he was a genius amongst jews. one of their best fraudsters ever. obviously requires some intelligence.
he was 100% a lying rat. he supported nationalism for the jews but not for anyone else. he spoke about white racism but was himself extremely racist. but i don't think he was so stupid that he couldn't recognise his own biases. he did these lying rat tactics on purpose to forward his own race above ours.
The important thing to remember about jews here is that they consider themselves divine and us human like animals so nothing they ever do to us is considered immoral.
Stop posting this shit. These guys are grifters and gatekeepers.
Relativity between speed and time = moral relativism Theory = Unsubstantiated postulation
Yeah, they are either morons or trying to make us look like morons.
The fact that speed and time are in relation to one another is well substantiated by scientific experiment, in fact we use it's predictions every day with our phones and gps devices.
It has nothing to do with moral philosophy, Einstein himself seemed to be someone who had very strong moral certainties, about the objective good of democracy and the objective evil of racism, about the good of jews and about the evil of germans, which he would have likely described as being an objective truth.
I couldn't keep watching past that point. I've never trusted these outlets that have supermodels giving us redpills. Isn't the guy who runs this production a jew?
Stop commenting this shit. 7 minute video has about 5 seconds that was poorly spoken and you're ready to denounce the pro-White organization behind it?
She's talking about his theory of relativity and segues into a critique of jewish moral relativism. Maybe she wasn't clear enough but I doubt she thinks Special Relativity and moral relativity are the same things. Relativistic speeds/time are well enough understood to be considered true.
I wouldn't call the pair grifters, I don't study them but they're doing the Lord's work as far as I can tell. I wouldn't call her a supermodel either but she's not bad looking.
Jewish moral relativism has proven itself correct, after all, as a morality is proven by it's consequences, the jews run the world now because of their moral views.
While we submitted to the useless ponderings of effete philosophers and priests navel-gazing about some great universal set of moral rules, the jews instead saw things as they were: personal benefit or group benefit, and strategy.
While we struggled to define good or evil in biblical or secular terms, they simply said "what's good for me and mine is good, what's bad for me and mine is evil" and played to win.
The jews aren't operating by a new set of rules, they are operating by a very old set of rules, the first set of rules, it was us who lost our way during the enlightenment.
For most of european and western history, we operated by the principles of moral relativism just as everyone else did at the time, and just as the jews do today. Our greatest cause was our king and our country, everybody else could get fucked for all we cared. God may have been there somewhere out in the ether, but your king and your countrymen were the representative of his will.
The jews operate in the mindset of european kings. We operate in the mindset of perpetual slaves and serfs.
It would benefit us immensely to think as the jews do. To put ourselves and our own people first. Abandon objective morality and start thinking about what is best for ourselves and those we care for.
You missed the point of moral relativism. It doesn't state that whoever's morals allow them to take over the World are correct, it says that everyone's morals, whatever they are, are all equally correct. In part it's a mental copout to allow psychopaths to operate without a conscience, and they use it to disarm White's who are complaining about other group's shitty behavior.
No, you are just retarded, not because you are stupid, but because you were brainwashed with stupidity. You got handed a tool, and you chose the most pants-on-head interpretation of how to use it. If I give you a hammer and tell you to drive in a nail, you would probably not drive it in with the handle, would you?
You've been so brainwashed by modernity that you cannot wrap your head about the kind of mindset that your ancestors had. The jews promote objective morality, they've been doing it in your media for decades. Unshakable universal principles of right and wrong are what they've programmed you with for years.
Moral relativism has two interpretations, the proper interpretation says that the world is a competition, not just between genes but also memes (of which morals are included), those who outlast the others win the prize of becoming more plentiful within the environments they inhabit. Then there's your interpretation, and it makes no sense, if you and he have different opinions, conflict is forced, and there's no way to reason out whose is "correct", the correct course of action is not to give up, but to fight. This is basic game theory.
Simply pursue what you desire, avoid what you fear, working within the bounds of what you can do and cannot do, not within any abstract limitations except those you impose upon yourself. But know what it is you desire and fear, a fat guy lazes around and overeats because he does not truly prioritize his wants, he wants to not be a lardass, that's his greater desire, his need to eat is just a fleeting impulse.
See the world in terms of strategy and personal benefit, stop having compassion wasted upon those you don't actually care about, you live for yourself, what is right in your eyes, what your ambitions are, and for what it is that you love.
