×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
31

The US govt is publicly bragging and putting 100+ Bradley Fighting vehicles on a ship and sending them to Ukraine….. Why not just paint a fucking giant target on the side of the ship?

submitted by Steelerfish to ClownWorld 2.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 18:14:39 ago (+32/-1)     (www.thedrive.com)

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/ukraine-situation-report-m2-bradleys-have-begun-their-voyage-to-the-battlefield

At what point is it obvious to the rest of the world that the (((WEF subverted west, Zelenskyyyyyyy, Putin, and Xi))) are all on the same side pitted against the values you and me hold dear? We are the threat to be eliminated.


32 comments block


[ - ] knightwarrior41 7 points 2.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 21:28:33 ago (+7/-0)

this "war" is scripted. i still believe that this whole thing is just a massive distraction for the vaxx issue.

remember, nobody wins in a nuclear CONflict.

also europe is re buying oil from russia through india and china. you can look it up i posted the story not long ago in v/worldnews

[ - ] ClaytonBigsby313 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 1, 2023 05:37:49 ago (+0/-0)

The vaxx was a destraction from Ghislane

[ - ] deleted -3 points 2.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 23:07:10 ago (+1/-4)

deleted

[ - ] deleted 4 points 2.3 yearsFeb 1, 2023 03:48:06 ago (+4/-0)

deleted

[ - ] uvulectomy 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 1, 2023 07:07:21 ago (+0/-0)

Even at half a percent, that's *22,000*. Drugs get recalled over a less than a dozen, so 22k is absolutely a faulty product.

Also, one doesn't "receive" side effects you fucking retarded ESL kike. Gas yourself and your 5 day old account.

[ - ] FluffyBunnySlippers 5 points 2.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 21:03:30 ago (+5/-0)

Maybe that is the goal? The US has always loved to use ships to start wars. Perhaps they are hoping Russia will find it too tempting of a target to ignore to give them an excuse to join the war

[ - ] TheSimulacra 5 points 2.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 22:44:21 ago (+5/-0)

The primary purpose of war is the destruction of human capital - George Orwell

[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 1, 2023 03:45:17 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] xmasskull 3 points 2.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 19:54:13 ago (+3/-0)

How much are WE(American Taxpayer)paying for this,and most importantly;WHY??

[ - ] MartinTimothy 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 19:54:30 ago (+2/-1)*

"Why not just paint a giant target on the side of the ship?"

https://i.postimg.cc/TPq2hYbx/HMAS-Sydney-in-Vung-Tau-Harbor.jpg

Yeah brings the Australian involvement in the Vietnam War to mind, in that troopship HMAS Sydney was anchored in Vung Tau Harbor up to three times per year for seven yrs, the VC / NVA who claim to have won the war never fired a shot. If they had put their minds to it they could have sunk the ship and inflicted thousands of casualties, which would have spelled the end of Australia's commitment to the war.

https://i.postimg.cc/59P0w0RN/Nui-Thai-Vai-2.jpg

Sure the whole thing was a cook up .. the Australian base at Nui Dat was over looked by a jungle covered hill with a number of summits and saddles called Nui Dinh, it would have been small beer to locate mortar tubes and artillery to give the Australians the full Dien Ben Phu treatment, the year I was there from November 1969 not one enemy round came over the wire! Link.

The whole thing was choreographed by Jews .. they start wars then sell armaments to both sides paid for by credit supplied by Zionist banking houses, on paper signed by their political stooges which forever indemnifies their nation's treasuries with interest payments .. the Russia / Ukraine shermasco no less.

[ - ] Joe_McCarthy 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 18:16:42 ago (+3/-3)

Hopefully Russia sinks the ship.

[ - ] FreeinTX 8 points 2.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 18:43:14 ago (+9/-1)

Russia has no need to sink a US ship and draw NATO unto a war. Russia is bleeding the US and the EU to death with this quagmire. Oh no, Ukraine got what 30? 100 Bradley's? Who cares? They don't work well anyway. They will be destroyed in no time, and we'll send another $100B in condolences to the dead white people that the filthy fucking jews got killed.

