I’ve been earning my living as an artist for 30 years. I should have an open mind, but I want to go in there with a fucking flame thrower.
Everyone at my two art schools were illustrators first. The only one that ever produced disgusting and shocking pieces as a project, was the one and only tranny in the building. The fag couldn’t draw well either.
You take no talent and mash it together with mental illness and degeneracy, it will crank out some fucked up stuff. Although, what is being displayed here is “performance art’. If it’s something that has to involve people doing something; it goes into a category separate from ‘modern’.
Fun story; this tranny used to come to every class with a Barbie doll carry case. He would arrange the dolls all sitting on the desk facing him and he would change their outfits and brush their hair. We got an assignment to each design a magazine ad about lung cancer. When it was the trannys turn to present, he said his solution was going to be about ‘loss’, and announced his intention to sacrifice one of his Barbies and we had to choose which doll. That should be an instant failure of the assignment, it was supposed to be a print ad campaign. Well, we all picked the red head because that was the one that he would ‘speak’ thru, like a ventriloquist dummy. We all hated, Flame.
He grabbed Flame, whispered something to it, kissed it, and destroyed it, crying and wailing the entire time. Then it said something about cancer and ran out of the room. It was a disturbing display. Don’t know what grade he got, but it didn’t check any of the boxes for the assignment. Performance art is always terrible.
I remember when I was in college a visiting lecturer gave the fine art students a presentation on performance art. They all got "inspired" and soon afterwards the cafeteria was full of lunatics doing deranged shit for attention like men breastfeeding baby dolls and two guys on an a-frame ladder whacking a sign with hammers.
Everyone just ignored them and awkwardly went about their day.
Sounds like most of the performance art I’ve ever seen. I once got invited to a semi good performance art show in New York City. This naked dude with a blindfold on sat in a metal chair on a circular sloped stage, he sat at the low point. All over the floor were glasses of water, hundreds of them. There was art on the walls around the perimeter. If enough glasses of water were accidentally (or purposely) knocked over, the guy in the chair would be electrocuted. Most of the water was being knocked over by bitches in heels that were looking at the art and not watching where they were going. There was no announcement of what was happening, you just had to look at the guys rig and figure out his peril. The broads weren’t getting it. I hung out a lot longer than I wanted to because I was sure the drunk woman were going to fry this guy. He fucking made it.
He later died when he was stuffed in a sack and thrown into heavy traffic. A cab ran over him. He died for his art. Not soon enough, I’d say
Why do I get the feeling that entire thing was his weird fetish?
I remember hearing about another one from my teacher where a woman sat completely naked in an art gallery surrounded by a bunch of BDSM things, like whips and floggers inviting people to use them on her.
Another one was an "ahtiste" couple stripped down and stood either side of a doorway, so you had to awkwardly push between them to access the art (plot twist, they were the art).
Modern art is an expression of disturbed Jewish mind. A mind that sees only ugliness and revolts against beauty. A mind that sees only distortion and unhappiness in The human condition and revolts against love and family and happiness except as it serves their purpose to continue their supremacy. And of course there's just a huge profit from the modern art game which is basically printing your own money. You really need to think of many of these modern art paintings and modern art factories as money printers because they have a set group of people who will buy them and those people are going to profit because they're going to borrow money from a bank which is controlled by people who are in part of the game. They're going to borrow money from the bank to buy the art for very little down. Then there's going to be a guaranteed chain of other buyers who will continue to borrow against the art and buy it for more and more money and each person along the way on paper makes millions of dollars. And no one ever loses because they all agree to keep supporting the circular fraud. They will not let a painting by certain artists go for below what other paintings go for because they need to maintain the circular fraud. and the way that affects us is when someone is able to fraudulently make 25 or 50 million from a piece of canvas that somebody through paint on they can then take that 50 million dollars and use it in the real world and that affects us because they're buying things with it or they're destroying businesses with it or they're buying media with it or they're doing all kinds of things in a way that people who aren't in that game can't do. Everybody knows about the Federal reserve but the modern art movement is just another money printing scheme and the money is the canvases themselves.
It's interesting in Trump's book The art of the deal which became famous in the 1980s and actually is a very good read one of the things he mentions is visiting one of his artist friends in New York he goes to his apartment and the artist throws a bunch of paint on the canvas and says there I just made x number of dollars. And it's really one of the most direct experiences that shows you that everybody involved knows it's about printing money.
