In fact, the curve of the earth will prevent seeing objects beyond and below the horizon. Timestamp is at the correct formula for determining earths curvature, not the 'gake and fey' formula for a parabola the flatters try to slip by you.
You've got nothing but shouting "the earth is flat!" You have no explanation for seasons, climate, movement of the sun and moon, gravity, and everything else we see. You don't even believe the earth is flat yourself, and have given it away by being able to type sentences in English.
Tbf though, my guys might have hired you in my call center back in the day. You stick to the script, and stay on point. That's important in a job where normal skills and abilities are typically lacking.
1 of 2 from old voat has been dormant since. The other was revived on communities.win. I have an alt here I brought over when it was shadowbanned on another site a couple weeks ago. My alt on saidit has been inactive since that whole 'tranny admin' episode. Not sure if my alt on poal still exists after deleting all content. My alt on the DS will be inactive until sometime in 2347, iirc. Too many to count, really, but this and the one on conpro are the two workhorses.
do you believe gravity would stop existing if "NASA" were defunded and shut down?
This is an example of jew argument. Gravity is a theory that attempts to explain an agreed upon downward acceleration. Just because the jew theory (Einstein theory of relativity) is wrong doesn't mean downward acceleration doesn't exist. Kike harder.
There is if you look across 10/20/30 miles of water. You'll notice you can't see objects obstructed by the curve of the earth.
The earth curvature is claimed to be 8 inches per mile squared. I guess you're not one of the faggot kikes any good at math.
McNasty already knows the earth is a globe, as do the vast majority of flat earthers. I doubt anyone would pay anyone to post this retarded shit here (the youtube flerfs actually earn money from the grift as do people who do public speaking) so the only thing i can think of him getting out of this is exactly what i posted yesterday, gets a massive hard on from all the attention.
Its the same talking points from the same person with all their alts daily and has been for the last what.... 5 years?
I used to enjoy that SciManDan bagging the shit out of them but he went full retard and joined the flat earth crowd himself the other day by 'proving' that the jabs arent killing anyone and anyone thinking the pandemic is real is ignoring 'science'
[ - ] UncleDoug 1 point 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 11:38:50 ago (+1/-0)
The density formula is different from the buoyancy formula.
Positive buoyancy is achieved when an object displaces water that is greater than it weighs. It is how its possible to have concrete hull ships that float.
What do you think buoyancy has to do with whatever you are trying to explain with your concept of Earth modeling? Do you know buoyancy is not transferable with gravity and other applied forces right?
Ask the flat earthers, which I am not. That's their theory. There is no gravity, only density and buoyancy.
Why do they think this? Bird wings are too small and cannot fly under gravity, because if gravity exists, it would be too strong for aerodynamic lift to overcome.
Bird wings are too small and cannot fly under gravity
birds can fly based on a different observable force called aerodynamics, they are able to generate lift and thrust, and their bones are also hollow which means they reduce weight.
Look at laminar flow on how a wing compresses air under the plane and air needs to equalise generating lift.
Do you think helicopters and planes are floating but in air? They would have to weight less than air then. Are you one fo the whack jobs that thinks brids are holograms in the matrix?
I know all of this, ask the flat earther. That's who the question is posed to. I was trying to give you a laugh because they will go into way more detail.
This is why I keep calling you all kikes. You just regurgitate kike talking points. Like your kike buddy Sector7 who says he can see the curvature 30 mi out into the water.
You're also a kike because you keep avoiding the jq about NASA.
This is great. Lol. You kikes absolutely hate the flat earth. You don't know what to do because your job is to talk shit about jews on voat but also not acknowledge jews at NASA.
- I know thy works and tribulation and poverty (but thou art rich), and I know the blasphemy of them that say they are jews and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.
The distance you can see to the horizon is way less when on a ship at sea level within normal height parameters. So yes a ship about 4-5km out will dip over the horizon because the world is a sphere and not a flat plane.
You're also a kike because you keep avoiding the jq about NASA.
So because there was a jew at NASA, everything science-related is a jew conspiracy?
Stop talking shit and post "proof" of flat world and I will prove where you went wrong.
