To be nuked? What strategic value would nuking LA have? They have no nuclear value, no command value. Nuclear war is about disabling your enemy's nuclear response.
lmao look at the kike seething about being disconnected from Aryan people
it can't stand the idea of not being able to parasite off of Aryan's like the pathetic weak kike that it is lmfao hahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhhahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahaha
non Whites rely on Whites, it's not about states, it's about ethnic heritage and genetics and IQ...you can't compete kike, so you gaslight constantly, it's proof of your weakness and inferiority, being proven on a daily basis everytime you open your filthy untermench kike mouth
Buuut....not one major military base or Lockhead factory? (correct me if I missed that any of those places has a major base or factory to it)
I would be better to let those places intact as the errupting chimpouts would make things more difficult for the US to make moves.
Unless of course its the US itself bombing their own (useless eaters and what not) and they don't want to bomb any too sparsely white populated areas, it of course would be contrary to their whole white replacement plan, but its not like the gov made too many smart decisions or the jews give a fuck about the shade of goyim.
Those bases would be busy with humanity relief or controlling the population after cities are wiped. No ones going to show up to work during ww3 so lockheed is irrelevant.
Houston is more like cutting off your enemy at a choke, instead of an actual strategic target.
NYC and Chicago are both important because both are major financial hubs. If NYC goes out, chicago takes over its business and volume, and vice-versa. So if foreign powers hit one, they have to hit the other. And because NYC was always going to be on any list of targets in a NBC war, chicago was always going to be as well.
And D.C. is a no-brainer.
If you were in a nuclear war, and responsible for determine the who and the what, what cities would you target?
When China strikes it will be DC. No need to nuke the others if you cut off the hand pulling the strings. Strike two must be ISRAEL to get the other hand. The head comes off next and it's in England
[ - ] Monica 1 point 2.3 yearsFeb 23, 2023 12:04:22 ago (+1/-0)
This is to get the people in those cities to flee and go to other cities. The infiltrators already own those towns and have destroyed them well enough and they need their army of destroyers to go to another town to destroy. Might even be how they communicate to their armies without talking to them directly. They know nukes don't exist.
Nukes may not exist but dirty-bomb tipped missiles do. All they do is launch one and then say "see! see! muh nukes are real! Just look at the fallout!"
Maybe we never mastered fusion or fission, but naturally radioactive elements do in fact exist and contaminate a very large area of land. Thats the issue. Thats the danger. And thats how a 'nuclear' war would actually be achieved across the planet in a ww3 type event (assuming conventional nuclear weapons, as we understand them, really are a large-scale secret/hoax).
As long as Houston and Kike York city are blown off the face of the planet that would be more than enough to stage an anti-communist coup and get control back from the kikes.
Nuking a rural area is of no use. Big cities are the perfect targets. They'll notify the Jews in advance so they can leave the place before the bombing.
LA has the biggest sea port, but LA has already been conquered. NY, the US's 2nd largest sea port is also under complete occupation. Nuking Houston would take out many refineries. But Houston is 2/3 non-White already.
If anything, they'd hit Montana's and North Dakota's intercontinental missile silos. As those could be seized by the biggest threat to the United States - Whites Supremacists.
But there's really no reason to nuke the US. It has already been conquered.
If anything, they'd hit Montana's and North Dakota's intercontinental missile silos. As those could be seized by the biggest threat to the United States - Whites Supremacists.
Thats prime real-estate for the taking. why ruin it when a foreign power can destroy the surrounding territory to make clear on the threat? And then they get to use the surrounding destruction as leverage to trade with the surviving states.
Nuking houston would most definitely take out refineries. But the fallout also leads to texas being cut off from the rest of the u.s. and too busy with disaster relief.
Leaving montana and north dakota makes sense if you don't want the power vacuum filled too quickly. Their missiles survive, and get launched, and result in equal carnage elsewhere, so no state is left too powerful afterward.
It actually makes sense to minimize the destruction of silos/subs if you want to transition to neo-feudalism. Maximum carnage ensues the maximum destruction of as many nation-states as possible.
[ + ] Wwwwwww
[ - ] Wwwwwww 3 points 2.3 yearsFeb 23, 2023 07:23:58 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] prototype
[ - ] prototype 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 23, 2023 15:14:07 ago (+0/-0)
Whats your case for choosing LA over San Fran?
Lot more globohomo up in san fran than LA I would think.
[ + ] x0x7
[ - ] x0x7 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 23, 2023 18:54:34 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted -4 points 2.3 yearsFeb 23, 2023 07:30:25 ago (+0/-4)
[ + ] AryanPrime
[ - ] AryanPrime 2 points 2.3 yearsFeb 23, 2023 08:06:44 ago (+2/-0)
it can't stand the idea of not being able to parasite off of Aryan's like the pathetic weak kike that it is lmfao hahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhhahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahaha
non Whites rely on Whites, it's not about states, it's about ethnic heritage and genetics and IQ...you can't compete kike, so you gaslight constantly, it's proof of your weakness and inferiority, being proven on a daily basis everytime you open your filthy untermench kike mouth
[ + ] Clubberlang
[ - ] Clubberlang 1 point 2.3 yearsFeb 23, 2023 11:34:44 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] MAGANDN
[ - ] MAGANDN 1 point 2.3 yearsFeb 23, 2023 07:55:09 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] Clubberlang
[ - ] Clubberlang 1 point 2.3 yearsFeb 23, 2023 11:33:11 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Mr_narrative
[ - ] Mr_narrative 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 23, 2023 13:01:43 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] HeavyBrain
[ - ] HeavyBrain 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 23, 2023 16:26:48 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] HeavyBrain
[ - ] HeavyBrain 3 points 2.3 yearsFeb 23, 2023 04:56:16 ago (+3/-0)
I would be better to let those places intact as the errupting chimpouts would make things more difficult for the US to make moves.
