I'm probably more of a brainwashed faggot than most here, or in the very least less inclined to unabashedly hide my retarded levels trash consumption.
Sometimes I'll be listening to something presumably neutral and there'll be a pointed comment made by the youtuber, podcaster, etc.
Let's say it's just some generic video game reviewer but they sneak in a seemingly innocent jab at all republicans being braindead. Or some tutorial about increasing the power of my air fryer and they bash Christianity.
Without getting too sidetracked I understand a lot of people on this site have an issue with Christianity but they're also likely critical of the other religions as well and if push came to shove they'd likely back us Christians before the kikes or pedo-worshipping camel fuckers.
Despite my mass-consumption of dogshit 'entertainment' I've retained my ability to think critically or at least my ability to believe I have.
Anyway, are people generally just brainwashed and so they turn out to be retarded? Or is there nefarious funding involved even on a small scale?
I think the greenroots influence is more dangerous to the youth then any mainstream bullshit. Either it's been mastermind levels of bullshit-layering to achieve the micro-levels of success or outright manipulation of the small creators.
You are going to sites owned by tyrannical globohomos that only accept progressive ideology. If a content maker goes slightly too far non-progressive, they get warning flags and are eventually banned, or at the very least removed from promotion. This leads to you mostly only hearing jabs against non-leftists.
It's a concerted effort "conspiracy" at the top, but the vast majority of the content creators are simply useful idiots.
Also, any non-progressive on these websites are controlled opposition, whether honest but bowing to the restrictions, or dishonest and grifting sucker conservatives, e.g., Black Rifle Coffee Company.
What really sucks about the, uh, mainstream internet (for lack of a better word) lately, is that it's just like TV, but it's much more insidious with the advertising. Instead of Pfizer coming on with a curated, heavily produced ad that is clearly an ad, you have C-list celebs like that Rapinhoe soccer bitch posting tik toks and tweets like "Gettin muh BOOSTER y'all! We about to get BOOSTED up in heeyah!" And while it's clearly cringe paid advertising to anyone with half a brain, well, by that metric it's effective to a large part of the target audience.
But that's not even the insidious shit - it's the bottom-tier influencers that have a few thousand followers or whatever that really drive it. I always had an inkling, but it really hit me with a recent Ford "International Women's Day" ad where Ford had the Explorer "Men's Edition" that didn't have like... a heater, windshield wipers, turn signal, GPS... all things "created by women." I honestly thought it was a troll - women are always cold, can't figure out windshield wipers (forget to turn them off, e.g.), don't use turn signals, can't get around w/out GPS... also, historical accuracy aside... NONE of those parts are indispensable to an automobile's function. Which, if the point you're trying to make is that women are critically-important... you missed by a mile.
But literally all of the top comments were "ermergerd so smrt so woman smrt ford so ad so smrt" (paraphrasing). Then a friend in a private forum shared it saying the same bullshit, and I know he's not paid, but it just showed the effectiveness of the low-level programming. Ford pays some 100 influencers like $20 for a 30-second tweet (pretty good wage), then suddenly thousands of people are calling a clearly-retarded ad "smart" and "good" and, most importantly, "shareworthy."
I'm still not entirely convinced it wasn't a brilliant troll, and all of the dudes out there are just kowtowing to make women think it's a good commercial... Poe's Law I suppose.
Point being - Pfizer, Ford, [insert big company here] can either pay an A-list celeb 10's of k's of $$$ for 1 ad... or you can pay 100 F-tier no-name "influencers" with a decent following (but more organic and believable because they seem so worthless "who would ever pay them?") $50 or so and get more effective/influential advertising with about the same reach for way less money.
Yup, that's exactly what they do. I dabble a little here and there with internet marketing, and with the right introduction, you can easily pay people with 40-50k followers $20 to say whatever you want them to say and drive effective traffic. The propagandists would be retarded not to exploit this, as insidious as it is.
The propagandists would be retarded not to exploit this, as insidious as it is.
That's why we need to mock it when we see it. Call out that the emperor wears no clothes. Do it just as organically - first point out why the ad is so cringe and retarded, then deride the top comments that are ignoring the obvious fact that it's a cringe and retarded ad.
There is an ancient alien entity controlling earth to make sure humanity never reaches the stars nor is ready for the next great reset. We are domesticated. Or lowering iq and extinction of species like Europeans is no accident.
Hating christianity is "cool". I did it a bunch in my youth. Still hate it now but for very different reasons. Christians are seen as obstacles to progress, clinging to old superstitions and being extraordinarily uncompromising. Of course youngins hate this.
While Christians are right about traditional values, they suck at explaining it. These values have a rational basis but "God said so" is intellectually lazy, but probably necessary when dealing with a nation of idiots.
Many churches are feeling the heat in the culture war and are cucking in their values, e.g. the post up now with a rainbow before the altar. Education is eating the superstitious pillar underneath christianity. Brainwashing is eating the traditionalist pillar. You can't stop the former, but you can fight the latter.
While Christians are right about traditional values, they suck at explaining it.
I'd go so far as saying the only way they can explain it is by declaring some book gave them the morals, which causes you to lose most intelligent rational thinkers who want to decide their own morals with access to information, not adhere to literal gospel.
well I obviously disagree :) it is true that we can come to know a little of God and His laws through our own reason, but I believe the book fills in all the finer details. a poor analogy would be that we can travel to some new place and figure most things out, but having a travel guide would be of tremendous help. the bible is certainly much more than a travel guide, and even the bible itself states that there is much more to God than what is just in the pages of the book, but hopefully you "rational thinkers" can at least follow the analogy.
the bible is written by man, but has been divinely inspired by God. I am not trying to convince you of anything. You joined a conversation, and I am just responding to your posts. You have already made your choice, and I doubt anything I have to say will have any effect on you.
The only thing I have chosen not to believe is the words of other men.
God made the world, and all the living creatures, including men. Is it not fitting then, that God should speak to us through his creation? If you don't have the guidebook of the Bible and Christian Tradition, how can you tell if someone is speaking truth or falsehood. As far as I can tell, the only guidebook you are using is your own will and desires.
Anyway, like I have said, you have made your decision to be your own God. I am under no pretense that anything I say will sway you or convince you of anything.
I always wonder. If good is just and good. Then a rapist murderer can go to heaven pretty easy but some Japanese guy who lived about as moral as possible by God's law and he goes to hell. That is not just in any way. Especially if the good moral Japanese man never even heard of Christianity.
