Flat earth theories only work in a vacuum. If you try applying all the flat earth theories at the same time the theories tear each other apart and nothing works properly.
Nasa and their "lie" is a better model than yours will ever be.
Move on and discover other jew theories to rot your brain too.
Incorrect. The earth we live on isn't a vacuum. We are a pressurized system that must be physically contained. This is because we are physically incapable of showcasing a vacuum without containing it with a physical barrier and then removing the gasses from the contained chamber.
In reality we live inside of the contained chamber and everything seeks its relative density medium. The Earth is the densest object in our realm hence why everything seeks it's density in a downwards vector.
People like yourself that defend the heliocentric model don't even understand anything about your own model. Us level earthers do. You only refer to us as flat earthers because it is an easy way to dismiss what we are saying and obfuscate us with control opposition like the flat earth society.
I understand more about your model because I set out to prove the heliocentric model. There isn't a single shred of evidence to back up the heliocentric model, just NASA cgi images and a fuckload of jewish indoctrination beginning from childhood.
The earth isn't "flat" per se because it contains mountains and valleys varying in altitudes. Water rests over 80% of the earth, we are told, and water always finds it's level. Therefor the surface of the earth that we know and understand is level. Any theories about the shape or size of it is pure speculation.
Then as I mentioned they use the term just as they use the term "nazi" instead of NSDAP in order to discredit and mock so it is best to disassociate with the term flat earth.
[ - ] Her0n 1 point 2.1 yearsMar 25, 2023 03:08:23 ago (+1/-0)
You are feigning ignorance in both of us, acting like I said the earth is "sucking" water to it like a vacuum cleaner when I clearly meant that flat earth theories disprove each other when you put it all together.
Even when flat earth experiments prove them wrong a flat earther sticks to the approved message.
I bet you also enjoy Star Wars and Star Trek and all the other gay space propaganda too. Watching Professor Dave videos doesn't count as doing any research either.
Your hollow moon theory is idiotic, you believe man landed on the moon? What about Santa Claus at the north pole? Do you still put your teeth under your pillow mate?
[ - ] dicedice 1 point 2.1 yearsMar 25, 2023 00:10:50 ago (+1/-0)
I'm also a fan of the tin bath to make flat glass. Those large plate glass sheets are made in a continuous stream of molten silicates on a bath of molten tin. The only thing flattening the glass is its natural state relative to the earth floating on a denser fluid until it is brought out to cool. The end result has no deviation from flat when put vertical. The largest panes of glass on earth are made in this way and they are larger than would be necessary to detect a curve if the earth did indeed curve.
Pour some water onto a spinning ball and watch it fling away because the priests of new age scientism suggest that we need to scale it up to such an extent that nobody can ever test their claims.
The ball can be stationary and the water will still run down the sides. It doesn't magically stick to a ball unless we scale it up to such an extent that we can not verify the claims.
I never understood this: If gravity pulling you towards a center of mass doesn't work as a theory, then what is pulling you down to the flat earth? A uniform field of force pulling you down? What would cause that and how would it work?
"Gravity" is a measurement of the rate of objects falling when seeking their relative density medium. Archimedes already knew this thousands of years before Newton the freemason kike.
Newton's theory allegedly began when upon seeing an apple fall from a tree at Woolsthorpe, as though no one in the history of humanity up to that point had ever seen a falling object and wondered why it fell, he had a veritable scientific epiphany. The apple fell not because it was heavier and denser than the air around it, but rather because a force at the center of the spinning ball-Earth pulled it to the ground! Newton quickly got to work formulating his theory of universal gravitation which he used to explain not only falling objects, but also orbiting celestial bodies. Newton claimed that the Sun, Moon, Earth, planets and stars' gravity caused them to all orbit around the most massive nearby bodies. So not only was gravity fickle and selective about which objects it caused to fall and which it allowed to rise, gravity was also able to perform different functions on different scales. At the human scale, gravity allegedly caused people, buildings and oceans to stick to the Earth, while at the planetary scale, gravity allegedly caused moons to orbit around planets and planets to orbit around stars. Unfortunately Newton never addressed this.
The earth is the largest and densest known entity in our realm. We don't know what is below it, above us or the actual size. We can all postulate theories but at the end of the day, without physically observable, measurable and repeatable testing they will remain as theory.
We can determine using practical science that water always finds its level and that dense objects seek their relative density medium. This is why dense objects fall to the ground (the ground being the densest object we know of) and why helium balloons rise as they are more buoyant than the air (density medium) that surrounds it.