Unless of course its the US itself bombing their own (useless eaters and what not) and they don't want to bomb any too sparsely white populated areas, it of course would be contrary to their whole white replacement plan, but its not like the gov made too many smart decisions or the jews give a fuck about the shade of goyim.
[ + ] prototype
[ - ] prototype 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 23, 2023 15:17:56 ago (+0/-0)
No ones going to show up to work during ww3 so lockheed is irrelevant.
[ + ] texasblood
[ - ] texasblood 2 points 2.3 yearsFeb 23, 2023 05:45:35 ago (+3/-1)
Definitely, places that need purged but not all of those places are high-value targets
[ + ] prototype
[ - ] prototype 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 23, 2023 15:17:01 ago (+0/-0)
NYC and Chicago are both important because both are major financial hubs. If NYC goes out, chicago takes over its business and volume, and vice-versa. So if foreign powers hit one, they have to hit the other. And because NYC was always going to be on any list of targets in a NBC war, chicago was always going to be as well.
And D.C. is a no-brainer.
If you were in a nuclear war, and responsible for determine the who and the what, what cities would you target?
[ + ] texasblood
[ - ] texasblood 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 23, 2023 17:43:25 ago (+0/-0)
No need to nuke the others if you cut off the hand pulling the strings.
Strike two must be ISRAEL to get the other hand.
The head comes off next and it's in England
[ + ] x0x7
[ - ] x0x7 1 point 2.3 yearsFeb 23, 2023 18:56:04 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] texasblood
[ - ] texasblood 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 23, 2023 20:33:14 ago (+0/-0)
NORAD is like the gold in Ft Knox.
[ + ] Monica
[ - ] Monica 1 point 2.3 yearsFeb 23, 2023 12:04:22 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] prototype
[ - ] prototype 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 23, 2023 15:25:04 ago (+0/-0)
Nukes may not exist but dirty-bomb tipped missiles do. All they do is launch one and then say "see! see! muh nukes are real! Just look at the fallout!"
Maybe we never mastered fusion or fission, but naturally radioactive elements do in fact exist and contaminate a very large area of land. Thats the issue. Thats the danger. And thats how a 'nuclear' war would actually be achieved across the planet in a ww3 type event (assuming conventional nuclear weapons, as we understand them, really are a large-scale secret/hoax).
[ + ] Clubberlang
[ - ] Clubberlang 1 point 2.3 yearsFeb 23, 2023 11:32:37 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] HeavyBrain
[ - ] HeavyBrain 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 23, 2023 16:28:55 ago (+0/-0)
That little bit of extra attention.
[ + ] RedBarchetta
[ - ] RedBarchetta 1 point 2.3 yearsFeb 23, 2023 10:51:52 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] prototype
[ - ] prototype 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 23, 2023 15:18:36 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] x0x7
[ - ] x0x7 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 23, 2023 19:22:12 ago (+0/-0)
The enemy of your enemy is your friend and all, but they don't necessarily have your values or priorities.
[ + ] bobdole9
[ - ] bobdole9 1 point 2.3 yearsFeb 23, 2023 10:46:44 ago (+1/-0)
Is there anything worthwhile in Houston besides refineries?
[ + ] RobertJHarsh
[ - ] RobertJHarsh 1 point 2.3 yearsFeb 23, 2023 09:41:53 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] dulcima
[ - ] dulcima 1 point 2.3 yearsFeb 23, 2023 03:18:29 ago (+1/-0)
That way they can get rid of people they hate while still blaming putin.
[ + ] herbert_west
[ - ] herbert_west 3 points 2.3 yearsFeb 23, 2023 04:56:23 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] AryanPrime
[ - ] AryanPrime 3 points 2.3 yearsFeb 23, 2023 08:07:14 ago (+3/-0)
See 9/11, recent Ukraine conflict for proof
[ + ] Irishluckk
[ - ] Irishluckk 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 23, 2023 23:45:48 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Not_C
[ - ] Not_C 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 23, 2023 14:25:54 ago (+0/-0)
NY, the US's 2nd largest sea port is also under complete occupation.
Nuking Houston would take out many refineries. But Houston is 2/3 non-White already.
If anything, they'd hit Montana's and North Dakota's intercontinental missile silos. As those could be seized by the biggest threat to the United States - Whites Supremacists.
But there's really no reason to nuke the US. It has already been conquered.
[ + ] prototype
[ - ] prototype 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 23, 2023 15:22:53 ago (+0/-0)
Thats prime real-estate for the taking. why ruin it when a foreign power can destroy the surrounding territory to make clear on the threat? And then they get to use the surrounding destruction as leverage to trade with the surviving states.
Nuking houston would most definitely take out refineries. But the fallout also leads to texas being cut off from the rest of the u.s. and too busy with disaster relief.
Leaving montana and north dakota makes sense if you don't want the power vacuum filled too quickly. Their missiles survive, and get launched, and result in equal carnage elsewhere, so no state is left too powerful afterward.
It actually makes sense to minimize the destruction of silos/subs if you want to transition to neo-feudalism. Maximum carnage ensues the maximum destruction of as many nation-states as possible.
[ + ] con77
[ - ] con77 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 23, 2023 11:40:05 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Leveraction
[ - ] Leveraction 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 23, 2023 10:44:58 ago (+0/-0)