If you ask a Christian this they never have legit answers
The answer is simple: it's a cult and perpetuating the cult is the primary goal. If people could go to heaven on good deeds, they wouldn't need the cult.
That said, it does provide some value by being a shared myth that brings a community together. Modern people use shit like movies to fill that void.
"Many churches are feeling the heat in the culture war and are cucking in their values"
The Overton window effect, a steady deviation leftward has changed organized religion and will continue to do so, seems the sand nigger muslims are the only ones actively resisting the left lean although their barbarism and savageness is abhorrent to us Aryans and our generally empathic "laissez faire" attitude.
It's just "the outsiders" are among us and almost out numbering us.
Times are cyclical and since technology has advanced so far in the last 60 years this cycle change to "weak men create bad times" could be the last chance to avoid the 1 world governance by kikes. They are truly close to their goal.
While Christians are right about traditional values, they suck at explaining it. These values have a rational basis but "God said so" is intellectually lazy, but probably necessary when dealing with a nation of idiots
"God said so" is as intellectually-lazy as reading Cliff Notes. Which is to say, it can be intellectually lazy, but many, many people are simply incapable of articulating the intellectual arguments (just as many people have trouble parsing Shakespeare). But all moral arguments eventually come back to the nature of being and reality, which delves into the metaphysical, which is God's realm (or whatever you want to call the irrefutable, undeniable power governing all of reality and imaginary e.g. logic).
I fully agree about the "suck at explaining it" for the masses, but there are Christian scholars through the years that weren't so bad (Thomas Aquinas, e.g.). I have good friends still on Faceberg that will be very outspoken about trans ideology, e.g., but people will come along to say "Hey man, 'don't yuck my yum'" or some other such meaningless platitude as if it makes a good point, and I'll come along to say "Nah, here's why your yum is disordered and repulsive and it's right that we 'yuck' it..." And my inarticulate friend will come along and say "Yes! That's what we're all thinking, but we can't put it into words." Which basically means they're operating on feeling, which also isn't terribly bad. We've developed that "wisdom of repugnance" through generations for a reason.
I don't think education undermines Christianity whatsoever except for possibly the leap of faith required to believe that Jesus actually physically rose from the dead. As for Christian tenets and the like... I mean, education may actually reinforce those, since some of the greatest achievements throughout history were in the name of Christianity or at least achieved by Christians. Literacy in the West, the Big Bang, Mendelian genetics, the Copernican model, Newtonian physics, our modern calendar, Pasteur and consequently Germ Theory... on and on. I think if one is educated in the history of science and culture one gains an undeniable appreciation for the pillar of Christianity. Pretty much all of our traditions are intertwined with it, so to reinforce one is to reinforce the other.
In fact I'd almost argue that, in today's secular society, scientific achievement has stagnated considerably. Because it's no longer in pursuit of some greater noble ideal like humans reaching out to God, it's scientists reaching out to $$$, because in the secular view point you inevitably get to nihilism or something like it. I'd "almost" argue it because I'm not going to think about it further right now.
We've developed that "wisdom of repugnance" through generations for a reason.
I think we have an instinct to be repulsed by evil and degenracy, and I think it has evolved over time. I think it is genetics that transmits this repugnance. We feel when something is wrong. Why? because people that didnt have a repugnance for homosexuality or pedophilia went extinct as a tribe.
Homophobia is perfectly understandable from a totally secular scientific point of view as an adaptive behavior. But conservatives who are not always big on evolutions do not think to make that argument.
Our taboos and desires are deeply rooted in these emotional instincts that come from our “lizard brains” and we then tend to create narratives to rationalize those instincts. “Because God says so” is one that often works, historically. But “because evolution promoted individuals that had this behavior” is probably closer to the truth and it’s one that progressive pro-homo atheists must acknowlege. I.e., we must force them to acknowlege that evolution hates fags.
we must force them to acknowlege that evolution hates fags
I crossed that point when I was an atheist, but quickly you should realize that evolution gives rise to homosexual behavior insomuch as there is a genetic aspect to pretty much all behavior. So why should we condemn fags for the very nature of their being? Or the alcoholic for the very nature of theirs? It could actually be an evolutionary population control mechanism after all; evolution is notoriously-incapable of making predictions. Citing evolution isn't a moral argument, and it fails because homosexual behavior is observed in basically all mammals through all generations. If it were so "evolutionarily despised" as, say, the Dodo, it would be extinct.
It also might lead one to say "Why is evolution even important? Why is humanity's continued existence important?" No matter what secularist, materialistic, empiricist, possibly-nihilistic, etc. viewpoint you take, you are ultimately going to reach some metaphysical (and I think, ultimately, theological) explanation if you keep asking.
I think there is enough confirmation that unseen things exist; logic is the simplest for me to point to. Logic helps us glimpse the divine order of reality; whether one wants to ascribe that to God or "just the way things are" is an exercise left to the reader. Personally, I think the "just the way things are" route involves accepting a probability so infinitesimal that I choose God. I think God wants us to exist and continue existing, I think the divine order of nature, reality, biology dictates that man sexually belongs with a woman with no deviation, and that's why fags, dikes, pedos, sexual deviants in general are wrong.
So why should we condemn fags for the very nature of their being?
Because it improves efficiency for the group. Eliminating homos from the tribe must have some big payoff for the survival of that teibe. Are fags a waste of resources because they do not fulfill one of the basic functions expected of tribe members? Do they spread disease? Do they spread homosexuality? (There may be a genetic predispostion for homosexuality in some homos, but we dont know how its caused or if its only caused in one way)
You dont have to blame them but you do have to understand why they were so dangerous to the tribe historically that we have universally evolved taboos againt it in every culture. Pedophilia is exactly the same. Maybe that danger is no longer relavant but we have to explain it to dismiss it.
Citing evolution isn't a moral argument,
Evolution is where morals come. Its a fancy term for instinct. The morals of the culture are the average behavioral instincts of the genetic population. Japanese and africans have different morals and the differences are mostly rooted in genetics. We are selected for useful behaviors which lead to the success of our tribe.
and it fails because homosexual behavior is observed in basically all mammals through all generations.
All kinds of disease and dysfunction is observed in animals. Homosexuality remains low in wild populations because its highly self limiting in nature. Among domestic livestock you are bound to see higher levels of it because the farmer is artificially subsidizing the animals and interfering with the natural reproductive process. Something similar may be happening with “domesticated man”. If there’s too much prosperity, efficiency will take a hit.
