Should a man only marry and have children with one woman, even if he can provide for more?
For example; a White man takes multiple White brides to have babies with and everyone involved is OK with it, is that actually wrong? I'm not sure anymore and I'm wondering what others have thought about this situation. I bounce back and forth between ok/wrong often and I think I'm making the switch again.
[ - ] Her0n [op] 1 point 2.4 yearsJan 25, 2023 10:57:03 ago (+1/-0)
Oh, duh.
I hope it works out for them, I love spending time with my son, and with another boy 4 months cooking I'm always wondering if I'll have enough time for them.
I still want more though, I'm always struggling with feelings like this.
I know for a fact that being a dad is the best choice if ever made, I'll continue to dive deeply into that.
It is ok but the man better be super moral on levels few could achieve. I think I could handle two women but any more then that I'm pretty sure I'd lose my mind or be so miserable it wouldn't be worth it.
Those people are sub 100 IQ. I cringed the entire time I watched. They all have little to no self awareness and don't reflect upon themselves. It's all fake and gay anyway.
I'm happy with my one wife, we have a couple here near us who brought another woman into the mix. I hope it works out for them, the original couple have two babies already as well. Two girls under age 2.
Officially, you'd only be married to one but still legally the father reguardless. Would be a benefit to increase White births in a shorter time and if you're able to provide as needed, seems justifiable.
He's my next door neighbor, next door here means our houses are a two minute car ride apart. He and his wife are bringing in another woman into their home.
[ - ] Her0n [op] 1 point 2.4 yearsJan 25, 2023 11:11:43 ago (+1/-0)
Of course, we don't let just anyone near our kid/home.
We don't even let some of our parents near our kid because they are shifty and corrosive narcissists.
I'm not sure how I feel about this, all I know is it's not my business past my child and his play dates with the neighbor girls.
I hope she's a good woman and that their lives don't collapse, I get my apples from them and my boy eats so much apple sauce. He signs for it specifically when he's cutting teeth.
Morally I think Whites are capable of creating a moral civilization around either model. The Romans vs the Germanics had different approaches here (with the Germanics being more strictly monogomous)
It's a question of practicality to me. 2 women eats up a lot of your time. 3 is fucking exhausting. I've never been able to get 4 in the rotation at the same time and I'm not really that interested in trying, even though it always seems like it's feast or famine with women.
One of the foundation blocks for civilization is one man, one women. If we allow for polygamy, it all starts to fall apart. As men fight over women, resources, and more women, they will absolutely turn to violence.
Granted, it's "natural" for us to have one man, many women. Or a cadre of top men with many women as their tribe. It's how we evolved. But it doesn't lead to the building of great things, only in-fighting over pussy, who fucks who, and who is in the "in" group.
Controlling our sexuality, esp. access to reproduction, is vitally important to building a lasting civilization. Otherwise you get something like the sand nigger's places, only "civilized" on the outside as a shield to keep the ZOG off their backs.
One of the foundation blocks for civilization is one man, one women
What tells you that? Our history up until Christianity shows us running around with as many women as we can muster. Those societies were also successful or else we'd know nothing of them and they wouldn't have been a threat to monogamous societies.
The difference between a successful polygamous or monogamous society is skin color. Non-Whites who attempt monogamous society fail just as much as the polygamous people. White people succeed in both arrangements.
a) a suggested "quest" tempts one to seek want outcomes, while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable origin.
b) suggested "moralism" (rules of behavior), tempts one to ignore being "free" will of choice within perceivable.
c) suggested "marriage" (wedlock) tempts one to united within another one, while ignoring perceivable U'NITY, noun [Latin unitas.] - "the state of being one; oneness", hence always be apart from one another.
Intercourse with the natural opposite for offspring represents the shared perpetuation of "oneself"...not togetherness. OFF (away from) SPRING (to vegetate; rise out of).
I bounce back and forth between ok/wrong
Instead of reasoning (right vs wrong) over suggested, try using implication (if/then) within perceivable.
if he can provide for more?
Only the process of dying provides everything for everyone living within...one can only react to an enacting system. Nature represents the divider (dai) and provider (mon)...everyone within represents the temporary sustainer (living) within the ongoing provision (process of dying), hence ones struggle to sustain apartheid, while being dissolved back into wholeness.
a) how can a suggested word not represent a misuse of perceivable sound?
b) to understand implies ones consent to "stand under" suggested information, while ignoring to grow comprehension within perceivable inspiration.
c) nature sets itself apart, hence from whole (process of dying) into each partial (living). The few suggest the many the inversion thereof aka e pluribus unum (out of many, one) aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka equality (sameness) through diversity (difference) aka united states aka united nations aka european union aka uniformity aka one world one people aka globalism aka mass migration aka SYN'TAX, noun [Latin syntaxis; Greek; together, and to put.]
Living within the process of dying implies ones need to sustain apartheid within wholeness, hence struggling to sustain self, while being dissolved back to origin.
d) what if ones choice to grow comprehension within perceivable (inspiration) represents "enlightenment", while ignoring it for the suggestions (information) by others represents "darkness"?