And one of the reasons they like abstract art so much is it can't be judged on quality. If someone's throwing paint on a canvas you can't say that person is a good or a bad artist. If the art was dependent on it say being landscapes then the person would actually have to be a very good landscape painter and it wouldn't be as easy to make a fraudulent market for it because people would be judging it on its quality. But if it's an abstract art piece there's no one who can say that it's better or worse so the fraud is very easy to do. It's like counterfeit currency that doesn't really look like the currency it's supposed to counterfeit. If you're trying to mimic a $100 bill you've got to do it well or it won't pass. But if you say you're printing a $100 bill that's an abstract then you don't have to do it well and you don't have to have any skill you can just print it and if you can convince another bunch of people that it's worth $100 and they engage in a circular fraud especially one that is largely subsidized by Banks which lend money against the fake bills then you've got something that you can make work. But it all depends on it being abstract and not actually being a painting whose quality can be judged.
Trumps ‘Art of the Deal’ was the first adult book I ever voluntarily read, besides the stuff they forced us to read for school assignments. It was a pretty good read. The only reason I knew about this guy, as a junior high kid in Texas, is that Trump was a frequent guest on the David Letterman show. Trump was quick witted and funny, and the audience loved his ass in the 80’s. He was the king of New York. I knew he was rich, but I didn’t know how. His story concerning how he went about getting payments from every building that cast a shadow on Trump Tower was unbelievable.
As far as modern art goes, the Charlie’s Angels actress Farrah Fawcett , began cranking out modern art in her 40’s. She would take a paint enema and then spew it out onto a canvas. She was getting top dollar for these abominations. If it had come from the ass of a normie, no one would want it, but this was from Farrah’s tight ass that everyone wanted to fuck in the 70’s.
She died from colon cancer. Which probably made her ass art sky rocket in value.
I could not confirm the paint enema either. It does seem she painted modern art nude “with her body” though. She died of “ anal cancer” which tells me she probably got it from HPV, often where HPV cancer shows up. Probably got it from Ryan.
Her son was recently judged unfit to stand trial for attempted murder and committed to a loony bin. What a mess of a family.
I think you're missing the point. The core of this "art" isn't ugliness or beauty it's about attention. It's about constantly trying to one-up everyone around you with some clever gimmick that's interesting for half a second.
The only reason any of it is "valuable" is money laundering. It has nothing to do with any kind of organic market. If laws were passed reducing it's value as a money laundering vehicle the entire industry would collapse instantly.
Now look up degenerate art and realize these kinds of cultural attacks or one of the main reasons that prompted the German people to revolt and begin to support alternatives. They were willing to endure the money that the world said they owed other countries for World War I even though they weren't any more at fault than anyone else because the German work ethic is such that if someone hands them something to do they feel their life is fulfilled. But when they culture began to be attacked and it became so obscene that no one could stomach it that's when they actually began revolting.
Faggots trying to justify their actions. Bullying needs to return. Bullying in all areas. It starts in school. Goes to business. Working in the dot com's of the late 90's the tech industry that is so woke now. Used to be based on ability. Those that were at the top of programming were making the rules. If you didn't like it, they wouldn't code. So fuck you, they held the power. ART, you produced good art or didn't get the galleries. NOW jew kikes are trying to push the most outrageous shit, literally by faggots that suck them off.
Blessed Are Those Who Plant Trees Under Whose Shade They Will Never Sit
Being a good artist requires a lot of talent and hard work. People nowadays lack both. They create turds, because that's all they can produce and are applauded by similarily untalented people. Our society hates beauty and talented people.
get those fucking kids away from those disgusting grooming trannies. holy fuck that was rage inducing. absolutely zero of those "artists" are white, all kikes.
Literally….the CIA helped usher in the modern art movement. Just like everything else that’s now backward and upside down, we know what works, we know what is beautiful, and we know what a man and woman is. They are purposely trying to blur the lines to make you question what works, what is beautiful, all the way down to something as basic as what a man or women is, just so they can reengineer everything in a way that makes no sense, such as a 2% demographic of elite Jews dictating every aspect of your way of life.
[ + ] PearofAnguishJuniorManager
[ - ] PearofAnguishJuniorManager 12 points 2.2 yearsApr 3, 2023 07:32:07 ago (+12/-0)*
Everyone at my two art schools were illustrators first. The only one that ever produced disgusting and shocking pieces as a project, was the one and only tranny in the building. The fag couldn’t draw well either.
You take no talent and mash it together with mental illness and degeneracy, it will crank out some fucked up stuff. Although, what is being displayed here is “performance art’. If it’s something that has to involve people doing something; it goes into a category separate from ‘modern’.