I feel that God is just a way of anthropomorphizing the will to do what is good for the collective members of the tribe. People who didnt understand why they had a strong sense of right and wrong in the context of evolution attributed those feelings to a supernatural. phenomenon.
Maybe that danger is no longer relavant but we have to explain it to dismiss it.
Always good to find a fellow Chesterton's Fencer.
I feel that God is just a way of anthropomorphizing the will to do what is good for the collective members of the tribe
Yes. A "divine will," one might say (though you might not). Evolution might provide a mechanism for a biological explanation of that will, but again, the "why" will go beyond that at some point until you start getting into pure logic and eventually theology - questions about the very nature of all of reality, not just life and our genetic line.
Anyway, I like your opinions; it doesn't take religion to see the incompatibility of homosexuality (degeneracy in general) as you have shown.
Yeah its just arrogance that leads progressive to overturn tradition indescriminantly. Are they incapable of understanding that unlimited genetic diversity could completely destroy cooperativity? Theyve never heard of kin selection?
A "divine will," one might say (though you might not)
I dont literally think its divine will but its an ok term for what I see as a collective will.
the "why" will go beyond that at some point until you start getting into pure logic and eventually theology - questions about the very nature of all of reality, not just life and our genetic line.
Why not? Evolution of life seems to be a case of reverse entropy. Life forms seem to increase in terms of organization. Is life just the universe ordering itself? Is life computing the information of the universe? Is human intelligence not the most advanced state of this phenomenon? I figure if there’s a purpose to life and the universe, it’s something like this.
Anyway Life has to have at least as many pros going for it as Not-Life. Need a reason for life? Its got to be better than Not-Life.
Anyway Life has to have at least as many pros going for it as Not-Life. Need a reason for life? Its got to be better than Not-Life.
Could you Ontological Argument any harder?
As to:
Evolution of life seems to be a case of reverse entropy. Life forms seem to increase in terms of organization. Is life just the universe ordering itself? Is life computing the information of the universe? Is human intelligence not the most advanced state of this phenomenon? I figure if there’s a purpose to life and the universe, it’s something like this.
Have you read Asimov's "The Last Question"? That rhetorical statement I quoted is sort of the entire premise - humanity is merely a step toward the universe recreating itself through reversing entropy. It's interesting; you remind me of a younger (and therefore cooler, if not necessarily wiser... but maybe) version of myself. Anyway it's a good read, very short, and it speaks to a deeper belief in me that humanity does have a divine purpose. Created in God's own image and all that; what if humanity is nothing more than God recreating itself (or just "the universe" in your view)? I've always said atheists, at the very least, should be pantheists, since they are subject to the undeniable forces of the universe in which they exist. And of course, for an extradimensional God to create something in its own image - time could easily be taken for granted by such a being. The entire 4D picture of humanity could be what God created, but we're just getting 3D+t glimpses of it, and that would be all the same to a God "creating something in Its own image." Anyway... also yea, enzymes have been called "entropy traps" for a reason.
You also remind me of a Catholic priest or monk whose name escapes me, but essentially they followed all of the tenets of the Catholic church, but in their deathbed memoirs confessed themselves to be an atheist that just saw all of the benefits of the Catholic order and thus, decided to abide by them and enforce them. Kinda funny... comes down to Pascal's Wager at that point, and why would you bet against God's existence? That's literally infinitely (or technically, "undefinedly" since divide by 0) worse than betting on God's existence. Idk, I presume a just and merciful God wouldn't judge too harshly on someone for being bad at math :)
I had not but I read quite a few of his novels. That sounds like him. I feel like intelligence is sort of a simulation, a simplified model of the actual universe ( even bacteria do this to some extent )— which then begs the question: is the universe a simulation of some other universe? I suppose this jives well with your suggestion that we preceive 3 dimensions of a 4D “thought” of God’s.
Anyway... also yea, enzymes have been called "entropy traps" for a reason.
Couldnt follow that one.
they followed all of the tenets of the Catholic church, but in their deathbed memoirs confessed themselves to be an atheist that just saw all of the benefits of the Catholic order and thus, decided to abide by them and enforce them.
I feel like christians get alot of things right but for the wrong reasons. But I dont really feel the need to convert them to my dogma.
why would you bet against God's existence?
Because I want to know the truth. If the comprehension of the universe is our prime directive, then it seems accepting the godless aspect of the universe would trump covering our asses vis-a-vis hell. However it would seem that belief in an afterlife or a supreme being would seem to confer some benefit for group cohesion which improves efficiency.
Brainwashing is used to override those instincts and feelings. That is where "education" can turn midwits against nature. This brainwashing is more detailed and convincing than "God said so" which is how it wins over midwits.
Christians aren't the problem it's the institutions larping as Christianity teaching bad doctrine to keep the government tax-free status poisoning the wells.
While I am not supernatural, the Jefferson bible has lessons that adhere to the Enlightenment dogma. From what I have witnessed, the majority of users here adhere to the same dogma.
However, we are all shitposters, so... well, you get this site.
Regarding Christianity, when young, we get hammered with simplistic preaching and badgered to accept the Christian viewpoint or face a supposed damnation. So tiring.
Now I'm older and to be honest, folks preaching to me never happens at all. So I have zero desire to bash Christians or Christianity. Live and let live.
If I did have a beef with Christians, it would be that damn few of them really understand the Bible. Were I an argumentative person, I'd arm myself with Bible quotes explaining what's really being revealed and have fun hammering the oh-so-shallow Christians I have met. But nah. Not important to me at all. Believe whatever you wish.
Every Christian is a Christian merely because of geography. Had you been born in Arabia, you'd be an unquestioning muslim. You know it's true. Geography.