On the Jewish side, Silverstein helped set up the entire human space flight program before NASA was created in 1958. Abraham Hyatt, who fled Ukraine with his family before World War II, was a headquarters planning director. Milton Rosen was chief of NASA’s science mission directorate. George Low became deputy chief of NASA, known for his advocacy of the gutsy 1968 decision to orbit the moon after only one human test flight of the Apollo system. Louis Rosenblum was a key technologist in energy. Slone specialized in propulsion. Erwin Zaretsky was one of the world’s top experts in ball bearings and machinery lubrication.
You're down playing the jew as if they didn't "helped set up the entire human space flight program before NASA was created in 1958." Typical. Are you going to tell me they play a big roll in banking and media next?
Stop talking shit and post "proof" of flat world and I will prove where you went wrong.
All observable reality dictates we live on a flat stationary plane. Everything you claim comes from a jew.
That all observable reality dictates a flat stationary plane? Lol. You mean like how we can't feel the rotation of the Earth? Or how we can see 60 miles over a body of water? For how water always finds its level? Or how the stars at night don't show any parallax between them? Or that flights on a flat earth map are a straight line as opposed to ridiculous layovers on a standard map?
Nope. We're told that we're in an elliptical orbit around the sun. This means that the earth has to speed up and slow down throughout the year.
The distance you can see to the horizon directly corresponds with your elevation above sea level.
No shit. It's the equation I posted earlier. It does not allow you to see Chicago from the Michigan shoreline which is easily done.
What is gravity for $100 Alec?
Literally a jew theory. Downward acceleration does not require a jew theory.
Parallax#1 Parallax#2
Apparently your too retarded to know what Parallax is.
Maps are 2D projections of a globular earth because it would be impractical for Sailors and Pilots to carry around a globe.
You dumb fuck. Globes aren't accurate either dumb faggot. In fact, all globes have a disclaimer on the bottom that says "for decoration only not for educational purposes."
Prove the world is flat mongoman
I get that I can never convince you the world is flat. You already know it. But you're a kike that gets paid shekels to deny it. You've repeated every single kike argument without pause. You're a pathetic faggot that should hang themselves for being a kike. The world could use a little less filth.
[ - ] chrimony 1 point 1.3 yearsFeb 1, 2023 05:23:10 ago (+1/-0)
We do observe parallax, as I've explained to you before, flattard. And I've explained why you're a retard for thinking you can observe parallax in nightly star trails. Not my fault you deny all evidence and reason that doesn't fit with your flattard world view.
But measuring parallax for great distances is a precision measurement. We don't need that to debunk flattard Earth, because something as so basic as the stars rotating about two poles is trivially explained by a rotating spherical Earth, but makes no sense in Flattard Land.
We do observe parallax, as I've explained to you before, flattard.
All you're doing is regurgitating kike nonsense. You telling me that we will not see the difference in a star trail between a star at five light years away and millions of light years away is retarded as fuck. You might as well be telling me I need to take my vaccine for yours to work. You kites are so fuckin stupid.
But measuring parallax for great distances is a precision measurement.
You believe outer space exists because of a jew named Albert Einstein.
You telling me that we will not see the difference in a star trail between a star at five light years away and millions of light years away is retarded as fuck.
What's retarded is that you thing a yoga ball and some christmas tree lights in your room are comparable to a star 25 trillion miles away.
And you also continue to argue about parallax, which takes precision measurement, and ignore that the stars rotate about two poles -- a fact literally written across the sky telling you that the Earth is a rotating sphere, and flat Earth is complete bullshit.
And the problem is that you believe this math affects all the stars equally. You believe stars exist a millions of light years apart and show no difference in paralax. You believe all of this because of a jew theory of relativity.
What's retarded is that you thing a yoga ball and some christmas tree lights in your room are comparable to a star 25 trillion miles away.
This is irrelevant. I could stick those lights at any distance. A full rotation will result in paralax.
And you also continue to argue about parallax, which takes precision measurement,
And the problem is that you believe this math affects all the stars equally.
What kind of retarded statement is that? Math is math, physics is physics. It's the same for all stars. You plug the numbers in and get your answers, retard.
You believe stars exist a millions of light years apart and show no difference in paralax.
Ah, I see your retard logic. They are millions of light years apart, so they must be easy to tell apart! The part you're missing is that they are both too far away to see parallax in something as crude as night trails. You can't see parallax for the closest stars with that method. So more of the same for even more distance stars still shows you nothing. Do you get it, retard?
