Seasonal changes make way more sense on a motionless plane Earth than they do in your insane globe cult. How the fuck does an axial tilt result in seasons?
Go ahead and post any image of earth from space and I'll debunk it.
Go ahead and post any of your proofs and I'll debunk them.
We live on a level, stationary plane.
Common sense dictates that the earth is not spinning 1000mph nor moving at 66,600mph. This is brainwashed into people through school and mainstream media. Just like every single communist alive, you have all of the mainstream media and every kiked nations government on your side. So ask yourself, are you alligned with the correct people? Kike. Globalist. Commie. Which one are you?
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 1 yearApr 12, 2023 09:19:12 ago (+1/-0)
You don't need a photo to prove the earth is a sphere. Photos can be faked, edited, altered and changed. Using a photo would shift the debate from proving the earth is a sphere to proving the photo is real, and then to proving why the photo is faked. So why bother when there are far easier and less controversial ways to prove the earth is a sphere.
I noticed, in this post, you didn't address any of my issues or provide me with a model of the flat earth on which you belueve we live. A model that would explain night and day, being exactly half and half at all times, and the seasons which change at regular, predictable intervals. Please provide this model or state that you don't know of one or don't have one.
You don't need a photo to prove the earth is a sphere.
So you admit there isn't a single legit photo of earth from space? If not go ahead and post the one you believe is legit.
So why bother when there are far easier and less controversial ways to prove the earth is a sphere.
Well if you think space and satellites are real, surely there must be a real photograph of earth that demonstrates the accurate curvature with a radius of 3900 miles.
I noticed, in this post, you didn't address any of my issues or provide me with a model of the flat earth
You provide me with a photo of earth from space and I'll provide you with whatever you want. I see you also ignored the fact that common sense dictates we are not moving at Mach 89. Thought i'd double check in case you missed that.
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 1 yearApr 12, 2023 08:35:31 ago (+2/-1)
proof of a spherical earth using simple geometry
If the Earth was flat centered around a north pole, the distance between the lines of longitude would be greater at 60°south latitude than at the equator. Instead, the distance between lines of longitude at 60°S is approximately the same as the distance between the lines of longitude at 60°N latitude, and both distances are shorter than at the equator. This happens with a globed earth.
Every one of the diagrams of flat earth that have lines of longitude and concentric lines of latitude show that the distance between lines of longitude at latitudes south of the equator are larger than the distance between two lines of longitude at the equator. This is demonstrably false and you can verify that it's false sitting in front of the computer, right now.
What does your flat earth look like?
proving the distance to the sun
Observe a CME coming from the sun. Gamma radiation is detected immediately because gamma radiation travels at the speed of light. At a very expected and determined time later, we detect beta radiation because beta radiation travels at a speed slower than gamma radiation. And then again, at a determined and expected time after that we detect the alpha radiation, because alpha radiation travels at a much slower speed than either beta or gamma radiation. These differences in time lapse can then be used to easily calculate the distance to the sun using basic algrebra. No assumptions needed. No NASA required. Easily observed using cheap equipment that anyone can purchase.
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 1 yearApr 12, 2023 09:30:46 ago (+1/-0)
Why would radiation travel at different speeds?
Well, thanks for admitting that you don't understand basic physics. Gamma radiation has no mass, so it is able to travel at the speed of light. Beta radiation is electron radiation. Electrons have a relatively small mass so it can travel faster than alpha radiation (which is proton radiation) but not as fast as mass less gamma radiation. These speeds can be determined and have been determined and are demonstrated every single time we detect a CME coming from the sun, with near perfect and consistent measure.
And, no, you don't need NASA equipment to do this research. You can buy radiation detectors on ebay for under $100.
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 1 yearApr 12, 2023 09:51:01 ago (+1/-0)
We are talking about gamma, beta, and alpha radiation immitted by the sun during a CME. The speeds of these types of radiations are different, predictable, repeatable, and known. Election radiation is called beta radiation, so if we are discussing beta radiation and why it's not a fast as gamma radiation, the reason for this, beta radiation is radiation caused by moving electrons which have mass verses gamma radiation that has no mass, we must talk about electrons. This shit isn't hard to understand. And, shows that you're simply being willfully ignorant because you know it destroys the fucking retard idea that the sun is only thousands of miles away, when, in fact, it is measurable using simple and cheap equipment and can be repeated over and over getting the same results.
So your proof of curvature is based on a map that uses angles of elevation which is only possible on a flat, level plane. Using a sextant for celestial navigation which can only be done with a flat horizon that extends in that horizontal plane for thousands of miles in order to triangulate a ground position.
You experience it every day. It looks level and the horizon is horizontal (not curved) and remains at eye level (not geometric)
Observe a CME coming from the sun
Show me the curvature, where has it been measured? Is the curvature completely based of theoretical equations if you can't show me a physical proof instead of a formal math equation?
