Evolution does not exist. Species don't undergo slow changes over the course of millennium. We were all intelligently designed, our entire realm is. Then we have environment and adaption that causes instantaneous change from generation to generation. Species adapt to their environment and undergo genetic changes in the womb, Darwinian evolution is a theory, has never been proven and no alternatives have been offered to us.
Genus Homo hasn’t existed for more than 2 million years.
There is no proof that humankind has been around longer than 1000 years let alone millions. What scientific experiments could me or you do to prove the theory of evolution? The fact that the theory posits slow change over the course of centuries to millennia automatically disqualifies it from any sort of scientific experiment. Nobody can reproduce the claims made by those that believe in evolution, instead they only regurgitate the opinion of "experts" in that field. Unless you have access to a time machine that is.
Edit: now if you want to know why niggers are so stupid. It is solely because they inhabited ecological paradises. They didn't have to prepare for harsh winters like our White ancestors did. Niggers had everything close to their vicinity so they never had a reason to invent anything like rafts or boats to sail to other land like our ancestors did. This is adaption, not evolution.
You're regurgitating religious talking points that did not originate from you. Christianity is descended from judaism. It is the religion of enslavement.
Which religious talking points am I regurgitating? I am stating a fact that we are intelligently designed. We didn't come about from a puddle of organisms that evolved into human beings over millions of years. We have always been human beings since our beginning. I don't subscribe to any religion either.
Almost everything you said is untrue. I have wasted time refuting arguments like this about a hundred times on this site. But Im not inclined to waste my time today. Youve decided what you believe based on feelings and you have selected available pseudo scientific explanations to suit your position.
It is solely because they inhabited ecological paradises. They didn't have to prepare for harsh winters like our White ancestors did. Niggers had everything close to their vicinity so they never had a reason to invent anything like rafts or boats to sail to other land like our ancestors did. This is adaption, not evolution.
It is evolution. Youve just described how evolution made us different. A high meat diet was availble in cold north eurasian environments which promoted “patriarchy” and monogamy, regimes where dads are responsible for feeding their offspring. Polygamy is a strategy where men reproduce with as many women as possible by murdering each other, and they dont focus on taking care of kids. It is more frequent in tropical climates for the reasons you mentioned. Natural darwinian selection favored one type of behavior in the tropics and a different one in temperate and sub arctic climates. This process entails mother nature “killing off” lineages that dont behave in useful ways according to their environment.
Additional (darwinian, gentic ) adaptations occured after the agricultural revolution in the neolithic which led to modern white people.
If you dont understand why what youve said actually supports evolution, then you dont understand evolutionary theory. Adaptation occurs intergenrationally at the genetic level. Sexual reproduction creates alot of different “models” and the genetic combinations best suited to an environment will propagate the most.
Youve just described how evolution made us different.
No, it isn't evolution and we were never monkeys, we were never a fucking single organism that eventually "evolved" into humans. It is adaption and it isn't always beneficial to the survival of the species.
If you dont understand why what youve said actually supports evolution, then you dont understand evolutionary theory.
It is clearly you who doesn't understand the idiotic theory of evolution. The entire point of the theory is to create a godless existence for the kikes cattle.
I have had these discussions with you in the past and you understood you were incorrectly using the word evolution instead of adaption. You think the 2 words can be interchanged for some reason. They can't because evolution is a kike theory that has never been proven.
Edit: And to top it of Darwin was a incest pedo fuckwit who married his own blood family. Creating literal retarded spawns akin to niggers.
Randall Carlson has recently alluded to evidence of Homo Sapiens dating back jn the millions of years though, but i've not seen anything to substantiate that.
That being said, the essence of the politicization of Anthropology is absolutely correct, as that's something I can speak to first hand from my time in college.
Im not too familiar with him. But I personally favor a multiregional model for human evolution which accounts for out of africa migrations but also relies on regional variants of homo that may retain the same adaptive regional traits while absorbing waves of “immigrants” over time.
Speciation is defined pretty arbitrarily imo. Who is to say homo erectus or heidelbergensis are not homo sapien? At what point does homo sapien “start”? They all seemed to be reproductively compatible with modern humans. In such a scenario, separate groups of homo are just passing system updates back and forth to each other between continents. Who can say who isnt a homo sapien?
Africans have simply lagged behind on a lot of recent updates. But I dont think that modern civilized white guys were running around with neolithic or bronze age technologies and economies 1 million years ago or even 50,000 years ago. Our hi IQs (greater than 75 or 80) is a adaptation that has occured mostly in the last 10 thousand years, maybe 20.
Wade's controversial book, "A Troublesome Inheritance: Genes, Race and Human History," argued that human races are a biological reality and that recent human evolution has led to racial differences in economic and social behavior. More than 130 population geneticists denounced the book at the time, including some of whom Wade had cited who said he had misrepresented their work.