Sleight of hand: "exit light" (exit comprehension) "enter night" (enter ignorance) "take my hand" (consent to my suggestion)..."and we're off to never-neverland" (ignored potential)
Consenting (want or not want) to any suggested information shapes a conflict of reason (want vs not want)...that's the foundation for pilpul. Furthermore; talmudic reasoning represents the deliberate contradiction of both sides within a conflict of reason.
To resist reasoning (want vs not want; true vs false; agreement vs disagreement; belief vs disbelief, good vs bad etc.) one needs to utilize implication (if/then).
It's just internet poop. I think it was written to be incomprehensible on purpose. Possible bot, maybe ESL retard, or maybe just a forum breaking technique.
You are a weak faggot for caring about what others think. You want to have a harem? just fucking get one. Stop asking us for their opinions on your decisions.
That's exactly what you did. "Morality" here is a matter of how others judge you for your choices, and how you judge yourself as a hypothetical third person. It is man's desires regarding the behavior of other men.
[ - ] Her0n [op] 1 point 2.4 yearsJan 24, 2023 23:59:44 ago (+1/-0)
I'm curious, and this question isn't even about me. You think I'm some machevelian dude pulling in multiple women? Lol I have to leave the homestead and meet other women first!
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 25, 2023 21:44:26 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Her0n
[ - ] Her0n [op] 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 25, 2023 21:54:30 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 25, 2023 22:17:38 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Her0n
[ - ] Her0n [op] 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 25, 2023 23:42:42 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 27, 2023 17:33:46 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] FacelessOne
[ - ] FacelessOne 1 point 2.4 yearsJan 24, 2023 14:52:12 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Her0n
[ - ] Her0n [op] 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 25, 2023 10:05:51 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] FacelessOne
[ - ] FacelessOne 2 points 2.4 yearsJan 25, 2023 10:36:57 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Her0n
[ - ] Her0n [op] 1 point 2.4 yearsJan 25, 2023 10:57:03 ago (+1/-0)
I hope it works out for them, I love spending time with my son, and with another boy 4 months cooking I'm always wondering if I'll have enough time for them.
I still want more though, I'm always struggling with feelings like this.
I know for a fact that being a dad is the best choice if ever made, I'll continue to dive deeply into that.
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 1 point 2.4 yearsJan 24, 2023 14:07:52 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Her0n
[ - ] Her0n [op] 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 24, 2023 14:18:44 ago (+0/-0)
Mine only nags if something she can't do needs done and I've been putting it off far too long.
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 24, 2023 14:35:15 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Her0n
[ - ] Her0n [op] 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 24, 2023 17:03:13 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Doglegwarrior
[ - ] Doglegwarrior 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 25, 2023 09:21:20 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Her0n
[ - ] Her0n [op] 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 25, 2023 10:00:09 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Invalid_user
[ - ] Invalid_user 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 24, 2023 23:14:15 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Her0n
[ - ] Her0n [op] 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 25, 2023 09:59:02 ago (+0/-0)
I'm happy with my one wife, we have a couple here near us who brought another woman into the mix. I hope it works out for them, the original couple have two babies already as well. Two girls under age 2.
I buy my honey and apples from them.
[ + ] SecretHitler
[ - ] SecretHitler 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 25, 2023 18:17:22 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] bobdole9
[ - ] bobdole9 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 24, 2023 22:29:07 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Her0n
[ - ] Her0n [op] 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 25, 2023 10:04:02 ago (+0/-0)
I like smart women
[ + ] bobdole9
[ - ] bobdole9 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 25, 2023 10:21:24 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Her0n
[ - ] Her0n [op] 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 25, 2023 10:26:44 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] bobdole9
[ - ] bobdole9 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 25, 2023 10:54:49 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Her0n
[ - ] Her0n [op] 1 point 2.4 yearsJan 25, 2023 11:11:43 ago (+1/-0)
We don't even let some of our parents near our kid because they are shifty and corrosive narcissists.
I'm not sure how I feel about this, all I know is it's not my business past my child and his play dates with the neighbor girls.
I hope she's a good woman and that their lives don't collapse, I get my apples from them and my boy eats so much apple sauce. He signs for it specifically when he's cutting teeth.
[ + ] Shotinthedark
[ - ] Shotinthedark 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 24, 2023 18:49:50 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Her0n
[ - ] Her0n [op] 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 25, 2023 10:00:57 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Shotinthedark
[ - ] Shotinthedark 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 25, 2023 18:49:52 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] bosunmoon
[ - ] bosunmoon 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 24, 2023 17:47:14 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Her0n
[ - ] Her0n [op] 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 25, 2023 10:04:55 ago (+0/-0)
The neighbors are spicing up the farmland lol
[ + ] texasblood
[ - ] texasblood 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 24, 2023 17:03:14 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Her0n
[ - ] Her0n [op] 1 point 2.4 yearsJan 25, 2023 10:06:36 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] SecretHitler
[ - ] SecretHitler 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 24, 2023 16:23:35 ago (+0/-0)
It's a question of practicality to me. 2 women eats up a lot of your time. 3 is fucking exhausting. I've never been able to get 4 in the rotation at the same time and I'm not really that interested in trying, even though it always seems like it's feast or famine with women.
