The Me 163. Gave some guys the real test pilot experience that you don't walk away from. And it wasn't flown that much so individually the odds are pretty bad.
A faked passport for Adolf Hitler made during the second world war by British intelligence officers was made public for the first time yesterday.
The faked Hitler passport was doctored to make him Jewish, carrying an entry visa for Palestine.
On the inside pages of Hitler's passport, a faked visa pass has also been stamped on behalf of the department of migration for the government of Palestine.
The visa states that Hitler is "permitted to remain permanently in Palestine as an immigrant", is dated the July 19, 1941, and signed by the inspector of migration.
A war the jews wanted, a war that Hitler provided to them. Hitler put Germany in a situation that could only lead to its destruction. Anyone who thinks that Hitler's attack on the Soviet Union was the correct move is using nothing but lousy cope arguments. As soon as Hitler put Germany in a two front war, that was it, the war was over for them, Germany was on borrowed time and nothing else.
Germany launched Barbarossa as a pre-emptive strike to catch the massing Soviets off guard and rip the dogshit out of them.
Explain to me these couple of questions then. If the Soviet Union had planned to invade near the start of WW2, why would Stalin;
A. Kill off his best Generals before the start WW2 and shortly after the start of war.
B. Through the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact, The Soviet Union provided Germany with resources and material and plenty of gas, that not only helped in Germany's war effort on Western Front, but the amount Germany had received from the Soviet Union is what enabled Germany to initiate Operation Barbarossa in the first place.
C. Why did Stalin ignore the multiple warnings he received from Soviet Intelligence that Germany was planning an attack on the Soviet Union based on their troop movements towards the East and did not prepare his defenses accordingly?
If the Soviet Union had plans to invade Germany, it sure wasn't as early as 1941..
And they did just that.
And that worked out just wonderfully did it not? The point of history is to see where things went wrong and not emulate them, not to find them and then excuse them away, giving room to repeat the very same mistake again. This constant need to justify Hitler's bad decisions is absolutely pathetic.
You do understand that one of the reasons for Hitler invading Poland and to secure a non-aggression pact with the Soviet Union was so that he would secure Germany's eastern border and to avoid a two front war? He said it himself in one of the letters he had sent to Mussolini. So Hitler knew the dangers of putting Germany in a two front war, but despite this he still attacks the Soviet Union while the war still raged on in the Western Front.
Stupid bastard. You don't get to have an opinion on anything related to the Reich. Ever.
Let me translate what you said; You don't get to have a negative opinion on anything related to the Reich. Ever. You only get to praise and worship the Reich.
Kill off his best Generals before the start WW2 and shortly after the start of war.
There were other factions in the USSR all vying for power. Trotsky, Stalin, and another man... Bukharev or something I can't remember at all, were the sort of "big 3". Trotsky was eventually forced out of the USSR and later on was killed with a pickaxe in Mexico. Ramon Mercader did it, he was a Spanish communist.
Stalin knew there were more than a few generals with either anti-communist sympathies or were loyal to another faction. All Stalin was doing was cleaning house. He didn't care about getting rid of generals pre-war or during, because in his eyes a potentially disloyal general may as well be the same as no general at all if not worse. I believe Zhukov was one of these generals under suspicion, but he became so much of a hero to dedicated Soviets in the citizenry and government that Stalin really couldn't get rid of him.
B. Through the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact, The Soviet Union provided Germany with resources and material and plenty of gas, that not only helped in Germany's war effort on Western Front, but the amount Germany had received from the Soviet Union is what enabled Germany to initiate Operation Barbarossa in the first place.
And Germany had already made other deals with the USSR for joint training academies, research efforts, and a few other things. Germany offered up assistance to the Soviets before Molotov-Ribbentrop, and I believe even after. The trade of resources to the Reich was moreso making things square in terms of what was given vs. received. The Reich didn't HAVE to partition Poland at all if they didn't wish to. It was simply a "hey, want a large swathe of free land, non-aggression pact, and all you need to do is send us some stuff so we can kick Allied ass?". It was a fair deal, apparently, else it wouldn't have gone through.
Everyone kinda knew that it wouldn't last however. Which is why the Soviets began, slowly, preparing for war against Germany. I would imagine they planned to strike a few years into the Allies vs. Axis war so both sides would be too depleted to do anything about the fresh and eager Red Army rushing through western Poland.
