☰
×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
28

Diversity hires nearly crash airliner into the ocean, incident suppressed for months, pilots not fired and received ‘additional training’

submitted by Spaceman84 to ClownWorld 2.2 yearsFeb 14, 2023 15:02:35 ago (+31/-3)     (archive.is)

https://archive.is/3IWa8



44 comments block

sort by: hot new top old low

[ - ] Belfuro -1 points 2.2 yearsFeb 14, 2023 15:26:00 ago (+0/-1)

Visualize a lumber jack a cutting into a base of a large proud tree.

That tree is our society. We are the cells making up the tree.

And the lumber jack is destroying everything that holds up our society.

Including that which keeps vital roles crewed by competents.

[ - ] Sector7 2 points 2.2 yearsFeb 14, 2023 16:51:35 ago (+2/-0)

The lumber jack is cutting down a diseased tree that's infested with jews. Both the jews and the people worshipping/tolerating them need to go. If that's almost all of us, so be it.

[ - ] Belfuro 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 14, 2023 22:50:40 ago (+0/-0)

Most of us are going to die when our tree falls.
Because we are all specialized and depend upon others to live in a intra connected web.

But given that the watchers are going to slaughter us with outlr own armies etc anyway...

[ - ] PostWallHelena 2 points 2.2 yearsFeb 14, 2023 17:40:08 ago (+2/-0)

What race is the lumberjack?

[ - ] Belfuro 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 14, 2023 22:48:48 ago (+1/-0)

Ultimately, Probably aliens.

[ - ] i_scream_trucks 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 15, 2023 04:10:52 ago (+1/-0)

It's a dial tier shitpost. I think that says enough.

[ - ] Steelerfish 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 14, 2023 16:42:59 ago (+1/-0)

Dammit, you niggerfaggot.
I’m going to have Jackyl stuck in my head the rest of the day…

[ - ] Steelerfish 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 14, 2023 16:41:07 ago (+0/-0)

Only description of the pilots I’ve seen is that they were experienced- 25k hours between them.
I’ve seen speculation in other articles about an equipment failure either caused intentionally or not- which leads to a possible hack and message being sent. Hence no public disclosures.
If something failed in the programming or hardware and the crew overcame it via redundancies- especially if they were diversity hires, it would be all over the news if it was an easy fix.

[ - ] lord_nougat 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 14, 2023 17:21:53 ago (+0/-0)

In some ways, this was even worse than this dumb shit.

[ - ] Special_Prosecutor 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 14, 2023 18:52:00 ago (+0/-0)

If United's flight to SF were remotely hijacked (for whatever reason, terror, ransom), then it would kinda be unsurprising that United Airlines just might consider grounding 4,600 flights in the following days.
And United might excuse it as Snow, rain, ice, wind. And the media would be complicent, and the government would be complicent. Just maybe....

[ - ] SteppingRazor 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 14, 2023 21:48:38 ago (+0/-0)

How do you know it was a diversity hire?
No names are mentioned.

[ - ] Spaceman84 [op] 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 14, 2023 23:46:50 ago (+0/-0)

Coulter Rule

[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 14, 2023 17:37:40 ago (+1/-0)

How do you know they werent white guys? I dont see those details.

[ - ] voatersaredumbasses 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 14, 2023 19:22:43 ago (+0/-0)

I'm curious about this as well. Nothing was mentioned in the article.

[ - ] Spaceman84 [op] 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 14, 2023 23:49:15 ago (+0/-0)

Identities hidden = shitskins did it. Coulter rule.

[ - ] i_scream_trucks 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 15, 2023 04:05:53 ago (+1/-1)

"Shit skins" that did 25,000 hours between them?

This is either a plane or jab issue which is why no one was told.

That's a fuck load of flight time for "diversity hired"

[ - ] voatersaredumbasses -1 points 2.2 yearsFeb 15, 2023 05:07:50 ago (+0/-1)*

That's idiotic. Stop shitting up voat.

