Lately Ive been noticing how the most minute things are mindblowing. Probably just going crazy but figured Id share some ramblings. Driving down the highway I see some cows on pasture. What bizarre creatures they are. They consume grass and produce drinkable milk in massive quantities, they have personalities and quirks, they are massive but docile and can be scared of much smaller creatures. A cave for spelunking. Formed over tens of millions of years by water and geological activity which I will never be able to see in real time. The patterns formed look identical to fungi, jellyfish, or fractal broccoli. Its as if they were carved by artists laboring away for millenia. A dog, carnivorous by nature, yet lying peacefully on my floor. Able to understand me on a certain level and communicate its needs, but also to perform what I need it to do.
All normal things, but incredible when you pause for a moment to ponder. Im probably just going crazy.
You're not going crazy. You're using your observational and critical thinking skills and are more mentally grounded than someone who ignores everything they see without a second thought. It is good to analyze and accept the true gravity of what you're seeing. Crazy people never question whether their crazy
What's the purpose, if there needs to be one, of all those planets, stars etc? What's out there, far out there? Think of Voyager 1 & 2. Travelling through Space since 1977!
SPACE, noun [Latin spatium, space; spatior, to wander)...does ones consent to suggested "space" tempts ones mind to "wander" about purpose and what's out there?
Sleight of hand: "They call me the wanderer...I roam around; around; around". Ones consent to the suggestions of others tempt one into circular reasoning, into the self destructive ouroboros aka the ring which binds aka the visible sign of an invisible bond aka kike (circle) aka heliocentricism etc.
Saying (by suggestion) and listening (by consent) tempts one to ignore perceivable. Does nature utter in words (say) or does it communicate itself as perceivable sound? What if those within perceivable sound deceive each other with suggestible words?
Does nature require labels to exist? Do those within nature need to label anything to sustain self? Could the foundation of idolatry represents suggested (fiction) overlaying perceivable (reality)? How could those communicating in words warn each other about that while utilizing words?
i have the same kind of reaction to power poles. copper dug out of the ground, wrapped in an oil byproduct, hammered up on trees cut down and processed into sticks, then strung across the landscape. yeah, we're really evolved, arent we? lets evolve past hammering copper up on trees (the simple shit) before we tackle things like gender (the hard shit).
Dude dude there is a small group of people who would have you believe we are flying at 68 thousand miles an hour while spinning 1100 miles an hour and wobbling at the same time with a moon in the sky facing us at all times because a force we can't measure is sucking it into us from 237 miles away.
"in-sanus" (within sound) + "per-sonos" (by sound)...the few suggest words (insane person) to tempt one to ignore perceivable sound. This represents spell-craft.
creatures
The few suggest creationism (out of nothing) to tempt one to ignore perceivable transmutation (out of; within and in response to everything).
tens of millions
Ones (partials) within oneness (whole) can be tricked to ignore one-self by "counting" others. Who suggested "tens of millions"? Can one perceive "tens of millions"? Who suggests others to count? https://img.gvid.tv/i/2AaaXSGq.jpg Vampires (by suggestion) require invites (by consent)...
geological activity
a) perceiving (reaction) within perceivable (action)...the few suggest "actors" under directors to distract the many from being reactors (life) within direction (inception towards death).
b) logic tempts reaction (perceiving) to ignore action (perceivable) for reasoning (conflict) about suggested.
will never be
Being implies as free "will" of choice within everything (balance)...suggested "never" (nothing ever) represents the inversion of everything perceivable.
look identical
Being implies difference (perceiving) within momentum of sameness (perceivable)...others suggest the inversion thereof...equality (same) through diversity (different)...under the umbrella of identitarianism, hence tempting each different "one" (singular) to consent to the same "we" (plural), hence all the lack of identity among the many.
to understand
Ones consent to suggested information tempts one to "stand under" (understand) those suggesting it, hence ignoring to grow ones comprehension within perceivable inspiration.
All normal things
One represents temporary chaos (life) within ongoing natural order (inception towards death), hence being in need to resist temptations such as following along suggested "norms".
a) utilizing ones temple to operate within perceivable setting is where's at.
b) how could another one be as niggerlicous as Terry?
c) RELA'TE, verb (Latin relatus, refero; re and fero, to produce.] - "to narrate the particulars of an event"...only nature produces, and each one within represents a particular within the whole event. Suggested narration thereof is where the parasites feast.