However, the Reich wasn't brainless and understood the peace would not last either, and began concocting plans of their own.
C. Why did Stalin ignore the multiple warnings he received from Soviet Intelligence that Germany was planning an attack on the Soviet Union based on their troop movements towards the East and did not prepare his defenses accordingly?
Hubris, paranoia of his own officers/advisors, and the fact that the Soviets weren't necessarily in a position to both fortify and prepare for attack. They are two opposite things and there wasn't enough time, equipment, or troops to do both. Yes, the Red Army was massive, but it had massive territory to cover. Stalin may have simply made the decision to acknowledge that the Germans MAY attack, but prepared for an attack on Germany at a later date anyway. It was a gamble and Stalin lost, if this was his thought process.
If the Soviet Union had plans to invade Germany, it sure wasn't as early as 1941..
And Germany didn't have plans to invade the USSR in 1941 either. Hell, they would have been content with forming an anti-communist alliance with the French, British, Polish, and anyone else who would listen. They even set the foundation with the anti-comintern pact or something of a similar name, I can't remember. It's why Germany sent troops and equipment to Spain, to ensure Spain didn't flip communist. If it did, France was sure to follow as it too had a sizeable amount of communist support. You can see that as a total fact when you look into the French Resistance and how they were just as likely to try killing each other for not being the proper color red.
Which is, as a side note, partly why we only airdropped those cheap ass pistols to "French Resistance" forces. The government feared dropping in a bunch of rifles, grenades, and the like would only cause a sort of French civil war. Good for causing chaos the Reich had to manage, but for the Allies trying to LIBERATE France and restore her democracy... Not so good.
And that worked out just wonderfully did it not?
It did. Barbarossa was an absolutely astounding success, making the blitz through the Ardennes look small in comparison. It was the largest invasion in history and went off practically without a hitch. The issue was when Germany reached Leningrad, Stalingrad, and the "outer outskirts" of Moscow near places like Rzhev. Their supply lines simply stretched too far and Allied bombing raids didn't necessarily help the situation. And Germany's allies... Well, they weren't exactly perfect. Stalingrad was lost not due to German incompetence (though Goering was a fool for bombing the city first, preventing tanks from maneuvering in the streets) but because Romanian or Hungarian divisions couldn't hold the flank.
The point of history is to see where things went wrong and not emulate them, not to find them and then excuse them away, giving room to repeat the very same mistake again.
Of course. I never argued that.
This constant need to justify Hitler's bad decisions is absolutely pathetic.
You say this because the Reich lost. If they had won or achieved a peace deal, the invasion would be seen as potential for a loss at worst, and a brilliant stroke at best. Not a mistake.
So Hitler knew the dangers of putting Germany in a two front war, but despite this he still attacks the Soviet Union while the war still raged on in the Western Front.
Two things.
1. Read everything I've previously said.
2. "raged on the Western front" is... No. France was under complete control, Spain wasn't a threat, Italy was still fucking around in the deserts of North Africa, all Germany had to do was garrison the coast and prepare defenses, which they did. The war in the West was relegated to Greece and North Africa, both much smaller theatres of war that don't require or necessarily "want" massive amounts of troops due to logistics. Garrisons didn't need to be top of the line infantry, but there to simply soak up damage against any potential Allied landing until the main force arrives. If that. In 1944, Rommel was going fucking nuts trying to get the panzers positioned on the beach like he wanted, but higher ups said no.
Let me translate what you said;
No, you don't have the fucking privilege of translating shit without my authorization. Not a fucking soul on this Earth that matters gave you the right to put words in my mouth.
The Reich made mistakes, as does any force for good other than Christ himself. There's no debate there. But you are dancing on the table screaming THEY LOST LOL NAZI BAD TRUMP IS GOD MAGA 2024 and acting like you have literally ANY right to talk about these things you are so ignorant about.
Stalin knew there were more than a few generals with either anti-communist sympathies or were loyal to another faction. All Stalin was doing was cleaning house. He didn't care about getting rid of generals pre-war or during, because in his eyes a potentially disloyal general may as well be the same as no general at all if not worse. I believe Zhukov was one of these generals under suspicion, but he became so much of a hero to dedicated Soviets in the citizenry and government that Stalin really couldn't get rid of him.
