There are many autistics who genuinely want to be cured of their condition, and would love to see a world without autism in it.
They see it as a disability that has only brought suffering to them and their loved ones, and are frustrated with those who try and pretend that it's not the negative condition that it is.
So many people who are autistic or are involved with autistics are quick to speak for the whole of the group, some speak for them by claiming it's a disorder autistics want to be cured, others by claiming its something they want to be accepted as not being a disorder at all, both are wrong.
There is no consensus among people with autism regarding their condition, some think one way, others think another, yet these representatives and organizations try and claim a uniformity that isn't there. By pretending there is a united front and trying to silence the other opinion they do a great disservice to the very people they pretend to represent.
-
Almost as bad are those who try and advertise the syndrome as if it were something cool and unique, especially all those who proudly proclaim themselves to have it, whether or not they actually do have it.
We've entered an age where everyone wants to have a mentally illness and to show it off like it was something fun and a source of pride, rather than something debilitating and a source of shame.
It reminds me of that part of "diary of a wimpy kid" where the main character breaks is friend's arm, and his friend gets all kinds of sympathy and special treatment for it.
So the main character pretends his own arm is broken, just to seek all the attention and ability to tell others what to do that comes with it.
All the privileges given to those who are suffering from a condition (because they literally require it to function normally), without actually having to suffer the condition (they look up symptoms and try to get others to believe they have the condition they do not have).
They are exhibiting the symptoms of a mental disorder, it's just not autism: We are living in an age of munchhousen syndrome. This is a world where people are starved for attention and power, they think that having autism gives you attention and the power to control others or flaunt social rules.
A truly autistic person tries to behave normally and learn to think more like ordinary people, they are forgiven for the mistakes they may make at times.
A faker will instead make no attempt to conform or function, and will instead just enjoy flouting the social conventions of their society while attacking anyone who tries to reign them in.
After all, that's what they seek out, the ability to be as inappropriate as they want and then shame those who address them for it.
People who have low IQs think people who have higher IQs and can concentrate and do deep research are autistic. So smart people embraced it as a badge of excellence.
My wife thinks I'm mildly autistic. I don't deal well with certain smells and social situations. I've also been cursed my whole life with being overly observant. I notice everything, and it sucks sometimes. On one hand, while driving it's super useful because I know what drivers five car lengths ahead of me are going to do. On the other hand, in crowds I am in information overload and it stresses me the fuck out. I think I'm just wired a little differently.
I have no beef with autists. Some of them can do some really cool shit and they don’t spread disease like faggots or anything so leave them alone and let them count their toothpicks:
My friends kid has got it and he is well fucked up. I doubt there will be a cure in this century but maybe we could learn more about cause and prevention.
[ - ] Cunt 2 points 11 monthsMay 23, 2023 20:46:36 ago (+2/-0)
It's a form of brain damage (but you cant say that anymore!) and like other forms of brain damage there are at least a few different reasons it can happen and chance of a cure is very low but rehabilitation to a point is certainly possible in most (but not all) cases.
I think the key to normalizing saying it is to admit the reality that people face micro brain damage every day. Neuroplasticity combats it. The fact that all people lose IQ as they age even without Alzheimers and fat people lose it faster because they can't breath while they sleep shows that brain damage is constant and stochastic. But if you get unlucky and catch an injury in the wrong spot, autism.
One of these days we will image it. 1 in 100 have it. So all we need to do is get 200 kids to do an fmri once a week, and we'll catch it. Probably there is other value you can get out of that data set so probably worth it.
AUT (from Greek autos; self) + -ISM (suggested by another)...ones consents to the latter tempts one to ignore the former. ISM contradicts AUT...a rhetorical deception.