[ - ] Spaceman84 [op] 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 15, 2023 11:51:07 ago (+0/-0)

Kill yourself kike

[ - ] voatersaredumbasses 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 15, 2023 12:40:42 ago (+0/-0)

Good one. Did you use all 3 of your IQ to come up with that one? Retard. You objectively make voat a shittier place by being shit-for-brains stupid. Go ahead, respond without using "kike". Fucking tardo.

[ - ] Spaceman84 [op] 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 15, 2023 13:43:46 ago (+0/-0)

Ask me if I care what you think. Take your meds spaz.

[ - ] voatersaredumbasses 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 15, 2023 13:54:29 ago (+0/-0)

Good one. I'm sure you put so much effort into that response you literally shit yourself. Clean up shit-for-brains. Your intelligence is dripping out your back side.

[ - ] SteppingRazor 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 14, 2023 21:49:36 ago (+1/-1)

Exactly. OP is a faggot for making the assumption.
The misinformation here is nonstop.

[ - ] nc22 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 14, 2023 23:10:45 ago (+0/-0)

Agreed, This article is vague but points to the pilots encountering a downburst, more dangerous on landing than takeoff but similar to the idea of a riptide(you don't fight it directly). It's counter intuitive that you'd want to "go with the flow" but the science is there - https://a.pomf.cat/rpwsmr.jpeg - The problem occurs when exiting the downburst as the airspeed dramatically drops which can produce a stall and at low altitude may not be recoverable. This is why it's a "somewhat" common practice to give up some altitude that you know you have, for the airspeed that you might very well need. I say "somewhat" because the real failure is putting yourself in that situation to begin with. The weather probably dictated the flight be delayed for 30 min for the conditions to improve, but they got in 30 min early instead. https://simpleflying.com/microburst-pilot-wind-shear/

[ - ] uvulectomy 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 15, 2023 01:32:43 ago (+1/-0)

An 8,600fpm descent, however, should have had ATC asking them wtf was going on. Apparently nothing, however. That concerns me, as does the fact that apparently nobody said anything whatsoever about it until just now. Even passengers.

A 2.7g pull after an 8,600fpm descent is going to make even normies realize "this isn't right."

[ - ] Spaceman84 [op] 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 14, 2023 23:46:08 ago (+0/-0)

Coulter Rule. Names omitted = shitskin involvement

[ - ] i_scream_trucks -1 points 2.2 yearsFeb 15, 2023 04:09:19 ago (+0/-1)

Horseshit.

25,000 flight hours. That's a good decade of time each plus a downburst.

This is going to be shit cheap upkeep training (see tiger air and what happened when they cut training) a known aircraft issue that's being covered up (see 737 MAX aka computerised flying house brick) or a jab issue (see passing out while flying and slumping over controls)

fuck outta here redneck.

[ - ] Spaceman84 [op] 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 15, 2023 11:51:24 ago (+0/-0)

Neck yourself schlomo

[ - ] voatersaredumbasses 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 15, 2023 12:44:24 ago (+0/-0)*

You have a lower IQ than a pile of dog shit. Nice going! Since you are probably AI because you can't respond without a jew reference, anytime you have the inclination to use a "kike", "jew", "schlomo" response, you are admitting you are gay and have a low double digit IQ at best.

[ - ] Spaceman84 [op] 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 15, 2023 13:46:52 ago (+0/-0)

Says the faggot who adds nothing to this site but inane commentary.

[ - ] voatersaredumbasses 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 15, 2023 13:51:53 ago (+0/-0)

As if you're any different. LMFAO!!! Idiot.

[ - ] Monica 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 14, 2023 18:42:03 ago (+1/-0)

I'm not a pilot or spaceman but

Flight tracking data analysis revealed that the Boeing 777-200 had reached an altitude of roughly 2,200ft when it began a steep dive, descending at a rate of about 8,600ft a minute.

How does one descend 8,600 ft a minute when you're only 2,200 ft up? That's a really stupid way of saying how fast they were going.

