×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
4

The USA Isn’t in Need of a Divorce or Secession – A Restructuring Is Probably a Better Answer.

submitted by localsal to whatever 2.3 yearsMar 11, 2023 17:14:49 ago (+5/-1)     (whatever)

Too much diversity is the problem (along with too many people) and the disenfranchised citizens are getting fed up.

After making this comment

https://www.talk.lol/viewpost?postid=640bc64fd86cf&commentid=640bda55b96fd

I thought about some options and settled on a restructuring idea.

Borders are obviously "traditional" and set up by slave owners - so libtards shouldn't really object to the plan.

One way to restructure would be by direct population numbers inside a border. Another would be by county populations. The fact that pedo joe* can (((win))) the presidency with a minuscule fraction of the 3200 counties in the USA shows how bad the current setup is. (I know he didn't "win", but the end observation is still valid)

The restructuring solution would be to adjust borders to encompass a more direct and equal representation. Big population centers like NYC could become a state to represent their populations, and then the remaining outlying areas could be joined to form a different state, and set up to matching populations.

The question of (((who))) gets to gerrymander the borders would need to be settled fairly though.

The number of states could be kept the same, just with different borders, or new states - like Jefferson - could be broken off.

Along with the new states, new electoral representation could be devised.

I particularly think the representation in the First Congress is a good model - each Representative actually is elected by and represents about 20,000 people. The current model where each US Representative accounts for about 800,000 people is insane.

Yes, this would make the US House of Representatives consist of around 18,000 elected members, but, logistics aside, that would be a much better outcome than what is happening now.

The number of Senators could also be adjusted if desired.

The optimal outcome is to prevent the huge urban areas from dictating policies to the rest of the citizens, much like the west coast does, and NYC, and Chicago, etc. How all these major cities generate the disenfranchised citizens is because of a) the libtarded utopia ideals that come from urban living, and b) the shift in the culture from agrarian and self sufficiency to urban "efficiencies".

The diversity of cultures in living styles, not just by race, is what causes the huge chasm between outlying low population areas and the major urban areas that ultimately dictate policy.



14 comments block


[ - ] GoldenAgeWhen 0 points 2.3 yearsMar 12, 2023 08:26:09 ago (+0/-0)

States need to be fixed as well. Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Missouri, Nebraska, Wisconsin, etc. Have very similar demographics except in the cities. These cities dictate the very different laws the people live under.
At city level 51% woke means 100% of city council, school board, etc. is woke.

[ - ] RMGoetbbels 0 points 2.3 yearsMar 11, 2023 20:14:37 ago (+0/-0)

A Flat Tax, with no exemptions, for everyone at the same exact rate, an end to SS and Medicare and an end to all foreign aid would fix our financial problems.

A strict adherence to the 10th Amendment would fix our moral problems somewhat in that you could move to another state that better suits your needs.

There is too much power in Washington DC and it was never meant to be that way.

[ - ] Taxedtv 1 point 2.3 yearsMar 11, 2023 20:24:53 ago (+1/-0)

Compulsory taxation is a jew concept. Government should compete like everyone else to limit its size and power.

[ - ] bonghits4jeebus 0 points 2.3 yearsMar 11, 2023 18:00:25 ago (+0/-0)

You could probably increase the number of representatives. I don't know what you think you'd be achieving though.

It would be interesting if representatives were "anonymous." They just voted for the people and didn't talk. I have no idea how you would enforce that, though.

[ - ] localsal [op] 0 points 2.3 yearsMar 11, 2023 18:11:18 ago (+0/-0)

As a thought experiment, assume each representative got elected by 10 people, and was accountable to those 10 people. Would that representative be easy to sway? Or would that representative be hard to find and "correct" if they didn't represent the will of the 10?

Now expand that to 20,000 people. Accountability is increased, elections are easier to monitor, voices are easier to hear, etc.

A lot harder to bribe 18,000 people than it is to bribe 435...

[ - ] bonghits4jeebus 0 points 2.3 yearsMar 11, 2023 18:13:27 ago (+0/-0)*

Not really, they just get bribed for less.

Think about that Santos con man. He will probably -- so far he's getting a vote, and how much could he sell that for?

With 18k of them, you'd have fewer eyes on them, and even more of the type of grifters you see in local government could get by.

Sometimes in local government that is not 1000% bad. At best, you have people who want to get things done bribing to get them done. Which is inefficient, but as long as the bribes are not massive does not throw a wrench in development.

[ - ] localsal [op] 0 points 2.3 yearsMar 11, 2023 18:17:04 ago (+0/-0)

Unfortunately for the filthy kikes, there is a "minimum" bribe level in most humans.

And much like the anti-work push to have talking about wages be encouraged, I would guess that everyone would eventually "find out" their position in the bribery scheme and complain to management. LOL.

[ - ] bonghits4jeebus 0 points 2.3 yearsMar 11, 2023 18:18:00 ago (+0/-0)

A lot of ppl would take 50k man. Especially to make a decision which they can just make up a reason to defend.

[ - ] localsal [op] 0 points 2.3 yearsMar 11, 2023 18:26:41 ago (+0/-0)

LMAO. 50k is 3 months salary...

18,000* 50,000 is 900,000,000 - that is no longer chump change, and will probably go much higher.

There is idealism on both ends.

I haven't heard anything, but I am curious how that truck driver from NJ is doing on resisting the (((government))) culture.
https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-local-correspondents/why-new-jersey-voters-picked-a-truck-driver-over-the-state-senate-president

[ - ] yesiknow 0 points 2.3 yearsMar 11, 2023 17:24:17 ago (+0/-0)

There's no such thing as farness

[ - ] Empire_of_the_Mind 0 points 2.3 yearsMar 11, 2023 17:24:03 ago (+0/-0)

What you're going to get is the federal government will fail, reverting everything to the States, then everyone fights over who controls the States.

[ - ] localsal [op] 1 point 2.3 yearsMar 11, 2023 17:28:22 ago (+1/-0)

Fighting over who controls the States is a much better answer.

Instead of trying to buy of 535 people for the feds, the filthy kikes will now have to buy off magnitudes more local politicians, who live among the voters and can easily be tarred and feathered.

[ - ] PotatoWhisperer2 0 points 2.3 yearsMar 11, 2023 19:07:17 ago (+0/-0)

Everything needs to be localized. Don't like my WN capitalist ethno-state? Detroit is thattaway>>>!