“The human race is a monotonous affair. Most people spend the greatest part of their time working in order to live, and what little freedom remains so fills them with fear that they seek out any and every means to be rid of it... No one is willing to believe that adults too, like children, wander about this earth in a daze and, like children, do not know where they come from or where they are going, act as rarely as they do according to genuine motives, and are as thoroughly governed as they are by biscuits and cake and the rod.” ― Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
"Every man mistakes the limits of his vision for the limits of the world... We will gradually become indifferent to what goes on in the minds of other people when we acquire a knowledge of the superficial nature of their thoughts, the narrowness of their views and of the number of their errors. Whoever attaches a lot of value to the opinions of others pays them too much honour.” -- Arthur Schopenhauer
Carlo Maria Cipolla's five fundamental laws of stupidity: 1 Always and inevitably each of us underestimates the number of stupid individuals in circulation. 2 The probability that a given person is stupid is independent of any other characteristic possessed by that person. 3 A person is stupid if they cause damage to another person or group of people without experiencing personal gain, or even worse causing damage to themselves in the process. 4 Non-stupid people always underestimate the harmful potential of stupid people; they constantly forget that at any time anywhere, and in any circumstance, dealing with or associating themselves with stupid individuals invariably constitutes a costly error. 5 A stupid person is the most dangerous type of person there is.
Realistically, about 5 inches. It can be stretched, in most cases, to about 6 inches - but usually not more than that. So if you've got a big dick, you're gonna have a tough time getting complete fulfillment.
Now, if you're a fucking degenerate, you can fuck her in the asshole because that can actually accommodate a much longer dick than can the average vagina. But that's just for you fucking degenerates (not many of which I hope are out here).
And while some have said deepthroating is great for big dicks, I have to disagree. It's rare to find a female with talent and willingness enough to do well in this department.
You know what? Just stop thinking about it. Stay away from women. Focus on improving yourself. Go out and lift some weights. Learn to openly chastise the jew - and do so with regularity. Pick up a new skill. Be useful. Improve society. Set a good example.
Do all of this and the right hole will come to you and you won't have to worry about how deep it goes.
I like to consoom certain YouTube videos. Just the algorithm alone, how it slips in some (((Jimmy Kimmel))) or (((Bill Maher))) shorts, is pathetic. I always click, “Do not recommend this channel,” but alas, more Jimmy Kikel comes as a recommendation from ANOTHER channel. I don’t even watch anything remotely connected to Hollywood or politics, yet it’s always suggested. Makes me sick.
Realize that most of the population doesn't have an internal monologue and are incapable of thinking and introspection. NPCs are real and they're the ones that go along with stuff without question.
they'd likely back us Christians before the kikes or pedo-worshipping camel fuckers.
Lol not a chance. They've been programmed to hate it. Most of them are stupid puppets simply repeating the narrative without realizing it or they are siding with what they perceive to be the majority. Useless cowards in other words. Good luck relying on them for anything when it comes down to it.
It's amazing just how much control they have, and how seemingly minor of things they use it for, and how far they go to communicate just what they're planning on doing. For example, they didn't just do 9/11, they inserted dozens of references to 9/11 into media years and in some cases over a decade prior to the event. Then they controlled much of the conversation around 9/11, including in the truther movement, to limit talk about Israeli involvement.
They didn't just create communism and islam and christianity, the world's three biggest and most successful control schemes. They also created satanism and new age movements and Ayn Rand and dozens of other control schemes. And they regularly turn their control schemes against each other because the conflict draws people in and reinforces support for their movements.
I feel like it is the hive mind. Everyone believes or is purported to believe the same thing. If you don't believe that Jesus is bad, you don't belong in their video game club. This is why voat exists. I call that shit out. "Uh, what does this video game have to do with Jesus? Don't be a chode dude." Somewhat like that. Or, "why are there so many women in this video? Is this supposed to be anti men?" Just my feelings. Fight when you get the opportunity and make people feel uncomfortable.
RELIGION; noun (Latin religio; to bind anew) represents choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law. The world, nature; system; whole etc. you live in does not make suggestions (information)...it is perceivable (inspiration).
Your consent to the suggestions of others not only gives them the power of your consent to define; redefine and contradict everything suggested to you, it also tempts you to ignore the perceivable world (reality) for the suggestions of others (fiction).
In simple...nature communicates perceivable sound, others tempt you with suggested words to ignore it.
As for religions...every one of them is based upon choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law, just like ENTER TAME MENT (to enter and tame mind/memory with suggested information).
Sometimes I'll be listening to...
...to whatever others are suggesting you. Your consent to do that tempts you to ignore that nature is wholly perceivable before anyone within can shape a suggestion about it. Only nature offers, those within tempt each other to ignore everything nature offers for what they offer each other...like for example names to brand everything around you, hence shaping a fictitious layer upon reality; prices upon everything to get you to consent to pay for them, authorities above your "free will of choice" or rules of behavior to restrict your choices.
Either it's been mastermind levels of bullshit-layering...
All suggested information represents "bullshit-layering" upon perceivable inspiration, yet the few don't represent "mastermind"...the many willingly consent to be "slavemind", which the few are parasitically exploiting.
The few represent the consequences of the ignorant many...if each one of the many ignores being free will of choice within perceivable for the suggested choices of others, then the few become the "chosen ones" aka the few ones using choice among many ones shirking response-ability (free will of choice).
nefarious funding
Perceivable represents value; perceiving represents evaluation...suggested money tempts those who consent to a) devalue themselves b) ignore perceivable value c) give those suggesting money the means to bury them under exponentially increasing debt, while preventing them access to everything costing money.
The highest value in existence represents evaluation...each one wields it, even when ignored.
how deep
Choice exists at the center of balance...as long as one's alive, one can choose to go left/right; up/down; forwards/backwards, yet always remain at center. Try it...make step to the left, and it implies coming from a right. Now make another step to the left, and it still implies coming from a right...there is no left or right; only choice at the center of a balance based system. Balance represents the momentum of motion (inception towards death) for those within (life).
As long as one chooses to dig, the choice to go deeper remains. The foundation for all form (life) represents flow (inception towards death).
Show me where I said I believed any of those things. #1. I don't believe in the big bang. Just because I don't believe in the bible doesn't mean I subscribe to other bullshit stories.
Catholics with good cathechesis could explain many concepts well and the reasoning to maintain tradition. That gradually went sideways in the 60s due to Vatican II.
[ + ] GrayDragon
[ - ] GrayDragon 14 points 1.2 yearsMar 22, 2023 06:27:31 ago (+14/-0)
It's a concerted effort "conspiracy" at the top, but the vast majority of the content creators are simply useful idiots.
Also, any non-progressive on these websites are controlled opposition, whether honest but bowing to the restrictions, or dishonest and grifting sucker conservatives, e.g., Black Rifle Coffee Company.
