×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
3

An unusual argument for green energy from someone who usually doesn't argue for it

submitted by deleted to whatever 2.2 yearsMar 25, 2023 12:47:59 ago (+4/-1)     (whatever)

deleted


7 comments block


[ - ] Panic 3 points 2.2 yearsMar 25, 2023 17:28:46 ago (+3/-0)

Gardeners and farmers understand that CO2 is necessary for all plants to breathe in to sustain their lives. Some plant growers even get up close and talk to their plants, and the plants take in the CO2 from the loving plant owners, then prosper.

I for one encourage burning of oil, coal, wood and jews, releasing all that yummy CO2 into the atmosphere. (yes, the jews will be stinking up the air, but it's a sacrifice I'm willing to endure).

[ - ] ReincarnatedGoat 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 26, 2023 04:56:49 ago (+0/-0)

What do the plants say?

[ - ] ItsOk2bArian 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 27, 2023 02:50:09 ago (+1/-0)

Feed me Seymour

[ - ] albatrosv15 2 points 2.2 yearsMar 25, 2023 16:07:39 ago (+2/-0)

All they want to do is to make white people dead. Look at the graphs on the next site
https://ourworldindata.org/energy/country/india
Look under the title "India: How much energy does the country consume each year?" and add some countries to it. Play around it. At least for an hour. Think about it. You'll understand.
Basically, europe consumes less energy now since 1990. All shitholes consume ALOT more energy. Nobody gives a shit in shitstanistans about green energy.

[ - ] Sleazy 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 25, 2023 19:15:41 ago (+1/-0)

CO2 is what plants crave

[ - ] Reawakened 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 25, 2023 13:02:07 ago (+1/-0)

I think that's way too complex. I think they want a carbon tax and they want to set up a carbon exchange based on that tax so they can gamble and they can use it as a tool to reward or punish whomever they see fit to reward or punish.

A nice bit of lagniappe is that they get to show the peasants who's the boss.

[ - ] x0x7 [op] 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 25, 2023 13:12:10 ago (+1/-0)*

Well exactly. That is in agreement with my last point. They want to control energy because they want to control social and political power. The point is they see their current model will create problems by the 2100s, and you already have access to more energy than they strictly require for you to pursue their interests, so a weaker energy model that clamps resources given to their livestock tighter and solves an eventual problem earlier is not an idea to turn down.

With more advanced technology and planning the amount of energy they are required to give you to pursue their plans is less.

With nuclear we could have nearly unlimited energy per person. With unlimited energy you can do pretty much anything. If every person on the planet could accomplish anything they want that would be a cacophony interests that would prevent them from pursuing their interests in exclusion.

Why can't you have unlimited energy? You can have unlimited food. Given what you make if you were to get the smallest apartment you could and minimize all other expenses to near zero could you not gorge yourself completely every day. I make enough I could do it 30 times over. The physical reality supports unlimited food because it does. Either it does or it doesn't, and our ability to manipulate physical reality biases it to more likely that it does because we can often make that reality. So then the same applies to energy. Either physical reality supports it or it doesn't. Observation is that it does. They've just convinced you that under some fundamental that it couldn't. Imagine telling a starving person there is a fundamental reason they couldn't gorge themselves with unlimited food every day. They'd believe you. They wouldn't imagine a world where you could.

[ - ] Laputois 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 25, 2023 15:23:06 ago (+1/-0)

Are you cajun?

[ - ] Panic 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 25, 2023 17:33:21 ago (+1/-0)

You saw that too. I'm from New Orleans. That's our word and it means 'a little bit extra'. Example: a baker's dozen being a box of donuts with a thirteenth donut added for free.

[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 26, 2023 11:22:40 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 25, 2023 16:41:48 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 25, 2023 16:43:06 ago (+0/-0)

deleted