You don't clean house of your military command when you're planning to assault a formidable nation such as Germany in the very near future. It's retarded. Period. Even Hitler realized that the Soviet Union was apprehensive towards Germany in 1940 and 1941 and was not capable at that time to conduct an invasion against Germany.
And Germany had already made other deals with the USSR for joint training academies, research efforts, and a few other things. Germany offered up assistance to the Soviets before Molotov-Ribbentrop, and I believe even after. The trade of resources to the Reich was moreso making things square in terms of what was given vs. received.
You mean the Rapallo Treaty? Yes, that continued on with Hitler under the Berlin Treaty.
"hey, want a large swathe of free land, non-aggression pact, and all you need to do is send us some stuff so we can kick Allied ass?"
Yes, Hitler was so kind to give the Soviet Union access to the Baltic States, I am sure Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, and parts of Romania appreciated having their country be under the rule of Stalin's regime and the deadly repression that came with it. Because of this pact, Soviet Union increased its population by over 20 million in just a single year. And before you come back with ''but Germany planned to annex these territories'', well yes they did, and that didn't last long as they were reclaimed after WW2 with only minor adjustments and they were part of the Soviet Union until its phony collapse. So the Soviet Union still kept the gains which was made possible first because of the German-Soviet pact.
Everyone kinda knew that it wouldn't last however. Which is why the Soviets began, slowly, preparing for war against Germany
And that's why they also sent material that could be used against (and was used) them in war?
I would imagine they planned to strike a few years into the Allies vs. Axis war so both sides would be too depleted to do anything about the fresh and eager Red Army rushing through western Poland
You seem to not understand that TIME is a very valuable thing in war and one of the things any nation fighting a war wants to do, is to avoid a two-front war. If the Soviets was going to invade Germany it would be years after 1941, that would be beneficial to Germany as that would have given them more time to defeat Britain, thus, avoiding a two-front war..
And I personally believe that Germany would have had a better chance of winning the war if Russia was the attacker, then they wouldn't have to deal with all the issues that come with attacking a country that is as large as Russia. To make it seem as if Germany was in a rush to attack the Soviet Union in fear that the Soviet Union might strike back first as if that would put Germany in a worse spot is stupid. Just look at the Winter War and how that went for the Soviet Union, and that was Finland, not Germany. Also diplomatically, It wouldn't be as easy for the U.S. to provide the Soviet Union lend-lease if they were the aggressors without making themselves look awfully bad internationally. Not to mention if Stalin attacks Germany, he would run the risk of starting a civil war in Russia because of the internal issues that were facing the Soviet Union at that time and the mass number of people who hated Stalin and his jew regime.
And Germany didn't have plans to invade the USSR in 1941 either.
This is factually wrong. Plans were discussed to invade Russia happened as early as the summer of 1940. Hitler wanted to originally invade Russia in the autumn of 1940 but was persuaded otherwise because of the dreaded Russian winter and the supply lines in Poland that was needed to support the invading Germans were not sufficient enough yet. So the date was postponed to May 1941 only for it to be postponed again to June.
They even set the foundation with the anti-comintern pact or something of a similar name, I can't remember.
You mean that pact that went absolutely nowhere because it became more of an anti-Western pact than an anti-Comintern pact? Also, it was Germany that killed the anti-comintern with the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact.
It did. Barbarossa was an absolutely astounding success, making the blitz through the Ardennes look small in comparison. It was the largest invasion in history and went off practically without a hitch.
I am not talking about the early stages of the invasion but the end result. Who cares how successful they were in the beginning when the end result was disastrous? And the main objective of the invasion was stupid because it was to fight and destroy the Soviet army to the point where Stalin would surrender. But the Soviet Union was massive and covered a huge mass of land and thus Stalin could continuously buy more time and extend the conflict by having the Red Army retreat, regroup, and to fight another day. Just like what happened with Napoleon.
Stalingrad was lost not due to German incompetence (though Goering was a fool for bombing the city first, preventing tanks from maneuvering in the streets) but because Romanian or Hungarian divisions couldn't hold the flank.
