×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules
-3

Lack of parallax in the stars prove that the stars have no depth.

submitted by McNasty to whatever 1.3 yearsJan 29, 2023 19:11:24 ago (+3/-6)     (whatever)

Here is a time lapse video of the stars.

https://youtu.be/tp6UkqIwVfk

Here is an experiment anyone can do to prove that parallax should be observable when viewing the stars if stars existed in an infinite vacuum of space at various depths.

https://files.catbox.moe/6pch45.png

Take a yoga ball. Attach a string to opposite ends. Attach one end to the ceiling and the other to the floor. Place two strings of lights above the ball at different depths. Attach a go pro camera to the ball. Record while rotating the ball. Notice that the distance between the lights at different depths will change as the position of the camera changes.

Conclusion: If we are able to see the stars make a trail across the sky as we rotate on the earth, we should see see stars cover different distances at different depths. A star at 100 light years away should appear to move a greater distance than a star at 400 light years away.

Heliocentrism is a lie. Case closed.


25 comments block


[ - ] MartinTimothy 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 29, 2023 19:42:42 ago (+1/-1)*

The Hevelius 1 spacecraft launched in the 1980's returned parallax measurements for thousands of stars, the satellite had a malfunction soon after launch that put it into a highly elliptical orbit which actually considerably improved its function .. all records of it have been expunged from the interweb.

[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 1.3 yearsJan 29, 2023 20:29:35 ago (+0/-1)

Cool story

[ - ] Monica 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 29, 2023 22:52:51 ago (+0/-0)

fuck off jew

[ - ] McNasty [op] 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 29, 2023 23:11:12 ago (+0/-0)

Kikes hate the flat earth. They take tens of millions of dollars a day from taxpayers with the fairy tail of outer space.

[ - ] Jerd34 1 point 1.3 yearsJan 29, 2023 20:22:41 ago (+1/-0)

we have no authority to say what stars are. things like this should remain a wonder and mystery. humanity is sick on so many levels

[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 1.3 yearsJan 29, 2023 22:37:18 ago (+0/-1)

Agreed. But anyone with a brain can verify that they have no depth.

[ - ] Monica 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 29, 2023 22:53:19 ago (+0/-0)

fuck off jew

[ - ] McNasty [op] 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 29, 2023 23:09:32 ago (+0/-0)

And there it is. Accused of being a jew for questioning the integrity of a government institution that receives 60 million a day. Lol. You kikes never change.

[ - ] Monica 1 point 1.3 yearsJan 29, 2023 22:50:07 ago (+1/-0)

You think anyone here owns or will buy a fucking yoga ball?

[ - ] McNasty [op] 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 29, 2023 23:08:00 ago (+0/-0)

True. None of you have girlfriends hot enough that would be into yoga.

[ - ] TheYiddler 1 point 1.3 yearsJan 30, 2023 09:07:48 ago (+1/-0)

You need to compare opposite seasons to measure parallax. Winter vs. Summer gives us two AU of distance. The stars are much further away than two AU, but it is enough.

[ - ] McNasty [op] 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 30, 2023 09:22:26 ago (+0/-0)

No. The heliocentric claim is that the illusion of stars rotating above us is due to the apparent position of the stars changing due to the observers position moving with the earth rotation. This is Parallax. The fact that all stars move in synchronicity at the same rate proves the stars have no depth.

Observable reality supports my claim. Where is your proof that stars have depth?

[ - ] Sector7 2 points 1.3 yearsJan 29, 2023 20:17:14 ago (+2/-0)

I like your use of balls to represent the stars.

[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 1.3 yearsJan 29, 2023 20:31:36 ago (+0/-1)

Christmas lights

[ - ] Monica 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 29, 2023 22:53:07 ago (+0/-0)

fuck off jew

[ - ] McNasty [op] 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 29, 2023 23:10:04 ago (+0/-0)

Triggered. Lol.

[ - ] i_scream_trucks 3 points 1.3 yearsJan 29, 2023 19:23:09 ago (+3/-0)

More word salad.

[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 1.3 yearsJan 29, 2023 22:35:57 ago (+0/-1)

Only retards that can't comprehend basic concepts use the phrase "word salad."

[ - ] i_scream_trucks 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 30, 2023 05:04:07 ago (+0/-0)

Only retards that cant comprehend basic concepts produce word salad then get asshurt about getting called out on it.

[ - ] McNasty [op] 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 30, 2023 08:29:00 ago (+0/-0)

What kind of retard thinks thinks saying "world salad" hurts anybody? Lol. You're a special kind of kike aren't you?.

[ - ] happytoes 3 points 1.3 yearsJan 29, 2023 19:51:12 ago (+3/-0)

Your argument was stronger back in Galileo's day. Back then they didn't know about the diffraction limit. They thought that stars appeared as blobs in their telescopes because they were actually imaging the disks of the stars. Since they "could see the disk" they could make a guess at the distance and calculate that the parallax ought to visible.

Only later would they realize that the stars were point sources as far as their telescopes could tell, and the stars could easily be too far away to see any parallax.

[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 1.3 yearsJan 29, 2023 20:28:19 ago (+0/-1)

Your argument was stronger back in Galileo's day.

The argument is solid no matter what time period we are in.

Parallax does not change.

Back then they didn't know about the diffraction limit.

Is irrelevant to parallax.

You are simply denying reality.

[ - ] chrimony 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 30, 2023 09:25:56 ago (+0/-0)

Parallax does not change.

Our knowledge of optics and distance does. Your retarded experiment wouldn't work for lights that are miles away, because the parallax would be too small to measure.

You are simply denying reality.

Says the flattard that ignores the stars rotate about two poles, something impossible in a flat Earth.

[ - ] McNasty [op] 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 30, 2023 09:31:14 ago (+0/-0)

You're a fuckin retard that believes the dumbest shit kikes come up with. You can't provide any proof. You're so retarded that you believe you can tell the distance of a light by looking at it. You can't provide any proof for your claim. Just regurgitated kike academia. The same kike academia that tells me vaccines are good and climate change is destroying the world.

[ - ] chrimony 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 30, 2023 10:54:23 ago (+0/-0)

You're a fuckin retard that believes the dumbest shit kikes come up with.

You whine about being called a kike, and then turn around and use the laziest argument on Voat yourself, hypocrite.

You can't provide any proof.

I just did, the stars rotate about two poles -- not possible of flattard Earth. You ignored it because your flattard brain can't handle it.

You're so retarded that you believe you can tell the distance of a light by looking at it.

Lulz, what a maroon. You're the one banging a drum about parallax, and now you just completely dismiss it. Flattard brain.