×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules
2
8 comments block


[ - ] GloryBeckons 3 points 11 monthsMay 19, 2023 06:35:13 ago (+3/-0)

Perhaps sensibly, he doesn't even try to explain it in detail.
In other words, we haven't a clue.
So if we can't understand it, we have to take it on trust, which I think suits Kaku too, as he spends most of the book telling us what extraordinary achievements these machines 'may' do.
Kaku's book is really an extended exercise in hi-tech wish fulfilment, with each chapter detailing a currently intractable problem that the quantums 'may' be able to solve

Author throwing shade left and right, clearly thinks Kuku is full of shit. And he's right.

Quantum computers will never replace silicon-based digital computers. They're actually much, much slower than current computers, and completely unsuited for general computation. They can only solve a few very specific math problems very quickly, in theory, maybe, by using some physical properties of quantum interactions to side step the expensive computations and arrive at the result using a shortcut.

Kind of like tide-predicting machines used a series of pulleys to effectively compute and graph very complex tide predictions, long before computers were a thing, and for a while after, by simply turning a wheel. But they were unsuitable for anything else. You could never make a general purpose computer out of that. And eventually they became obsolete, when digital computers became fast enough to beat them without needing an analog shortcut.

The QC hype will never pan out. It's vaporware.

[ - ] AugustineOfHippo2 1 point 11 monthsMay 19, 2023 10:03:49 ago (+1/-0)

All hype, not reality. Same thing with nuclear fusion. Always just around the corner, but never actually here.

Kinda like global warming...

[ - ] iThinkiShitYourself 0 points 11 monthsMay 20, 2023 00:25:16 ago (+0/-0)

Quantum computers aren't, weren't and never will be replacements for classical computers and no one but fake geeks ever said that.

You dont understand what quantum computing is

[ - ] paul_neri [op] 0 points 11 monthsMay 20, 2023 06:22:28 ago (+0/-0)

I saw a program on TV about it about an hour ago and apparently we should be preparing for Q day (the apocalypse in computing/AI).

[ - ] iThinkiShitYourself 0 points 10 monthsMay 27, 2023 23:59:24 ago (+0/-0)

they're talking about SPECIFIC problems being solved by quantum algorithms; it doesn't do away with classical computers. ever. you could theoretically run a quantum computer as a classical computer but the expense is too high, and will be for a long time, like the beginning of classical computing. the moore's law of quantum computers hasn't been observed yet (that I know of).

I get the impression that there are diversity hires working on these quantum projects, as they should have a certain path forward by now, for at least a little while, and it makes no sense for the research to be stalled out

[ - ] bobdole9 0 points 11 monthsMay 19, 2023 08:44:51 ago (+0/-0)

My 12 year old desktop I assembled still beats almost every laptop currently available under $2,000.

Quantum computing will never be a thing for us peons.

[ - ] iThinkiShitYourself 0 points 11 monthsMay 20, 2023 00:26:53 ago (+0/-0)

You don't understand what quantum computing is

[ - ] 0000000000002 0 points 11 monthsMay 19, 2023 08:43:55 ago (+0/-0)

Great. More cheap, excess computer cycles that will allow people to do shit they shouldn't be doing in the first place.