Sign into an existing account

What is this eras context?

We have more heads though.

Raising awareness has been our approach for over a decade. It doesn't work.

For one the problem isn't awareness at all, the problem is a lack of concern for these matters, and that of those who are concerned moat of them are on the opposite side of the conflict from us.

Secondly, awareness by itself is completely ineffective, it changes nothing but how aware the individual is of what is going on, plenty of people I've met wished they remained ignorant.

Third, awareness raising prevents actual effective activism from taking place, as awareness raising is low risk and low investment it is preferable for the majority of those who should be doing activities with a lot more potential impact. It needs to be removed from the list of things to do so that people won't just be raising consciousness and then feeling satisfied that they did something for the cause.

In many ways the emphasis on consciousness raising has harmed the cause more than it has helped it.

This is the rquivalent of incels who try to do things to get bitches on their dicks. What they should be doing is working on improving themselves and achieving things while pursuing a goal besides getting to score with some chicks.

Thats how women come to you.

We are taking a similarly misdirected approach.

Want a better direction for your energy? Focus on meeting the enemy with their own methods.

For example. Go on the offensive by exploring unfamiliar ground where their defenses are weak.

Talk about white people being enslaved by other races, having their lands invades and occupied by other races. Being subjected to discrimination by other races.

Then focus you energy on aggresively and insistently demanding reparations for those transgressions against your ancestors.

Right now the narrative is that whire people were never subjected to such atrocities, thoa narrative collapses once the common knowledge is that these events did indeed occur in the past.

The emphasis should be on winning hearts over, to make people sympathize with and feel compassion for the white victims of these events. This means activating their consciences by crwsting intimacy with the experiences of those victims.

The jews win because they will talk about how black people suffered under white people, but when whites people who suffered under blacks get brought up, they diffuse the pathos energy by making it about the form of atrocity in general, not about this particular event where the atrocity was perpetrated by one identified race against another.

Emotional energy comes from things like loud, repetitive demands for actions to provide justice to the offended party, or punishment to the offenders.

The conservatives play the jewish game in their favor when they try to get the game dismissed, they come across as a guilty party trying to avoid their accountability for their actions.

Watch the Jesse Peterson interview. When it's hatred towards jews its called what it is, but when that same hatred is directed against whites he focuses on hatred in general.

Jews have practical and pragmatic concerns in protecting their borders from dangerous invaders, he keeps this discussion firmly grounded in the concrete reality of the situation.

When it's whites who are being invaded, he takes the conversation into the realm of abstractions and ideals, he talks only about moral principles and political ideology, distracting you from the reality of the situation which produces an empathic connection to those being affected by this issue.

Conservatives need to abandon ideology if they can hope to win here.

3. "Mostly peaceful" protesting seems to work.

You got a better one?

deleted