[ + ] InYourFaceNancyGrace
[ - ] InYourFaceNancyGrace 1 point 1.2 yearsMar 22, 2023 11:12:35 ago (+1/-0)
But that's not even the insidious shit - it's the bottom-tier influencers that have a few thousand followers or whatever that really drive it. I always had an inkling, but it really hit me with a recent Ford "International Women's Day" ad where Ford had the Explorer "Men's Edition" that didn't have like... a heater, windshield wipers, turn signal, GPS... all things "created by women." I honestly thought it was a troll - women are always cold, can't figure out windshield wipers (forget to turn them off, e.g.), don't use turn signals, can't get around w/out GPS... also, historical accuracy aside... NONE of those parts are indispensable to an automobile's function. Which, if the point you're trying to make is that women are critically-important... you missed by a mile.
But literally all of the top comments were "ermergerd so smrt so woman smrt ford so ad so smrt" (paraphrasing). Then a friend in a private forum shared it saying the same bullshit, and I know he's not paid, but it just showed the effectiveness of the low-level programming. Ford pays some 100 influencers like $20 for a 30-second tweet (pretty good wage), then suddenly thousands of people are calling a clearly-retarded ad "smart" and "good" and, most importantly, "shareworthy."
I'm still not entirely convinced it wasn't a brilliant troll, and all of the dudes out there are just kowtowing to make women think it's a good commercial... Poe's Law I suppose.
Point being - Pfizer, Ford, [insert big company here] can either pay an A-list celeb 10's of k's of $$$ for 1 ad... or you can pay 100 F-tier no-name "influencers" with a decent following (but more organic and believable because they seem so worthless "who would ever pay them?") $50 or so and get more effective/influential advertising with about the same reach for way less money.
[ + ] I_am_baal
[ - ] I_am_baal 2 points 1.2 yearsMar 22, 2023 12:33:55 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] InYourFaceNancyGrace
[ - ] InYourFaceNancyGrace 1 point 1.2 yearsMar 22, 2023 17:01:26 ago (+1/-0)
That's why we need to mock it when we see it. Call out that the emperor wears no clothes. Do it just as organically - first point out why the ad is so cringe and retarded, then deride the top comments that are ignoring the obvious fact that it's a cringe and retarded ad.
[ + ] Belfuro
[ - ] Belfuro 0 points 1.2 yearsMar 22, 2023 15:27:54 ago (+0/-0)
We are domesticated. Or lowering iq and extinction of species like Europeans is no accident.
And its happened before.
[ + ] TheYiddler
[ - ] TheYiddler 9 points 1.2 yearsMar 22, 2023 06:08:48 ago (+10/-1)
While Christians are right about traditional values, they suck at explaining it. These values have a rational basis but "God said so" is intellectually lazy, but probably necessary when dealing with a nation of idiots.
Many churches are feeling the heat in the culture war and are cucking in their values, e.g. the post up now with a rainbow before the altar. Education is eating the superstitious pillar underneath christianity. Brainwashing is eating the traditionalist pillar. You can't stop the former, but you can fight the latter.
[ + ] FuckShitJesus
[ - ] FuckShitJesus 3 points 1.2 yearsMar 22, 2023 10:04:09 ago (+3/-0)
I'd go so far as saying the only way they can explain it is by declaring some book gave them the morals, which causes you to lose most intelligent rational thinkers who want to decide their own morals with access to information, not adhere to literal gospel.
[ + ] AugustineOfHippo2
[ - ] AugustineOfHippo2 3 points 1.2 yearsMar 22, 2023 10:14:01 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted 2 points 1.2 yearsMar 22, 2023 10:25:48 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] AugustineOfHippo2
[ - ] AugustineOfHippo2 2 points 1.2 yearsMar 22, 2023 10:44:05 ago (+2/-0)
it is true that we can come to know a little of God and His laws through our own reason, but I believe the book fills in all the finer details.
a poor analogy would be that we can travel to some new place and figure most things out, but having a travel guide would be of tremendous help. the bible is certainly much more than a travel guide, and even the bible itself states that there is much more to God than what is just in the pages of the book, but hopefully you "rational thinkers" can at least follow the analogy.
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted 1 point 1.2 yearsMar 22, 2023 10:49:03 ago (+2/-1)*
[ + ] AugustineOfHippo2
[ - ] AugustineOfHippo2 0 points 1.2 yearsMar 22, 2023 16:54:46 ago (+0/-0)
I am not trying to convince you of anything. You joined a conversation, and I am just responding to your posts. You have already made your choice, and I doubt anything I have to say will have any effect on you.
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 1.2 yearsMar 23, 2023 01:57:25 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] AugustineOfHippo2
[ - ] AugustineOfHippo2 0 points 1.2 yearsMar 23, 2023 15:27:05 ago (+0/-0)
God made the world, and all the living creatures, including men. Is it not fitting then, that God should speak to us through his creation? If you don't have the guidebook of the Bible and Christian Tradition, how can you tell if someone is speaking truth or falsehood. As far as I can tell, the only guidebook you are using is your own will and desires.
Anyway, like I have said, you have made your decision to be your own God. I am under no pretense that anything I say will sway you or convince you of anything.
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 1.2 yearsMar 23, 2023 16:50:26 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Doglegwarrior
[ - ] Doglegwarrior 1 point 1.2 yearsMar 22, 2023 20:27:30 ago (+1/-0)
If you ask a Christian this they never have legit answers
[ + ] TheYiddler
[ - ] TheYiddler 0 points 1.2 yearsMar 23, 2023 08:12:02 ago (+0/-0)
That said, it does provide some value by being a shared myth that brings a community together. Modern people use shit like movies to fill that void.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 1.2 yearsMar 22, 2023 10:55:45 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] goatfugee12
[ - ] goatfugee12 2 points 1.2 yearsMar 22, 2023 10:49:43 ago (+2/-0)
The Overton window effect, a steady deviation leftward has changed organized religion and will continue to do so, seems the sand nigger muslims are the only ones actively resisting the left lean although their barbarism and savageness is abhorrent to us Aryans and our generally empathic "laissez faire" attitude.
It's just "the outsiders" are among us and almost out numbering us.
Times are cyclical and since technology has advanced so far in the last 60 years this cycle change to "weak men create bad times" could be the last chance to avoid the 1 world governance by kikes. They are truly close to their goal.
