After watching Jews take over countries I realized why the American founding fathers only wanted landowners to vote. Landowners voting prevents outsiders from coming in and taking over your governments. Jews take over governments under the guise of democracy. When people who don't own the land in the country can vote then the government can be taken over by people who don't live in the country. Then they can use that mechanism of taking over the government to acquire all the land and goods in the country. And this is exactly what Jews have done in america. And this is why they always push "democracy".
And this is why the founding fathers in America knew it was essential to establish a republic and not a democracy. They understood democracies could easily be taken over by small groups of outsiders who manipulate masses.
you seem to have things confused. the crown is the one who wouldn't destroy white nations. masons and jews would... i don't know why you're asking the question. if it's cause you don't understand why figures like george washington etc. would want that, that's because they were never leaders of freemasonry, they just joined it because it supported their cause for liberty and freedom of religion. washington has a letter where he states he hasn't set foot in a lodge in 30 yrs and couldn't give a fuck about it anymore.
But to me masons seemed to be a white organization? I heard it was infiltrated by jews but the original one thr reason it was formed was brick masons stone masons who were enlighten or smarter then the average bear and they created seceret societies because they were tired of religion and monarchs?
I could be way off but I have heard of the jew infiltration I guess it got really bad and was used to destroy white civilization.
That being said Rhodes seemed to have wanted a white dominated world but he failed???
it was jewish from the beginning. jews and templars created it in the 1300s after being persecuted by the catholic church. the aim of the org was always to bring down the catholic church, and as they became successful to then institute their own new world order. their first known attack came with the peasants' revolt in 1381, it's even noted on wikipedia:
"Conspiracy theorists, including writer John Robinson, have attempted to explain alleged flaws in mainstream historical accounts of the events of 1381, such as the speed with which the rebellion was coordinated.[310] Theories include that the revolt was led by a secret, occult organisation called "the Great Society", said to be an offshoot of the order of the Knights Templar destroyed in 1312, or that the fraternity of the Freemasons was covertly involved in organising the revolt."
Problem is they would just buy land. Unless, ideally, it is made so that foreigners can not buy land unless and until they become citizens.
A bigger problem is that nobody owns their land because of bullshit theft through taxes.
Lets not mince words and talk real issues, instead.
The problem is that we keep pretending we're a Democracy. Every time I see some milquetoast low IQ moron declare anything about 'muh Democracy, I just ask them when the fuck we stopped being a Representative Republic and watch whatever remains of their cerebral function short-circuit.
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep taking a vote on what to have for dinner.
i don't know how well this could work in a non-kingdom, but it was a huge source of frustration for jews in other places. no matter how much money they attained, they struggled to gain land and state power. the land nobility continued to rule generation after generation. the nazis tried to reestablish a similar tactic, forcing landowners to keep their land within the family and being banned from selling.
No, only men who work in real jobs ( not bureaucracies) should vote. Only married women with children should vote. Social parasites can gain control of land through rent seeking behaviors like violence or deception. The period in which wealthy “noble” warlords controlled all the real estate in Europe was an exploitive period.
A cooperative society can only occur in a highly related population because the basis of altruism is relatedness. A cooperative society also requires monogamy or men will kill each other, cheat each other etc, to acquire more wealth and more females. Polygamy is inherently unstable and men will try to hoard as much territory as possible in such a regime. A ban of divorce or extra marital sex is key to eliminating corruption. Also every child needs a paternity test. Stigmatizing bastards is also a good idea. Most of the old taboos make sense in terms of eugenics. Evolution and economics and politics are inextricably linked.
People will say this is unworkable, but I think each family/household should have one vote. And taxation should be done on that unit too which it kinda is already. That way you don't sow disunity within the family. They have to hash it out internally.
Ya even if they had opened up voting to women and other races<<< a terrible idea. Keeping it to land owners would have been better. I'm sure the commie jews would have figured out a work around to get their insatiable need to destroy healthy civilizations met but it could have helped
Nothing of that works long-term if the spirit of what they wanted wasnt founded on something spiritual. America's greatest flaw was to not proclaim itself a Catholic Monarchy and instituting the second american Catholic empire, this time in the north.