[ + ] yesiknow
[ - ] yesiknow 9 points 1.2 yearsMar 7, 2023 21:31:40 ago (+9/-0)
[ + ] SumerBreeze
[ - ] SumerBreeze 4 points 1.2 yearsMar 7, 2023 22:20:53 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] GayPatriot1969
[ - ] GayPatriot1969 -8 points 1.2 yearsMar 8, 2023 01:24:19 ago (+0/-8)
[ + ] yesiknow
[ - ] yesiknow 0 points 1.2 yearsMar 8, 2023 14:13:56 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] ModernGuilt
[ - ] ModernGuilt 5 points 1.2 yearsMar 7, 2023 22:14:52 ago (+5/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 2 points 1.2 yearsMar 7, 2023 23:50:56 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] BlueEyedAngloMasterRaceGod
[ - ] BlueEyedAngloMasterRaceGod 2 points 1.2 yearsMar 8, 2023 00:49:03 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 1.2 yearsMar 8, 2023 10:53:55 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt 2 points 1.2 yearsMar 8, 2023 03:11:58 ago (+3/-1)*
There is no proof that humankind has been around longer than 1000 years let alone millions. What scientific experiments could me or you do to prove the theory of evolution? The fact that the theory posits slow change over the course of centuries to millennia automatically disqualifies it from any sort of scientific experiment. Nobody can reproduce the claims made by those that believe in evolution, instead they only regurgitate the opinion of "experts" in that field. Unless you have access to a time machine that is.
Edit: now if you want to know why niggers are so stupid. It is solely because they inhabited ecological paradises. They didn't have to prepare for harsh winters like our White ancestors did. Niggers had everything close to their vicinity so they never had a reason to invent anything like rafts or boats to sail to other land like our ancestors did. This is adaption, not evolution.
[ + ] ZyklonDryCleaners
[ - ] ZyklonDryCleaners 1 point 1.2 yearsMar 8, 2023 06:28:03 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] doginventer
[ - ] doginventer 1 point 1.2 yearsMar 8, 2023 06:57:29 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt 0 points 1.2 yearsMar 8, 2023 20:09:01 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 1.2 yearsMar 8, 2023 11:26:08 ago (+0/-0)
It is evolution. Youve just described how evolution made us different. A high meat diet was availble in cold north eurasian environments which promoted “patriarchy” and monogamy, regimes where dads are responsible for feeding their offspring. Polygamy is a strategy where men reproduce with as many women as possible by murdering each other, and they dont focus on taking care of kids. It is more frequent in tropical climates for the reasons you mentioned. Natural darwinian selection favored one type of behavior in the tropics and a different one in temperate and sub arctic climates. This process entails mother nature “killing off” lineages that dont behave in useful ways according to their environment.
Additional (darwinian, gentic ) adaptations occured after the agricultural revolution in the neolithic which led to modern white people.
If you dont understand why what youve said actually supports evolution, then you dont understand evolutionary theory. Adaptation occurs intergenrationally at the genetic level. Sexual reproduction creates alot of different “models” and the genetic combinations best suited to an environment will propagate the most.
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt 0 points 1.2 yearsMar 8, 2023 20:15:01 ago (+0/-0)
No, it isn't evolution and we were never monkeys, we were never a fucking single organism that eventually "evolved" into humans. It is adaption and it isn't always beneficial to the survival of the species.
It is clearly you who doesn't understand the idiotic theory of evolution. The entire point of the theory is to create a godless existence for the kikes cattle.
I have had these discussions with you in the past and you understood you were incorrectly using the word evolution instead of adaption. You think the 2 words can be interchanged for some reason. They can't because evolution is a kike theory that has never been proven.
Edit: And to top it of Darwin was a incest pedo fuckwit who married his own blood family. Creating literal retarded spawns akin to niggers.
[ + ] I_am_baal
[ - ] I_am_baal 0 points 1.2 yearsMar 8, 2023 01:07:55 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Clueless_Enigma
[ - ] Clueless_Enigma 0 points 1.2 yearsMar 8, 2023 04:29:30 ago (+0/-0)
That being said, the essence of the politicization of Anthropology is absolutely correct, as that's something I can speak to first hand from my time in college.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 1.2 yearsMar 8, 2023 12:14:47 ago (+0/-0)
Speciation is defined pretty arbitrarily imo. Who is to say homo erectus or heidelbergensis are not homo sapien? At what point does homo sapien “start”? They all seemed to be reproductively compatible with modern humans. In such a scenario, separate groups of homo are just passing system updates back and forth to each other between continents. Who can say who isnt a homo sapien?
Africans have simply lagged behind on a lot of recent updates. But I dont think that modern civilized white guys were running around with neolithic or bronze age technologies and economies 1 million years ago or even 50,000 years ago. Our hi IQs (greater than 75 or 80) is a adaptation that has occured mostly in the last 10 thousand years, maybe 20.
[ + ] ModernGuilt
[ - ] ModernGuilt 0 points 1.2 yearsMar 8, 2023 14:31:24 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PotatoWhisperer2
[ - ] PotatoWhisperer2 0 points 1.2 yearsMar 8, 2023 11:50:18 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] DukeCanon
[ - ] DukeCanon 0 points 1.2 yearsMar 8, 2023 06:58:35 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Belfuro
[ - ] Belfuro 0 points 1.2 yearsMar 8, 2023 02:01:55 ago (+0/-0)