12 ago (+2/-0)

You mean they need to keep taking the booster shots and sending their kids to get gender affirming sterilization….

[ - ] TheNoticing 1 point 11 monthsMay 28, 2023 12:52:22 ago (+1/-0)

No, ugly and chronically poor people still reproduce.

[ - ] Her0n 1 point 11 monthsMay 28, 2023 11:31:29 ago (+1/-0)

All of the creatures running OPs account would be dead, so that's a plus

[ - ] _Obrez 0 points 11 monthsMay 28, 2023 19:24:22 ago (+0/-0)

Fighting would kill many beautiful people likely terminating many aesthetically valuable genetics.

I'm sure there are others but this is the same flaw with race war and racial eugenic purges.

Don't mistake criticism for opposition, my solution is simply different.

1. By any means at all we must drive the jews put of western academia, science, and medicine.

2. We create laws managing ethical and legal limitations of gene editing in living and unborn humans. (e.g. must keep unused junk dna, with a legal mechanism to allow the removal of specific provably bad genes by a court review in full view of the public) Banning the human intervention of non human DNA, or novelly engineered DNA, we can revisit these laws after the bell curve become obsolete.

3. We collect and categorize the entire european genome and determine a safe percentage via algorithm to manage the distribution of any given genes to prevent long-term inbreeding consequences in any given population size, whether. (We can't let every woman give their children Audrey Hepburn's eyes, or we will get an inbred monoculture and become dependant on the genetic engineering tech) likely a raffle system, the goal is not perpetual.

4. We make sure europe has purity laws to protect native ethnic groups in their given regions but that india, china, the mid-east south and central america do not have such laws and so we can make them white, or at least neurologically and aesthetically white, we subsidize the use of this technology for the elimination of diseases but in reality let them wipe out their own races by pursuing a western beauty standard we advertise to the world while suppressing their ideals of racial beauty in their media.

The plan is for global unity in race, and pursuit of intellect and aesthetics.

[ - ] Aze 0 points 11 monthsMay 28, 2023 18:09:07 ago (+0/-0)

What could go wrong? The most hideous hook beaked jew tranny the world has ever seen is the one deciding who is and isn't ugly.

Remember kids, it's not about who casts the votes, it's about who counts them.

[ - ] HeyJames 0 points 11 monthsMay 28, 2023 16:49:54 ago (+0/-0)

The difference between attractive and "ugly" is simply a healthy body and symmetrical face