Are you telling me that the failure of German intelligence to gather intel on the huge amount of reserves, equipment, and technology that the Soviet military possessed was not incompetence?
If Germany wanted to win the war, their focus should have been to supply and arm and incorporate the anti-Bolshevik element into the fighting in Russia against Stalin's jew regime. I don't need to tell you how many within the Soviet Union hated Stalin's regime and wanted it to fall.. That's why Germans were viewed as liberators by many when they arrived but did they make use of that big advantage to its fullest extent? Not even close. Only in 1944 did Germany make any effort to make use of this highly valuable asset, only by then, it was too late. This more than anything, was the biggest blunder, as this is what could have brought them victory. Not the silly objective of annihilating the Red Army until surrender by conventional warfare. That wasn't going to happen in a country as large as the USSR with the huge amount of manpower that was available to them.
''raged on the Western front" is... No''
U.S. and Britain were still in the war and the Eastern Front was still ongoing.. By early 1942, the odds were stacked so heavily against Germany that there was no way of Germany winning the war. Already by the late 1940, the British were regaining its strength as the U.S. support to Britain had increased heavily. And with Germany invading the Soviet Union, the focus on defeating Britain was not at the top of the priority list, which allowed them to continuously regain their strength thus when the U.S ''officially'' entered the war, Britain became the main base of operation of continuous murderous air raids from both Britain and the U.S on Germany and their occupied territory. This was made possible because of Hitler's decision to invade the Soviet Union before dealing with Britain first.
No, you don't have the fucking privilege of translating shit without my authorization. Not a fucking soul on this Earth that matters gave you the right to put words in my mouth.
Haha, oh boy the arrogance just shines through you, doesn't it? It's a pretty common characteristic with christcucks so I shouldn't be surprised..
The Reich made mistakes, as does any force for good other than Christ himself.
Yes, Rabbi Jesus was perfect wasn't he?
THEY LOST LOL NAZI BAD TRUMP IS GOD MAGA 2024
Oh and here you are putting words into my mouth while complaining that I did that to you. Hypocrisy is also another common characteristic amongst christcucks so yeah.
Listen, jew: You don't get to deny the Lord. You're just repeating the same bullshit anyway, but using different words.
Also, no, I'm not hypocritical at all putting words in your mouth. You did it to me, there's no reason not to do it right back. Not used to a goy retaliating are you?
Dismissed, jew. You don't have the privilege of replying to your superior.
They lost because of logistics. If your best weapons cost twice as much to build and can only be fielded in half the numbers of your opponents cheap crap, you will lose.
No, that was the SS purging the Strasserist SA kikes from the ranks. The SA, following the Strassers, were turning into NazBol bullshit and the SS nipped that fucking shit in the bud.
[ + ] Thyhorrorcosmic103
[ - ] Thyhorrorcosmic103 3 points 1.2 yearsFeb 27, 2023 06:15:20 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] bonghits4jeebus
[ - ] bonghits4jeebus 0 points 1.2 yearsFeb 27, 2023 04:21:56 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PhantomXLII
[ - ] PhantomXLII 0 points 1.2 yearsFeb 27, 2023 12:16:08 ago (+0/-0)
Yeah. Neat idea, terrible in practice.
[ + ] bonghits4jeebus
[ - ] bonghits4jeebus 0 points 1.2 yearsFeb 27, 2023 17:43:35 ago (+0/-0)
Wil-e-coyote may claim design on that one.
[ + ] IfuckedYerMum
[ - ] IfuckedYerMum 0 points 1.2 yearsFeb 27, 2023 04:20:21 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] JustALover
[ - ] JustALover 4 points 1.2 yearsFeb 27, 2023 06:12:40 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] Lordbananafist
[ - ] Lordbananafist 2 points 1.2 yearsFeb 27, 2023 07:52:05 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] PeckerwoodPerry
[ - ] PeckerwoodPerry 0 points 1.2 yearsFeb 27, 2023 08:23:17 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] didyouknow
[ - ] didyouknow 0 points 1.2 yearsFeb 27, 2023 08:53:39 ago (+0/-0)
https://archive.ph/QbrkM
[ + ] boekanier
[ - ] boekanier 1 point 1.2 yearsFeb 27, 2023 07:50:55 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] didyouknow
[ - ] didyouknow -2 points 1.2 yearsFeb 27, 2023 08:51:10 ago (+0/-2)
[ + ] PhantomXLII
[ - ] PhantomXLII 4 points 1.2 yearsFeb 27, 2023 12:11:08 ago (+4/-0)
Except the Soviets were going to attack anyway. They were massing troops to do exactly that.
