Flat earthers are like Mal in Inception. There was a moment a seed was planted, perhaps when they were 8, perhaps 12, or perhaps 20 years old. It's a sponsoring thought that all other thoughts grew; a root thought, that allows them to see alternative angles while still getting drunk on the stupidest one.
It has something to do with mind control. Flattery, for example, is the first rule of mind control. One must fancy themselves brilliant. But it also has something to do with slavery. Flat earthers are the first to say 'None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.' But there is deeper level of slavery that they are ironically very unaware of. It goes like this:
"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsley believe they are slaves when they are free."
Flat eartherism is a symptom of a deeper problem. Religions like this one are freely born on the internet that otherwise would be a simple matter of sunlight to disinfect.
In short. Arrogant people who spend too much time on the internet and who believe themselves to be ineffectual slaves when they are free.
Get off the internet. You aren't nearly as bright as you think you are.
There was a moment a seed was planted, perhaps when they were 8, perhaps 12, or perhaps 20 years old.
Cool projection story. Kids are literally bombarded with the globe model since birth. Anyone with a Nikon p900 can verify for themselves that there is no curvature.
It has something to do with mind control.
When you learn to stop trusting government institutions and do your own research, only then will you be awake to the truth.
Flattery, for example, is the first rule of mind control.
Lol. Cuz being a flat earther is all about being flattered.
One must fancy themselves brilliant.
You literally regurgitate government institutions than proceed to think of yourself as smart.
None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.
Do you believe you are "free" from this so-called "flatter deception."
But there is deeper level of slavery that they are ironically very unaware of.
I couldn't agree more with this.
Flat eartherism is a symptom of a deeper problem.
Yeah. Questioning the narrative of official government institutions.
Religions like this one
I'm told to simply "Trust the science." Have faith in it one might say.
born on the internet that otherwise would be a simple matter of sunlight to disinfect.
You mean the thing that allowed people to bypass the monopoly government institutions have on information? Sure.
Preaching to the choir about not trusting government institutions. But not all crows are black. Not sure what you're talking about with a nikon p900 but I'm sure whatever logic you use to dismiss evidence of a round earth would be precisely used to dismiss this camera if it showed you what you didn't want to see. That is, if you were consistent with your beliefs.
The intenet is like the sun. The sun is good too. Gives vitamin D. But too much of it will burn you.
Your brain is toast. Take a break. Get off the internet.
Don't bother. This person is too far gone. Their "research" is YouTube videos that bring poor receipts. Ask this person about "density and buoyancy." According to them birds can't exist. Aerodynamic lift? A myth. Even better, ask how much energy it takes to lift 1kg to 100 km. Ask for the equation using "density and buoyancy." You'll never get it.
Why wouldn't you ask me? You seem to waste your time commenting under posts I make yet you won't ask me yourself?
Replace the word gravity with electro static acceleration. Heliocentrism is backwards engineered. They recognized a downward acceleration but needed to have it explaine how it could make shit stick to a ball. So they coined gravity and said it had the ability to attract matter based on mass. They later threw this out with Einstein's theory of relativity. With this theory, he gives You the bending of space and time which dictates the direction a moving object will move. He does not ever explain what makes the object move. For equations that require gravity acceleration, they simply use the average agreed upon. The truth is that the theory of relativity is rubbish and electrostatic acceleration is the downward force that creates the average downward force agreed upon that they call gravity acceleration.
density and buoyancy
This just creates another force that can either work with or against electrostatic acceleration. By force I mean pressure. If you drop a brick, the air around it does not contain enough pressure to sustain it. When a bird flaps it's wings, it pushes air against other air molecules condensing the air temporarily creating pressure under the wings.
Not sure what you're talking about with a nikon p900 but I'm sure whatever logic you use to dismiss evidence of a round earth would precisely used to dismiss a camera
A round earth has curvature. The zoom on a Nikon p900 can see objects beyond said curvature.
The intenet is like the sun. The sun is good too. Gives vitamin D. But too much of it will burn you.
Are you saying that at some point we must shut it off and turn the TV back on So Bill Nye the science Guy and Niel degrasse Tyson can teach us how to think?
Your brain is toast. Take a break. Get off the internet.
If I shut the internet off, it still doesn't stop a Niko P900 from seeing past the supposed cuveture dumb dumb.
The very toys you admire for seeing beyond the horizon, also demonstrate that ships do eventually fall below the horizon, no matter how powerful the lens.
You can use this to find out exactly where the horizon should be on a globe earth.
If the calculation says the horizon is 3 miles from the viewer, then you shouldn't see anything beyond 3 miles due to the obstruction of the curvature. The horizon isn't where ships "fall below the horizon." The horizon on a globe is measurable. If you see a ship beyond where the supposed horizon is, it is because the calculation is not accurate. If the calculation is not accurate, then that means the globe is either a different size than what we are told, or it's a lie all together. If it were a different size, it completely destroys everything else about the heliocentric model because the model is dependent on the radius of the earth being exactly what they say it is.