You believe all of this because of a jew theory of relativity.
Truly a know-nothing retard. It has NOTHING to do with relativity. This is basic geometry that even flattards accept. Parallax.
I could stick those lights at any distance. A full rotation will result in paralax.
None you could measure with your naked eye or without precise instruments, retard. It's like saying you could read the fine print on a piece of paper 10 miles away. Yeah, you could -- in theory. But you ain't gonna read shit with your P900, retard.
And notice how, AGAIN, you refuse to address that stars rotate about two poles. Completely bullshit on Flattard Earth, but trivially explained on spherical Earth. You'd rather argue over technical details about parallax, because while you're still wrong, you're retarded enough to muddy the issue in your mind.
What kind of retarded statement is that? Math is math, physics is physics.
No. You're a retard because you don't understand the math and you believe the jew theory that tries to explain physics.
You plug the numbers in and get your answers, retard.
Paralax is relative. Five light years is nowhere close to a million light years?.
Ah, I see your retard logic. They are millions of light years apart, so they must be easy to tell apart!
When compared to each other, yea. Alone, no.
The part you're missing is that they are both too far away to see parallax in something as crude as night trails. You can't see parallax for the closest stars with that method.
Seeing trails is seeing paralax. It's retarded enough to believe they are ever expanding and we never see a change. It's just more retarded to believe they are also too far to notice a difference of millions of light years.
Truly a know-nothing retard. It has NOTHING to do with relativity.
Do you believe relativity?
None you could measure with your naked eye or without precise instruments, retard.
Cool story. It takes a extreme amount of faith in your jewish overloads to believe such a retarded thing.
It's like saying you could read the fine print on a piece of paper 10 miles away.
That wouldn't be visible. Stars can be visible at billions of light years. The inverse square law should tell you just how retarded you are. But we forget all about that when it comes to space. I'm sure you have another retarded excuse why it's even possible to see stars.
And notice how, AGAIN, you refuse to address that stars rotate about two poles.
Cool story. Nobody can record anything at the poles so who gives a fuck.
Paralax is relative. Five light years is nowhere close to a million light years?.
An immeasurable number is still immeasurable when it's even harder to measure, retard. You can't read the fine print on a piece of paper 10 miles away. And you can't read the fine print on a piece of paper 100 miles away, retard. You get the same answer no matter how far away it is -- nothing.
Cool story. Nobody can record anything at the poles so who gives a fuck.
Even flattards in Australia can photograph the night sky, retard. You know those star trails you love so much for parallax, even though they are completely useless for that? Well guess what, they show two poles, one for the north, one for the south. Makes no sense on Flattard Land, makes perfect sense on spherical Earth.
Except that the spherical model can be proven. Facts are important because it determines how much knowledge you acquire, and ascertaining facts from opinions helps individuals develop their critical and analytical skills int he pursuit of knowledge.
Incorrect opinions obfuscate facts and retard the pursuit of knowledge, with enough retards spouting factually incorrect assertions we delve into another dark age.
Not all opinions are made equal, some people are clearly wrong.
[ + ] Sector7
[ - ] Sector7 5 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 02:02:51 ago (+5/-0)
https://youtu.be/KyD8VIK032o?t=272
In fact, the curve of the earth will prevent seeing objects beyond and below the horizon. Timestamp is at the correct formula for determining earths curvature, not the 'gake and fey' formula for a parabola the flatters try to slip by you.
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty [op] -2 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 02:40:46 ago (+2/-4)
Can you see curvature a 30 mi over the water like you said you did? The space nigger I linked is your rabbi, not mine.
[ + ] Sector7
[ - ] Sector7 3 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 03:41:04 ago (+3/-0)
Tbf though, my guys might have hired you in my call center back in the day. You stick to the script, and stay on point. That's important in a job where normal skills and abilities are typically lacking.
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted -1 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 05:00:17 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] Sector7
[ - ] Sector7 2 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 12:51:08 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 1.3 yearsFeb 1, 2023 03:33:44 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Sector7
[ - ] Sector7 0 points 1.3 yearsFeb 1, 2023 14:56:59 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 1.3 yearsFeb 2, 2023 03:48:25 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 14:50:20 ago (+0/-1)
No. I've posted several times with NASA fakery and flat facta. You just regurgitate the jew lie and ignore everything in reality.
