Sign into an existing account

deleted

Which letter is for “nigger with a mask on”?

Does the s stand for straight?

We could add an h for hetero if it's not.

Everybody on that stage deserves a bullet.

Instead of the quick brown fox jumped over the lazy dog it will be LGBTQUIAAP and P is pedophile

Going to have to throw in some greek and hebrew at some point.

every week or so they ad a new letter to it. By the end of the year they won't have letters left.

At this point, you can just bash your fists on the keyboard.

+2SCLGNBTQT^&#GNVNADSAI*^!!%TU4893YUYUYUYUYUYUYU83OI[J3VV$]UIYRSZXPEDOFAGGOTS

they forgot the P for pedo

You guys are still paying attention to this crap?

3 to 6 for sexual orientation.
- straight
- gay
- lesbian
- bisexual
- questioning
- asexual
That's all I can think of, pansexual is usually used as a way to say "bisexual plus trannies: all sexes, plus all types of trannies". But I just think of them as pretentious bisexuals, if it is its own category then that would mean all bisexuals are superbisexual, and exclude trannies, but then we could add even more categories because there are now four sexes you could be attracted to in any combination.

Then a fucktonne of gender identities:
- cisgender (man in man's body)
- intersex (either pseudo-hemaphrodite with one chromosomal sex but a body that is physically ambiguous, or true hermaphrodite with two chromosomal sexes in a physically ambiguous body)
- transgender (Those of one sex who claim they are of the other)
- agender (Those of one sex who claim they are of no sex)
- bigender (Those of one sex who claim they are of both sexes)
- genderfluid (Those of one sex who claim they could be either sex, neither sex, or both sexes depending upon what they claim they are at the time)
That's all I can think of, it covers everything you could possibly claim to be: male, female, both, neither, and fluctuating. So anything else is yet more pretension.

Let's see, we have 6-7 up top for sexual orientation, and 5 at the bottom for what you claim to be mentally.

On trannyism, I have one thought: It's strange to see Christians arguing against transgender claims.

This is because Christians advocate dualism: the position that the body and mind are separate, one is the mortal form, and the other is the immortal soul.

Yet when they attack the claims of trannies, they attack the dualism that trannies assert, for trannies make the same distinctions the Christians do, tat they have a mind which is meaningfully distinct from the rest of their bodies.

Christians are attacking their own position in a roundabout way and not realizing it - if the soul and body are separate entities from one another, why couldn't one have a female soul in a male body? God doesn't make mistakes? He gives us retards and freaks all the time when he makes the babies of us or any other species, it's okay for him to give us debilitating traits or fuck up our chromosomes, but not for him to sometimes misplace a soul of one type into the body of another.
Alternatively, if the mental sex is disregarded, what does that say about the soul, given that the same proofs used by the trannies for their mind-body distinction is used in slightly changed forms to argue for the existence of a soul.

Either mind-body dualism is true or it is not, there exists between the Christian and the tranny a common assertion, and a myopia that keeps them from seeing how either side could not see that by attacking the idea of this dualistic claim on the other side, they sometimes even provide arguments that could be used against them when they make their version of the same assertion.

Just some funny idea I thought I'd share.

Who cares.
Make your kid laugh at this B.S.
He'll be fine in no time.