Moral relativism means you do not need to justify taking an action that benefits you or people like you with any argument except itself, you can justify your cruelty towards other groups or preference towards your own like this as well. It sidesteps all the thinking traps the jews will use upon you otherwise with incomparable ease. Your logic is understandable, it is sensible, and it can even be argued to be moral.
So you and the other guy have your own opinions, and your are forced into a conflict, and there's nothing making one opinion any better than the other. Well, there is one thing, your opinion belongs to you, so it matters more to you. The same could be said for him, but you and him are not the same. Basic game theory says that both of you should attack, so you will. Unless one of you is programmed to play dove in a world of hawks, which if you are a white westerner, you have been.
Rather than giving a rat's ass what the world thinks is right, you focus on what you think is right. By doing so you gain strength to fight for your beliefs, and in doing so you make your opinions the correct ones. So by taking a relativistic stance, and asking what is right for each player, you can answer all the ethical questions and realize the world is a competition, not some globalist cooperative endeavor. Why are they wrong and you right? Because it's from your perspective and while you can understand that from their perspective it's the reverse, all that means is that you must settle it through conflict or competition. For winners (re)write the history, so the best man always wins in the end.
If you are christian, look through the pages of your bible and see that moral objectivity is nowhere to be seen, it's always concerned with the good of the descendants of a single lineage, one favored by god with a special connection to him, but still just one specific people. Pharoah wasn't punished for practicing slavery, he was punished for enslaving the hebrews.
Look at nature if you aren't religious, the same lesson is found there. For the fox not catching the rabbit means death by starvation, for the rabbit not escaping the fox means death by getting eaten. One's evil is the other's good and vice versa, upon what objective standpoint could you determine who is right and wrong? Does that mean that the fox should give up the chase? Or that the rabbit should surrender to the fox's jaws? No, nature is such that it counts on every species to act in it's own best interests, or more specifically in the interests of it's genes and memes.
Europeans used to act like this, around the time of the renaissance we started to lose our way, we abandoned personal ambitions and became beholden to these abstract principles that philosophers cooked up in their ivory towers. Moral good is what benefits the things you care about, moral evil is what harms the things you care about.
Your desires include the wellbeing of your people, your fears include their destruction. Simply asserting "This is what I want, this is what benefits me, etc." is the perfect counter to all the bullshit they use to control you with today.
I went to those sensitivity training courses, I was forced to attend them, I ruined those classes with evolution, game theory, and evolutionary game theory, as well as strategy and history of what strategy resulted in what consequences.
I focused on what benefitted me personally, and by extension that includes those who are like me in some way (for example demographically), I talked about the kind of mindset that people had throughout history, and completely shut down ethics. It was the jewess leading the class who was arguing objective moral principles, and I brought up that nobody but post-enlightenment whites believes in them, and that this way of thinking has been to our detriment every time.
You had a strong interpretation of moral relativism, and you immediately went to the weak kind. The jews pushed moral objectivity upon you throughout your life, such as through (((superhero))) media, you gained such a connection to it that this was how you saw the truth when it was revealed to you. In the way that leads to your own destruction.
You decide your morals, they decide theirs, you do what you want to do, and they do the same. This does not mean you "live and let live", for it may well violate what you truly feel you should do, what you truly desire to do, no you follow your heart wherever it leads you.
It doesn't stop you from preaching your morals, it doesn't stop you from enforcing them upon others, it doesn't stop you from doing anything at all. Unlike the satanists I truly believe this, I don't go "oh, but don't you dare join a christian church and start worshipping jesus", when I see satanists accepting christ as their lord and savior, maybe then I will treat satanists with a bit more respect.
You should think of it like this. There's no such thing as a universal right or wrong, morality is personal, subjective, relative to the perspective of the practitioner.
The fox must eat the rabbit to live, the rabbit must evade the fox to preserve its own life.
Good for the fox is catching the rabbit, bad is letting it go.
Good for the rabbit is escaping the fox, bad for the rabbit is getting caught.
Nature takes no side but the winner, it favors foxes who catch rabbits, and rabbits who escape foxes.
The fox likely recognizes that the rabbit sees itself being eaten as evil. The rabbit likely recognizes the fox as seeing itself starve in the same way.
Yet this is not any ground for the fox to give up the chase, nor for the rabbit to surrender itself to the fox's jaws.
The same applies to people, only whites care about what's good or evil in the eyes of someone else, other races only care about what benefits themselves.
Self interest rules all other races but ours. However, this was not always the case. Whites used to be dominated by self interest as well, but sometime in our history we gave it up, I blame the rise of philosopher's influence when we were so safe and comfortable.
