Midjourney is an "artificial intelligence" program created by a San Francisco-based independent research lab Midjourney, Inc. Midjourney generates images from natural language descriptions, called "prompts", similar to OpenAI's DALL-E and Stable Diffusion.
Someone should prompt it to generate some art of space
First of all that capsule doesn't look anything like the capsule that appears in the movies of the mood landing. Second of all there's tons of high quality imagery of the moon landings and there were more than one and Apollo 17 they spent something like 24 hours on the moon with very high quality cameras running all over it with their space buddy. I highly recommend any people who doubt they were on the moon watch the footage from Apollo 17 not Apollo 11.
Yeah they supposedly played golf and drove around on a golf buggy I know the stories we were told growing up.
Imagery isn't proof of anything and can be highly manipulative and edited. We require actual tangible evidence of the claims and the one thing they brought back, the moon rock, turned out to be fake as fuck.
A prize possession in the Dutch national museum is not what the curators thought. In 1969, three Apollo 11 astronauts visited the Netherlands. And the U.S. ambassador gave the Dutch prime minister what he said was a moon rock. When an expert saw the rock in the museum, he didn't think it was real. Geologists have identified the moon rock as petrified wood.
The point of this post is to highlight how easy it is for kikes to manipulate imagery and spread it as fact. They have been doing this long before modern media.
FROM BLURRING IMPERFECTIONS TO FALSIFYING REALITY: HOW STALIN MADE THE TRUTH DISAPPEAR THROUGH ‘PHOTOSHOP’
So I don't need to rely on some fake machine generated images to prove the moon landings are fake. I don't need to watch the Apollo 17 footage in order to believe in something. I require physical tangible proof, until then the claims are unsubstantiated.
I agree, if you understand anything about optics or camera technology you would also come to the conclusion that the moon landing is clearly faked. Do you think they took their clunky space suits of to look down the view finder, focus in and take those studio quality shots?
" A prize possession in the Dutch national museum is not what the curators thought. In 1969, three Apollo 11 astronauts visited the Netherlands. And the U.S. ambassador gave the Dutch prime minister what he said was a moon rock. When an expert saw the rock in the museum, he didn't think it was real. Geologists have identified the moon rock as petrified wood."
[ + ] Crackinjokes
[ - ] Crackinjokes 1 point 2.1 yearsMar 27, 2023 04:23:13 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt [op] 1 point 2.1 yearsMar 27, 2023 04:29:34 ago (+3/-2)
Imagery isn't proof of anything and can be highly manipulative and edited. We require actual tangible evidence of the claims and the one thing they brought back, the moon rock, turned out to be fake as fuck.
https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=112324216#:~:text=In%201969%2C%20three%20Apollo%2011,moon%20rock%20as%20petrified%20wood.
The point of this post is to highlight how easy it is for kikes to manipulate imagery and spread it as fact. They have been doing this long before modern media.
https://www.historynet.com/from-blurring-imperfections-to-falsifying-reality-how-stalin-made-the-truth-disappear-through-photoshop/
So I don't need to rely on some fake machine generated images to prove the moon landings are fake. I don't need to watch the Apollo 17 footage in order to believe in something. I require physical tangible proof, until then the claims are unsubstantiated.
[ + ] _Obrez
[ - ] _Obrez 0 points 2.1 yearsMar 27, 2023 05:10:34 ago (+1/-1)
I understand the skepticism but like with flat earth the theory doesn't hold up to scrutiny.
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt [op] 0 points 2.1 yearsMar 27, 2023 05:54:33 ago (+2/-2)*
https://files.catbox.moe/7pbzwr.jpg
Also. You seem to have ignored this part