If there are nukes that don't release tons of radiation I guarantee a new year's nuke in the middle of no where would bring in millions of dollars for people who would pay to see it
guise, the erf is flat and the moon is a hologram! Money is worthless and you will just blow it on dumb shit so just send it all to me. You should drink turpentine to kill the gay grabblers in your stomach every time you feel like you wanna suck a dick. It isn't gay to suck dick or fuck dudes if you just did it 7-8 times or less. To Beartardia!!
They banned testing nuclear warheads in the atmosphere, in space and underwater decades ago you absolute retard. There hasn’t been a nuclear warhead detonated above ground since China did their last one in 1980. Most other nuclear powers had switched to underground tests back in the 60s.
While I believe all of these test to be real, the audio definitely gives away that the video has been been manipulated in a couple instances. There is no way a camera 6km away from the detonation will hear the explosion in sync with the light flash. Even the ground rumbling would be hard to believe. The sound should arrive just shortly before the shockwave, and the ground propagation is still relatively slow compared to light.
edit: LMAO at dumbass downvoating retards that don't know how physics works LOL
if you want retards to believe the truth, don't manipulate it - seems pretty simple.
Nukes are fake???? Just for all you that think that, during Nam I was in what was called a "Purple Exercise", in which a nuke depth charge was dropped near some junk ships. I crewed in the third helo, an SH-3A Sikorsky Sea King, which was able to carry four torpedoes or four depth charges, including nukes. While the exercise was and is classified as to procedures, I can tell you this: when a nuke depth charge goes off, even if your bird is miles away (10, to be precise), it blows a helo around pretty good, and it makes a very large bubble that can easily destroy/swamp ships close by. Nuke exist, folks, and there's no doubt of it. As to radiation, that's a different story, my opinion. However, if you look at Chernobyl, last year Russia took Chernobyl as a part of their operation. Note, if you will, that there was/is an underground facility directly underneath the plant that was being used to produce a dirty nuke, and also as a human trafficking center. So, that and Japan sort of belie the radiation aspect of it. Needs a lot of proof before I'll accept it.
Nukes are fake and gay. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were fuel/air bombs, recently developed. The US had been firebombing Japan for a year already. The wily Nips rebuilt those cities immediately. There never was any radiation. If nukes did exist, Pakistan and India would already have used them against each other, or two other countries, take your pick.
[ + ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic
[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic 6 points 1 yearApr 28, 2023 11:56:51 ago (+7/-1)
[ + ] BushChuck
[ - ] BushChuck 0 points 1 yearApr 28, 2023 14:59:16 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic
[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic -1 points 1 yearApr 28, 2023 15:04:19 ago (+1/-2)
[ + ] BushChuck
[ - ] BushChuck 0 points 1 yearApr 28, 2023 15:06:30 ago (+0/-0)
Good sperging, bro.
[ + ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic
[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic 0 points 1 yearApr 28, 2023 15:09:44 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] BushChuck
[ - ] BushChuck 0 points 1 yearApr 28, 2023 15:42:51 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic
[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic 0 points 1 yearApr 28, 2023 23:26:44 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Spaceman84
[ - ] Spaceman84 5 points 1 yearApr 28, 2023 12:15:09 ago (+5/-0)
[ + ] BushChuck
[ - ] BushChuck -1 points 1 yearApr 28, 2023 14:58:49 ago (+1/-2)
How retarded are you?
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 4 points 1 yearApr 28, 2023 11:49:24 ago (+4/-0)
???
[ + ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic
[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic 6 points 1 yearApr 28, 2023 11:59:21 ago (+6/-0)
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal 0 points 1 yearApr 28, 2023 12:21:34 ago (+1/-1)*
edit: LMAO at dumbass downvoating retards that don't know how physics works LOL
if you want retards to believe the truth, don't manipulate it - seems pretty simple.
[ + ]deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 1 yearApr 28, 2023 13:24:38 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] BushChuck
[ - ] BushChuck 0 points 1 yearApr 28, 2023 15:01:09 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Seadevil110
[ - ] Seadevil110 -1 points 1 yearApr 28, 2023 17:51:06 ago (+0/-1)
Just for all you that think that, during Nam I was in what was called a "Purple Exercise", in which a nuke depth charge was dropped near some junk ships. I crewed in the third helo, an SH-3A Sikorsky Sea King, which was able to carry four torpedoes or four depth charges, including nukes. While the exercise was and is classified as to procedures, I can tell you this: when a nuke depth charge goes off, even if your bird is miles away (10, to be precise), it blows a helo around pretty good, and it makes a very large bubble that can easily destroy/swamp ships close by.
Nuke exist, folks, and there's no doubt of it.
As to radiation, that's a different story, my opinion. However, if you look at Chernobyl, last year Russia took Chernobyl as a part of their operation. Note, if you will, that there was/is an underground facility directly underneath the plant that was being used to produce a dirty nuke, and also as a human trafficking center. So, that and Japan sort of belie the radiation aspect of it. Needs a lot of proof before I'll accept it.
[ + ] BushChuck
[ - ] BushChuck -2 points 1 yearApr 28, 2023 14:56:04 ago (+0/-2)
[ + ] Anus_Expander
[ - ] Anus_Expander -7 points 1 yearApr 28, 2023 11:32:31 ago (+1/-8)
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 1 yearApr 28, 2023 13:31:28 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Anus_Expander
[ - ] Anus_Expander 1 point 1 yearApr 28, 2023 14:42:56 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] BushChuck
[ - ] BushChuck -2 points 1 yearApr 28, 2023 15:03:03 ago (+0/-2)
I've been to both of the cities that have been "nuked". Both very nice, very clean places. Which were immediately rebuilt, and repopulated.
Nuclear weapons do not exist.