Fun story; this tranny used to come to every class with a Barbie doll carry case. He would arrange the dolls all sitting on the desk facing him and he would change their outfits and brush their hair. We got an assignment to each design a magazine ad about lung cancer. When it was the trannys turn to present, he said his solution was going to be about ‘loss’, and announced his intention to sacrifice one of his Barbies and we had to choose which doll. That should be an instant failure of the assignment, it was supposed to be a print ad campaign. Well, we all picked the red head because that was the one that he would ‘speak’ thru, like a ventriloquist dummy. We all hated, Flame.
He grabbed Flame, whispered something to it, kissed it, and destroyed it, crying and wailing the entire time. Then it said something about cancer and ran out of the room. It was a disturbing display. Don’t know what grade he got, but it didn’t check any of the boxes for the assignment. Performance art is always terrible.
[ + ] Broc_Liath
[ - ] Broc_Liath 3 points 2.2 yearsApr 3, 2023 14:40:18 ago (+3/-0)
I remember when I was in college a visiting lecturer gave the fine art students a presentation on performance art. They all got "inspired" and soon afterwards the cafeteria was full of lunatics doing deranged shit for attention like men breastfeeding baby dolls and two guys on an a-frame ladder whacking a sign with hammers.
Everyone just ignored them and awkwardly went about their day.
[ + ] PearofAnguishJuniorManager
[ - ] PearofAnguishJuniorManager 1 point 2.2 yearsApr 4, 2023 17:47:13 ago (+1/-0)*
He later died when he was stuffed in a sack and thrown into heavy traffic. A cab ran over him. He died for his art. Not soon enough, I’d say
[ + ] Broc_Liath
[ - ] Broc_Liath 0 points 2.2 yearsApr 7, 2023 09:55:20 ago (+0/-0)
I remember hearing about another one from my teacher where a woman sat completely naked in an art gallery surrounded by a bunch of BDSM things, like whips and floggers inviting people to use them on her.
Another one was an "ahtiste" couple stripped down and stood either side of a doorway, so you had to awkwardly push between them to access the art (plot twist, they were the art).
[ + ] PearofAnguishJuniorManager
[ - ] PearofAnguishJuniorManager 0 points 2.2 yearsApr 7, 2023 10:01:06 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Broc_Liath
[ - ] Broc_Liath 0 points 2.2 yearsApr 8, 2023 09:22:16 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 2.2 yearsApr 3, 2023 11:51:41 ago (+1/-0)
That was a fun story. Thanks.
[ + ] PotatoWhisperer2
[ - ] PotatoWhisperer2 1 point 2.2 yearsApr 3, 2023 14:34:59 ago (+1/-0)
Probably at least a passing grade so the prof doesn't have to see that fucker again. It's what they do with niggers.
[ + ] NukeAmerica
[ - ] NukeAmerica 0 points 2.2 yearsApr 3, 2023 08:59:16 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PearofAnguishJuniorManager
[ - ] PearofAnguishJuniorManager 1 point 2.2 yearsApr 3, 2023 09:57:03 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.2 yearsApr 8, 2023 09:50:51 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Clubberlang
[ - ] Clubberlang 0 points 2.2 yearsApr 3, 2023 09:54:56 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Crackinjokes
[ - ] Crackinjokes 8 points 2.2 yearsApr 3, 2023 07:20:34 ago (+8/-0)*
It's interesting in Trump's book The art of the deal which became famous in the 1980s and actually is a very good read one of the things he mentions is visiting one of his artist friends in New York he goes to his apartment and the artist throws a bunch of paint on the canvas and says there I just made x number of dollars. And it's really one of the most direct experiences that shows you that everybody involved knows it's about printing money.
And one of the reasons they like abstract art so much is it can't be judged on quality. If someone's throwing paint on a canvas you can't say that person is a good or a bad artist. If the art was dependent on it say being landscapes then the person would actually have to be a very good landscape painter and it wouldn't be as easy to make a fraudulent market for it because people would be judging it on its quality. But if it's an abstract art piece there's no one who can say that it's better or worse so the fraud is very easy to do. It's like counterfeit currency that doesn't really look like the currency it's supposed to counterfeit. If you're trying to mimic a $100 bill you've got to do it well or it won't pass. But if you say you're printing a $100 bill that's an abstract then you don't have to do it well and you don't have to have any skill you can just print it and if you can convince another bunch of people that it's worth $100 and they engage in a circular fraud especially one that is largely subsidized by Banks which lend money against the fake bills then you've got something that you can make work. But it all depends on it being abstract and not actually being a painting whose quality can be judged.