From the outside, it does appear like autists and sperglords don't really take in the stimuli from other people. It's one of the most common traits seen across the whole spectrum.
a) being able to perceive perceivable implies being center of surrounding...suggestions by others tempt one to ignore this.
b) life being moved from inception towards death implies from outside (process of dying) into inside (living). This represents transmutation of ingredient (temporary growth) out of base (ongoing loss)...others suggest creationism (out of nothing) as the inversion of transmutation (within everything).
c) ignoring perceivable (reality) for suggested (fiction) corrupts appearances.
autists and sperglords
a) -IST implies ones consent to suggested -ISM aka ones submission to another, while ignoring self and thereby giving the other the power of ones consent to define; redefine and contradict the suggested at will.
b) branding others as -ISTs; sperglords; insane etc. represents psychoanalysis aka Sigismund Schlomo Freud (alleged father of psychoanalysis) domesticating goy-cattle to brand each other through suggestion.
stimuli from other people
Action (inception towards death) animates reactions (life)...other life uses suggested stimuli to tempt one to react to them instead of resisting origin. Why? Because ignoring resistance allows others the opportunity to exploit ones lack thereof. If life chooses to resist being moved towards death; then resistance grows, which makes it harder for others to tempt one with suggested.
one of the most common traits
a) suggested "most" tempts perceiving "one" to ignore self (partial within whole) for others (part of collective).
b) TRAIT, noun [Latin tractus] - "a line; a feature"...one represents feature (life) within line (inception towards death).
whole spectrum
Whole (motion) generates spectrum (momentum aka balance) for partial (choice) within...one can only exist within the spectrum of whole. SPEC'TRUM, noun - "visible form" aka all perceivable for each perceiving one within.
across
a) aka "intersecting; passing over at any angle"...life intersects with being moved from inception towards death, hence giving life the free will of choice to balance (within momentum), while being moved (through motion).
b) across aka A CROSS to bear aka ones response-ability (free will of choice). How does one get nailed to that cross? By consenting to the suggested choices of others.
-ISM aka ones submission to another, while ignoring self and thereby giving the other the power of ones
how do you reconcilie the temptation of a man to pursue an attractive woman (mate) which then results in life?
likewise, how do you reconcile the submission of a woman to her man, giving him power over her (and her offspring) ?
these are 'good temptations, no' ? You seem to suggest (not directly) that we must resist temptation, to not 'go with the flow', and to avoid consenting to the offers of another.... yet if we resist the temptation of an attractive female we may never get a mate - and if a female never submits/consents her authority to that of a man we may never have a stable family.
now this is where I predict you would suggest 'balance in momentum'.... that too much temptation (ie- chasing ass) or that too much consent (ie- physical abuse) is where the problems arise from temptation/consent.
RECONCILE (to call back into union) tempts one to ignore self, hence UNION; UNITAS; UNUS - "one" for suggested togetherness with others. It's the natural order (inception towards death) which calls back each one (life) within. Being implies ones struggle for apartheid (temporary growth) within wholeness (ongoing loss).
the temptation of a man to pursue an attractive woman
a) before suggested want (temptation) comes perceivable need (response-ability).
b) pursuing suggested outcomes (progressivism) tempts one to ignore being resistance (life) within origin (inception towards death), hence in need to resist want.
c) ATTRACT (to cause to move towards) tempts one to ignore that the natural order moving from inception towards death is setting life apart from one another...not together. Intercourse among one another implies OFF-spring, hence perpetuation of one-self through another one.
d) origin of male (motion) to female (momentum) generates trans-form aka temporary choice (life) within the balance (momentum of being moved from inception towards death) of ongoing motion. NATURE (born, produced) generates SEX (Latin seco; to divide aka distinction between male and female.
FE-minine-MALE + WO-mb-MAN + S-plit-HE implies both natural aspects (male/female) within one trans-form. Intercouse for off-spring of oneself implies distinct sex (male/female) finding center (balance aka momentum) of surrounding (motion).
This represents alchemy...as form (life) within flow (inception towards death) it goes flow to form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death) aka ingredient out of base transmutation. Inception of off-spring implies form out of flow transmutation.
mate
MATE, verb - "to equal; to be equal to" aka equality (same) through diversity (difference)...a suggested inversion of being diverse (life) within equal (inception towards death). Being one implies being different from all other ones. The few suggest the "ring to bind" male and female together. TO (towards) GET (getting) tempts one to ignore being partial within whole, hence already got access to everything perceivable. Life isn't towards getting, but temporary growth within ongoing loss.
which then results in life
RESULT (to leap back; to rebound; to preceed, spring or rise, as a consequence)...the implies out of perceivable origin not by pursuing suggested outcomes. Ones want for children lowers fertility needed to sustain self by intercourse with another, because one wants an outcome instead of planting ones seed within origin.
submission of a woman to her man, giving him power over her (and her offspring) ?
a) momentum (female) represents the consequence of motion (male), hence primary action followed by subordinate reaction. Momentum represents the balance within motion, which generates at its center...ones free will of choice, hence temporary reaction within ongoing action.
b) foundation for male/female balance implies ENERGY (internal/inherent power) aka the power of ongoing loss (male motion) and temporary growth (female momentum) in balance with one another as center (growth) within surrounding (loss) both representing and sustaining energy as a whole through each partial.