You said you can see the curvature 30 mi out into the water. Are you sticking to that script?
[ + ] Sector7
[ - ] Sector7 1 point 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 14:59:56 ago (+1/-0)
Ho hum. Quote what I really said.
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 15:13:08 ago (+0/-1)
This is an example of jew argument. Gravity is a theory that attempts to explain an agreed upon downward acceleration. Just because the jew theory (Einstein theory of relativity) is wrong doesn't mean downward acceleration doesn't exist. Kike harder.
The earth curvature is claimed to be 8 inches per mile squared. I guess you're not one of the faggot kikes any good at math.
[ + ] Sector7
[ - ] Sector7 1 point 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 16:00:24 ago (+1/-0)
Only by flat earthers so clueless about math that they use the formula for a parabola.
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 17:31:45 ago (+0/-1)
Lol. The equation comes from NASA you dumb faggot. If the earth is a sphere and has a radius, then any retard can figure this out.
[ + ] Sector7
[ - ] Sector7 1 point 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 18:50:11 ago (+1/-0)
Now you're figuring it out.
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 19:21:46 ago (+0/-1)
which gives a circumference (c)of c = 2 π r = 40 030 km
We wish to find the height (h) which is the drop in curvature over the distance (d)
Using the circumference we find that 1 kilometer has the angle
360° / 40 030 km = 0.009°. The angle (a) is then a = 0.009° distance (d)
The derived formula h = r (1 - cos a) is accurate for any distance (d)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 19:22:55 ago (+0/-1)
Are vaccines also safe?
[ + ] Master_Foo
[ - ] Master_Foo 3 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 02:40:03 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] TheBigGuyFromQueens
[ - ] TheBigGuyFromQueens 1 point 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 03:11:49 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 02:41:20 ago (+1/-2)
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug 3 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 02:19:16 ago (+3/-0)
Maps are a 2D projection of a 3D model, each type with their own shortcomings.
McNasty is without doubt the dumbest person on this forum.
Stop calling everyone a kike and post evidence to support your claim of the retarded flat earth , all so I can debunk each claim.
[ + ] i_scream_trucks
[ - ] i_scream_trucks 3 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 02:25:01 ago (+3/-0)
Its the same talking points from the same person with all their alts daily and has been for the last what.... 5 years?
I used to enjoy that SciManDan bagging the shit out of them but he went full retard and joined the flat earth crowd himself the other day by 'proving' that the jabs arent killing anyone and anyone thinking the pandemic is real is ignoring 'science'
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty [op] -2 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 02:58:56 ago (+1/-3)
[ + ] ghetto_shitlord
[ - ] ghetto_shitlord 1 point 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 11:32:28 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug 1 point 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 11:38:50 ago (+1/-0)
Positive buoyancy is achieved when an object displaces water that is greater than it weighs. It is how its possible to have concrete hull ships that float.
What do you think buoyancy has to do with whatever you are trying to explain with your concept of Earth modeling? Do you know buoyancy is not transferable with gravity and other applied forces right?
[ + ] ghetto_shitlord
[ - ] ghetto_shitlord 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 13:10:26 ago (+0/-0)
Why do they think this? Bird wings are too small and cannot fly under gravity, because if gravity exists, it would be too strong for aerodynamic lift to overcome.
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 13:15:09 ago (+0/-0)
Incorrect.
birds can fly based on a different observable force called aerodynamics, they are able to generate lift and thrust, and their bones are also hollow which means they reduce weight.
Look at laminar flow on how a wing compresses air under the plane and air needs to equalise generating lift.
Do you think helicopters and planes are floating but in air? They would have to weight less than air then.
Are you one fo the whack jobs that thinks brids are holograms in the matrix?
[ + ] ghetto_shitlord
[ - ] ghetto_shitlord 1 point 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 13:49:19 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 02:39:22 ago (+2/-3)
This is why I keep calling you all kikes. You just regurgitate kike talking points. Like your kike buddy Sector7 who says he can see the curvature 30 mi out into the water.
You're also a kike because you keep avoiding the jq about NASA.
[ + ] i_scream_trucks
[ - ] i_scream_trucks 4 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 02:41:08 ago (+4/-0)
fuck you cant even come up with fresh material, its the same fucking points every single day.