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted 1 point 1.2 yearsMar 22, 2023 06:46:50 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] InYourFaceNancyGrace
[ - ] InYourFaceNancyGrace 1 point 1.2 yearsMar 22, 2023 10:51:04 ago (+1/-0)*
"God said so" is as intellectually-lazy as reading Cliff Notes. Which is to say, it can be intellectually lazy, but many, many people are simply incapable of articulating the intellectual arguments (just as many people have trouble parsing Shakespeare). But all moral arguments eventually come back to the nature of being and reality, which delves into the metaphysical, which is God's realm (or whatever you want to call the irrefutable, undeniable power governing all of reality and imaginary e.g. logic).
I fully agree about the "suck at explaining it" for the masses, but there are Christian scholars through the years that weren't so bad (Thomas Aquinas, e.g.). I have good friends still on Faceberg that will be very outspoken about trans ideology, e.g., but people will come along to say "Hey man, 'don't yuck my yum'" or some other such meaningless platitude as if it makes a good point, and I'll come along to say "Nah, here's why your yum is disordered and repulsive and it's right that we 'yuck' it..." And my inarticulate friend will come along and say "Yes! That's what we're all thinking, but we can't put it into words." Which basically means they're operating on feeling, which also isn't terribly bad. We've developed that "wisdom of repugnance" through generations for a reason.
I don't think education undermines Christianity whatsoever except for possibly the leap of faith required to believe that Jesus actually physically rose from the dead. As for Christian tenets and the like... I mean, education may actually reinforce those, since some of the greatest achievements throughout history were in the name of Christianity or at least achieved by Christians. Literacy in the West, the Big Bang, Mendelian genetics, the Copernican model, Newtonian physics, our modern calendar, Pasteur and consequently Germ Theory... on and on. I think if one is educated in the history of science and culture one gains an undeniable appreciation for the pillar of Christianity. Pretty much all of our traditions are intertwined with it, so to reinforce one is to reinforce the other.
In fact I'd almost argue that, in today's secular society, scientific achievement has stagnated considerably. Because it's no longer in pursuit of some greater noble ideal like humans reaching out to God, it's scientists reaching out to $$$, because in the secular view point you inevitably get to nihilism or something like it. I'd "almost" argue it because I'm not going to think about it further right now.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 1.2 yearsMar 22, 2023 11:11:04 ago (+1/-0)
I think we have an instinct to be repulsed by evil and degenracy, and I think it has evolved over time. I think it is genetics that transmits this repugnance. We feel when something is wrong. Why? because people that didnt have a repugnance for homosexuality or pedophilia went extinct as a tribe.
Homophobia is perfectly understandable from a totally secular scientific point of view as an adaptive behavior. But conservatives who are not always big on evolutions do not think to make that argument.
Our taboos and desires are deeply rooted in these emotional instincts that come from our “lizard brains” and we then tend to create narratives to rationalize those instincts. “Because God says so” is one that often works, historically. But “because evolution promoted individuals that had this behavior” is probably closer to the truth and it’s one that progressive pro-homo atheists must acknowlege. I.e., we must force them to acknowlege that evolution hates fags.
[ + ] InYourFaceNancyGrace
[ - ] InYourFaceNancyGrace 2 points 1.2 yearsMar 22, 2023 11:33:58 ago (+2/-0)
I crossed that point when I was an atheist, but quickly you should realize that evolution gives rise to homosexual behavior insomuch as there is a genetic aspect to pretty much all behavior. So why should we condemn fags for the very nature of their being? Or the alcoholic for the very nature of theirs? It could actually be an evolutionary population control mechanism after all; evolution is notoriously-incapable of making predictions. Citing evolution isn't a moral argument, and it fails because homosexual behavior is observed in basically all mammals through all generations. If it were so "evolutionarily despised" as, say, the Dodo, it would be extinct.
It also might lead one to say "Why is evolution even important? Why is humanity's continued existence important?" No matter what secularist, materialistic, empiricist, possibly-nihilistic, etc. viewpoint you take, you are ultimately going to reach some metaphysical (and I think, ultimately, theological) explanation if you keep asking.
I think there is enough confirmation that unseen things exist; logic is the simplest for me to point to. Logic helps us glimpse the divine order of reality; whether one wants to ascribe that to God or "just the way things are" is an exercise left to the reader. Personally, I think the "just the way things are" route involves accepting a probability so infinitesimal that I choose God. I think God wants us to exist and continue existing, I think the divine order of nature, reality, biology dictates that man sexually belongs with a woman with no deviation, and that's why fags, dikes, pedos, sexual deviants in general are wrong.
But yea, that's just like, my opinion, man.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 1.2 yearsMar 22, 2023 16:51:24 ago (+1/-0)
Because it improves efficiency for the group. Eliminating homos from the tribe must have some big payoff for the survival of that teibe. Are fags a waste of resources because they do not fulfill one of the basic functions expected of tribe members? Do they spread disease? Do they spread homosexuality? (There may be a genetic predispostion for homosexuality in some homos, but we dont know how its caused or if its only caused in one way)
You dont have to blame them but you do have to understand why they were so dangerous to the tribe historically that we have universally evolved taboos againt it in every culture. Pedophilia is exactly the same. Maybe that danger is no longer relavant but we have to explain it to dismiss it.
Evolution is where morals come. Its a fancy term for instinct. The morals of the culture are the average behavioral instincts of the genetic population. Japanese and africans have different morals and the differences are mostly rooted in genetics. We are selected for useful behaviors which lead to the success of our tribe.
All kinds of disease and dysfunction is observed in animals. Homosexuality remains low in wild populations because its highly self limiting in nature. Among domestic livestock you are bound to see higher levels of it because the farmer is artificially subsidizing the animals and interfering with the natural reproductive process. Something similar may be happening with “domesticated man”. If there’s too much prosperity, efficiency will take a hit.
I feel that God is just a way of anthropomorphizing the will to do what is good for the collective members of the tribe. People who didnt understand why they had a strong sense of right and wrong in the context of evolution attributed those feelings to a supernatural. phenomenon.
Just my opinion.
[ + ] InYourFaceNancyGrace
[ - ] InYourFaceNancyGrace 1 point 1.2 yearsMar 22, 2023 17:12:04 ago (+1/-0)
Always good to find a fellow Chesterton's Fencer.
Yes. A "divine will," one might say (though you might not). Evolution might provide a mechanism for a biological explanation of that will, but again, the "why" will go beyond that at some point until you start getting into pure logic and eventually theology - questions about the very nature of all of reality, not just life and our genetic line.