Germany launched Barbarossa as a pre-emptive strike to catch the massing Soviets off guard and rip the dogshit out of them.
And they did just that.
But you're too much of an ignorant fuck to consider such a fact, and probably drone on about muh Rushin winterrrrr and how the T-34 saved Russia.
Stupid bastard. You don't get to have an opinion on anything related to the Reich. Ever.
[ + ] didyouknow
[ - ] didyouknow -1 points 1.2 yearsFeb 27, 2023 13:14:06 ago (+0/-1)*
Explain to me these couple of questions then. If the Soviet Union had planned to invade near the start of WW2, why would Stalin;
A. Kill off his best Generals before the start WW2 and shortly after the start of war.
B. Through the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact, The Soviet Union provided Germany with resources and material and plenty of gas, that not only helped in Germany's war effort on Western Front, but the amount Germany had received from the Soviet Union is what enabled Germany to initiate Operation Barbarossa in the first place.
C. Why did Stalin ignore the multiple warnings he received from Soviet Intelligence that Germany was planning an attack on the Soviet Union based on their troop movements towards the East and did not prepare his defenses accordingly?
If the Soviet Union had plans to invade Germany, it sure wasn't as early as 1941..
And that worked out just wonderfully did it not? The point of history is to see where things went wrong and not emulate them, not to find them and then excuse them away, giving room to repeat the very same mistake again. This constant need to justify Hitler's bad decisions is absolutely pathetic.
You do understand that one of the reasons for Hitler invading Poland and to secure a non-aggression pact with the Soviet Union was so that he would secure Germany's eastern border and to avoid a two front war? He said it himself in one of the letters he had sent to Mussolini. So Hitler knew the dangers of putting Germany in a two front war, but despite this he still attacks the Soviet Union while the war still raged on in the Western Front.
Let me translate what you said; You don't get to have a negative opinion on anything related to the Reich. Ever. You only get to praise and worship the Reich.
[ + ] PhantomXLII
[ - ] PhantomXLII 1 point 1.2 yearsFeb 27, 2023 14:56:27 ago (+1/-0)
There were other factions in the USSR all vying for power. Trotsky, Stalin, and another man... Bukharev or something I can't remember at all, were the sort of "big 3". Trotsky was eventually forced out of the USSR and later on was killed with a pickaxe in Mexico. Ramon Mercader did it, he was a Spanish communist.
Stalin knew there were more than a few generals with either anti-communist sympathies or were loyal to another faction. All Stalin was doing was cleaning house. He didn't care about getting rid of generals pre-war or during, because in his eyes a potentially disloyal general may as well be the same as no general at all if not worse. I believe Zhukov was one of these generals under suspicion, but he became so much of a hero to dedicated Soviets in the citizenry and government that Stalin really couldn't get rid of him.
And Germany had already made other deals with the USSR for joint training academies, research efforts, and a few other things. Germany offered up assistance to the Soviets before Molotov-Ribbentrop, and I believe even after. The trade of resources to the Reich was moreso making things square in terms of what was given vs. received. The Reich didn't HAVE to partition Poland at all if they didn't wish to. It was simply a "hey, want a large swathe of free land, non-aggression pact, and all you need to do is send us some stuff so we can kick Allied ass?". It was a fair deal, apparently, else it wouldn't have gone through.
Everyone kinda knew that it wouldn't last however. Which is why the Soviets began, slowly, preparing for war against Germany. I would imagine they planned to strike a few years into the Allies vs. Axis war so both sides would be too depleted to do anything about the fresh and eager Red Army rushing through western Poland.
However, the Reich wasn't brainless and understood the peace would not last either, and began concocting plans of their own.