The few utilize suggestion to tempt the many to ignore this, which in return allows the few to exploit ignored energy.
c) being implies power of resistance (life) within power of velocity (inception towards death)...discerning this implies being resistance (centered need) within temptation (wanted surrounding), hence the struggle to sustain self by need to resist want...others suggest want to tempt one to ignore need, which in return allows others to exploit ones lack of resistance.
these are 'good temptations, no'?
a) good vs bad aka yes vs no aka agreement vs disagreement aka want vs not etc. represents ones choice to ignore perceivable for suggested, hence falling for temptation.
b) temptation (inception towards death) generates response-ability (life)...discerning that implies ones "need" to resist "wanted" temptation.
You seem to suggest (not directly) that we must resist temptation
a) that which directs (inception towards death) aka motion, also tempts those within (life) to ignore resisting. The path of least resistance implies going with the flow, hence others suggesting progressivism (luring one towards outcomes).
b) perceivable directs; perceiving reacts...suggested distracts.
c) suggested "we must" tempts perceiving one to ignore that being necessitates adaptation (as choice) to perceivable origin (balance). Consenting to suggested "we" (plural) implies that the perceiving "one" (singular) already choose to ignore self for others.
The few suggest "we; we the people; we are the world; where we go one we go all" aka e pluribus unum (out of many one) aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) etc. as the inversion of apartheid (perceiving) within wholeness (perceivable).
The many and the few is based on ones consent to suggested THE-ism, hence submitting oneself to authority of another one. Being partial within whole implies ones within oneness...there can be only one + all for one and one for all + all represents one in energy (internal/inherent power).
to not 'go with the flow'
a) being implies as form (life) within flow (inception towards death)...suggested "to not" aka towards nothing tempts one to ignore being moved from (inception) within (life) and towards (death) everything.
b) utilizing no; not; none; nothing; nothingness etc. implies ones consent to suggested nihilism, hence ignoring everything (perceivable) for nothing (suggested), which ties into suggested creationism (out of nothing) over perceivable transmutation (within everything).
Such a deception only works if oneself lacks self discernment, which implies ones mind discerning self..."not" by others.
to avoid consenting to the offers of another
a) suggested "avoid" once again represents a void aka emptiness aka nothingness. Everyone (partial) represents filling within everything (whole).
b) consent implies as choice consenting towards suggested choices of others...that ignore being choice (reaction) within balance (enacting), hence in need to adapt by balancing. Male/female; salt/oil; penis/vagina always find level; balance; intercourse (aka internal momentum within course of motion)...with or without consent to each other.
One gets hard; one gets wet...the more each one resists temptation (lust) of one another; the nearer one can be apart from one another. Getting into each others pants is awkward; yet the more one resists the want to get into each others pants, the more comfortable one gets among one another...until the pants drop naturally.
The suggested consent-ritual tempts each one to ignore ones struggle within to resist surrounding.
temptation of an attractive
a) temptation (inception towards death) attracts ignorance of resistance (life)...stabilizing self doesn't make others uglier.
b) male (motion) to female (momentum) to trans-form (resistance within velocity)...male attracts; female divides; trans-form resists as divided partial within attraction of whole. Nature produces SEX (Latin seco; to divide; distinction between male/female aka fe(minine)male + wo(mb)man + s(plit)he. Suggested male and female represents dualism, hence tempting trans-muted one to ignore self for others, hence all the attraction vs repulsion issue for those ignoring to be choice (trans) within balance (male/female)...balance (enacting) transmutes choice (reactions) within base (energy).
never get
Everyone (perceiving) already got momentary access to everything (perceivable)...wanting to get from others (suggested) distracts one from comprehending that.
never have a stable family.
