Sign into an existing account

You can start with the fact that it used to be called "global warming". They claimed all the ice would melt by 2020 and we now know that claim was 100% bullshit.

Climate change refutations? What the fuck are you wanting us to refute. Lets start with this list. Do you accept this media documented science is not the truth?


colder winters held dawn of new ice age scientists see ice age in the future (the washington post, january 11, 1970)

is mankind manufacturing a new ice age for itself? (l.a. times, january 15, 1970)

new ice age may descend on man (sumter daily item, january 26, 1970)

pollution prospect a chilling one (the argus-press, january 26, 1970)

pollution's 2-way 'freeze' on society (middlesboro daily news, january 28, 1970)

cold facts about pollution (the southeast missourian, january 29, 1970)

pollution could cause ice age, agency reports (st. petersburg times, march 4, 1970)

scientist predicts a new ice age by 21st century (the boston globe, april 16, 1970)

pollution called ice age threat (st. petersburg times, june 26, 1970)

u.s. and soviet press studies of a colder arctic (the new york times, july 18, 1970)

dirt will bring new ice age (the sydney morning herald, october 19, 1970)

ice age refugee dies underground (montreal gazette, febuary 17, 1971)

pollution might lead to another ice age (the schenectady gazette, march 22, 1971)

pollution may bring ice age scientist rites risk (the windsor star, march 23, 1971)

u.s. scientist sees new ice age coming (the washington post, july 9, 1971)

ice age around the corner (chicago tribune, july 10, 1971)

danger: ice age may lurk in dusty skies (the christian science monitor, july 12, 1971)

new ice age coming it's already getting colder (l.a. times, october 24, 1971)

another ice age? pollution blocking sunlight (the day, november 1, 1971)

air pollution could bring an ice age (harlan daily enterprise, november 4, 1971)

air pollution may cause ice age (free-lance star, february 3, 1972)

scientist says new ice age coming (the ledger, february 13, 1972)

ice age cometh for dicey times (the sun, may 29, 1972)

ice age coming (deseret news, september 8, 1972)

there's a new ice age coming! (the windsor star, september 9, 1972)

scientist predicts new ice age (free-lance star, september 11, 1972)

british expert on climate change says new ice age creeping over northern hemisphere (lewiston evening journal, september 11, 1972)

climate seen cooling for return of ice age (the portsmouth times, ‎september 11, 1972‎)

new ice age slipping over north (the press-courier, september 11, 1972)

beginning of new ice age (the canberra times, september 12, 1972)

ice age begins a new assault in north (the age, september 12, 1972)

weather to get colder (montreal gazette, ‎september 12, 1972‎)

british climate expert predicts new ice age (the christian science monitor, september 23, 1972)

scientist sees chilling signs of new ice age (l.a. times, september 24, 1972)

science: another ice age? (time magazine, november 13, 1972)

geologist at case traces long winters sees ice age in 20 years (youngstown vindicator, december 13, 1972)

ice age on its way, scientist says (toledo blade, december 13, 1972)

ice age predicted in about 200 years (the portsmouth times, december 14, 1972)

new ice age coming? (popular science, january 1973)

the ice age cometh (the saturday review, march 24, 1973)

believe new ice age is coming (the bryan times, march 31, 1973)

'man-made ice age' worries scientists (the free lance-star, june 22, 1973)

fear of man-made ice age (the spartanburg herald, june 28, 1973)

possibility of ice age worries the scientists (the argus-press, november 12, 1973)

weather-watchers think another ice age may be on the way (the christian science monitor, december 11, 1973)

ominous changes in the world's weather (pdf) (fortune magazine, february 1974)

atmospheric dirt: ice age coming?‎ (pittsburgh press, february 28, 1974)

support for theory of a cooling world (the canberra times, may 16, 1974)

new evidence indicates ice age here (eugene register-guard, may 29, 1974)

another ice age? (time magazine, june 24, 1974)

2 scientists think 'little' ice age near (hartford courant, august 11, 1974)

ice age, worse food crisis seen (chicago tribune, october 30, 1974)

imminent arrival of the ice (radio times, november 14, 1974)

making a bbc science special the weather machine (new scientist, november 14, 1974)

the weather machine (bbc, november 20, 1974)

new ice age 'could be in our lifetime' (the canberra times, november 22, 1974)

believes pollution could bring on ice age (ludington daily news, december 4, 1974)

pollution could spur ice age, nasa says (beaver country times, ‎december 4, 1974‎)

air pollution may trigger ice age, scientists feel (the telegraph, ‎december 5, 1974‎)

more air pollution could trigger ice age disaster (daily sentinel, ‎december 5, 1974‎)

