", faces trial on March 9th in the criminal court of Marseilles on charges of incitement to discrimination, hatred, or violence."
So if there was to be a group that was proven to be prone to violence or discrimination or hatred against people in a country or anywhere then it would be against the law to call that group out?
So how does that law commingle with people for example who would call out Chairman Mao or Pol pot or Stalin or Hitler and their followers for killing people? Because it seems like the law would prevent anybody from calling them out simply because they were a member of a group that were associated with violence or death or hatred or whatever.
charges of incitement to discrimination, hatred, or violence.
Notice this particular law covers 3 broad, and entirely subjective, topics. And even then only for speaking about them, not actually engaging in the broad ideas.
I agree. We need to squash bigotry before it gets out of hand. We don't need another wave of late-2010s fascism that elected the likes of Trump, Boris Johnson, and Bolsonaro.
Actually, you can. I know you don't have any statistics to back this up, and are simply regurgitating white supremacist propaganda. White men are the number 1 culprits of rape in every Western country.
[ + ] dulcima
[ - ] dulcima 6 points 2.2 yearsMar 6, 2023 05:29:35 ago (+6/-0)
[ + ] boekanier
[ - ] boekanier 7 points 2.2 yearsMar 6, 2023 07:39:52 ago (+7/-0)*
[ + ] Clubberlang
[ - ] Clubberlang 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 6, 2023 10:21:16 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] TopCitizen
[ - ] TopCitizen -6 points 2.2 yearsMar 6, 2023 11:21:44 ago (+0/-6)
[ + ] 9000timesempty
[ - ] 9000timesempty 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 6, 2023 11:28:25 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] squidicuz
[ - ] squidicuz 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 6, 2023 11:36:21 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] AryanPrime
[ - ] AryanPrime 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 6, 2023 12:07:50 ago (+0/-0)
nah fuck off and die kike filth, there was no holohoax, claiming there was is hate speech and slandering an ethnic group just as you said right?
[ + ] Crackinjokes
[ - ] Crackinjokes 4 points 2.2 yearsMar 6, 2023 08:37:37 ago (+4/-0)
So if there was to be a group that was proven to be prone to violence or discrimination or hatred against people in a country or anywhere then it would be against the law to call that group out?
So how does that law commingle with people for example who would call out Chairman Mao or Pol pot or Stalin or Hitler and their followers for killing people? Because it seems like the law would prevent anybody from calling them out simply because they were a member of a group that were associated with violence or death or hatred or whatever.
[ + ] PotatoWhisperer2
[ - ] PotatoWhisperer2 4 points 2.2 yearsMar 6, 2023 08:46:01 ago (+4/-0)
Notice this particular law covers 3 broad, and entirely subjective, topics. And even then only for speaking about them, not actually engaging in the broad ideas.
[ + ] Clubberlang
[ - ] Clubberlang 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 6, 2023 10:22:30 ago (+0/-0)
Is that redefined under the CDC as a war cry?
[ + ] TopCitizen
[ - ] TopCitizen -3 points 2.2 yearsMar 6, 2023 11:22:16 ago (+0/-3)
[ + ] RepublicanNerd
[ - ] RepublicanNerd 4 points 2.2 yearsMar 6, 2023 05:07:03 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] TopCitizen
[ - ] TopCitizen -4 points 2.2 yearsMar 6, 2023 11:23:02 ago (+0/-4)
[ + ] RepublicanNerd
[ - ] RepublicanNerd 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 6, 2023 15:30:12 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] yesiknow
[ - ] yesiknow 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2023 00:28:33 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Doglegwarrior
[ - ] Doglegwarrior 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 6, 2023 10:52:23 ago (+0/-0)
Can't deny that one
[ + ] TopCitizen
[ - ] TopCitizen -2 points 2.2 yearsMar 6, 2023 11:23:41 ago (+0/-2)