a) instable (prone to change aka choice) can only exits within stable (balance)...hence IN (being within) STABLE (stabilized by). Only within stable balance can one shape instable choices. Suggested UNstable aka negation of balance represents the inversion of choice within balance, hence having the choice to imbalance self when ignoring balance, which doesn't negate balance only trips choice.
b) suggested FAM'ILY, noun [Latin familia.] - "collective body" tempts one to ignore family UNIT (Latin unitas; unus) - "one", hence perpetuation of one by intercourse with another one for off-spring for yet more ones. Ones consent to suggested collectivism (family) gives other the power of ones consent to rip families "apart" from "one" another. This is also where "the ring which binds" is being suggested for wed-lock within a marriage-contract.
problems arise
Only within ongoing solution (inception towards death) can temporary problems (life) arise. Ones struggle to resist being dissolved implies a problematic situation...others suggest the inversion, hence tempting one to solve problems by seeking solutions from others.
Base (ongoing loss) represents solvent of ingredients (temporary growth)...fill (inception); nourish (life); digest (death).
[ + ] Crackinjokes
[ - ] Crackinjokes 3 points 11 monthsMay 23, 2023 10:59:17 ago (+3/-0)
No cure necessary.
[ + ] PeckerwoodPerry
[ - ] PeckerwoodPerry 3 points 11 monthsMay 23, 2023 10:05:35 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] TheBigGuyFromQueens
[ - ] TheBigGuyFromQueens 3 points 11 monthsMay 23, 2023 10:28:15 ago (+3/-0)
you’re a big boy now and he can’t hurt you anymore. It’s not your fault.
[ + ] PeckerwoodPerry
[ - ] PeckerwoodPerry 6 points 11 monthsMay 23, 2023 10:32:06 ago (+6/-0)
[ + ] Spaceman84
[ - ] Spaceman84 2 points 11 monthsMay 23, 2023 11:38:20 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Conspirologist
[ - ] Conspirologist 1 point 11 monthsMay 23, 2023 13:05:22 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] TheBigGuyFromQueens
[ - ] TheBigGuyFromQueens 2 points 11 monthsMay 23, 2023 10:26:32 ago (+2/-0)
https://youtube.com/shorts/vlqoJ3zTUN0?feature=share
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 11 monthsMay 23, 2023 17:50:34 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Cunt
[ - ] Cunt 2 points 11 monthsMay 23, 2023 20:46:36 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] x0x7
[ - ] x0x7 2 points 11 monthsMay 23, 2023 21:48:20 ago (+2/-0)*
One of these days we will image it. 1 in 100 have it. So all we need to do is get 200 kids to do an fmri once a week, and we'll catch it. Probably there is other value you can get out of that data set so probably worth it.
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason -1 points 11 monthsMay 23, 2023 12:28:08 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] AntiPostmodernist
[ - ] AntiPostmodernist [op] 1 point 11 monthsMay 23, 2023 12:38:53 ago (+1/-0)
From the outside, it does appear like autists and sperglords don't really take in the stimuli from other people. It's one of the most common traits seen across the whole spectrum.
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason -1 points 11 monthsMay 23, 2023 13:11:37 ago (+0/-1)
a) being able to perceive perceivable implies being center of surrounding...suggestions by others tempt one to ignore this.
b) life being moved from inception towards death implies from outside (process of dying) into inside (living). This represents transmutation of ingredient (temporary growth) out of base (ongoing loss)...others suggest creationism (out of nothing) as the inversion of transmutation (within everything).
c) ignoring perceivable (reality) for suggested (fiction) corrupts appearances.
a) -IST implies ones consent to suggested -ISM aka ones submission to another, while ignoring self and thereby giving the other the power of ones consent to define; redefine and contradict the suggested at will.
b) branding others as -ISTs; sperglords; insane etc. represents psychoanalysis aka Sigismund Schlomo Freud (alleged father of psychoanalysis) domesticating goy-cattle to brand each other through suggestion.
Action (inception towards death) animates reactions (life)...other life uses suggested stimuli to tempt one to react to them instead of resisting origin. Why? Because ignoring resistance allows others the opportunity to exploit ones lack thereof. If life chooses to resist being moved towards death; then resistance grows, which makes it harder for others to tempt one with suggested.
a) suggested "most" tempts perceiving "one" to ignore self (partial within whole) for others (part of collective).
b) TRAIT, noun [Latin tractus] - "a line; a feature"...one represents feature (life) within line (inception towards death).
