Howabout just don’t concentrate on religion? I’ll focus on lethality. You read your book for another 2,000 years. We’ll see who gets the job done first.
The majority of people throughout history to oppose jews and jewry have also been Christians.
As have the majority of people throughout history to support or conspire with them. The medieval ages was rife with collaboration between royalty, nobility, the guilds, the churches etc. And jews. Jews held power back then, power over the country and most of its people, in the events you love to cite where the common masses rose up against the jews to evict them, those were the times when the powers of the country were weakened, these weren't the church leading the people against Jewry, this was the time when the church and other institutions of power became powerless to stop the common man from going after the jews. There were times when the church did go after jews, such as the inquisition, but that wasn't the standard.
I'd agree on the tradcons being the same as the sjws, both are moralizing totalitarian control freaks, zealots who feel they must enforce their standards on other people while falsely calling themselves the champions of "freedom".
The moral absolutes are different, but both act as though they have the authority to dictate to others what they cannot do and what they must be forced to do.
Satanists and luciferians are also pretentious controlling assholes, who lie about being for freedom.
"Do what though wilt shall be the whole of the law"
"OK then I'll go to church"
"no you can't do that"
"then your laws were just a fucking lie, werent they?"
Or
"We are individualists who support your right to be true to yourself, nothing is true everything is permitted"
"OK then I'll be racist, avoiding niggers and criticising them, becauer thats what I feel like doing"
"No, our bullshit individualism means we get to arbitrarily police your thoughts, actions, and behaviors if they offend our personal values such as the American tradition of nigger worshipping"
I'm such an autistic libertarian that I just focus on what I think works best in the long term.
I support freedom like everywhere political group, but for me the only cut offs on freedom and independence is where we can't have a stable society, the limits that must exist in order for these liberties to be preserved by ensuring that the existence of the society permitting them is also preserved.
I take some weird positions for a libertarian.
I think that we cannot allow legislative power to exist in the hands of government or people.
We need a hereditary monarchy to hold the highest office. The ministers may be elected, but only by a very select few, and everyonebinder the minister is whoever they choose to take on as staff.
Taxation is necessary for ensuring the existence of the state, which must exist for the sake of preservation of freedoms.
Morals principles ideologies etc. I don't care about them.
What i care about is what is strictly necessary for the state to exist, and there's very little that a government needs to be and do to maintain itself, all it needs to be is the enforcer of laws, the protector of territory, and the master of money, all the laws need be are the ones derived from the NAP, the ones proposed in monetary/banking reform, and the laws regarding fair taxation to support the government existence.
Those laws need not apply to the whole population, just a specific segment of it. They need only apply to the biologically alive. They need only apply to biological adults. They need only apply to the biologically male sex. They need only apply to biological human species. They need only apply to those who are biologically grouped within the White or Aryan or Europoid or Caucasoid race.
[ + ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic
[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic 2 points 2.2 yearsMar 29, 2023 20:23:47 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Lordbananafist
[ - ] Lordbananafist 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 29, 2023 17:47:56 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt [op] 4 points 2.2 yearsMar 29, 2023 18:10:17 ago (+4/-0)
Marxist-Lenin Atheism is the religion of the left and it has been growing in strides since it was first introduced to Western nations.
The majority of people throughout history to oppose jews and jewry have also been Christians.
[ + ] Lordbananafist
[ - ] Lordbananafist 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 29, 2023 18:33:45 ago (+0/-0)
Howabout just don’t concentrate on religion? I’ll focus on lethality. You read your book for another 2,000 years. We’ll see who gets the job done first.
[ + ] AntiPostmodernist
[ - ] AntiPostmodernist 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 29, 2023 18:45:39 ago (+0/-0)
As have the majority of people throughout history to support or conspire with them. The medieval ages was rife with collaboration between royalty, nobility, the guilds, the churches etc. And jews.
Jews held power back then, power over the country and most of its people, in the events you love to cite where the common masses rose up against the jews to evict them, those were the times when the powers of the country were weakened, these weren't the church leading the people against Jewry, this was the time when the church and other institutions of power became powerless to stop the common man from going after the jews.
There were times when the church did go after jews, such as the inquisition, but that wasn't the standard.
[ + ] Lordbananafist
[ - ] Lordbananafist 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 29, 2023 18:51:49 ago (+0/-0)
You guys are confused about what “oppose” means.
[ + ] Lordbananafist
[ - ] Lordbananafist 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 29, 2023 18:54:13 ago (+0/-0)
20 bucks on “guys with sticks”.
[ + ] IfuckedYerMum
[ - ] IfuckedYerMum 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 29, 2023 18:39:28 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] AntiPostmodernist
[ - ] AntiPostmodernist 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 29, 2023 18:39:39 ago (+0/-0)
The moral absolutes are different, but both act as though they have the authority to dictate to others what they cannot do and what they must be forced to do.
Satanists and luciferians are also pretentious controlling assholes, who lie about being for freedom.
"Do what though wilt shall be the whole of the law"
"OK then I'll go to church"
"no you can't do that"
"then your laws were just a fucking lie, werent they?"
Or
"We are individualists who support your right to be true to yourself, nothing is true everything is permitted"
"OK then I'll be racist, avoiding niggers and criticising them, becauer thats what I feel like doing"
"No, our bullshit individualism means we get to arbitrarily police your thoughts, actions, and behaviors if they offend our personal values such as the American tradition of nigger worshipping"
I'm such an autistic libertarian that I just focus on what I think works best in the long term.
I support freedom like everywhere political group, but for me the only cut offs on freedom and independence is where we can't have a stable society, the limits that must exist in order for these liberties to be preserved by ensuring that the existence of the society permitting them is also preserved.
I take some weird positions for a libertarian.
I think that we cannot allow legislative power to exist in the hands of government or people.
We need a hereditary monarchy to hold the highest office. The ministers may be elected, but only by a very select few, and everyonebinder the minister is whoever they choose to take on as staff.
Taxation is necessary for ensuring the existence of the state, which must exist for the sake of preservation of freedoms.
Morals principles ideologies etc. I don't care about them.
What i care about is what is strictly necessary for the state to exist, and there's very little that a government needs to be and do to maintain itself, all it needs to be is the enforcer of laws, the protector of territory, and the master of money, all the laws need be are the ones derived from the NAP, the ones proposed in monetary/banking reform, and the laws regarding fair taxation to support the government existence.
Those laws need not apply to the whole population, just a specific segment of it.
They need only apply to the biologically alive.
They need only apply to biological adults.
They need only apply to the biologically male sex.
They need only apply to biological human species.
They need only apply to those who are biologically grouped within the White or Aryan or Europoid or Caucasoid race.