It's ethics and morals that make us weak. We can't simply accept that this is a competition. Which means what's good or evil in our eyes is not universal, but that just makes our morals into a part of our team colors. In reality there are good moves and bad moves in a strategic sense, not moral sense, and we prove our morals as being good by ourlasting those who have a difference of opinion.
^^^calls kikes "Jews" as if that title belongs to them properly, it doesn't
- capitalizes "Jewish" lower e for "european". - gives moral justification for inbred kike filth and their "mentality" - pretends "jews today" are "moral creatures" = pretends kikes are simply "natural born kings" and we are "natural born slaves"
kike filth like you literally needs to have your throat slit
Trivializing shill. I'm telling you how to win, you are here to shut this down.
^^^calls kikes "Jews" as if that title belongs to them properly, it doesn't
Unimportant.
- capitalizes "Jewish" lower e for "european".
Also unimportant, I never capitalize manually, it happens for me automatically as I write.
- pretends "jews today" are "moral creatures"
This kind of superiority bullshit needs to die fast before it kills us. You are acting superior to those who have conquered you and this guarantees you will remain conquered. Niggers and Native Americans do this, it why they stay on the bottom of their respective societies. People have only broken out from subjugation by learning from those who rule over you, knowing how they beat you, and integrating their most effective traits into their rebellions.
= pretends kikes are simply "natural born kings" and we are "natural born slaves"
Never said that, never said anything remotely like that, and if you aren't a shill then you are very fucking stupid. why am I even responding to you?
kike filth like you literally needs to have your throat slit
[ + ] BlueEyedAngloMasterRaceGod
[ - ] BlueEyedAngloMasterRaceGod 1 point 2 yearsMay 4, 2023 21:45:27 ago (+1/-0)
he was 100% a lying rat. he supported nationalism for the jews but not for anyone else. he spoke about white racism but was himself extremely racist. but i don't think he was so stupid that he couldn't recognise his own biases. he did these lying rat tactics on purpose to forward his own race above ours.
[ + ] allAheadFull
[ - ] allAheadFull [op] 0 points 2 yearsMay 5, 2023 20:10:30 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Belfuro
[ - ] Belfuro 2 points 2 yearsMay 4, 2023 15:27:43 ago (+2/-0)
Relations in big media able to publish his papers before even being peer reviewed
[ + ] Barfcock19
[ - ] Barfcock19 5 points 2 yearsMay 4, 2023 12:55:09 ago (+5/-0)
[ + ] allAheadFull
[ - ] allAheadFull [op] 8 points 2 yearsMay 4, 2023 12:58:12 ago (+8/-0)
[ + ] AntiPostmodernist
[ - ] AntiPostmodernist 0 points 2 yearsMay 4, 2023 10:57:38 ago (+3/-3)
These guys are grifters and gatekeepers.
Theory = Unsubstantiated postulation
Yeah, they are either morons or trying to make us look like morons.
The fact that speed and time are in relation to one another is well substantiated by scientific experiment, in fact we use it's predictions every day with our phones and gps devices.
It has nothing to do with moral philosophy, Einstein himself seemed to be someone who had very strong moral certainties, about the objective good of democracy and the objective evil of racism, about the good of jews and about the evil of germans, which he would have likely described as being an objective truth.
I couldn't keep watching past that point. I've never trusted these outlets that have supermodels giving us redpills. Isn't the guy who runs this production a jew?
[ + ] SecretHitler
[ - ] SecretHitler 1 point 2 yearsMay 4, 2023 13:18:51 ago (+2/-1)
Mad because an attractive woman is involved?
Why do you hate pro-Whites?
[ + ] allAheadFull
[ - ] allAheadFull [op] 0 points 2 yearsMay 4, 2023 11:33:03 ago (+1/-1)
I wouldn't call the pair grifters, I don't study them but they're doing the Lord's work as far as I can tell. I wouldn't call her a supermodel either but she's not bad looking.
[ + ] AntiPostmodernist
[ - ] AntiPostmodernist 0 points 2 yearsMay 4, 2023 12:23:23 ago (+1/-1)
While we submitted to the useless ponderings of effete philosophers and priests navel-gazing about some great universal set of moral rules, the jews instead saw things as they were: personal benefit or group benefit, and strategy.
While we struggled to define good or evil in biblical or secular terms, they simply said "what's good for me and mine is good, what's bad for me and mine is evil" and played to win.