scientists fear smog could cause ice age (milwaukee journal sentinel, december 5, 1974)

climate changes called ominous (the new york times, january 19, 1975)

climate change: chilling possibilities (science news, march 1, 1975)

b-r-r-r-r: new ice age on way soon? (chicago tribune, march 2, 1975)

cooling trends arouse fear that new ice age coming (eugene register-guard, ‎march 2, 1975‎)

is another ice age due? arctic ice expands in last decade (youngstown vindicator, ‎march 2, 1975‎)

is earth headed for another ice age? (reading eagle, march 2, 1975)

new ice age dawning? significant shift in climate seen (times daily, ‎march 2, 1975‎)

there's troublesome weather ahead (tri city herald, ‎march 2, 1975‎)

is earth doomed to live through another ice age? (the robesonian, ‎march 3, 1975‎)

the ice age cometh: the system that controls our climate (chicago tribune, april 13, 1975)

the cooling world (newsweek, april 28, 1975)

cooling trend may signal coming of another ice age (the sun, may 16, 1975)

scientists ask why world climate is changing; major ling may be ahead (pdf) (the new york times, may 21, 1975)

summer of a new ice age (the age, june 5, 1975)

in the grip of a new ice age? (international wildlife, july-august, 1975)

experts ponder another ice age (the spokesman-review, september 8, 1975)

oil spill could cause new ice age (milwaukee journal entinel, december 11, 1975)

deadly harvest film (starring: kim cattrall, clint walker, 1976)

the cooling: has the next ice age already begun? book (lowell ponte, 1976) ice age predicted (reading eagle, january 22, 1976) ice age predicted in century (bangor daily news, january 22, 1976) it's going to get chilly about 125 years from now (sarasota herald-tribune, january 23, 1976) worrisome cia report; even u.s. farms may be hit by cooling trend (u.s. news & world report, may 31, 1976)

blizzard what happens if it doesn't stop? book (george stone, 1977)

the weather conspiracy: the coming of the new ice age book (the impact team, 1977)

the ice age cometh... (new york magazine, january 31, 1977)

the big freeze (time magazine, january 31, 1977)

has the ice age cometh again? (calgary herald, february 1, 1977)

space mirrors proposed to prevent crop freezes (bangor daily news, february 7, 1977)

sunspot lull may bring on new ice age (the christian science monitor, march 30, 1977)

You don't need any facts or links or anything, the premise that it can ever be concluded that humans affect the global climate is false.

The only way to scientifically prove causation is with the scientific method. The most important part of the scientific method is the experiment. In order to determine causation, one must isolate the measurable independent variable (human activity), change the value, and compare the change in the dependent variable (climate) between the experiment group and the control group. Given the fact that there is only one planet Earth, it is literally impossible to conduct an experiment as to whether humans affect the climate because there is no control group in existence. Thus, it is scientifically impossible to conclude that a causal relationship exists between human activity and the climate.

All of the "science" and "studies" aren't actually either. What they are doing is technically called observational studies, but they aren't actually studies. They are simply parsing data. Data that may or may not even be accurate since they can't calibrate the methods they are using to determine temperatures from millions of years ago because accurate global temperature recordings have only existed for a couple centuries. It is literally scientifically impossible to derive causation from an observational study. Just google it. Observational studies are like mechanistic studies (which also aren't actually studies either), they are basically preliminary "experiments" that only serve to indicate the possibility of a relationship that must be followed up with actual experimentation to make a causal determination. They are what scientists use to determine if it is even worth it to do a study without spending tons of resources.

Don't fight studies with studies, don't engage like that, just show people that they don't know jack shit about basic scientific concepts. The scientific method is literally middle school level shit.

open any grade 2 science book and read the part about what makes trees grow.

tl;dr trees suck in CO2, store the carbon (wood) and release O2. Remove CO2, you kill trees, you kill trees you remove O2, remove O2 you remove us.

its basic as fuck.

"Hide the decline" explained: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_8xd0LCeRQ

Sea levels rose 400 feet in the last 20,000 years: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early_Holocene_sea_level_rise

CO2 greening Earth: https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2016/carbon-dioxide-fertilization-greening-earth/

Rich people continue to buy property on the coast.

Ask for a predictive model proven correct.

I shit you not the closest was in the 70s before they went warming alarmist.

Very little increases you see.

Now look up the younger dryas event to see real climate change occurring.

10deg change in a couple of years.

Co2 is nothing

Ask for a predictive model proven correct.

I shit you not the closest was in the 70s before they went warming alarmist.

Very little increases you see.

Now look up the younger dryas event to see real climate change occurring.

10deg change in a couple of years.

Co2 is nothing

https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost?postid=62ec6cbbac3e4

Milankovic cycle