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 02:43:23 ago (+2/-3)
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 03:12:50 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 -1 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 03:21:10 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 14:52:24 ago (+0/-1)
REVELATION 2:9
- I know thy works and tribulation and poverty (but thou art rich), and I know the blasphemy of them that say they are jews and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 1.3 yearsFeb 1, 2023 03:34:14 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 14:53:57 ago (+0/-1)
Pure projection. Tells me the earth is a globe with jew sources.
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug 3 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 04:15:56 ago (+3/-0)
So yes a ship about 4-5km out will dip over the horizon because the world is a sphere and not a flat plane.
So because there was a jew at NASA, everything science-related is a jew conspiracy?
Stop talking shit and post "proof" of flat world and I will prove where you went wrong.
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 14:47:57 ago (+0/-1)
Your space nigger rabbi said the earth looks completely flat at 180,000 feet.
https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-03-01/who-got-america-to-the-moon-a-unlikely-collaboration-of-jews-and-former-nazi-engineers
You're down playing the jew as if they didn't "helped set up the entire human space flight program before NASA was created in 1958." Typical. Are you going to tell me they play a big roll in banking and media next?
All observable reality dictates we live on a flat stationary plane. Everything you claim comes from a jew.
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug 1 point 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 21:28:54 ago (+1/-0)
Do yuo get all your talking points from niggers?
Prove it flattard
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 23:28:52 ago (+0/-1)
Lol. That's your space nigger, not mine.
That all observable reality dictates a flat stationary plane? Lol. You mean like how we can't feel the rotation of the Earth? Or how we can see 60 miles over a body of water? For how water always finds its level? Or how the stars at night don't show any parallax between them? Or that flights on a flat earth map are a straight line as opposed to ridiculous layovers on a standard map?
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug 1 point 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 23:39:03 ago (+1/-0)
Because the speed is contant.
The distance you can see to the horizon directly corresponds with your elevation above sea level.
What is gravity for $100 Alec?
Parallax#1
Parallax#2
Maps are 2D projections of a globular earth because it would be impractical for Sailors and Pilots to carry around a globe.
Flight patterns
Prove the world is flat mongoman
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 1.3 yearsFeb 1, 2023 04:23:04 ago (+0/-1)
Nope. We're told that we're in an elliptical orbit around the sun. This means that the earth has to speed up and slow down throughout the year.
No shit. It's the equation I posted earlier. It does not allow you to see Chicago from the Michigan shoreline which is easily done.
Literally a jew theory. Downward acceleration does not require a jew theory.
Apparently your too retarded to know what Parallax is.
You dumb fuck. Globes aren't accurate either dumb faggot. In fact, all globes have a disclaimer on the bottom that says "for decoration only not for educational purposes."
I get that I can never convince you the world is flat. You already know it. But you're a kike that gets paid shekels to deny it. You've repeated every single kike argument without pause. You're a pathetic faggot that should hang themselves for being a kike. The world could use a little less filth.
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony 2 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 09:44:41 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 14:39:02 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony 1 point 1.3 yearsFeb 1, 2023 05:23:10 ago (+1/-0)
But measuring parallax for great distances is a precision measurement. We don't need that to debunk flattard Earth, because something as so basic as the stars rotating about two poles is trivially explained by a rotating spherical Earth, but makes no sense in Flattard Land.
Cope harder.
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 1.3 yearsFeb 1, 2023 15:31:03 ago (+0/-1)
All you're doing is regurgitating kike nonsense. You telling me that we will not see the difference in a star trail between a star at five light years away and millions of light years away is retarded as fuck. You might as well be telling me I need to take my vaccine for yours to work. You kites are so fuckin stupid.
You believe outer space exists because of a jew named Albert Einstein.
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony 0 points 1.3 yearsFeb 2, 2023 09:51:15 ago (+0/-0)
It's just math, retard. I linked you this site that last time we had this retarded debate: https://www.translatorscafe.com/unit-converter/en-US/calculator/parallax-distance/
What's retarded is that you thing a yoga ball and some christmas tree lights in your room are comparable to a star 25 trillion miles away.
And you also continue to argue about parallax, which takes precision measurement, and ignore that the stars rotate about two poles -- a fact literally written across the sky telling you that the Earth is a rotating sphere, and flat Earth is complete bullshit.