Your autism is off the charts, bro.
a) Sigismund Schlomo Freud; the alleged "founder of psychoanalysis" + Leo Kanner, who allegedly coined "autism"...jewish tricks of deception.
b) -IST (autist) implies ones consent to suggested -ISM (autism); which contradicts AUT; from AUTO (self)
That was the longest, most complicated "yes" I've ever read. Good show. Interesting that autosm is an internally contradictory word, much like another popular jew-made The Word.
yes vs no aka want vs not want aka agree vs disagree implies ones ignorance of perceivable (need) for suggested (want). In other words...being choice within balance (need/want) implies simple; choosing to ignore need for want shapes a complex imbalance (want vs not want); hence all the conflicts within this system.
Try it like this...suggested apple or oranges tempts you to choose yes or no. Whichever side you choose puts you into a conflict against the other side. Perceivable "hunger" doesn't give a fuck about your choice of yes or no, it demands you to adapt to the need of eating.
Suggested apples (want) or oranges (not want) tempt one to ignore perceivable hunger (need)...others utilize suggestion to exploit ones ignorance of perceivable.
the word
a) suggested words tempt one to ignore perceivable sound. Nature doesn't speak; those within do to deceive each other with words they define; redefine and contradict for each other.
b) during the switch from Latin to Pig-Latin (English) all the natural connotations where exchanged for THE aka suggested THE-ism, which shapes anyone consenting into A-THE-IST...unbeknownst to them, hence exploiting their ignorance.
[ + ] Ozark
[ - ] Ozark 15 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 04:55:51 ago (+15/-0)
[ + ] Hobama
[ - ] Hobama [op] 6 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 05:07:56 ago (+6/-0)
[ + ] con77
[ - ] con77 6 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 10:32:54 ago (+6/-0)
[ + ] Hobama
[ - ] Hobama [op] 2 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 05:15:24 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] totes_magotes
[ - ] totes_magotes 8 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 05:47:30 ago (+8/-0)
Or these other animals that breathe water. WATER.
Fuckin' magic, yo.
[ + ] HeyJames
[ - ] HeyJames 7 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 08:24:10 ago (+7/-0)
[ + ] doginventer
[ - ] doginventer 6 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 08:35:13 ago (+6/-0)
[ + ]deleted
[ - ] deleted 4 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 09:51:26 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ]deleted
[ - ] deleted 4 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 09:12:43 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] Hobama
[ - ] Hobama [op] 2 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 13:31:54 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Hobama
[ - ] Hobama [op] 1 point 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 13:40:48 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] con77
[ - ] con77 3 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 10:32:27 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ]deleted
[ - ] deleted 2 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 10:05:09 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] con77
[ - ] con77 3 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 10:35:59 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] Yeah_okay
[ - ] Yeah_okay 2 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 08:52:24 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] paul_neri
[ - ] paul_neri 2 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 05:07:25 ago (+2/-0)
What's the purpose, if there needs to be one, of all those planets, stars etc? What's out there, far out there? Think of Voyager 1 & 2. Travelling through Space since 1977!
[ + ] Hobama
[ - ] Hobama [op] 0 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 05:13:31 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Hobama
[ - ] Hobama [op] 0 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 05:15:21 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 0 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 05:38:54 ago (+1/-1)
Sleight of hand: "They call me the wanderer...I roam around; around; around". Ones consent to the suggestions of others tempt one into circular reasoning, into the self destructive ouroboros aka the ring which binds aka the visible sign of an invisible bond aka kike (circle) aka heliocentricism etc.
[ + ] paul_neri
[ - ] paul_neri 1 point 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 06:03:34 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason -1 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 06:45:39 ago (+0/-1)
Does nature require labels to exist? Do those within nature need to label anything to sustain self? Could the foundation of idolatry represents suggested (fiction) overlaying perceivable (reality)? How could those communicating in words warn each other about that while utilizing words?
[ + ] SirNiggsalot
[ - ] SirNiggsalot 0 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 15:54:52 ago (+0/-0)
Pretty cool things
[ + ] drstrangegub
[ - ] drstrangegub 0 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 12:17:17 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Pikevillian
[ - ] Pikevillian 0 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 12:07:36 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] SocksOnCats
[ - ] SocksOnCats 0 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 12:04:35 ago (+0/-0)
I do this too, as much as I can.
There's so much sad and depressing stuff going on right now sometimes I like to dive deep in to anything else. Cows and caves and dogs are wonderful.
