×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
3

It's a waste of time energy and resources to fight against the government removing restrictions or allowing what was once prohibited. The only acts of government which you should be resisting are the times when the government imposes restrictions upon you or forces you to do something.

submitted by AntiPostmodernist to whatever 2.3 yearsFeb 28, 2023 10:20:14 ago (+3/-0)     (whatever)

We could deal with equal rights being given to black people if we were still permitted to exercise our right to dissociate ourselves from blacks.

The issue wasn't gays being allowed to sodomize each other within the context of marriage, it was the government forcing people to bake the cake.

Any freedom could be dealt with by just forming communities in an area that do not allow that particular freedom to be exercised there.

You do not need the government to be involved in order to live apart from those who do something you do not approve of.

Heck, even the allowance of things like murder or rape aren't an issue so long as the people are given the complimentary freedom to police their own communities against what they deem to be rapists and murderers.

Freedom is never a problem, legal allowance is never the issue, the issue is always the opposite.

It's the lack of freedom, where you can't do something, or when you must do something, that's what tends to be the matter.

Individual suffering us not important to me, there will always be someone who undeservingly lives a nightmare life no matter how the system is structured, what matters to me is the health of society at large, and how best to improve the people as a whole.

My focus is on eugenics, I want the best quality people, and I judge their quality by what they can accomplish. That is my chief concern. I believe that to achieve this we should permit some degree of suffering or death, and freedom allows this to happen.

You will see the kind of society I want to build in my posting history, it's simultaneously authoritarian and libertarian, where rights are given only to a very select group of people.


9 comments block


[ - ] yesiknow 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 28, 2023 13:40:22 ago (+0/-0)

There's too many problems with the "others" that you have to always be patrolling and shooting. The nogs that were raping and robbing in the south and were hanged like any horse thief is being used against all Americans today by the jews.

[ - ] SkullFuckerSupreme 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 28, 2023 10:48:39 ago (+0/-0)

If you get near a powerful jew, kill it is my motto.

[ - ] JustALover 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 28, 2023 12:08:32 ago (+0/-0)

Don't worry, that will never happen.

The first part, not the last.

[ - ] noonefromnowhere 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 28, 2023 10:33:53 ago (+0/-0)

Cuckservatism is dead. Three generations of principled losers are enough. Lolbertarianism has failed.

[ - ] AntiPostmodernist [op] 1 point 2.3 yearsFeb 28, 2023 12:04:57 ago (+1/-0)

Conservatives and Libertarians are significantly different things from each other.

[ - ] noonefromnowhere 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 28, 2023 14:51:17 ago (+0/-0)

Yeah, but they both failed miserably.

[ - ] AntiPostmodernist [op] 1 point 2.3 yearsFeb 28, 2023 14:53:54 ago (+1/-0)

Libertarianism succeeded. What are you talking about?

[ - ] noonefromnowhere 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 28, 2023 19:40:39 ago (+0/-0)

Where?

[ - ] AntiPostmodernist [op] 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 28, 2023 21:05:39 ago (+0/-0)

USA is a notable example.

The problem with libertarianism is keeping the country libertarian.

There also needs to be some nationalism to give your country an edge over the others.

But in the economic and civil sense libertarianism works best.

The political axis is where the idea needs some work.