☰
×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
15

Texas: More Charges Thrown at Rancher Who Shot Mexican Invader

submitted by Spaceman84 to news 2.3 yearsFeb 24, 2023 13:41:57 ago (+17/-2)     (dailystormer.in)

https://dailystormer.in/texas-rancher-who-shot-mexican-invader-gets-extra-charges-added/



18 comments block

sort by: hot new top old low

[ - ] Peleg 7 points 2.3 yearsFeb 24, 2023 14:00:08 ago (+7/-0)

I certainly hope that he gets a jury of his peers, his real peers and not just a bunch of faggets, niggers, and spics, who really know the constitutional purpose of a jury.

[ - ] Love240 6 points 2.3 yearsFeb 24, 2023 15:59:36 ago (+7/-1)

I don't like the constant changing of the story. He's an ARIZONA rancher, and it was the invaders that 'had an AK'. He fired on them after they pointed it at him. (as I read in the previous story)

[ - ] bonghits4jeebus 5 points 2.3 yearsFeb 24, 2023 16:40:26 ago (+5/-0)

The prosecutor is likely working for the cartels.

[ - ] Fascinus 5 points 2.3 yearsFeb 24, 2023 14:12:45 ago (+5/-0)

victims

[ - ] SirNiggsalot 3 points 2.3 yearsFeb 24, 2023 15:42:08 ago (+3/-0)

No Country For Old (White) Men.

[ - ] PearofAnguishJuniorManager 2 points 2.3 yearsFeb 24, 2023 18:39:51 ago (+2/-0)

He let some get away. That was a mistake

[ - ] Jiggggg 1 point 2.3 yearsFeb 24, 2023 18:27:27 ago (+1/-0)

Man I wish I could be on the jury.

[ - ] MasklessTheGreat 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 24, 2023 17:56:36 ago (+0/-0)

I’m more interested in how the law got involved. Especially if it happened out on a ranch. I skimmed the article but it didn’t see much about the location.

[ - ] texasblood -1 points 2.3 yearsFeb 24, 2023 21:04:40 ago (+0/-1)

DUMB AS FUCK CUNTS CANT UNDERSTAND 100 YARDS IS NOT DEFENSE.
FFS this place is rank AF with idiots

[ - ] texasblood -6 points 2.3 yearsFeb 24, 2023 14:23:02 ago (+0/-6)

It's not the white that's kicking his ass.
It's a bad shooting if the article is correct.
100 yards distance is not a justified defense shot to be taking.
It's a murder charge easily.

[ - ] FluffyBunnySlippers 4 points 2.3 yearsFeb 24, 2023 14:41:14 ago (+4/-0)

Yes but a person on the jury has the right to determine application of the law. They could for any reason decide he was not guilty

[ - ] bonghits4jeebus 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 24, 2023 16:41:39 ago (+1/-1)

If they felt more sympathy for him than, say, the cartel or the cartel's human cargo.

[ - ] texasblood -3 points 2.3 yearsFeb 24, 2023 14:56:52 ago (+0/-3)

AGAIN!
If the facts are as presented.
It will be 1st-degree murder.
Pulling the trigger on a human at 100 yards is intended murder.
Shooting a running human in the back seldom happens in war.
As a combat Vet that's seen it and done it.
The white boy will be latched for 20 on a plea bargain

[ - ] Sector7 4 points 2.3 yearsFeb 24, 2023 15:01:10 ago (+4/-0)

"on a human"

Key phrase.

[ - ] RepublicanNerd 3 points 2.3 yearsFeb 24, 2023 16:32:09 ago (+3/-0)

If the ‘human’ he shot had a gut pointed back as reported previously that completely changes the narrative

[ - ] texasblood -4 points 2.3 yearsFeb 24, 2023 17:14:40 ago (+0/-4)

NOT AT ONE HUNDRED YARDS!!
There is no justified bodily threat to defend at ONE HUNDRED YARDS.
A gut shot at 100yds is still murder
Only one weapon at the scene, the other was a lie

[ - ] Kozel 8 points 2.3 yearsFeb 24, 2023 18:08:26 ago (+8/-0)

You contradict yourself.

If there is no justified bodily threat to defend at at one hundred yards how did the guy get shot at 100 yards?

[ - ] ReincarnatedGoat 2 points 2.3 yearsFeb 24, 2023 18:27:22 ago (+2/-0)

not if they were firing at him.