First, the world wars, and conflicts that you see are being used to domesticate europeans through dysgenic annihilation followed by policies forcing, coercing, rewarding, and promoting miscegenation.
Theres a few ways to stop world kikery. Some are focused on building general AI to anticipate and out maneuver the interlocking world regimes, others are working on bringing down world telecommunications by breaking the fundamentals of cryptography like prime factorization, others are building billion dollar companies to fund the logistics of actual wars, while others are working on large scale clandestine networks and programs.
What the global regime doesn't understand is europeans have two modes: imperial expansionism through multiple fronts (religion, trade, war), and instrumentality where many many people all pursue different approaches converging on a single solution.
There are only two ethnic groups that do this. The one currently running the world, judaism, and the other, currently being annihilated, europeans. The ones running things don't realize we have the same mode of solution seeking as them.
Theres some critical differences in the operation of these processes, and because of that world jewry keeps experiencing failures, pogroms, pushback, and defeats. I won't go into detail at the time, only that it boils down to the level of competitiveness of jews. Some of the pogroms, ensuing cultural adjustments, and technological innovation have allowed them to overcome the disadvantages entailed by excessive intra-ethnic competition, but the affect remains a net negative.
As time goes on, and they eventually experience defeat (again), and worse pogroms, the genetics affecting the level of competition will be adjusted accordingly, intensifying the conflict between europeans and judaism.
There are four competing outcomes that repeatedly crop-up from a many-models approach for projecting potential futures:
1. The extinction of judaism to globally emergent big-tent reactionary fundamentalism. This is the "intra-religious mosaic reunification" model I derived from examining the lessons of the baltics (christianity vs islam), as applied to an expanding fundamentalist trend across all religions during global instability--especially in the face of expansionist islam, both in the european sphere, and the asian sphere. It posits that there will be a coming period of "great powers" conflict, where the equivalent of 'wahhabism' will arise in other major religions, including christianinity, and buddhism, but taken to the level of international movements and officated bodies. These bodies will perhaps not take over their given regions, but become defacto major influencers in regional and national policies on everything, from major decisions about who to go to war with, to economic policy. And that at some time in this scenario an armistice will be reached, a 'big tent' third position will form, and all of this right at the time that global antisemitism is reaching its actual peak. With the various economic crises reaching critical levels at the time (global supplies of conflict minerals for example), the natural tendency will be to blame those who have historically ran things. This will lead to a resurgence in first, localized (national level) pogroms, becoming an outright international sentiment, before the world reverts to pre 1950s sentiments of judaism. With the existence of current technology, there will be no where to flee to, and the ghettoization, if not stealth sterilization by (unwritten/unspoken) government policy, will commence in earnest, one nation after another.
It will simply look like plummeting jewish birth rates, and over a generation, perhaps 100 years, the last jews will vanish. The culture itself will continue, picked up by adopters, for another paltry 100-300 years, but the inheritors of it will themselves not be jews by blood.
2. The extinction of humanity. This is the "ethnic-pathological loop" that sees a broader culture-forcing deriving from the over-success of one particular ethnic group, and the structural pathologies that arise economically, politically, socially, and ecologically--from their groups particular psychology writ-large.
3. The eventual sublimation of judaism (genetically) into the larger body of humanity, leading to the loss of them genetically, while the culture continues on for perhaps another 500-1000 years. This is the "fading diaspora" model.
4. The integration of judaism into the europeans, or vice-versa, with a moderate risk of repeated euro-judaic genocides by larger groups (south america integrated as a bloc, or perhaps by eurasia or a greater unified asia), in say, the next 100-300 years. This is the "vanished to secularism" model which is the most likely outcome in the near future.
One of these four models is very likely to highly likely the correct prediction about what will become of judaism.
I have been careful to simulate everything from integration rates, to the dynamical effects of regime type on harvests and resource extraction to the knock-on-effect of political-forcing of inter-ethnic conflict typically used by regimes to maintain power.
The model is primarily culture-oriented (ethnicity + long term sentiments) with heavy reliance on the type theory of regimes (autocracy, hybrid/partial democracy, democracy). I've not only modeled this in relation to official states, but also to cultural power centers, economics such as syndicates, and the effects of single-influencer drop-out (what happens if tomorrow orthodox judaism stops being relevant? What happens culturally if israel disappears off the map for some reason? What happens if fox news goes bankrupt? What happens if a mega-donor stops donating) across simulations. The size of a network, like a geographic territory, governs the length of its existence, and this relationship can be extended to any trend, movement, or organization. On this basis I modelled lifetime relationships, and predicted across categories, rather than individual organisms, the rate of 'die off' and how it changed the outcome of scenarios.
Out of all simulations, the four most common outcomes were the ones listed above.