The jews aren't operating by a new set of rules, they are operating by a very old set of rules, the first set of rules, it was us who lost our way during the enlightenment.
For most of european and western history, we operated by the principles of moral relativism just as everyone else did at the time, and just as the jews do today. Our greatest cause was our king and our country, everybody else could get fucked for all we cared. God may have been there somewhere out in the ether, but your king and your countrymen were the representative of his will.
The jews operate in the mindset of european kings. We operate in the mindset of perpetual slaves and serfs.
It would benefit us immensely to think as the jews do. To put ourselves and our own people first. Abandon objective morality and start thinking about what is best for ourselves and those we care for.
[ + ] allAheadFull
[ - ] allAheadFull [op] 1 point 2 yearsMay 4, 2023 13:21:01 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] AryanPrime
[ - ] AryanPrime 1 point 2 yearsMay 4, 2023 15:23:52 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] AntiPostmodernist
[ - ] AntiPostmodernist 0 points 2 yearsMay 4, 2023 22:40:14 ago (+0/-0)
You've been so brainwashed by modernity that you cannot wrap your head about the kind of mindset that your ancestors had. The jews promote objective morality, they've been doing it in your media for decades. Unshakable universal principles of right and wrong are what they've programmed you with for years.
Moral relativism has two interpretations, the proper interpretation says that the world is a competition, not just between genes but also memes (of which morals are included), those who outlast the others win the prize of becoming more plentiful within the environments they inhabit. Then there's your interpretation, and it makes no sense, if you and he have different opinions, conflict is forced, and there's no way to reason out whose is "correct", the correct course of action is not to give up, but to fight. This is basic game theory.
Simply pursue what you desire, avoid what you fear, working within the bounds of what you can do and cannot do, not within any abstract limitations except those you impose upon yourself. But know what it is you desire and fear, a fat guy lazes around and overeats because he does not truly prioritize his wants, he wants to not be a lardass, that's his greater desire, his need to eat is just a fleeting impulse.
See the world in terms of strategy and personal benefit, stop having compassion wasted upon those you don't actually care about, you live for yourself, what is right in your eyes, what your ambitions are, and for what it is that you love.
Moral relativism means you do not need to justify taking an action that benefits you or people like you with any argument except itself, you can justify your cruelty towards other groups or preference towards your own like this as well. It sidesteps all the thinking traps the jews will use upon you otherwise with incomparable ease. Your logic is understandable, it is sensible, and it can even be argued to be moral.
So you and the other guy have your own opinions, and your are forced into a conflict, and there's nothing making one opinion any better than the other. Well, there is one thing, your opinion belongs to you, so it matters more to you. The same could be said for him, but you and him are not the same. Basic game theory says that both of you should attack, so you will. Unless one of you is programmed to play dove in a world of hawks, which if you are a white westerner, you have been.
Rather than giving a rat's ass what the world thinks is right, you focus on what you think is right. By doing so you gain strength to fight for your beliefs, and in doing so you make your opinions the correct ones. So by taking a relativistic stance, and asking what is right for each player, you can answer all the ethical questions and realize the world is a competition, not some globalist cooperative endeavor. Why are they wrong and you right? Because it's from your perspective and while you can understand that from their perspective it's the reverse, all that means is that you must settle it through conflict or competition. For winners (re)write the history, so the best man always wins in the end.
If you are christian, look through the pages of your bible and see that moral objectivity is nowhere to be seen, it's always concerned with the good of the descendants of a single lineage, one favored by god with a special connection to him, but still just one specific people. Pharoah wasn't punished for practicing slavery, he was punished for enslaving the hebrews.
Look at nature if you aren't religious, the same lesson is found there. For the fox not catching the rabbit means death by starvation, for the rabbit not escaping the fox means death by getting eaten. One's evil is the other's good and vice versa, upon what objective standpoint could you determine who is right and wrong? Does that mean that the fox should give up the chase? Or that the rabbit should surrender to the fox's jaws? No, nature is such that it counts on every species to act in it's own best interests, or more specifically in the interests of it's genes and memes.
Europeans used to act like this, around the time of the renaissance we started to lose our way, we abandoned personal ambitions and became beholden to these abstract principles that philosophers cooked up in their ivory towers. Moral good is what benefits the things you care about, moral evil is what harms the things you care about.
Your desires include the wellbeing of your people, your fears include their destruction. Simply asserting "This is what I want, this is what benefits me, etc." is the perfect counter to all the bullshit they use to control you with today.