Shouldn't just be a land owner or they could vote for schemes to expand their Influence/wealth.
Should be white man of good character with kids. Without kids you have no real investment in the future. They can't vote for short term greed at the expense of the future unless they detest their children.
I came up with a weighted voting system basically the more educated you are with more kids and land and tax paying thr more voting power you have.
Educated I would have some type of test showing you know history commen sense logic goverment economics then you can earn more voting power. Not bullshit degrees
Education is tricky. One idea is that politicians get to write special short manifestos that voters have to learn in order to be permitted to vote. Maybe 600 words in total for all the parties. Each party gets to contribute words in proportion to their share of the vote.
Politicians would love this. They get to cram their manifestos down the throats of voters. Politicians get to say "we are the party of equality and fairness and we will cut taxes on ordinary working people." Voters have to learn that shit. Some of them believe it. It helps the politician win the election. It helps the politician win the first election.
The second election however,... Ordinary voters were forced to commit the politicians' manifestos to memory. At the next election they can still remember some of it, which promises were kept, which where broken. Whoops! Politicians loved it first time around, now it is a millstone around their necks.
The proposal filters out voters who have gone senile (cannot memorize the manifesto). And it filters out the voters who aren't all that interested, learning the manifestos is enough work to act as a small deterrent.
And this is why the founding fathers in America knew it was essential to establish a republic and not a democracy.
Republic is the system of rule. For example, you can have a foreign monarch or someone born in your country.
Democracy is the system of government. You can choose Democracy, Dictatorship, or Monarchy (state owned by a family).
For example, you can have a constitutional parliamentary monarchy representative democracy (Australia) or you can have a constitutional federal republic representative democracy (USA).
Do you know what the only difference is? Your ultimate authority is not the monarch of England, your head fuckwit was born in the good old US of A.
[ + ] WanderingToast
[ - ] WanderingToast 3 points 2.3 yearsFeb 26, 2023 11:01:20 ago (+3/-0)
It wasn't a war of independence, it was a civil war crown Vs masons.
The masons won
[ + ] Doglegwarrior
[ - ] Doglegwarrior 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 26, 2023 11:51:33 ago (+1/-1)
Why are the masons allowing the destruction of a white nation?
[ + ] I_am_baal
[ - ] I_am_baal 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 26, 2023 15:15:08 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] BlueEyedAngloMasterRaceGod
[ - ] BlueEyedAngloMasterRaceGod 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 26, 2023 19:55:39 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Doglegwarrior
[ - ] Doglegwarrior 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 26, 2023 23:10:31 ago (+0/-0)
I could be way off but I have heard of the jew infiltration I guess it got really bad and was used to destroy white civilization.
That being said Rhodes seemed to have wanted a white dominated world but he failed???
[ + ] BlueEyedAngloMasterRaceGod
[ - ] BlueEyedAngloMasterRaceGod 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 26, 2023 23:18:13 ago (+0/-0)
"Conspiracy theorists, including writer John Robinson, have attempted to explain alleged flaws in mainstream historical accounts of the events of 1381, such as the speed with which the rebellion was coordinated.[310] Theories include that the revolt was led by a secret, occult organisation called "the Great Society", said to be an offshoot of the order of the Knights Templar destroyed in 1312, or that the fraternity of the Freemasons was covertly involved in organising the revolt."
[ + ] WanderingToast
[ - ] WanderingToast 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 27, 2023 18:27:48 ago (+0/-0)
The USA is simply a vessel, a mask, for ((them)) to hide behind
[ + ] TheNoticing
[ - ] TheNoticing 2 points 2.3 yearsFeb 26, 2023 14:39:19 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] FuckShitJesus
[ - ] FuckShitJesus 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 26, 2023 19:00:50 ago (+0/-0)
A bigger problem is that nobody owns their land because of bullshit theft through taxes.
Lets not mince words and talk real issues, instead.
The problem is that we keep pretending we're a Democracy. Every time I see some milquetoast low IQ moron declare anything about 'muh Democracy, I just ask them when the fuck we stopped being a Representative Republic and watch whatever remains of their cerebral function short-circuit.