I asked for a model that shows how day and night provide a constant half and half coverage of the earth that also explains how seasons occure at regular and predictable intervals. I don't want a general description, show me a model.
I explained how the curvature is demonstrated. You wanted proof of curvature, not a measure of curvature. And, now you're asking for a mathematical equation to measure curvature without giving you a "formal math equation". None of this has anything to do with proving the earth is a sphere. I told you how to determine, without any doubt, that the earth is a sphere, and cannot, by any means be flat.
You see that the distance between the lines of longitude are shorter at latitudes south of the equator than they are at the equator, right?
And, you see that the distance between the lines of longitude are approximately the same at the similar latitudes north of the equator (60° S and 60° N for example), right? This only possible on spherical objects.
Simple 10th grade geometry.
Let's establish this before I go further.
You agree with this, so far, right? If not, why not?
Who said anything about angle of elevation? I said the distance between two lines of longitude at specific latitudes. Elevation isn't needed. If the Earth was flat, spanning out from a central "pole", the distance between the lines of longitude at latitudes south of the equator (60°S) would be greater than the distances at the same latitude lines north of the equator (60°N), and would be greater than distances between two lines of longitude at the equator (0°).
This isn't rocket science. This is 9th grade physical science and 10th grade geometry.
We take our base measurement from the north pole, Polaris is directly overhead at the North Pole (90° of latitude); in other words, the angle between Polaris and the horizon at the North Pole is 90°. To do this you need to measure the angle of elevation, which is only possible on a level plane. You can not do this with a curved baseline.
I'm not spending $20 on crap when I can navigate perfectly fine using my own common sense.
[ + ] olinneserpona
[ - ] olinneserpona 1 point 1 yearApr 12, 2023 09:51:30 ago (+1/-0)
Post your reeesearch here; https://www.voat.xyz/v/CubeEarth
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt [op] -1 points 1 yearApr 12, 2023 09:54:53 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] olinneserpona
[ - ] olinneserpona 1 point 1 yearApr 12, 2023 11:09:02 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 1 yearApr 12, 2023 08:15:48 ago (+2/-1)
And you can't prove the earth is flat. Best you can do is show alternative theories to explain away some evidence that the earth is a sphere.
[ + ] BushChuck
[ - ] BushChuck 0 points 1 yearApr 12, 2023 08:35:26 ago (+1/-1)
This should be good.
Seasonal changes make way more sense on a motionless plane Earth than they do in your insane globe cult. How the fuck does an axial tilt result in seasons?
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 1 yearApr 12, 2023 08:37:06 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] BushChuck
[ - ] BushChuck 0 points 1 yearApr 12, 2023 08:40:28 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt [op] -2 points 1 yearApr 12, 2023 08:23:10 ago (+0/-2)
Go ahead and post any of your proofs and I'll debunk them.
We live on a level, stationary plane.
Common sense dictates that the earth is not spinning 1000mph nor moving at 66,600mph. This is brainwashed into people through school and mainstream media. Just like every single communist alive, you have all of the mainstream media and every kiked nations government on your side. So ask yourself, are you alligned with the correct people? Kike. Globalist. Commie. Which one are you?
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 1 yearApr 12, 2023 08:30:43 ago (+2/-1)
And common sense is completely capable of being used to explain the earth's rotation about its axis and it revolutions around the sun.
I would love for you to explain day and night using the exact same model to explain the shift in seasons.
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt [op] -1 points 1 yearApr 12, 2023 08:58:55 ago (+0/-1)
No, common sense tells us all that we are motionless and not moving at Mach 89 while spinning faster than the speed of sound.
If you think common sense tells you this then you have forsaken yours.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 1 yearApr 12, 2023 09:19:12 ago (+1/-0)
I noticed, in this post, you didn't address any of my issues or provide me with a model of the flat earth on which you belueve we live. A model that would explain night and day, being exactly half and half at all times, and the seasons which change at regular, predictable intervals. Please provide this model or state that you don't know of one or don't have one.
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt [op] -1 points 1 yearApr 12, 2023 09:22:43 ago (+0/-1)*
So you admit there isn't a single legit photo of earth from space? If not go ahead and post the one you believe is legit.
Well if you think space and satellites are real, surely there must be a real photograph of earth that demonstrates the accurate curvature with a radius of 3900 miles.
You provide me with a photo of earth from space and I'll provide you with whatever you want. I see you also ignored the fact that common sense dictates we are not moving at Mach 89. Thought i'd double check in case you missed that.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 1 yearApr 12, 2023 08:35:31 ago (+2/-1)
If the Earth was flat centered around a north pole, the distance between the lines of longitude would be greater at 60°south latitude than at the equator. Instead, the distance between lines of longitude at 60°S is approximately the same as the distance between the lines of longitude at 60°N latitude, and both distances are shorter than at the equator. This happens with a globed earth.