If a "flat earther" claims that we are on a disc rising upwards at the falling rate of objects then they are control opposition. As none of us have ever postulated this theory nor believe in it.
[ - ] 3Whuurs 1 point 2.1 yearsMar 25, 2023 02:09:49 ago (+1/-0)
What if you cover a ball in water, then let it fall at the exact speed of gravity, would the water fling away or run down the sides then? Because that would not be scaling it up.
The ball and the water will simply separate as they fall as no force is acting upon the water to pull it towards the balls "center of gravity". In the heliocentric model they claim we need to scale up to such an extent that the ball creates a gravitational pull that holds and shapes the water to its contours.
Here is a simple demonstration of what I am talking about.
"We don't construct level structures over a mile long" ~ Chrimony
https://files.catbox.moe/pt1t4n.webp
Edit: > The Suez Canal connecting the Mediterranean with the Red Sea is 100 miles long without any locks making the water an uninterrupted continuation of the two seas. When constructed, the Earth’s supposed curvature was not taken into account, it was dug along a horizontal datum line 26 feet below sea-level, passing through several lakes from one sea to the other, with the datum line and water’s surface running perfectly parallel over the 100 miles.
Plane surveying is the survey in which the earth surface is assumed to be plane and the curvature of the earth is ignored. The plane surveys extend only over small areas and the lines connecting any two points on the surface of the earth are treated as straight lines and the angles between such lines are taken as plane angles. In dealing with plane surveys, knowledge of plane geometry and trigonometry is required. Surveys covering an area up to 260 km² may be treated as plane surveys. It is to be noted that the difference in length between the arc and the subtended chord on the earth surface for a distance of 18.2 km is only 0.1 m.
Plane surveys are carried out for engineering projects on sufficiently large scale to determine relative positions of individual features of the earth surface. Plane surveys are used for the layout of highways, railways, canals, fixing boundary pillars, construction of bridges, factories etc. The scope and use of plane surveys is very wide. For majority of engineering project, plane surveying is the first step to execute them. Plane surveys are basically needed for proper, economical and accurate planning of all engineering projects and their practical significance cannot be overestimated.
Plane surveying doesn't magically stop after 250km squared. That is where the kike lie begins to enforce the propaganda of a ball earth. In reality a sphere can never have a level surface. Especially a sphere with the radius of 3900 miles.
The Suez canal would have a measurable curvature of over 1.2 miles instead of running parallel considering they utilized Plane Surveying (no factoring for earths supposed curvature)
And this is the radius that NASA has determined in order to supposedly launch satellites into alleged circular orbits
How do you think they made the canal, flattard? That they had one giant, straight canal built at that factory, and then installed it into the ground? They dug a trench from one sea to another, moron. And if you build each piece to be level locally, naturally you will approximate the curve of the Earth.
And it's not that you need the ground to be exactly level, moron. You just need it to be deep enough to let ships pass by. As you flattards like to say, "Water finds its level."
You are starting to learn mate. Can you teach me how to draw straight lines with a protractor? Do I just need to zoom in to see the curve magically turn into a straight line ya fucking retard?
You can't measure for the curvature so it isn't there and now you claim that we can approximate for it. Well go head and showcase the deviation, you illiterate nigger brained fuck.
I'd say you were, but that's a dangerous assumption to make with flattards. I proved curves flatten out as you zoom in, which you had denied. You ran away like a little bitch after that, but now after coming back you no longer make the claim. So apparently you learned.
Now if only you could learn how differing levels of precision work, where precision matters and to what level, and when curve is actually measured and taken into account. But you're a flattard.
No you didn't, you showcased that a curve is still a curve when zoomed in because the properties of a curve are completely opposite of a straight line. This is basic shapes 101. A circle doesn't have straight lines. A square isn't a circle.
No you didn't, you showcased that a curve is still a curve when zoomed in because the properties of a curve are completely opposite of a straight line.
Ah, sorry, I thought a flattard could learn. Back to the first rule of being a flattard: flattards don't acknowledge reason or evidence.
But why did you run away like a little bitch after that? Oh, that's right, because I proved exactly what I said I did, and made you look like the ignorant flattard you are. So now all you can hang your hat is if there's still a nanometer of deviation from a line 10 miles long, it's still a curve! Fuckin' flattards, amirite?
All cherry picked to include videos with glare. Why is it when you control for glare you don't see this, flattard? Why don't you see for yourself, and measure the width of the sun at noon and then sunset using a welder's mask?
Projection and excuses just as my previous comments had indicated. "all glare"
Why don't you see for yourself, and measure the width of the sun at noon and then sunset using a welder's mask?
