Sign into an existing account

Wikipedis smells bad.

I reject Christianity, but accept Christians for the most part. It is too universalist, but so is what is described in the post. Spirituality should be personal, and nobody should tell anyone how to interpret it. Mein Kampf might have it's merits, I don't know, never read it. I don't think it should be viewed as religious text though.

I think a lot about occult and esoteric knowledge. There's a lot that's being hidden from us, and I generally don't have a problem with people seeking knowledge and wisdom on that path. If you notice, that's the same stance I have on Christianity. Also, just for the record I don't consider judiasim a religion, I consider it a race and separate society. I think that as long as a person's spiritual pursuit is traveled with pure intentions that they are on the right path.

Rosenberg was particularly influenced by Meister Eckhart, which is apparent if one reads Whisker's bio of him or The Myth of the Twentieth Century. And Gnostics, Cathars, etc. He was a kind of modern Gnostic arguably. The influence is obvious. But Gnosticism can be Christian. And he did self-describe as a Christian in a way reminding me of Jefferson who didn't believe in the virgin birth or miracles attributed to Jesus Christ and reduced Jesus to a kind of Confucius-like teacher that he followed. Rosenberg was much more mystical. But the point is that both called themselves Christians.