×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules
63

Based Battlefield or "Which one of you goats was this? "

submitted by Cunt to gaming 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 05:59:50 ago (+63/-0)     (files.catbox.moe)

https://files.catbox.moe/m2zt8v.jpeg

I also recently participated as the "e" when during the end of round stream of "gg" [Good Game] in the chat when two goats quickly slipped in an N & then a I before the next "gg" came up. yes a forth player did the R to complete the

N
I
GG
E
R


34 comments block


[ - ] herbert_west 6 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 07:10:15 ago (+6/-0)

There was a nice article dealing with lifetime tax contributions by race. Does anyone has the link to it?

[ - ] Kozel 1 point 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 21:22:52 ago (+1/-0)

[ - ] herbert_west 0 points 11 monthsMay 19, 2023 02:58:06 ago (+0/-0)

Thank you. I wonder why the site went offline. Shoahded?

[ - ] Sector7 1 point 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 11:59:48 ago (+1/-0)

Which race has paid the jews the most to attack us?

[ - ] xmasskull 2 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 14:22:25 ago (+2/-0)

We have. Whites.

[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic 3 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 13:36:37 ago (+3/-0)

BF4 was the last real BF game. anyone who plays any game after that is homosexually gay

[ - ] PostWallHelena 3 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 10:05:25 ago (+3/-0)

The problem with this stat is it probably uses GDP or some similar phoney jew metric.

Im sure jews like George Soros are in the “white” number.

I dont know what kind of calculation could ever estimate this sort of thing properly, because the redistribution of wealth from wealth producers to bankers and shysters and other bureacrats is difficult to isolate, but the jewish steal from our economy DWARFS what nigger freeload.

Also of interest would be how much wealth from men is redistributed to women. Why do we never see that stat? White women are probably in the neighborhood of the average spic in terms of true productivity. Maybe worse. :(

[ - ] bonghits4jeebus 0 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 13:59:15 ago (+0/-0)

It's pretty simple that high taxpayers will shoulder the burden for lower ones. This would be true even if all payers were white. You'd just break them down by income level or something.

[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 11 monthsMay 18, 2023 09:18:58 ago (+1/-0)

No its not that simple. Lets say you have a productve job like car mechanic or factory worker making something useful. You have to work for your wealth. But the government just counterfeits money to pay their little pets within the bureaucracy. Sometimes this is called quantitative easing and sometimes its called deficit spending. But what it is really doing is devaluing your currency.. The bankers that own wall street are doing something similar with corporations. Both the private and public bureacracies are harming productivity, not producing wealth.

You or one of your family members are likely to have had one of these types of bureacratic jobs at some point. They dont produce wealth. And yet people get paid hansomely for them. These jobs are all part of wealth redistribution. But you arent directly taxed for all of that wealth. Its done by a more complex economic legerdeamain.

Most of the economy is fake. Look at all the jobs that do nothing. Cops dont fight crime, they help it. If the cops would take a year off, we could shoot the theives and drug dealers, problem solved. Librarians? School administrators? How about all the psychologists that get paid by the government to practice on government workers with health care coverage? All the scientists at universities and research outfits that get funding from the government and wall street?

All the workers who received their position instead of a more productive person because of skin color or sex? How will you calculate that? Is the black affirmative action factory worker stealing from the white government bureacrat who pays taxes? Or the other way around?

Then there are all the people that so services for these “artificially wealthy” people working for the government or wall street. Someone might appear to have a productive business but if they are living off the wealthh of parasitic bureacrats, arent they part f the steal? Is a car mechanic or doctor living in Washington DC really a parasite? A restaurant owner? The entire local DC economy is run on stolen money from everywhere else.

The entire economy is fake and gay. Everyone is particitpating in the steal somehow but some people are being stolen from far more than they are in fact stealing. There is no economic fidelity. Compensation has been completely divorced from productive behavior. That was the problem with commmunism and that is the problem here. It is dysgenic and it disincentivizes productive behavior fast.

Tldr It’s not at all simple. Lots of freeloaders pay taxes. Taxes are not the only form of redistribution by a long shot.

[ - ] bonghits4jeebus 1 point 11 monthsMay 18, 2023 14:18:37 ago (+1/-0)

I agree with all that and yet I still think that math dictates that high earners in a graduated income tax system end up paying more, even proportionally, than their fair share. It's definitely more extreme now than it needs to be.

[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 11 monthsMay 18, 2023 15:24:29 ago (+0/-0)

Are high earners truly earners? Or are they the biggest stealers, engaged in rent seeking behaviors. I would even say that guys like engineers and programmers who do skilled work are in fact parasitic if they are using their skills to forward the ends of ZOG and wall street kikery. Guys in the defense industry? What is their “fair share”? We manufacture fake brother wars so they can make $$$. This is the antithesis of efficiency.

Maybe youve seen be blather about efficiency before. Efficiency is key. Most of the industries in the economy are not just inefficient but are ipso facto destructors of productivity— the war machine, tourism, psychology, academia, entertainment and arts, booze and drugs, insurance, banking.

I look to the amish as a good model of efficiency. Not because Im obsessed with using 1800s technology. But they have a utilitarian perspective of economics and they ban really economically non-productive behavior. Usury, insurance, and alot of things they deem sins or pleasure or vanity are bad for group prosperity.