Judaism as a culture very likely has less than a thousand years to live. They will either be pogromed, mixed out of existence, fade into irrelevance, or alternatively, take over the world, with a very high probability global civilization (maybe not mankind, but civilization) goes extinct, and we descend into a very long period of (relatively) high tech feudalism, perhaps 2000-3000 years in length at the extreme.
[ + ] zongongo
[ - ] zongongo 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 9, 2023 15:07:05 ago (+0/-0)
This is why I come here every day.
💪🏻💪🏻
[ + ] prototype
[ - ] prototype [op] 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 23, 2023 23:20:56 ago (+0/-0)
Anyway thanks.
[ + ] yesiknow
[ - ] yesiknow 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 9, 2023 14:27:22 ago (+1/-1)
Christians and Muslims and Asian Buddhists have no choice if they don't want to either die or live in servitude to jews as the abusive scavenger elites.
There 2 and a half billion Christians, and about 2 billion muslims with zero reason to abide, tolerate or stand their abuse.
[ + ] Peleg
[ - ] Peleg 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 9, 2023 20:33:22 ago (+0/-0)
— Daniel 7:18 (KJV)
This says that the saints of the most High will TAKE the kingdom.
Like you said, it does not say that the Christ will do it in bodily material form.
I look forward to that day. I hope that I live to see it, and I am healthy enough to participate, and I make a good showing for my family.
[ + ] prototype
[ - ] prototype [op] 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 23, 2023 23:30:32 ago (+0/-0)
basically this. There is a good probability of a large scale long-term conflict between the islamic world and christian culture (thin the 100 years war, though in this case it might be more like 20-30 years long instead). The premise is the inter-ethnic churn of religious violence inverts the typical pattern of jews benefiting, to jews being mutually targetted, both nationally (israel) and organizationally. The enemy of my enemy ceases to be my friend. They don't have the global population density to revert this change of sentiment in that kind of conflict. See the model of the armenian genocide in support of oil interests for details (they were the weakest faction out of three possible factions europeans could support, and so they got targetted for removal in order to stabilize the region). Orthodox judaism may be a recognition of this problem seeing as its birth rate is so high, but it is significantly losing credibility due, once again, to intra-ethnic conflict, so my opinion is that there is a fair (30-40%) probability that the orthodox movement will not be sufficient to increase their global population density sufficiently that they aren't targetted during conflict between christians and muslims.
This also suggests that corporatism (which is cannabalizing the remainders of the nation-state system, even as you read this) loses significant influence or power in the future. That this model somehow bifurcates or fails in some major way down the line, starting in just the next couple of decades. I don't know what the trigger for this will be, only that there will be a widespread social, political, economic, and possibly paramilitary diaspora of the global western public away from corporate power or stakeholder capitalism (managerialism, etc, though I'm painting with a broad brush here and playing fast and loose with the terminology).
The power vacuum invites religion as the new major system, which is actually in line with the predictions of even the very best pro-regime experts, of a sort of emerging neo-feudalism.
[ + ] yesiknow
[ - ] yesiknow 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 23, 2023 23:56:40 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] prototype
[ - ] prototype [op] 0 points 2.1 yearsApr 4, 2023 10:10:08 ago (+0/-0)
I'm not surprised. It bodes unwell for the global liberal tendencies of judaism.
[ + ] prototype
[ - ] prototype [op] -1 points 2.2 yearsMar 9, 2023 14:42:35 ago (+0/-1)
I like to sometimes compare revelations to a handbook or manual explaining the mass-psychology and other factors, that will, as describe in metaphor, lead to 'the apocalypse', (for some definition of 'apocalypse').
Imagine it as the condensed wisdom of thousands of social engineers over perhaps ten thousand years, broadly extrapolating what the end of an age (if not the world) might look like, steeped in allegory, imagery, and metaphor, because they lacked the technical language to more precisely describe the concepts at a sufficient level of abstraction.
Eschatology could be a social science if given more love. Carl Jung gave it a go, but I don't think even he fully understood the implications of communicating specific concepts and hard social phenomenon across many generations using 'sticks and stones' storytelling as the only scientific formula.
Society suffers from a collective generational forgetting of every lesson we ever learn. Even the people who run the world in their respective parts, suffer from this. What is required is perhaps a new religion, or perhaps not, but a new spirituality that looks at mans urge toward the divine as a hard process, and what can be learned from that, composing a culture that endeavors to transmit this knowledge at all costs, above and before all others.
We have the science to preserve knowledge for thousands of years. What we lack is the science to preserve and transmit wisdom for the same length of time.
[ + ] yesiknow
[ - ] yesiknow 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 9, 2023 19:02:22 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Lordbananafist
[ - ] Lordbananafist -2 points 2.2 yearsMar 9, 2023 15:19:49 ago (+0/-2)
jews have to be alive prior to the apocalypse for your story to be accurate.
fag.
[ + ] Kozel
[ - ] Kozel -1 points 2.2 yearsMar 9, 2023 17:50:15 ago (+0/-1)