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep taking a vote on what to have for dinner.
[ + ] bonghits4jeebus
[ - ] bonghits4jeebus 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 26, 2023 23:15:02 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] BlueEyedAngloMasterRaceGod
[ - ] BlueEyedAngloMasterRaceGod 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 26, 2023 19:58:59 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 26, 2023 13:59:44 ago (+1/-1)
A cooperative society can only occur in a highly related population because the basis of altruism is relatedness. A cooperative society also requires monogamy or men will kill each other, cheat each other etc, to acquire more wealth and more females. Polygamy is inherently unstable and men will try to hoard as much territory as possible in such a regime. A ban of divorce or extra marital sex is key to eliminating corruption.
Also every child needs a paternity test. Stigmatizing bastards is also a good idea. Most of the old taboos make sense in terms of eugenics. Evolution and economics and politics are inextricably linked.
[ + ] Monica
[ - ] Monica 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 26, 2023 18:18:39 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] TheNoticing
[ - ] TheNoticing 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 26, 2023 21:49:02 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 26, 2023 21:52:27 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Doglegwarrior
[ - ] Doglegwarrior 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 26, 2023 23:12:54 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 27, 2023 00:11:33 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] bonghits4jeebus
[ - ] bonghits4jeebus 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 26, 2023 23:18:32 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Doglegwarrior
[ - ] Doglegwarrior 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 26, 2023 11:48:23 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Razzoriel
[ - ] Razzoriel 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 26, 2023 11:33:49 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] DivineLight2
[ - ] DivineLight2 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 26, 2023 11:23:50 ago (+0/-0)
Should be white man of good character with kids.
Without kids you have no real investment in the future. They can't vote for short term greed at the expense of the future unless they detest their children.
[ + ] Doglegwarrior
[ - ] Doglegwarrior 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 26, 2023 11:50:37 ago (+0/-0)
I came up with a weighted voting system basically the more educated you are with more kids and land and tax paying thr more voting power you have.
Educated I would have some type of test showing you know history commen sense logic goverment economics then you can earn more voting power. Not bullshit degrees
[ + ] happytoes
[ - ] happytoes 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 26, 2023 15:33:26 ago (+0/-0)
Politicians would love this. They get to cram their manifestos down the throats of voters. Politicians get to say "we are the party of equality and fairness and we will cut taxes on ordinary working people." Voters have to learn that shit. Some of them believe it. It helps the politician win the election. It helps the politician win the first election.
The second election however,... Ordinary voters were forced to commit the politicians' manifestos to memory. At the next election they can still remember some of it, which promises were kept, which where broken. Whoops! Politicians loved it first time around, now it is a millstone around their necks.
The proposal filters out voters who have gone senile (cannot memorize the manifesto). And it filters out the voters who aren't all that interested, learning the manifestos is enough work to act as a small deterrent.
[ + ] Krier55
[ - ] Krier55 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 26, 2023 09:58:12 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Clubberlang
[ - ] Clubberlang 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 26, 2023 09:23:58 ago (+1/-1)
Eventually the unquestioning normies will believe we live in one.
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 26, 2023 08:28:06 ago (+0/-0)
Republic is the system of rule. For example, you can have a foreign monarch or someone born in your country.
Democracy is the system of government. You can choose Democracy, Dictatorship, or Monarchy (state owned by a family).
For example, you can have a constitutional parliamentary monarchy representative democracy (Australia) or you can have a constitutional federal republic representative democracy (USA).
Do you know what the only difference is? Your ultimate authority is not the monarch of England, your head fuckwit was born in the good old US of A.
[ + ] Dread_Pirate_Johnson
[ - ] Dread_Pirate_Johnson 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 26, 2023 09:18:28 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Clubberlang
[ - ] Clubberlang 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 26, 2023 09:32:13 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] SkullFuckerSupreme
[ - ] SkullFuckerSupreme -1 points 2.3 yearsFeb 26, 2023 09:23:46 ago (+0/-1)
If you are a worthless nigger looking for gibs you will destroy anything for your gibs.
Better to destroy the jew that brought the nigger and let the niggers destroy themselves.