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty [op] 0 points 1.3 yearsFeb 2, 2023 14:42:22 ago (+0/-0)
And the problem is that you believe this math affects all the stars equally. You believe stars exist a millions of light years apart and show no difference in paralax. You believe all of this because of a jew theory of relativity.
This is irrelevant. I could stick those lights at any distance. A full rotation will result in paralax.
And you buy this kike bullshit.
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony 0 points 1.3 yearsFeb 3, 2023 02:28:09 ago (+0/-0)
What kind of retarded statement is that? Math is math, physics is physics. It's the same for all stars. You plug the numbers in and get your answers, retard.
Ah, I see your retard logic. They are millions of light years apart, so they must be easy to tell apart! The part you're missing is that they are both too far away to see parallax in something as crude as night trails. You can't see parallax for the closest stars with that method. So more of the same for even more distance stars still shows you nothing. Do you get it, retard?
Truly a know-nothing retard. It has NOTHING to do with relativity. This is basic geometry that even flattards accept. Parallax.
None you could measure with your naked eye or without precise instruments, retard. It's like saying you could read the fine print on a piece of paper 10 miles away. Yeah, you could -- in theory. But you ain't gonna read shit with your P900, retard.
And notice how, AGAIN, you refuse to address that stars rotate about two poles. Completely bullshit on Flattard Earth, but trivially explained on spherical Earth. You'd rather argue over technical details about parallax, because while you're still wrong, you're retarded enough to muddy the issue in your mind.
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty [op] 0 points 1.3 yearsFeb 3, 2023 12:36:33 ago (+0/-0)
No. You're a retard because you don't understand the math and you believe the jew theory that tries to explain physics.
Paralax is relative. Five light years is nowhere close to a million light years?.
When compared to each other, yea. Alone, no.
Seeing trails is seeing paralax. It's retarded enough to believe they are ever expanding and we never see a change. It's just more retarded to believe they are also too far to notice a difference of millions of light years.
Do you believe relativity?
Cool story. It takes a extreme amount of faith in your jewish overloads to believe such a retarded thing.
That wouldn't be visible. Stars can be visible at billions of light years. The inverse square law should tell you just how retarded you are. But we forget all about that when it comes to space. I'm sure you have another retarded excuse why it's even possible to see stars.
Cool story. Nobody can record anything at the poles so who gives a fuck.
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony 0 points 1.3 yearsFeb 3, 2023 13:55:16 ago (+0/-0)
An immeasurable number is still immeasurable when it's even harder to measure, retard. You can't read the fine print on a piece of paper 10 miles away. And you can't read the fine print on a piece of paper 100 miles away, retard. You get the same answer no matter how far away it is -- nothing.
Even flattards in Australia can photograph the night sky, retard. You know those star trails you love so much for parallax, even though they are completely useless for that? Well guess what, they show two poles, one for the north, one for the south. Makes no sense on Flattard Land, makes perfect sense on spherical Earth.
Flattard has his head stuck up his ass.
[ + ]deleted
[ - ] deleted 2 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 03:11:54 ago (+3/-1)
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug 2 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 04:16:54 ago (+2/-0)
Some opinions are wrong.
There are no unicorns, dogs don't have 8 legs, and the sky isn't purple.
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted -2 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 04:18:29 ago (+0/-2)
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug 4 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 04:45:06 ago (+4/-0)
Incorrect opinions obfuscate facts and retard the pursuit of knowledge, with enough retards spouting factually incorrect assertions we delve into another dark age.
Not all opinions are made equal, some people are clearly wrong.
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 04:57:40 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug 2 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 05:12:43 ago (+2/-0)
Objectively wrong assertions are dangerous ideas, shills and retards should be physically beaten.
[ + ] FacelessOne
[ - ] FacelessOne 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 13:06:52 ago (+0/-0)
Anyone who disagrees will be sent to the Ministry of NASA for reconditioning.
Accept your place in the beast system.
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug 1 point 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 13:09:49 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] FacelessOne
[ - ] FacelessOne 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 18:40:24 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 21:36:51 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 14:41:06 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ]deleted
[ - ] deleted 1 point 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 14:53:58 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 14:57:00 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] observation1
[ - ] observation1 -1 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2023 04:01:45 ago (+0/-1)