I don't need to rely on a light in the sky to measure the dimensions of the ground, that would be akin to a carpet layer measuring the lights in the recessed ceiling to work out how much carpet he requires.
Instead of regurgitating from a text book about what the sun might be and its path that it travels e.t.c. I am actually performing my own experiments.
Also why do you expect the sun on our horizon to showcase the same properties as a boat on the horizon? You do realize that the sun is much further than a boat is correct? Also the fact that a boat is composed of physical properties that we manufacture where as what the sun is is pure speculation.
Projection and excuses just as my previous comments had indicated. "all glare"
Does glare exist or not, flattard? What's your explanation for the videos without glare, flattard? Why don't you try for yourself, and measure the disk of the sun at noon and then at sunset, using a welder's mask?
I don't need to rely on a light in the sky to measure the dimensions of the ground
Oh, so you pretend the sun shrinks into the distance in Flattard Land, and then when glare is removed and it is shown to be setting from bottom to top, without shrinking, all of a sudden it doesn't concern you.
Back to the first rule of being a flattard: flattards don't acknowledge reason or evidence.
Instead of regurgitating from a text book about what the sun might be and its path that it travels e.t.c. I am actually performing my own experiments.
Lulz. It's basic geometry, flattard. YOU are the one that linked to perspective and an Eric "The Flattard King" Dubay video on sunsets, moron. If the sun is moving away it would be shrinking. If the sun is instead setting below the horizon it doesn't shrink and is shown to set from bottom to top.
You won't do the welder's mask experiment because you know it proves you wrong, period.
Also why do you expect the sun on our horizon to showcase the same properties as a boat on the horizon?
Why do you expect it not to, flattard? And I don't need to use the sun, I could instead use mountains. The sun is just a convenient object in the sky that everybody can see.
Do you not see how ignorant you are?
Lulz. Flattard floppin' around in pig shit, tellin' me how wonderful it is.
[ + ] Her0n
[ - ] Her0n 2 points 2.1 yearsMar 24, 2023 22:30:53 ago (+5/-3)
Nasa and their "lie" is a better model than yours will ever be.
Move on and discover other jew theories to rot your brain too.
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt [op] -1 points 2.1 yearsMar 24, 2023 22:35:53 ago (+2/-3)
In reality we live inside of the contained chamber and everything seeks its relative density medium. The Earth is the densest object in our realm hence why everything seeks it's density in a downwards vector.
People like yourself that defend the heliocentric model don't even understand anything about your own model. Us level earthers do. You only refer to us as flat earthers because it is an easy way to dismiss what we are saying and obfuscate us with control opposition like the flat earth society.
I understand more about your model because I set out to prove the heliocentric model. There isn't a single shred of evidence to back up the heliocentric model, just NASA cgi images and a fuckload of jewish indoctrination beginning from childhood.
[ + ] albatrosv15
[ - ] albatrosv15 1 point 2.1 yearsMar 25, 2023 03:44:50 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt [op] 0 points 2.1 yearsMar 25, 2023 05:46:36 ago (+1/-1)
Then as I mentioned they use the term just as they use the term "nazi" instead of NSDAP in order to discredit and mock so it is best to disassociate with the term flat earth.
[ + ] Her0n
[ - ] Her0n 1 point 2.1 yearsMar 25, 2023 03:08:23 ago (+1/-0)
Even when flat earth experiments prove them wrong a flat earther sticks to the approved message.
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt [op] -1 points 2.1 yearsMar 25, 2023 05:47:34 ago (+0/-1)
You don't clearly express any opinion and you simply regurgitate the same talking points I come across over and over again.
[ + ] Her0n
[ - ] Her0n 1 point 2.1 yearsMar 25, 2023 10:02:29 ago (+1/-0)
I don't believe in hollow moon either, I have to be 100% clear with flat earthers.
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt [op] -1 points 2.1 yearsMar 25, 2023 10:20:43 ago (+0/-1)
Your hollow moon theory is idiotic, you believe man landed on the moon? What about Santa Claus at the north pole? Do you still put your teeth under your pillow mate?
[ + ] Her0n
[ - ] Her0n 1 point 2.1 yearsMar 25, 2023 10:52:32 ago (+1/-0)
You don't read or understand humans very well yet.