Every one of the diagrams of flat earth that have lines of longitude and concentric lines of latitude show that the distance between lines of longitude at latitudes south of the equator are larger than the distance between two lines of longitude at the equator. This is demonstrably false and you can verify that it's false sitting in front of the computer, right now.
What does your flat earth look like?
proving the distance to the sun
Observe a CME coming from the sun. Gamma radiation is detected immediately because gamma radiation travels at the speed of light. At a very expected and determined time later, we detect beta radiation because beta radiation travels at a speed slower than gamma radiation. And then again, at a determined and expected time after that we detect the alpha radiation, because alpha radiation travels at a much slower speed than either beta or gamma radiation. These differences in time lapse can then be used to easily calculate the distance to the sun using basic algrebra. No assumptions needed. No NASA required. Easily observed using cheap equipment that anyone can purchase.
Debunk away, faggot.
[ + ] BushChuck
[ - ] BushChuck -1 points 1 yearApr 12, 2023 08:39:22 ago (+1/-2)
Why would radiation travel at different speeds?
So your easy proof requires access to a nasa laboratory?
Weak.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 1 yearApr 12, 2023 09:30:46 ago (+1/-0)
Well, thanks for admitting that you don't understand basic physics. Gamma radiation has no mass, so it is able to travel at the speed of light. Beta radiation is electron radiation. Electrons have a relatively small mass so it can travel faster than alpha radiation (which is proton radiation) but not as fast as mass less gamma radiation. These speeds can be determined and have been determined and are demonstrated every single time we detect a CME coming from the sun, with near perfect and consistent measure.
And, no, you don't need NASA equipment to do this research. You can buy radiation detectors on ebay for under $100.
[ + ] BushChuck
[ - ] BushChuck 1 point 1 yearApr 12, 2023 09:44:29 ago (+1/-0)
Lol.
"Proton radiation"?
Double lol.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 1 yearApr 12, 2023 09:51:01 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt [op] -1 points 1 yearApr 12, 2023 08:56:39 ago (+0/-1)
https://files.catbox.moe/lsmlmc.png
You experience it every day. It looks level and the horizon is horizontal (not curved) and remains at eye level (not geometric)
Show me the curvature, where has it been measured? Is the curvature completely based of theoretical equations if you can't show me a physical proof instead of a formal math equation?
so again, where is the curvature?
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX -1 points 1 yearApr 12, 2023 09:26:13 ago (+1/-2)
No. My model, as described, is only possible on a sphere.
https://files.catbox.moe/4fvxvd.jpeg
I asked for a model that shows how day and night provide a constant half and half coverage of the earth that also explains how seasons occure at regular and predictable intervals. I don't want a general description, show me a model.
I explained how the curvature is demonstrated. You wanted proof of curvature, not a measure of curvature. And, now you're asking for a mathematical equation to measure curvature without giving you a "formal math equation". None of this has anything to do with proving the earth is a sphere. I told you how to determine, without any doubt, that the earth is a sphere, and cannot, by any means be flat.
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt [op] 0 points 1 yearApr 12, 2023 09:30:20 ago (+1/-1)
https://files.catbox.moe/lsmlmc.png
That's nice, I asked for proof of curvature. You are the one making the positive claim. Go ahead and provide a physical, scientific proof.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 1 yearApr 12, 2023 09:45:59 ago (+1/-0)
You see that the distance between the lines of longitude are shorter at latitudes south of the equator than they are at the equator, right?
And, you see that the distance between the lines of longitude are approximately the same at the similar latitudes north of the equator (60° S and 60° N for example), right? This only possible on spherical objects.
Simple 10th grade geometry.
Let's establish this before I go further.
You agree with this, so far, right? If not, why not?
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 1 yearApr 12, 2023 09:34:55 ago (+1/-1)
This isn't rocket science. This is 9th grade physical science and 10th grade geometry.
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted 1 point 1 yearApr 12, 2023 09:38:27 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] BushChuck
[ - ] BushChuck 0 points 1 yearApr 12, 2023 09:45:14 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt [op] -1 points 1 yearApr 12, 2023 09:46:48 ago (+0/-1)
Here I thought you actually knew about navigation.
So again, how do you get your angle of elevation measurements on a curved baseline? It isn't rocket science.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 1 yearApr 12, 2023 09:53:32 ago (+1/-0)
No one is suggesting that you measure lines of longitude with respect to Polaris.
You're avoiding the issue and you still haven't provided a flat earth model as I requested.
The lines of longitude are needed only for a reference point that you can get using any GOS device that you can purchase for @$20.
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt [op] -1 points 1 yearApr 12, 2023 10:05:13 ago (+0/-1)
I'm not spending $20 on crap when I can navigate perfectly fine using my own common sense.