Whole (motion) generates spectrum (momentum aka balance) for partial (choice) within...one can only exist within the spectrum of whole. SPEC'TRUM, noun - "visible form" aka all perceivable for each perceiving one within.
a) aka "intersecting; passing over at any angle"...life intersects with being moved from inception towards death, hence giving life the free will of choice to balance (within momentum), while being moved (through motion).
b) across aka A CROSS to bear aka ones response-ability (free will of choice). How does one get nailed to that cross? By consenting to the suggested choices of others.
[ + ] reptillian
[ - ] reptillian 0 points 10 monthsMay 30, 2023 01:40:01 ago (+1/-1)
how do you reconcilie the temptation of a man to pursue an attractive woman (mate) which then results in life?
likewise, how do you reconcile the submission of a woman to her man, giving him power over her (and her offspring) ?
these are 'good temptations, no' ? You seem to suggest (not directly) that we must resist temptation, to not 'go with the flow', and to avoid consenting to the offers of another.... yet if we resist the temptation of an attractive female we may never get a mate - and if a female never submits/consents her authority to that of a man we may never have a stable family.
now this is where I predict you would suggest 'balance in momentum'.... that too much temptation (ie- chasing ass) or that too much consent (ie- physical abuse) is where the problems arise from temptation/consent.
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason -1 points 10 monthsJun 2, 2023 05:49:11 ago (+0/-1)
RECONCILE (to call back into union) tempts one to ignore self, hence UNION; UNITAS; UNUS - "one" for suggested togetherness with others. It's the natural order (inception towards death) which calls back each one (life) within. Being implies ones struggle for apartheid (temporary growth) within wholeness (ongoing loss).
a) before suggested want (temptation) comes perceivable need (response-ability).
b) pursuing suggested outcomes (progressivism) tempts one to ignore being resistance (life) within origin (inception towards death), hence in need to resist want.
c) ATTRACT (to cause to move towards) tempts one to ignore that the natural order moving from inception towards death is setting life apart from one another...not together. Intercourse among one another implies OFF-spring, hence perpetuation of one-self through another one.
d) origin of male (motion) to female (momentum) generates trans-form aka temporary choice (life) within the balance (momentum of being moved from inception towards death) of ongoing motion. NATURE (born, produced) generates SEX (Latin seco; to divide aka distinction between male and female.
FE-minine-MALE + WO-mb-MAN + S-plit-HE implies both natural aspects (male/female) within one trans-form. Intercouse for off-spring of oneself implies distinct sex (male/female) finding center (balance aka momentum) of surrounding (motion).
This represents alchemy...as form (life) within flow (inception towards death) it goes flow to form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death) aka ingredient out of base transmutation. Inception of off-spring implies form out of flow transmutation.
MATE, verb - "to equal; to be equal to" aka equality (same) through diversity (difference)...a suggested inversion of being diverse (life) within equal (inception towards death). Being one implies being different from all other ones. The few suggest the "ring to bind" male and female together. TO (towards) GET (getting) tempts one to ignore being partial within whole, hence already got access to everything perceivable. Life isn't towards getting, but temporary growth within ongoing loss.
RESULT (to leap back; to rebound; to preceed, spring or rise, as a consequence)...the implies out of perceivable origin not by pursuing suggested outcomes. Ones want for children lowers fertility needed to sustain self by intercourse with another, because one wants an outcome instead of planting ones seed within origin.
a) momentum (female) represents the consequence of motion (male), hence primary action followed by subordinate reaction. Momentum represents the balance within motion, which generates at its center...ones free will of choice, hence temporary reaction within ongoing action.
b) foundation for male/female balance implies ENERGY (internal/inherent power) aka the power of ongoing loss (male motion) and temporary growth (female momentum) in balance with one another as center (growth) within surrounding (loss) both representing and sustaining energy as a whole through each partial.