[ + ] ParnellsUprising
[ - ] ParnellsUprising 2 points 2.1 yearsMar 24, 2023 22:19:02 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] dicedice
[ - ] dicedice 1 point 2.1 yearsMar 25, 2023 00:10:50 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] i_scream_trucks
[ - ] i_scream_trucks 0 points 2.1 yearsMar 25, 2023 05:18:02 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] dicedice
[ - ] dicedice 1 point 2.1 yearsMar 25, 2023 10:48:27 ago (+1/-0)
Pretty long.
[ + ] xmasskull
[ - ] xmasskull 1 point 2.1 yearsMar 24, 2023 22:12:42 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt [op] 1 point 2.1 yearsMar 24, 2023 22:17:42 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] Prairie
[ - ] Prairie 4 points 2.1 yearsMar 24, 2023 22:22:13 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt [op] 0 points 2.1 yearsMar 24, 2023 22:30:48 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] Rebooted
[ - ] Rebooted 4 points 2.1 yearsMar 24, 2023 22:48:16 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] Belfuro
[ - ] Belfuro 1 point 2.1 yearsMar 25, 2023 03:31:45 ago (+1/-0)
The universe is electric and connected.
All there is and all we know is electro magnetism.
Everything else is made up
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt [op] -1 points 2.1 yearsMar 24, 2023 22:57:34 ago (+1/-2)
The earth is the largest and densest known entity in our realm. We don't know what is below it, above us or the actual size. We can all postulate theories but at the end of the day, without physically observable, measurable and repeatable testing they will remain as theory.
We can determine using practical science that water always finds its level and that dense objects seek their relative density medium. This is why dense objects fall to the ground (the ground being the densest object we know of) and why helium balloons rise as they are more buoyant than the air (density medium) that surrounds it.
If a "flat earther" claims that we are on a disc rising upwards at the falling rate of objects then they are control opposition. As none of us have ever postulated this theory nor believe in it.
[ + ] 3Whuurs
[ - ] 3Whuurs 1 point 2.1 yearsMar 25, 2023 02:09:49 ago (+1/-0)
Because that would not be scaling it up.
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt [op] -1 points 2.1 yearsMar 25, 2023 02:19:00 ago (+0/-1)
Here is a simple demonstration of what I am talking about.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELGXdlpxlNU
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt [op] 1 point 2.1 yearsMar 24, 2023 21:54:19 ago (+2/-1)*
https://files.catbox.moe/pt1t4n.webp
Edit: > The Suez Canal connecting the Mediterranean with the Red Sea is 100 miles long without any locks making the water an uninterrupted continuation of the two seas. When constructed, the Earth’s supposed curvature was not taken into account, it was dug along a horizontal datum line 26 feet below sea-level, passing through several lakes from one sea to the other, with the datum line and water’s surface running perfectly parallel over the 100 miles.
[ + ] 3Whuurs
[ - ] 3Whuurs 2 points 2.1 yearsMar 25, 2023 02:15:59 ago (+2/-0)
Would like to see proof of this.
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt [op] -1 points 2.1 yearsMar 25, 2023 02:40:26 ago (+0/-1)*
Plane surveying doesn't magically stop after 250km squared. That is where the kike lie begins to enforce the propaganda of a ball earth. In reality a sphere can never have a level surface. Especially a sphere with the radius of 3900 miles.
https://files.catbox.moe/68t9rs.png
The Suez canal would have a measurable curvature of over 1.2 miles instead of running parallel considering they utilized Plane Surveying (no factoring for earths supposed curvature)
And this is the radius that NASA has determined in order to supposedly launch satellites into alleged circular orbits
https://files.catbox.moe/zfsyvh.png
https://files.catbox.moe/rcrc0z.png
https://files.catbox.moe/e8zirr.png
[ + ] 3Whuurs
[ - ] 3Whuurs 1 point 2.1 yearsMar 25, 2023 03:13:45 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt [op] 0 points 2.1 yearsMar 25, 2023 18:32:38 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] 3Whuurs
[ - ] 3Whuurs 0 points 2.1 yearsMar 25, 2023 19:09:05 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt [op] 0 points 2.1 yearsMar 25, 2023 20:07:13 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] 3Whuurs
[ - ] 3Whuurs 0 points 2.1 yearsMar 25, 2023 20:10:39 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt [op] 0 points 2.1 yearsMar 25, 2023 20:54:07 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] 3Whuurs
[ - ] 3Whuurs 0 points 2.1 yearsMar 25, 2023 20:57:15 ago (+0/-0)
Just make sure you never question if you misunderstood the question right from the start.
Only fags would do that..