[ + ] PearofAnguishJuniorManager
[ - ] PearofAnguishJuniorManager 5 points 2.2 yearsApr 3, 2023 07:58:40 ago (+5/-0)*
As far as modern art goes, the Charlie’s Angels actress Farrah Fawcett , began cranking out modern art in her 40’s. She would take a paint enema and then spew it out onto a canvas. She was getting top dollar for these abominations. If it had come from the ass of a normie, no one would want it, but this was from Farrah’s tight ass that everyone wanted to fuck in the 70’s.
She died from colon cancer. Which probably made her ass art sky rocket in value.
[ + ] dulcima
[ - ] dulcima 1 point 2.2 yearsApr 3, 2023 09:41:08 ago (+1/-0)
That is the first I've ever heard of this - and it sounds fake and gay. And she was into art well before she reached her 40s.
She left her artwork to the University of Texas.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 2.2 yearsApr 3, 2023 12:27:17 ago (+1/-0)
Her son was recently judged unfit to stand trial for attempted murder and committed to a loony bin. What a mess of a family.
She was a pretty girl but obviously batsht crazy.
[ + ] Broc_Liath
[ - ] Broc_Liath 0 points 2.2 yearsApr 3, 2023 14:43:19 ago (+0/-0)
The only reason any of it is "valuable" is money laundering. It has nothing to do with any kind of organic market. If laws were passed reducing it's value as a money laundering vehicle the entire industry would collapse instantly.
[ + ] Imsickofmakingusernames
[ - ] Imsickofmakingusernames 0 points 2.2 yearsApr 3, 2023 23:45:18 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] beanbagWizard
[ - ] beanbagWizard 6 points 2.2 yearsApr 3, 2023 07:14:05 ago (+6/-0)
[ + ] drhitler
[ - ] drhitler 6 points 2.2 yearsApr 3, 2023 07:17:02 ago (+6/-0)
[ + ] NukeAmerica
[ - ] NukeAmerica 4 points 2.2 yearsApr 3, 2023 07:16:06 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] Peleg
[ - ] Peleg 2 points 2.2 yearsApr 3, 2023 07:35:27 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Crackinjokes
[ - ] Crackinjokes 3 points 2.2 yearsApr 3, 2023 07:27:11 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] Crackinjokes
[ - ] Crackinjokes 3 points 2.2 yearsApr 3, 2023 07:28:10 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 3 points 2.2 yearsApr 3, 2023 12:30:33 ago (+3/-0)
...as if we are dealing with the same mind over and over. Did you imagine that genetics could control such a thing? It seems that it does.
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 1 point 2.2 yearsApr 3, 2023 14:04:21 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Hoobeejoo
[ - ] Hoobeejoo 0 points 2.2 yearsApr 3, 2023 23:11:45 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] RedBarchetta
[ - ] RedBarchetta 2 points 2.2 yearsApr 3, 2023 12:15:38 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] rabidR04CH
[ - ] rabidR04CH 1 point 2.2 yearsApr 3, 2023 08:42:24 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] herbert_west
[ - ] herbert_west 1 point 2.2 yearsApr 3, 2023 09:01:40 ago (+1/-0)
People nowadays lack both. They create turds, because that's all they can produce and are applauded by similarily untalented people.
Our society hates beauty and talented people.
[ + ] Clubberlang
[ - ] Clubberlang 0 points 2.2 yearsApr 3, 2023 09:57:07 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Clubberlang
[ - ] Clubberlang 1 point 2.2 yearsApr 3, 2023 09:53:41 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] kammmmak
[ - ] kammmmak 1 point 2.2 yearsApr 3, 2023 09:55:07 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] kammmmak
[ - ] kammmmak 1 point 2.2 yearsApr 3, 2023 09:56:14 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Spaceman84
[ - ] Spaceman84 1 point 2.2 yearsApr 3, 2023 10:05:14 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] Moravian
[ - ] Moravian 1 point 2.2 yearsApr 3, 2023 11:30:46 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 2.2 yearsApr 3, 2023 11:48:16 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Doglegwarrior
[ - ] Doglegwarrior 1 point 2.2 yearsApr 3, 2023 12:05:37 ago (+1/-0)
1. Jews
2. Jews
3. Jews
4. Jews
I was trying to rationalize any other group but those groups exist because of jews so ya it's the jews
[ + ] killallkikes
[ - ] killallkikes 1 point 2.2 yearsApr 3, 2023 16:51:48 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Centaurus
[ - ] Centaurus 1 point 2.2 yearsApr 3, 2023 16:54:48 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Warden
[ - ] Warden 0 points 2.2 yearsApr 4, 2023 15:58:52 ago (+0/-0)