I went to those sensitivity training courses, I was forced to attend them, I ruined those classes with evolution, game theory, and evolutionary game theory, as well as strategy and history of what strategy resulted in what consequences.
I focused on what benefitted me personally, and by extension that includes those who are like me in some way (for example demographically), I talked about the kind of mindset that people had throughout history, and completely shut down ethics. It was the jewess leading the class who was arguing objective moral principles, and I brought up that nobody but post-enlightenment whites believes in them, and that this way of thinking has been to our detriment every time.
You had a strong interpretation of moral relativism, and you immediately went to the weak kind. The jews pushed moral objectivity upon you throughout your life, such as through (((superhero))) media, you gained such a connection to it that this was how you saw the truth when it was revealed to you. In the way that leads to your own destruction.
You decide your morals, they decide theirs, you do what you want to do, and they do the same. This does not mean you "live and let live", for it may well violate what you truly feel you should do, what you truly desire to do, no you follow your heart wherever it leads you.
It doesn't stop you from preaching your morals, it doesn't stop you from enforcing them upon others, it doesn't stop you from doing anything at all. Unlike the satanists I truly believe this, I don't go "oh, but don't you dare join a christian church and start worshipping jesus", when I see satanists accepting christ as their lord and savior, maybe then I will treat satanists with a bit more respect.
[ + ] allAheadFull
[ - ] allAheadFull [op] 0 points 2 yearsMay 5, 2023 20:21:30 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] AntiPostmodernist
[ - ] AntiPostmodernist 0 points 2 yearsMay 5, 2023 14:35:30 ago (+0/-0)
You should think of it like this. There's no such thing as a universal right or wrong, morality is personal, subjective, relative to the perspective of the practitioner.
The fox must eat the rabbit to live, the rabbit must evade the fox to preserve its own life.
Good for the fox is catching the rabbit, bad is letting it go.
Good for the rabbit is escaping the fox, bad for the rabbit is getting caught.
Nature takes no side but the winner, it favors foxes who catch rabbits, and rabbits who escape foxes.
The fox likely recognizes that the rabbit sees itself being eaten as evil. The rabbit likely recognizes the fox as seeing itself starve in the same way.
Yet this is not any ground for the fox to give up the chase, nor for the rabbit to surrender itself to the fox's jaws.
The same applies to people, only whites care about what's good or evil in the eyes of someone else, other races only care about what benefits themselves.
Self interest rules all other races but ours. However, this was not always the case. Whites used to be dominated by self interest as well, but sometime in our history we gave it up, I blame the rise of philosopher's influence when we were so safe and comfortable.
It's ethics and morals that make us weak. We can't simply accept that this is a competition. Which means what's good or evil in our eyes is not universal, but that just makes our morals into a part of our team colors. In reality there are good moves and bad moves in a strategic sense, not moral sense, and we prove our morals as being good by ourlasting those who have a difference of opinion.
[ + ] allAheadFull
[ - ] allAheadFull [op] 0 points 2 yearsMay 5, 2023 20:18:12 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Monica
[ - ] Monica 0 points 2 yearsMay 4, 2023 13:22:38 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] AryanPrime
[ - ] AryanPrime 1 point 2 yearsMay 4, 2023 15:23:30 ago (+1/-0)
outing yourself again huh kike?
[ + ] AryanPrime
[ - ] AryanPrime 0 points 2 yearsMay 4, 2023 15:23:12 ago (+0/-0)
- capitalizes "Jewish" lower e for "european".
- gives moral justification for inbred kike filth and their "mentality"
- pretends "jews today" are "moral creatures"
= pretends kikes are simply "natural born kings" and we are "natural born slaves"
kike filth like you literally needs to have your throat slit
[ + ] AntiPostmodernist
[ - ] AntiPostmodernist 0 points 2 yearsMay 4, 2023 21:38:01 ago (+0/-0)
I'm telling you how to win, you are here to shut this down.
Unimportant.
Also unimportant, I never capitalize manually, it happens for me automatically as I write.
This kind of superiority bullshit needs to die fast before it kills us. You are acting superior to those who have conquered you and this guarantees you will remain conquered. Niggers and Native Americans do this, it why they stay on the bottom of their respective societies. People have only broken out from subjugation by learning from those who rule over you, knowing how they beat you, and integrating their most effective traits into their rebellions.
Never said that, never said anything remotely like that, and if you aren't a shill then you are very fucking stupid. why am I even responding to you?
Right back at you.