[ + ]deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 11:18:41 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] dingbat
[ - ] dingbat 0 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 10:52:14 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] drstrangegub
[ - ] drstrangegub 0 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 10:40:43 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Doglegwarrior
[ - ] Doglegwarrior 0 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 09:51:28 ago (+2/-2)*
No not good the jew scientist told us all this
[ + ] con77
[ - ] con77 4 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 10:34:42 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] La_Chalupacabra
[ - ] La_Chalupacabra 2 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 18:05:12 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ]deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 08:44:32 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] texasblood
[ - ] texasblood -1 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 06:03:19 ago (+2/-3)
All that doesnt come random
[ + ] AugustineOfHippo2
[ - ] AugustineOfHippo2 3 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 07:52:45 ago (+5/-2)
[ + ] TheBigGuyFromQueens
[ - ] TheBigGuyFromQueens -2 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 08:45:55 ago (+0/-2)
Oh how wondrous the world is.
J/K
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason -2 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 05:26:21 ago (+0/-2)
"in-sanus" (within sound) + "per-sonos" (by sound)...the few suggest words (insane person) to tempt one to ignore perceivable sound. This represents spell-craft.
The few suggest creationism (out of nothing) to tempt one to ignore perceivable transmutation (out of; within and in response to everything).
Ones (partials) within oneness (whole) can be tricked to ignore one-self by "counting" others. Who suggested "tens of millions"? Can one perceive "tens of millions"? Who suggests others to count? https://img.gvid.tv/i/2AaaXSGq.jpg Vampires (by suggestion) require invites (by consent)...
a) perceiving (reaction) within perceivable (action)...the few suggest "actors" under directors to distract the many from being reactors (life) within direction (inception towards death).
b) logic tempts reaction (perceiving) to ignore action (perceivable) for reasoning (conflict) about suggested.
Being implies as free "will" of choice within everything (balance)...suggested "never" (nothing ever) represents the inversion of everything perceivable.
Being implies difference (perceiving) within momentum of sameness (perceivable)...others suggest the inversion thereof...equality (same) through diversity (different)...under the umbrella of identitarianism, hence tempting each different "one" (singular) to consent to the same "we" (plural), hence all the lack of identity among the many.
Ones consent to suggested information tempts one to "stand under" (understand) those suggesting it, hence ignoring to grow ones comprehension within perceivable inspiration.
One represents temporary chaos (life) within ongoing natural order (inception towards death), hence being in need to resist temptations such as following along suggested "norms".
Sleight of hand: "where everybody knows your name" (NORM) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXED2AVlbR0
Consider if perceivable moment represents momentum (balance) of ongoing motion for each one within (choice)?
As partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable) one represents CRAZY, adjective - "broken" aka apart from one another.
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 4 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 07:33:03 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason -2 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 08:56:41 ago (+0/-2)
a) utilizing ones temple to operate within perceivable setting is where's at.
b) how could another one be as niggerlicous as Terry?
c) RELA'TE, verb (Latin relatus, refero; re and fero, to produce.] - "to narrate the particulars of an event"...only nature produces, and each one within represents a particular within the whole event. Suggested narration thereof is where the parasites feast.
a) Sigismund Schlomo Freud; the alleged "founder of psychoanalysis" + Leo Kanner, who allegedly coined "autism"...jewish tricks of deception.
b) -IST (autist) implies ones consent to suggested -ISM (autism); which contradicts AUT; from AUTO (self)
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 1 point 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 11:03:46 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 0 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 12:30:54 ago (+1/-1)
yes vs no aka want vs not want aka agree vs disagree implies ones ignorance of perceivable (need) for suggested (want). In other words...being choice within balance (need/want) implies simple; choosing to ignore need for want shapes a complex imbalance (want vs not want); hence all the conflicts within this system.
Try it like this...suggested apple or oranges tempts you to choose yes or no. Whichever side you choose puts you into a conflict against the other side. Perceivable "hunger" doesn't give a fuck about your choice of yes or no, it demands you to adapt to the need of eating.
Suggested apples (want) or oranges (not want) tempt one to ignore perceivable hunger (need)...others utilize suggestion to exploit ones ignorance of perceivable.
a) suggested words tempt one to ignore perceivable sound. Nature doesn't speak; those within do to deceive each other with words they define; redefine and contradict for each other.
b) during the switch from Latin to Pig-Latin (English) all the natural connotations where exchanged for THE aka suggested THE-ism, which shapes anyone consenting into A-THE-IST...unbeknownst to them, hence exploiting their ignorance.
[ + ] paul_neri
[ - ] paul_neri -2 points 11 monthsMay 17, 2023 05:21:12 ago (+1/-3)