Being "against" is a trick for creating the illusion of agreement. Mr B condemns Mr A as insane, and Mr C, Mr D, and Mr E agree. Mr A gets booted out. Mr B gets put in charge.
Now Mr B cannot hide behind being "against". He has to reveal what he is "for". Then Mr C says he is nuts, Mr D says he is crazy, and Mr E says he is mad. The illusion of agreement is broken; it was only ever a trick.
[ + ] Sheitstrom
[ - ] Sheitstrom 4 points 2.3 yearsFeb 6, 2023 10:08:13 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 2 points 2.3 yearsFeb 6, 2023 11:14:43 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Wahaha
[ - ] Wahaha 1 point 2.3 yearsFeb 6, 2023 10:34:26 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] SithEmpire
[ - ] SithEmpire 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 6, 2023 14:32:33 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] happytoes
[ - ] happytoes 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 6, 2023 13:38:29 ago (+0/-0)
Now Mr B cannot hide behind being "against". He has to reveal what he is "for". Then Mr C says he is nuts, Mr D says he is crazy, and Mr E says he is mad. The illusion of agreement is broken; it was only ever a trick.