[ - ] Steelerfish [op] 2 points 2.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 19:29:59 ago (+2/-0)

They will be destroyed in no time

That’s ok!- Along with the cash tribute paid to Zelenskyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy, The military industrial complex will get a new influx of taxpayer shekels for 100 more shiny brand-spanking new ones to be shipped right on over.

[ - ] deleted 3 points 2.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 19:37:40 ago (+3/-0)

deleted

[ - ] TheGreatWar 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 1, 2023 02:14:16 ago (+0/-0)

The dollars come in. The tanks go out. Where they blow up is not my department.

[ - ] TheGreatWar 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 1, 2023 02:12:35 ago (+0/-0)

If Russia doesn't attack, a false flag operation will sink a NATO ship anyway. And if Russia does attack a NATO ship, Russia will claim it was a false flag.

[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 1, 2023 08:21:57 ago (+0/-0)

If Russia did attack, which they wouldn't, it would make no sense to deny culpability. They would have every justification to sink that ship.

If they deny that they had a hand in it, we would need to see blatant proof of their involvement before we should just believe that bullshit. We have seen to specific examples of Ukraine fucking up and killing their own people and then blaming it on Russia. The missile that landed in Poland, the attacks on a nuclear plant, and that recent apartment building being struck by a missile. All blamed on Russia and Ukraine knew damn well that they were responsible.

And, it isn't the American or European people that need to be convinced. We've shown that our media will lie and manufacture consent that doesn't exist.



[ - ] Joe_McCarthy -4 points 2.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 19:39:50 ago (+0/-4)

I'm far less interested in the 'need' of Russia than what them sinking a US ship in these conditions would precipitate. You think Lenin liked the German Empire and its reactionary rulers? More like he knew the revolutionary possibilities at home of world war and conflict in terms of toppling a hated regime that both he and the Germans were hostile to.

And mine is a revolutionary position if definitely not a Communist one.

[ - ] FreeinTX 2 points 2.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 20:54:21 ago (+2/-0)

Again, Russia has no need to sink a US ship and draw NATO into war. You maybe couldn't give a shit about Russia's "needs" but the reward for not attacking a US ship far outweigh any conceivable benefit. The US and the EU are losing on the world stage every day, and it's specifically because of this. If anything happens to that shit, I'd side eye some of our (((allies))) before believing Russia did it.

[ - ] Glowbright 6 points 2.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 18:32:04 ago (+6/-0)

Supply ships are typically seen as non-combatants. U-boats sinking American and British supply ships is a big part of how we escalated into WWII. OP's question is the right one to ask:

Why not just paint a fucking giant target on the side of the ship?

...Because a target would be too obvious. EVERYTHING THE US IS DOING IS INTENDED TO ESCALATE THE CONFLICT

[ - ] BlueEyedAngloMasterRaceGod 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 19:48:53 ago (+1/-0)

like how the nazis had to sink the same arms ships resulting in the obvious intention of the US eventually entering the war

[ - ] TheGreatWar 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 1, 2023 02:10:08 ago (+0/-0)

Don't be naive. That ship doesn't contain 50 fighting vehicles. If it does, and Russia sinks it, the moral narrative will support Russia. You want them to sink a ship full of children and nuns. These coms are goading the Russians to attack for sure. But which ship to sink and where and when isn't something the US will give away.

[ - ] 1234lkjh 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 1, 2023 02:42:23 ago (+0/-0)

Well, if the US enters the war it'll be over very quickly.

[ - ] jigganiggaboo 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 1, 2023 03:09:17 ago (+0/-0)

Standard war starter right there. The Russians will sink the ship then the US will be like" Oh noes muh Lusitania 2.0 gud boies who dindu nuffins" then kick off WW3 or whatever they decide to call it

[ - ] AttilaHitler 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 1, 2023 06:47:10 ago (+0/-0)

Next thing you know they'll be sending Africans...J/K

[ - ] autotic 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 1, 2023 08:27:02 ago (+0/-0)

They WANT a war. Why not goad Russia into attacking that ship?

That said, I think Russia -- or at least their Jewish oligarchs -- are in on the hustle.

[ - ] winners_history 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 1, 2023 11:05:42 ago (+0/-0)

It's the "Lusitania" gambit, updated for the memory-of-a-goldfish generation.

[ - ] StealthNinjaTaliban 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 1, 2023 12:50:39 ago (+0/-0)

RMS Lusitania