[ - ] uvulectomy 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 14, 2023 22:02:29 ago (+1/-0)

Climbs and descents are always measured in fpm. It's a standardized measure of performance. On takeoff, an airliner is climbing at 4,000-4,500fpm, but that always drops off in short order.

[ - ] PotatoWhisperer2 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 14, 2023 21:46:00 ago (+0/-0)

Obviously they didn't drop for an entire minute.

[ - ] Empire_of_the_Mind 3 points 2.2 yearsFeb 14, 2023 16:21:07 ago (+3/-0)

I've been looking around but don't see the pilot names anywhere. I'm guessing women.

[ - ] Spaceman84 [op] 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 14, 2023 23:45:29 ago (+0/-0)

Oh shit, I hadn’t considered that. But when names are omitted they’re almost always brown.

[ - ] Leveraction 4 points 2.2 yearsFeb 14, 2023 16:25:48 ago (+4/-0)

Hence the reason i quit flying. They get all pissy if you ask who the pilots are before boarding, so fuck em

[ - ] uvulectomy 10 points 2.2 yearsFeb 14, 2023 16:15:59 ago (+10/-0)*

How the fuck did it not even get mentioned on passengers' kikebook pages? 8,600fpm is a *VERY fast descent.

You know how you really feel that initial climb after takeoff? That's about 4,000fpm. They were dropping at TWICE that speed. There's no way in hell nobody noticed.

8,600fpm is roughly 98mph. Downward.

Then the recovery climb was said to have placed about 2.7g on the airframe (and thus passengers). THEY NOTICED* so why did they say nothing?

[ - ] Tallest_Skil 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 14, 2023 16:23:35 ago (+1/-0)

Could it have been a cargo flight, then?

[ - ] uvulectomy 3 points 2.2 yearsFeb 14, 2023 16:42:55 ago (+3/-0)

UA1722 was a passenger flight. And AFAIK, their cargo wing just uses available space on passenger flights.

[ - ] Tallest_Skil 3 points 2.2 yearsFeb 14, 2023 17:39:55 ago (+3/-0)

Yeah, that’s extremely strange, then. We should have heard something, even if it was someone bragging about a payoff to stay silent.

[ - ] AngryWhiteKeyboardWarrior 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 14, 2023 18:36:26 ago (+0/-0)

Yep, and depending on how fast they nosed over, shit would have been floating in the cabin or launching into the ceiling of the plane. When I was doing my private pilot flying, my instructor and I would sometimes make our checklists float by nosing the Cessna down fairly rapidly. Of course once you let off the yoke, the g's go back to normal.

I have a feeling that 2.7 G's could possibly be enough to injure someone frail, or someone caught in an awkward position, and depending on how long it was sustained. I did a catapult launch off a carrier in the back of a C-2 Greyhound once, and that was supposedly 3-4 G's.

[ - ] Pasty 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 14, 2023 19:00:20 ago (+0/-0)

I did about 5 minutes of research and for the large aircraft they are only rated up to about 2.5g so it's probably written the plane off assuming it's one of the larger ones.

[ - ] JoggerLogger 2 points 2.2 yearsFeb 14, 2023 19:36:27 ago (+2/-0)

they would have done an over-g check to see if it’s serviceable still. even then the g limit is sustained limits not a “hit it once” and trash the airframe limit.

[ - ] uvulectomy 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 14, 2023 22:00:32 ago (+1/-0)*

Experienced G-force and limit load factor aren't always the same.

For aircraft over 50,000lbs (this was a 777-200, so VERY large), the limit load factor is 1.5, while the ultimate load factor is 2.5x the limit load factor. However, when the wings are full of fuel (as was the case in this incident, being shortly after takeoff), that actually provides some bending relief as the wing itself is carrying a good portion of that load, rather than the junction between the wing and the body.

In this case, there was an inspection done at the gate at SFO, then it continued on to Chicago.

For airliners, one of the certification tests for the design is bending the wing until it breaks. Wings have a design limit that represents the absolute worst conditions it would ever be expected to encounter during flight (for any reason), plus an added safety factor. For the 777, the wing was able to withstand 154% of that design load limit before breaking.