Hubris, paranoia of his own officers/advisors, and the fact that the Soviets weren't necessarily in a position to both fortify and prepare for attack. They are two opposite things and there wasn't enough time, equipment, or troops to do both. Yes, the Red Army was massive, but it had massive territory to cover. Stalin may have simply made the decision to acknowledge that the Germans MAY attack, but prepared for an attack on Germany at a later date anyway. It was a gamble and Stalin lost, if this was his thought process.
And Germany didn't have plans to invade the USSR in 1941 either. Hell, they would have been content with forming an anti-communist alliance with the French, British, Polish, and anyone else who would listen. They even set the foundation with the anti-comintern pact or something of a similar name, I can't remember. It's why Germany sent troops and equipment to Spain, to ensure Spain didn't flip communist. If it did, France was sure to follow as it too had a sizeable amount of communist support. You can see that as a total fact when you look into the French Resistance and how they were just as likely to try killing each other for not being the proper color red.
Which is, as a side note, partly why we only airdropped those cheap ass pistols to "French Resistance" forces. The government feared dropping in a bunch of rifles, grenades, and the like would only cause a sort of French civil war. Good for causing chaos the Reich had to manage, but for the Allies trying to LIBERATE France and restore her democracy... Not so good.
Of course. I never argued that.
You say this because the Reich lost. If they had won or achieved a peace deal, the invasion would be seen as potential for a loss at worst, and a brilliant stroke at best. Not a mistake.
Two things.
1. Read everything I've previously said.
2. "raged on the Western front" is... No. France was under complete control, Spain wasn't a threat, Italy was still fucking around in the deserts of North Africa, all Germany had to do was garrison the coast and prepare defenses, which they did. The war in the West was relegated to Greece and North Africa, both much smaller theatres of war that don't require or necessarily "want" massive amounts of troops due to logistics. Garrisons didn't need to be top of the line infantry, but there to simply soak up damage against any potential Allied landing until the main force arrives. If that. In 1944, Rommel was going fucking nuts trying to get the panzers positioned on the beach like he wanted, but higher ups said no.
No, you don't have the fucking privilege of translating shit without my authorization. Not a fucking soul on this Earth that matters gave you the right to put words in my mouth.
The Reich made mistakes, as does any force for good other than Christ himself. There's no debate there. But you are dancing on the table screaming THEY LOST LOL NAZI BAD TRUMP IS GOD MAGA 2024 and acting like you have literally ANY right to talk about these things you are so ignorant about.
Dismissed.
[ + ] didyouknow
[ - ] didyouknow 0 points 1.2 yearsMar 1, 2023 06:21:13 ago (+0/-0)*
You don't clean house of your military command when you're planning to assault a formidable nation such as Germany in the very near future. It's retarded. Period. Even Hitler realized that the Soviet Union was apprehensive towards Germany in 1940 and 1941 and was not capable at that time to conduct an invasion against Germany.
You mean the Rapallo Treaty? Yes, that continued on with Hitler under the Berlin Treaty.
Yes, Hitler was so kind to give the Soviet Union access to the Baltic States, I am sure Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, and parts of Romania appreciated having their country be under the rule of Stalin's regime and the deadly repression that came with it. Because of this pact, Soviet Union increased its population by over 20 million in just a single year. And before you come back with ''but Germany planned to annex these territories'', well yes they did, and that didn't last long as they were reclaimed after WW2 with only minor adjustments and they were part of the Soviet Union until its phony collapse. So the Soviet Union still kept the gains which was made possible first because of the German-Soviet pact.
And that's why they also sent material that could be used against (and was used) them in war?
You seem to not understand that TIME is a very valuable thing in war and one of the things any nation fighting a war wants to do, is to avoid a two-front war. If the Soviets was going to invade Germany it would be years after 1941, that would be beneficial to Germany as that would have given them more time to defeat Britain, thus, avoiding a two-front war..
And I personally believe that Germany would have had a better chance of winning the war if Russia was the attacker, then they wouldn't have to deal with all the issues that come with attacking a country that is as large as Russia. To make it seem as if Germany was in a rush to attack the Soviet Union in fear that the Soviet Union might strike back first as if that would put Germany in a worse spot is stupid. Just look at the Winter War and how that went for the Soviet Union, and that was Finland, not Germany. Also diplomatically, It wouldn't be as easy for the U.S. to provide the Soviet Union lend-lease if they were the aggressors without making themselves look awfully bad internationally. Not to mention if Stalin attacks Germany, he would run the risk of starting a civil war in Russia because of the internal issues that were facing the Soviet Union at that time and the mass number of people who hated Stalin and his jew regime.
