Sign into an existing account

On jewish supremacy, racial supremacy and ethnonationalism are not the same thing, and it's the same difference as between imperialism and nationalism. An ethnonationalist may prefer his race personally and does want to live in a community where most people are of the same race, but does not see a need to conquer the world and enslave/replace the rest of its people. An ethnosupremacist does not recognize the right to ethnonationalism of other races, and supremacy usually leads to imperialistic conquest and globalist manipulation. The jews will not stop until they have destroyed the genome of any ethnic group that poses a threat to them. They want to turn all other races into slaves - basically the opposite of ethnonationalism allowing each race to have its own space until they encroach on the space of others.

The idea of Abrahamism is that the jews deserve to rule all nations. That was borne out through Joseph taking over Egypt. When you look at how that worked out, the Egyptians that Joseph supposedly saved wanted the jews gone - why? In Egyptian history, there is no record of Moses - why? The closest thing in Egyptian history to Joseph and Moses is Akhenaton, who tried to impose monotheism on Egypt, and his grandson/successor Tut, whose tomb was cursed with a plague. Akhenaton was about as close to a feminist as you could be in ancient Egypt, and was completely hated by his people, leading him to flee the capitol and found a new one which was abandoned shortly after his death, and to his dynasty ending after the brief rule of his grandson.

Try looking at the Joseph/Moses story from the perspective that it is the jewish version of a story that the Egyptians have nearly the opposite take on. How many times have you seen the jews flee to a new land, claiming to be penniless and oppressed, only to become the richest and most powerful people in that country - just like Joseph? How often do they use predictions of economic boom and bust cycles and ecological disaster to manipulate the leaders of nations - just like Joseph? How often has a jew taken over a nation by subverting its leaders and used that power to move a new population in - just like Joseph? Moses begins with the Egyptians being accused of murdering male babies (which Akhenaton the monotheist was accused of). How often do jews murder children, and how often do they accuse others of what they are guilty of? When the Egyptians want the jews gone, they inflict plagues and natural disasters on Egypt - have you seen the last few years? And it culminates in a genocide - what's happening now?

Now look at it from the perspective that it's the honest truth - why would Egypt respond to Joseph saving the country by killing jewish kids? Were the Egyptians - closely related to modern Europeans - just plain evil? Was it wrong for the people of Egypt to not want to be ruled by this foreign child of Abraham? Did they deserve to be genocided like the Canaanites, simply for not wanting Joseph to rule them? If a child of Abraham arrived in your country, claiming to be a penniless refugee, and next thing you know he's talking the ruler of your country into major economic and political changes, wouldn't you want to kick him out just like the Egyptian people did? If the inheritors of the Abrahamic legacy have the right to simply genocide any race or nation that does not submit to their rule, what happens when they genocide you? Does the story really make sense and fit your moral beliefs, even if taken at face value? Or does it make more sense as the jewish lie to cover up their attempt to take over Egypt by creating and imposing a new religion and the genocide they inflicted when they were forced to leave?

Jesus' story directly parallels Joseph's. Not gonna go into great detail on that as plenty of christians have done it better, but Jesus' adoptive dad was named Joseph for a reason. Joseph was the first to fulfill the Abrahamic promise of his descendants ruling over other nations. Jesus expanded on that, granting the jews the ability to control other nations through words as Joseph had done, rather than through the sword as their people had tried and failed to do under David and others. Before Jesus, the jews were merely a nuisance, scammy merchants who swindled people across the ancient world's trade routes but not a serious political power. Since Jesus, jews control almost every government in the world, partly through christians being manipulated into enforcing jewish imperialism. I could believe the claim that Jesus was the jewish messiah - not because he came to save us, but because he came to empower the jews over us.

Your response to my claim that it's mock cannibalism is basically that it is actual cannibalism because many christians believe it to be so. I won't argue with you there.