[ - ] bonghits4jeebus 0 points 11 monthsMay 18, 2023 16:09:59 ago (+0/-0)

I almost went on about this. CEOs making 140x an employee is not fair, but no matter how fair your pay system is, some people will always earn more than others. If nothing else, people may get better at their job over time.

[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 11 monthsMay 18, 2023 16:36:12 ago (+0/-0)

You dont want everyone to earn the same— thats obviously crazy. You want pay to be based on productivity which serves the community. Some really effective engineers and managers should get higher pay because they can run a company more efficiently than the average worker. But nobody is 10,000x more productive than the average factory worker.

We need to limit the amount of compensation a person can have in this economy. We need to limit the amount of wealth a person can posses in this economy. And we need to remove the financial incentive from rent seeking behaviors like money lending, government work, landlording, entertainment, gambling, selling booze, etc.

How can it be a democracy when a kike with 50 billion dollars can buy politicians?

With the amish, wealth disparity is low but it does exist. People who are smarter or harder working have more than those that don’t. They just dont allow kike “financial tools”— that eliminates much of the source of disparity.

Too much competition and wealth disparity is bad for prosperity, just as too little is. If you allow some guys to make 140x what most people are making, this will favor the most corrupt, cut throat assholes imaginable and they will out-reproduce everyone else and the population will be full of cut throat assholes.

[ - ] MichaelStewart 2 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 08:26:17 ago (+2/-0)

Bad Company 2 was the best of the series.

[ - ] NoRefunds 2 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 16:59:12 ago (+2/-0)

No, 1942 then BF2, BF2 Special Forces. All the rest are dogshit, but I bought them all anyway. Best mod was point of existence.

[ - ] RMGoetbbels 1 point 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 19:22:12 ago (+1/-0)

He's not wrong.

[ - ] PhantomXLII 1 point 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 17:59:17 ago (+1/-0)

Oh that guy. Yeah, he keeps making new accounts. Talked to him awhile ago, he's a character.

[ - ] Cunt [op] 0 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 21:44:28 ago (+0/-0)

MentalHealthMD? Can you confirm that the chat filters are lax enough to say nigger?

[ - ] PhantomXLII 1 point 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 22:24:11 ago (+1/-0)

Yeah, he makes different accounts because faggots report him and eventually EA bans him. Community servers on Battlefield 1 (which is what the screenshot is from) are either heavily moderated or moderated only on cheaters and nobody gives a fuck what you say.

Usually this guy fucks around and almost copypastes this stuff on DICE (game developers) official servers. There's no moderation on those servers, not even anticheat stuff.

So yeah, the dude will switch usernames, best guess, every few months. But he's there... Doing his thing.

[ - ] Cunt [op] 0 points 11 monthsMay 18, 2023 00:48:40 ago (+0/-0)

Good on him.

[ - ] SirNiggsalot 1 point 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 15:52:36 ago (+1/-0)

How do I enlist in White Army ?

[ - ] TheBigGuyFromQueens 1 point 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 09:18:26 ago (+1/-0)

THASS RACIT YA HEARD

U POSED TO AXE ME HOW BIG MY DICK IS AIIGHT

[ - ] Cunt [op] 0 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 20:51:09 ago (+0/-0)

That's how I found this screenshot! Some loser on twitter was complaining that that the makers of Battlefield "refuse" to ban racists, and this was his example.

[ - ] PhantomXLII 1 point 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 22:25:38 ago (+1/-0)

Lol BF1 hasn't been supported since 2018. DICE and EA don't give a fuck what goes on there, they're busy with the absolute fucking dumpster fire that 2042 is.

[ - ] GroundskeeperWillie 1 point 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 08:37:58 ago (+1/-0)

How the hell did that make it past the chat filter? It filters out normal words ffs.

[ - ] PhantomXLII 1 point 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 22:29:29 ago (+1/-0)

It's not filtered.

[ - ] Cunt [op] 0 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 21:18:31 ago (+0/-0)

I assumed the old games had a lesser/no filter, but maybe the person who wrote it posted the screenshot as it won't show yourself which words are censored.

[ - ] Cunt [op] 0 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 21:20:58 ago (+0/-0)

FYI "Faggot" is censored but "fahguette" is not.

[ - ] HeyJames 1 point 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 08:28:09 ago (+1/-0)

That could be a goat because it was something said online and nothing said/done IRL. Saying or doing things IRL makes you a federal agent remember?

[ - ] FacelessOne 0 points 11 monthsMay 18, 2023 04:57:25 ago (+0/-0)

How many Niggers Faggots or Kikes did you kill this week?

Wars are only won by reduction of enemy numbers. Not complaining about how nobody will do anything online like a demoralized tallest skil wanna be.

[ - ] HeyJames 0 points 11 monthsMay 18, 2023 08:16:50 ago (+0/-0)

There was no complaints just a pointing out of facts. You have done nothing as have I.

[ - ] FuckShitJesus 0 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 08:42:29 ago (+0/-0)

Sadly, 99% of the room-temp crowd here follow this satire as gospel. Literally.

[ - ] bonghits4jeebus 0 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 13:57:19 ago (+0/-0)

I do think that it would help but not because of these statistics. These statistics will remain true as long as you have graduated taxation that the high taxpayers pay way more than their even share.

[ - ] Rowdybme 0 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 08:54:14 ago (+0/-0)

Well somebody has to do the nigger work.