This is factually wrong. Plans were discussed to invade Russia happened as early as the summer of 1940. Hitler wanted to originally invade Russia in the autumn of 1940 but was persuaded otherwise because of the dreaded Russian winter and the supply lines in Poland that was needed to support the invading Germans were not sufficient enough yet. So the date was postponed to May 1941 only for it to be postponed again to June.
You mean that pact that went absolutely nowhere because it became more of an anti-Western pact than an anti-Comintern pact? Also, it was Germany that killed the anti-comintern with the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact.
I am not talking about the early stages of the invasion but the end result. Who cares how successful they were in the beginning when the end result was disastrous? And the main objective of the invasion was stupid because it was to fight and destroy the Soviet army to the point where Stalin would surrender. But the Soviet Union was massive and covered a huge mass of land and thus Stalin could continuously buy more time and extend the conflict by having the Red Army retreat, regroup, and to fight another day. Just like what happened with Napoleon.
Are you telling me that the failure of German intelligence to gather intel on the huge amount of reserves, equipment, and technology that the Soviet military possessed was not incompetence?
If Germany wanted to win the war, their focus should have been to supply and arm and incorporate the anti-Bolshevik element into the fighting in Russia against Stalin's jew regime. I don't need to tell you how many within the Soviet Union hated Stalin's regime and wanted it to fall.. That's why Germans were viewed as liberators by many when they arrived but did they make use of that big advantage to its fullest extent? Not even close. Only in 1944 did Germany make any effort to make use of this highly valuable asset, only by then, it was too late. This more than anything, was the biggest blunder, as this is what could have brought them victory. Not the silly objective of annihilating the Red Army until surrender by conventional warfare. That wasn't going to happen in a country as large as the USSR with the huge amount of manpower that was available to them.
U.S. and Britain were still in the war and the Eastern Front was still ongoing.. By early 1942, the odds were stacked so heavily against Germany that there was no way of Germany winning the war. Already by the late 1940, the British were regaining its strength as the U.S. support to Britain had increased heavily. And with Germany invading the Soviet Union, the focus on defeating Britain was not at the top of the priority list, which allowed them to continuously regain their strength thus when the U.S ''officially'' entered the war, Britain became the main base of operation of continuous murderous air raids from both Britain and the U.S on Germany and their occupied territory. This was made possible because of Hitler's decision to invade the Soviet Union before dealing with Britain first.
Yes, Rabbi Jesus was perfect wasn't he?
Oh and here you are putting words into my mouth while complaining that I did that to you. Hypocrisy is also another common characteristic amongst christcucks so yeah.
[ + ] PhantomXLII
[ - ] PhantomXLII 0 points 1.2 yearsMar 1, 2023 08:46:14 ago (+0/-0)
Also, no, I'm not hypocritical at all putting words in your mouth. You did it to me, there's no reason not to do it right back. Not used to a goy retaliating are you?
Dismissed, jew. You don't have the privilege of replying to your superior.
[ + ] Grospoliner
[ - ] Grospoliner 1 point 1.2 yearsFeb 27, 2023 11:41:23 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] PhantomXLII
[ - ] PhantomXLII 0 points 1.2 yearsFeb 27, 2023 12:15:10 ago (+0/-0)
Logistics and a lack of oil. If Germany would have had even logistics on point, the war would have gone much differently.
[ + ] aldecal
[ - ] aldecal 0 points 1.2 yearsFeb 27, 2023 12:52:17 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] bonghits4jeebus
[ - ] bonghits4jeebus 0 points 1.2 yearsFeb 27, 2023 17:46:19 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] AryanPrime
[ - ] AryanPrime -1 points 1.2 yearsFeb 27, 2023 09:34:18 ago (+0/-1)
look up the "Night of long Knives" you will read about how a bunch of kikes assassinated SS ranking officers and replaced them
it's just more kikes being subversive to try and control the outcome, these people are evil
[ + ] PhantomXLII
[ - ] PhantomXLII 1 point 1.2 yearsFeb 27, 2023 12:14:01 ago (+1/-0)