The big bad scary world that was easier to succeed in than any other time in history including today. Which the boomers then ensured would not be passed down to their grandchildren. The tools to succeed that boomers voted to have ripped out of the hands of the future generations. The fact that you believe young people continuing to live with their parents during an extreme economic recession makes them pieces of shit says more about you than it does about them. Are there entitled youths out there? Yes. But they're still not as entitled as the boomers were.
You provided for yourself a life where you don't have to rely "on others" but what would your stance be when you reach the age you are too old to take care of yourself? Would you rather your children throw you to rot in retirement homes, have them take care of you, or just put yourself out of your and everyone else's misery?
Your very sentiments contradict each other. You talk about providing for your family but not relying on others. Are you going to be a repeat of the boomers and say "hey kids, you're 18. I know you have no work or life experience, the economy is in the toilet, job market is shit, and housing is through the roof. Better get out there and figure something out!" or are you going to grow up and realize that the traditional way of doing things worked for thousands of years and the break in the tradition as seen by the boomers didn't.
lolbertchristcuck 1 points 1 year ago
The big bad scary world that was easier to succeed in than any other time in history including today. Which the boomers then ensured would not be passed down to their grandchildren. The tools to succeed that boomers voted to have ripped out of the hands of the future generations.
The fact that you believe young people continuing to live with their parents during an extreme economic recession makes them pieces of shit says more about you than it does about them.
Are there entitled youths out there? Yes. But they're still not as entitled as the boomers were.
You provided for yourself a life where you don't have to rely "on others" but what would your stance be when you reach the age you are too old to take care of yourself? Would you rather your children throw you to rot in retirement homes, have them take care of you, or just put yourself out of your and everyone else's misery?
Your very sentiments contradict each other. You talk about providing for your family but not relying on others. Are you going to be a repeat of the boomers and say "hey kids, you're 18. I know you have no work or life experience, the economy is in the toilet, job market is shit, and housing is through the roof. Better get out there and figure something out!" or are you going to grow up and realize that the traditional way of doing things worked for thousands of years and the break in the tradition as seen by the boomers didn't.