Anyway, I like your opinions; it doesn't take religion to see the incompatibility of homosexuality (degeneracy in general) as you have shown.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 1.2 yearsMar 22, 2023 19:03:50 ago (+1/-0)
Yeah its just arrogance that leads progressive to overturn tradition indescriminantly. Are they incapable of understanding that unlimited genetic diversity could completely destroy cooperativity? Theyve never heard of kin selection?
I dont literally think its divine will but its an ok term for what I see as a collective will.
Why not? Evolution of life seems to be a case of reverse entropy. Life forms seem to increase in terms of organization. Is life just the universe ordering itself? Is life computing the information of the universe? Is human intelligence not the most advanced state of this phenomenon? I figure if there’s a purpose to life and the universe, it’s something like this.
Anyway Life has to have at least as many pros going for it as Not-Life. Need a reason for life? Its got to be better than Not-Life.
[ + ] InYourFaceNancyGrace
[ - ] InYourFaceNancyGrace 0 points 1.2 yearsMar 22, 2023 20:34:01 ago (+0/-0)
Could you Ontological Argument any harder?
As to:
Have you read Asimov's "The Last Question"? That rhetorical statement I quoted is sort of the entire premise - humanity is merely a step toward the universe recreating itself through reversing entropy. It's interesting; you remind me of a younger (and therefore cooler, if not necessarily wiser... but maybe) version of myself. Anyway it's a good read, very short, and it speaks to a deeper belief in me that humanity does have a divine purpose. Created in God's own image and all that; what if humanity is nothing more than God recreating itself (or just "the universe" in your view)? I've always said atheists, at the very least, should be pantheists, since they are subject to the undeniable forces of the universe in which they exist. And of course, for an extradimensional God to create something in its own image - time could easily be taken for granted by such a being. The entire 4D picture of humanity could be what God created, but we're just getting 3D+t glimpses of it, and that would be all the same to a God "creating something in Its own image." Anyway... also yea, enzymes have been called "entropy traps" for a reason.
You also remind me of a Catholic priest or monk whose name escapes me, but essentially they followed all of the tenets of the Catholic church, but in their deathbed memoirs confessed themselves to be an atheist that just saw all of the benefits of the Catholic order and thus, decided to abide by them and enforce them. Kinda funny... comes down to Pascal's Wager at that point, and why would you bet against God's existence? That's literally infinitely (or technically, "undefinedly" since divide by 0) worse than betting on God's existence. Idk, I presume a just and merciful God wouldn't judge too harshly on someone for being bad at math :)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 1.2 yearsMar 22, 2023 21:33:12 ago (+0/-0)
I had not but I read quite a few of his novels. That sounds like him. I feel like intelligence is sort of a simulation, a simplified model of the actual universe ( even bacteria do this to some extent )— which then begs the question: is the universe a simulation of some other universe? I suppose this jives well with your suggestion that we preceive 3 dimensions of a 4D “thought” of God’s.
Couldnt follow that one.
Because I want to know the truth. If the comprehension of the universe is our prime directive, then it seems accepting the godless aspect of the universe would trump covering our asses vis-a-vis hell. However it would seem that belief in an afterlife or a supreme being would seem to confer some benefit for group cohesion which improves efficiency.
[ + ] TheYiddler
[ - ] TheYiddler 0 points 1.2 yearsMar 23, 2023 08:02:38 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Pasty
[ - ] Pasty 0 points 1.2 yearsMar 22, 2023 15:01:48 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] rhy
[ - ] rhy 6 points 1.2 yearsMar 22, 2023 04:26:28 ago (+6/-0)
Definitely everyone at the top: will Ferrell, Gwen Stefani, lady Gaga, all the top democrats and republicans.
[ + ] FuckShitJesus
[ - ] FuckShitJesus 1 point 1.2 yearsMar 22, 2023 10:04:46 ago (+1/-0)
Project Mockingbird is well documented.
[ + ] Belfuro
[ - ] Belfuro 0 points 1.2 yearsMar 22, 2023 15:21:40 ago (+0/-0)
People do not rise to fame in Hollywood without fiddling children, getting raped on the casting couch or letting blood from innocents.
[ + ] KyleIsThisTall
[ - ] KyleIsThisTall 0 points 1.2 yearsMar 23, 2023 19:17:38 ago (+0/-0)
However, we are all shitposters, so... well, you get this site.
[ + ]deleted
[ - ] deleted 1 point 1.2 yearsMar 22, 2023 12:35:08 ago (+1/-0)*
[ + ]deleted
[ - ] deleted 1 point 1.2 yearsMar 22, 2023 10:24:51 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Panic
[ - ] Panic 0 points 1.2 yearsMar 23, 2023 11:29:52 ago (+0/-0)
Now I'm older and to be honest, folks preaching to me never happens at all. So I have zero desire to bash Christians or Christianity. Live and let live.
If I did have a beef with Christians, it would be that damn few of them really understand the Bible. Were I an argumentative person, I'd arm myself with Bible quotes explaining what's really being revealed and have fun hammering the oh-so-shallow Christians I have met. But nah. Not important to me at all. Believe whatever you wish.
Every Christian is a Christian merely because of geography. Had you been born in Arabia, you'd be an unquestioning muslim. You know it's true. Geography.
So be happy in your belief system.
[ + ] ReformedNPC
[ - ] ReformedNPC 0 points 1.2 yearsMar 22, 2023 22:20:22 ago (+0/-0)
"Every man mistakes the limits of his vision for the limits of the world... We will gradually become indifferent to what goes on in the minds of other people when we acquire a knowledge of the superficial nature of their thoughts, the narrowness of their views and of the number of their errors. Whoever attaches a lot of value to the opinions of others pays them too much honour.” -- Arthur Schopenhauer
Carlo Maria Cipolla's five fundamental laws of stupidity:
1 Always and inevitably each of us underestimates the number of stupid individuals in circulation.
2 The probability that a given person is stupid is independent of any other characteristic possessed by that person.
3 A person is stupid if they cause damage to another person or group of people without experiencing personal gain, or even worse causing damage to themselves in the process.
4 Non-stupid people always underestimate the harmful potential of stupid people; they constantly forget that at any time anywhere, and in any circumstance, dealing with or associating themselves with stupid individuals invariably constitutes a costly error.