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony -1 points 2.1 yearsMar 25, 2023 12:17:25 ago (+0/-1)
Why do you have to misquote, flattard, to make an argument? https://www.talk.lol/viewpost?postid=641dc061636c5#comment_641e51508bc2d
How do you think they made the canal, flattard? That they had one giant, straight canal built at that factory, and then installed it into the ground? They dug a trench from one sea to another, moron. And if you build each piece to be level locally, naturally you will approximate the curve of the Earth.
And it's not that you need the ground to be exactly level, moron. You just need it to be deep enough to let ships pass by. As you flattards like to say, "Water finds its level."
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt [op] 0 points 2.1 yearsMar 25, 2023 18:38:31 ago (+0/-0)
You can't measure for the curvature so it isn't there and now you claim that we can approximate for it. Well go head and showcase the deviation, you illiterate nigger brained fuck.
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony 0 points 2.1 yearsMar 25, 2023 19:14:21 ago (+0/-0)
I'd say you were, but that's a dangerous assumption to make with flattards. I proved curves flatten out as you zoom in, which you had denied. You ran away like a little bitch after that, but now after coming back you no longer make the claim. So apparently you learned.
Now if only you could learn how differing levels of precision work, where precision matters and to what level, and when curve is actually measured and taken into account. But you're a flattard.
Where's the sun go, flattard? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gB1punBbeV8
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt [op] 0 points 2.1 yearsMar 25, 2023 20:06:27 ago (+0/-0)
No you didn't, you showcased that a curve is still a curve when zoomed in because the properties of a curve are completely opposite of a straight line. This is basic shapes 101. A circle doesn't have straight lines. A square isn't a circle.
Beyond our limit of perspective, retard.
https://files.catbox.moe/pqtp8p.png
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tPvwdn6Iodo
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony 0 points 2.1 yearsMar 25, 2023 23:34:42 ago (+0/-0)
Ah, sorry, I thought a flattard could learn. Back to the first rule of being a flattard: flattards don't acknowledge reason or evidence.
But why did you run away like a little bitch after that? Oh, that's right, because I proved exactly what I said I did, and made you look like the ignorant flattard you are. So now all you can hang your hat is if there's still a nanometer of deviation from a line 10 miles long, it's still a curve! Fuckin' flattards, amirite?
https://files.catbox.moe/pqtp8p.png
The disk of the sun never shrank in that video, flattard. The sun set from bottom to top, exactly as you would expect on a round Earth.
All cherry picked to include videos with glare. Why is it when you control for glare you don't see this, flattard? Why don't you see for yourself, and measure the width of the sun at noon and then sunset using a welder's mask?
We know why, flattard.
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt [op] 0 points 2.1 yearsMar 25, 2023 23:47:51 ago (+0/-0)
I don't need to rely on a light in the sky to measure the dimensions of the ground, that would be akin to a carpet layer measuring the lights in the recessed ceiling to work out how much carpet he requires.
Instead of regurgitating from a text book about what the sun might be and its path that it travels e.t.c. I am actually performing my own experiments.
Also why do you expect the sun on our horizon to showcase the same properties as a boat on the horizon? You do realize that the sun is much further than a boat is correct? Also the fact that a boat is composed of physical properties that we manufacture where as what the sun is is pure speculation.
Do you not see how ignorant you are?
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony 0 points 2.1 yearsMar 25, 2023 23:58:57 ago (+0/-0)
Does glare exist or not, flattard? What's your explanation for the videos without glare, flattard? Why don't you try for yourself, and measure the disk of the sun at noon and then at sunset, using a welder's mask?
Oh, so you pretend the sun shrinks into the distance in Flattard Land, and then when glare is removed and it is shown to be setting from bottom to top, without shrinking, all of a sudden it doesn't concern you.
Back to the first rule of being a flattard: flattards don't acknowledge reason or evidence.
Lulz. It's basic geometry, flattard. YOU are the one that linked to perspective and an Eric "The Flattard King" Dubay video on sunsets, moron. If the sun is moving away it would be shrinking. If the sun is instead setting below the horizon it doesn't shrink and is shown to set from bottom to top.
You won't do the welder's mask experiment because you know it proves you wrong, period.
Why do you expect it not to, flattard? And I don't need to use the sun, I could instead use mountains. The sun is just a convenient object in the sky that everybody can see.
Lulz. Flattard floppin' around in pig shit, tellin' me how wonderful it is.
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt [op] 0 points 2.1 yearsMar 26, 2023 00:33:09 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony 0 points 2.1 yearsMar 26, 2023 06:06:03 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] boekanier
[ - ] boekanier 0 points 2.1 yearsMar 25, 2023 02:22:47 ago (+0/-0)