[ + ] Her0n
[ - ] Her0n [op] 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 25, 2023 10:08:03 ago (+0/-0)
In other words I think we could make anything work.
[ + ] PotatoWhisperer2
[ - ] PotatoWhisperer2 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 24, 2023 16:03:46 ago (+0/-0)
Granted, it's "natural" for us to have one man, many women. Or a cadre of top men with many women as their tribe. It's how we evolved. But it doesn't lead to the building of great things, only in-fighting over pussy, who fucks who, and who is in the "in" group.
Controlling our sexuality, esp. access to reproduction, is vitally important to building a lasting civilization. Otherwise you get something like the sand nigger's places, only "civilized" on the outside as a shield to keep the ZOG off their backs.
[ + ] Her0n
[ - ] Her0n [op] 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 25, 2023 10:13:15 ago (+0/-0)
What tells you that? Our history up until Christianity shows us running around with as many women as we can muster. Those societies were also successful or else we'd know nothing of them and they wouldn't have been a threat to monogamous societies.
The difference between a successful polygamous or monogamous society is skin color. Non-Whites who attempt monogamous society fail just as much as the polygamous people. White people succeed in both arrangements.
[ + ] ghetto_shitlord
[ - ] ghetto_shitlord 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 24, 2023 15:04:04 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Sleazy
[ - ] Sleazy 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 24, 2023 15:47:23 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] ghetto_shitlord
[ - ] ghetto_shitlord 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 24, 2023 19:53:39 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Her0n
[ - ] Her0n [op] 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 25, 2023 10:15:16 ago (+0/-0)
I've had multiple girlfriends in the past, but the envy and jealousy was too much to bear for me.
[ + ] SecretHitler
[ - ] SecretHitler 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 25, 2023 18:20:54 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 24, 2023 14:39:06 ago (+0/-0)
b) suggested "moralism" (rules of behavior), tempts one to ignore being "free" will of choice within perceivable.
c) suggested "marriage" (wedlock) tempts one to united within another one, while ignoring perceivable U'NITY, noun [Latin unitas.] - "the state of being one; oneness", hence always be apart from one another.
Intercourse with the natural opposite for offspring represents the shared perpetuation of "oneself"...not togetherness. OFF (away from) SPRING (to vegetate; rise out of).
Instead of reasoning (right vs wrong) over suggested, try using implication (if/then) within perceivable.
Only the process of dying provides everything for everyone living within...one can only react to an enacting system. Nature represents the divider (dai) and provider (mon)...everyone within represents the temporary sustainer (living) within the ongoing provision (process of dying), hence ones struggle to sustain apartheid, while being dissolved back into wholeness.
[ + ] Her0n
[ - ] Her0n [op] 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 25, 2023 10:18:04 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 25, 2023 13:01:00 ago (+0/-0)
Does perceivable need to be translated by the suggestions of others?
[ + ] Her0n
[ - ] Her0n [op] 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 25, 2023 20:01:28 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 26, 2023 02:54:28 ago (+0/-0)
b) to understand implies ones consent to "stand under" suggested information, while ignoring to grow comprehension within perceivable inspiration.
c) nature sets itself apart, hence from whole (process of dying) into each partial (living). The few suggest the many the inversion thereof aka e pluribus unum (out of many, one) aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka equality (sameness) through diversity (difference) aka united states aka united nations aka european union aka uniformity aka one world one people aka globalism aka mass migration aka SYN'TAX, noun [Latin syntaxis; Greek; together, and to put.]
Living within the process of dying implies ones need to sustain apartheid within wholeness, hence struggling to sustain self, while being dissolved back to origin.
d) what if ones choice to grow comprehension within perceivable (inspiration) represents "enlightenment", while ignoring it for the suggestions (information) by others represents "darkness"?
Sleight of hand: "exit light" (exit comprehension) "enter night" (enter ignorance) "take my hand" (consent to my suggestion)..."and we're off to never-neverland" (ignored potential)
[ + ] Her0n
[ - ] Her0n [op] 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 26, 2023 05:14:38 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 26, 2023 07:08:23 ago (+0/-0)
To resist reasoning (want vs not want; true vs false; agreement vs disagreement; belief vs disbelief, good vs bad etc.) one needs to utilize implication (if/then).
[ + ] SecretHitler
[ - ] SecretHitler 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 25, 2023 18:15:07 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] AntiPostmodernist
[ - ] AntiPostmodernist -1 points 2.4 yearsJan 24, 2023 17:00:12 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] Her0n
[ - ] Her0n [op] 2 points 2.4 yearsJan 24, 2023 17:02:38 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] AntiPostmodernist
[ - ] AntiPostmodernist 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 24, 2023 17:04:33 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Her0n
[ - ] Her0n [op] 1 point 2.4 yearsJan 24, 2023 23:59:44 ago (+1/-0)