5 A stupid person is the most dangerous type of person there is.
[ + ] SocksOnCats
[ - ] SocksOnCats 0 points 1.2 yearsMar 22, 2023 12:51:21 ago (+0/-0)
Now, if you're a fucking degenerate, you can fuck her in the asshole because that can actually accommodate a much longer dick than can the average vagina. But that's just for you fucking degenerates (not many of which I hope are out here).
And while some have said deepthroating is great for big dicks, I have to disagree. It's rare to find a female with talent and willingness enough to do well in this department.
You know what? Just stop thinking about it. Stay away from women. Focus on improving yourself. Go out and lift some weights. Learn to openly chastise the jew - and do so with regularity. Pick up a new skill. Be useful. Improve society. Set a good example.
Do all of this and the right hole will come to you and you won't have to worry about how deep it goes.
[ + ] PotatoWhisperer2
[ - ] PotatoWhisperer2 0 points 1.2 yearsMar 22, 2023 12:22:27 ago (+0/-0)
Literally tens of thousands of years.
Maybe, but then there's these fuckers. You guys need to clean out your own house before stepping out.
[ + ] dingbat
[ - ] dingbat 0 points 1.2 yearsMar 22, 2023 11:37:49 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Doglegwarrior
[ - ] Doglegwarrior 0 points 1.2 yearsMar 22, 2023 11:33:14 ago (+0/-0)
The pedophile camal fuckers
Muslims hate
Jews
Faggots
Feminist
Hmmmmm most Christian churches love
Jews
Faggots
Feminist
[ + ] Grospoliner
[ - ] Grospoliner 0 points 1.2 yearsMar 22, 2023 10:09:59 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] GoatWarVet
[ - ] GoatWarVet 0 points 1.2 yearsMar 22, 2023 10:00:40 ago (+0/-0)
Lol not a chance. They've been programmed to hate it. Most of them are stupid puppets simply repeating the narrative without realizing it or they are siding with what they perceive to be the majority. Useless cowards in other words. Good luck relying on them for anything when it comes down to it.
[ + ] HeyJames
[ - ] HeyJames 0 points 1.2 yearsMar 22, 2023 08:45:06 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 0 points 1.2 yearsMar 22, 2023 07:31:58 ago (+2/-2)
They didn't just create communism and islam and christianity, the world's three biggest and most successful control schemes. They also created satanism and new age movements and Ayn Rand and dozens of other control schemes. And they regularly turn their control schemes against each other because the conflict draws people in and reinforces support for their movements.
[ + ] MaryXmas
[ - ] MaryXmas 0 points 1.2 yearsMar 22, 2023 06:55:48 ago (+0/-0)
Just my feelings. Fight when you get the opportunity and make people feel uncomfortable.
[ + ]deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 1.2 yearsMar 22, 2023 06:54:15 ago (+0/-0)*
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 0 points 1.2 yearsMar 22, 2023 05:42:11 ago (+1/-1)
Your consent to the suggestions of others not only gives them the power of your consent to define; redefine and contradict everything suggested to you, it also tempts you to ignore the perceivable world (reality) for the suggestions of others (fiction).
In simple...nature communicates perceivable sound, others tempt you with suggested words to ignore it.
As for religions...every one of them is based upon choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law, just like ENTER TAME MENT (to enter and tame mind/memory with suggested information).
...to whatever others are suggesting you. Your consent to do that tempts you to ignore that nature is wholly perceivable before anyone within can shape a suggestion about it. Only nature offers, those within tempt each other to ignore everything nature offers for what they offer each other...like for example names to brand everything around you, hence shaping a fictitious layer upon reality; prices upon everything to get you to consent to pay for them, authorities above your "free will of choice" or rules of behavior to restrict your choices.
All suggested information represents "bullshit-layering" upon perceivable inspiration, yet the few don't represent "mastermind"...the many willingly consent to be "slavemind", which the few are parasitically exploiting.
The few represent the consequences of the ignorant many...if each one of the many ignores being free will of choice within perceivable for the suggested choices of others, then the few become the "chosen ones" aka the few ones using choice among many ones shirking response-ability (free will of choice).
Perceivable represents value; perceiving represents evaluation...suggested money tempts those who consent to a) devalue themselves b) ignore perceivable value c) give those suggesting money the means to bury them under exponentially increasing debt, while preventing them access to everything costing money.
The highest value in existence represents evaluation...each one wields it, even when ignored.
Choice exists at the center of balance...as long as one's alive, one can choose to go left/right; up/down; forwards/backwards, yet always remain at center. Try it...make step to the left, and it implies coming from a right. Now make another step to the left, and it still implies coming from a right...there is no left or right; only choice at the center of a balance based system. Balance represents the momentum of motion (inception towards death) for those within (life).
As long as one chooses to dig, the choice to go deeper remains. The foundation for all form (life) represents flow (inception towards death).
[ + ] Clubberlang
[ - ] Clubberlang 0 points 1.2 yearsMar 22, 2023 09:49:49 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] TheYiddler
[ - ] TheYiddler -1 points 1.2 yearsMar 22, 2023 05:54:44 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] Monica
[ - ] Monica -1 points 1.2 yearsMar 22, 2023 08:55:27 ago (+0/-1)
believes a book written a thousand years ago that says a man walked on water and was the son of god...
lol
You can't make this stuff up folks! Clown world continues! Honk honk honk!
[ + ] Belfuro
[ - ] Belfuro 0 points 1.2 yearsMar 22, 2023 15:25:52 ago (+0/-0)
Big bang was real.
Gravity was a force.
Gravity and speed of light are constants.
Electricity is where electrons flow like water bearing power.
Homo sapiens is a species.
Human civilization is 6000 years old.
Global floods never happened.
Basically you worshipped scientism.
Hypocrite.
[ + ] Monica
[ - ] Monica 0 points 1.2 yearsMar 23, 2023 05:10:30 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Belfuro
[ - ] Belfuro 0 points 1.2 yearsMar 23, 2023 14:36:24 ago (+0/-0)
You and I both know that you have believed scientism in your life.
And this list of falsehoods taught as truth in scientism is incomplete.
Step up and be a man. Talk about your time worshipping scientism and how you are shocked that some of what I wrote are actually false ideas
[ + ] Razzoriel
[ - ] Razzoriel -1 points 1.2 yearsMar 22, 2023 08:22:26 ago (+0/-1)
Catholics with good cathechesis could explain many concepts well and the reasoning to maintain tradition. That gradually went sideways in the 60s due to Vatican II.