The few utilize suggestion to tempt the many to ignore this, which in return allows the few to exploit ignored energy.
c) being implies power of resistance (life) within power of velocity (inception towards death)...discerning this implies being resistance (centered need) within temptation (wanted surrounding), hence the struggle to sustain self by need to resist want...others suggest want to tempt one to ignore need, which in return allows others to exploit ones lack of resistance.
a) good vs bad aka yes vs no aka agreement vs disagreement aka want vs not etc. represents ones choice to ignore perceivable for suggested, hence falling for temptation.
b) temptation (inception towards death) generates response-ability (life)...discerning that implies ones "need" to resist "wanted" temptation.
a) that which directs (inception towards death) aka motion, also tempts those within (life) to ignore resisting. The path of least resistance implies going with the flow, hence others suggesting progressivism (luring one towards outcomes).
b) perceivable directs; perceiving reacts...suggested distracts.
c) suggested "we must" tempts perceiving one to ignore that being necessitates adaptation (as choice) to perceivable origin (balance). Consenting to suggested "we" (plural) implies that the perceiving "one" (singular) already choose to ignore self for others.
The few suggest "we; we the people; we are the world; where we go one we go all" aka e pluribus unum (out of many one) aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) etc. as the inversion of apartheid (perceiving) within wholeness (perceivable).
The many and the few is based on ones consent to suggested THE-ism, hence submitting oneself to authority of another one. Being partial within whole implies ones within oneness...there can be only one + all for one and one for all + all represents one in energy (internal/inherent power).
a) being implies as form (life) within flow (inception towards death)...suggested "to not" aka towards nothing tempts one to ignore being moved from (inception) within (life) and towards (death) everything.
b) utilizing no; not; none; nothing; nothingness etc. implies ones consent to suggested nihilism, hence ignoring everything (perceivable) for nothing (suggested), which ties into suggested creationism (out of nothing) over perceivable transmutation (within everything).
Such a deception only works if oneself lacks self discernment, which implies ones mind discerning self..."not" by others.
a) suggested "avoid" once again represents a void aka emptiness aka nothingness. Everyone (partial) represents filling within everything (whole).
b) consent implies as choice consenting towards suggested choices of others...that ignore being choice (reaction) within balance (enacting), hence in need to adapt by balancing. Male/female; salt/oil; penis/vagina always find level; balance; intercourse (aka internal momentum within course of motion)...with or without consent to each other.
One gets hard; one gets wet...the more each one resists temptation (lust) of one another; the nearer one can be apart from one another. Getting into each others pants is awkward; yet the more one resists the want to get into each others pants, the more comfortable one gets among one another...until the pants drop naturally.
The suggested consent-ritual tempts each one to ignore ones struggle within to resist surrounding.
a) temptation (inception towards death) attracts ignorance of resistance (life)...stabilizing self doesn't make others uglier.
b) male (motion) to female (momentum) to trans-form (resistance within velocity)...male attracts; female divides; trans-form resists as divided partial within attraction of whole. Nature produces SEX (Latin seco; to divide; distinction between male/female aka fe(minine)male + wo(mb)man + s(plit)he. Suggested male and female represents dualism, hence tempting trans-muted one to ignore self for others, hence all the attraction vs repulsion issue for those ignoring to be choice (trans) within balance (male/female)...balance (enacting) transmutes choice (reactions) within base (energy).
Everyone (perceiving) already got momentary access to everything (perceivable)...wanting to get from others (suggested) distracts one from comprehending that.
a) instable (prone to change aka choice) can only exits within stable (balance)...hence IN (being within) STABLE (stabilized by). Only within stable balance can one shape instable choices. Suggested UNstable aka negation of balance represents the inversion of choice within balance, hence having the choice to imbalance self when ignoring balance, which doesn't negate balance only trips choice.
b) suggested FAM'ILY, noun [Latin familia.] - "collective body" tempts one to ignore family UNIT (Latin unitas; unus) - "one", hence perpetuation of one by intercourse with another one for off-spring for yet more ones. Ones consent to suggested collectivism (family) gives other the power of ones consent to rip families "apart" from "one" another. This is also where "the ring which binds" is being suggested for wed-lock within a marriage-contract.
Only within ongoing solution (inception towards death) can temporary problems (life) arise. Ones struggle to resist being dissolved implies a problematic situation...others suggest the inversion, hence tempting one to solve problems by seeking solutions from others.
Base (ongoing loss) represents solvent of ingredients (temporary growth)...fill (inception); nourish (life); digest (death).