So no, seeing a ship appear to "fall below the horizon" does not prove your thesis when that horizon the ship appears to fall below is beyond the calculated horizon.
I'll explain what you're really seeing by using repeatable evidence and experiments.
1-Angular degradation is when an object appears to get smaller as it moves further away. Eventually, all the angles will decrease so much as to be invisible to the human eye. The human eye cannot see anything below 2°.
2- atmospheric lensing is when the atmosphere bends light and produces a magnifying effect.
Here's an example of atmospheric lensing naturally occuring.
The combination of angular degradation and atmospheric lensing creates a situation where even though the object is appearing to shrink, the magnification will allow you to see an object long enough to also see the object get cut off my the same magnification effect.
As a bonus, here's a video of the sun not setting but traveling beyond it's capability to penetrate the atmosphere.
Refraction. Refraction is magnification. The atmosphere acts as the lens. When a lens magnifies, objects on the edge will no longer fit into the lens. The apparent horizon acts as the bottom of the lens. So the combination of angular degradation with atmospheric conditions will cause the illusion of objects disappearing over the apparent horizon.
Yes. But it's not magical. It can be measured and reproduced. Refraction is the bending of light through a material. Like a pencil in a glass of water. The water bends the light creating a magnifying effect. This effect will cause the image in the glass to increase is size from the center of the lens being created. The lens is the entirety of the water in the glass. So if the pencil is not in the center, it will appear as if the pencil is broken. If it's on the edge, it will be partially cut off. If the pencil is in the center standing straight up, it will just look slightly bigger.
On the matter of seeing far past the spherical model horizon, then you dont believe light bends.
Sure it bends, but refraction is the visible atmosphere creating a lens. It's scientifically impossible for an object beneath the curvature to be seen through this lens. The lens causes magnification. The apparent horizon is the bottom of the lens. Like the bottom of the glass. Any object that would naturally be at the edge of this lens would be cut off with any magnification because the image in the lens is now bigger and there is no room for the objects on the edge.
Here's an example of refraction occurring naturally:
Notice that the "Shrinking Mill" is magnified then shrinks in size as it is approached. This is no different than holding a magnifying glass out in front of your face then bringing it closer to your face. As you pull it closer, objects will shrink leaving room in the lens to see more of the surrounding objects.
Now here's an example of how refraction actually works on a flat earth:
They stopped teaching it around the same time jews took over the worlds finance. And we all know what jews say about who makes the laws and who prints the money.
It was created and financed by jews.
So jews make a magic camera that sees around a curve? Or are you saying everyone that bought a Nikon p900 is a jew? Because that's what is causing this flat earth thing to pick up a lot of momentum.
[ - ] Sector7 1 point 1.3 yearsJan 22, 2023 12:46:18 ago (+1/-0)
you only watch what jewtube recommends.
You collect and assemble models of flat earth, then imagine all the adventures you'll have beyond the ice wall. (is there a nice ice girl waiting for you to find her?)
What's up with you? You haven't actually left me a comment yet you waste your time in my posts reading all the comments and saying dumb shit like you just watched a kike Dave video on jewtub. It's like you're to stupid to participate but you need that circle jerking kikes do on voat.
I don't know about you but I'm arguing with too many people to give a fuck about. I use speech to text. So you'll just have to deal with that classic shit.
[ + ] observation1
[ - ] observation1 4 points 1.3 yearsJan 21, 2023 00:22:10 ago (+4/-0)*
It has something to do with mind control. Flattery, for example, is the first rule of mind control. One must fancy themselves brilliant. But it also has something to do with slavery. Flat earthers are the first to say 'None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.' But there is deeper level of slavery that they are ironically very unaware of. It goes like this:
"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsley believe they are slaves when they are free."
Flat eartherism is a symptom of a deeper problem. Religions like this one are freely born on the internet that otherwise would be a simple matter of sunlight to disinfect.
In short. Arrogant people who spend too much time on the internet and who believe themselves to be ineffectual slaves when they are free.
Get off the internet. You aren't nearly as bright as you think you are.
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 1.3 yearsJan 21, 2023 00:31:26 ago (+1/-2)
Cool projection story. Kids are literally bombarded with the globe model since birth. Anyone with a Nikon p900 can verify for themselves that there is no curvature.
When you learn to stop trusting government institutions and do your own research, only then will you be awake to the truth.
Lol. Cuz being a flat earther is all about being flattered.
You literally regurgitate government institutions than proceed to think of yourself as smart.
Do you believe you are "free" from this so-called "flatter deception."
I couldn't agree more with this.
Yeah. Questioning the narrative of official government institutions.
I'm told to simply "Trust the science." Have faith in it one might say.
You mean the thing that allowed people to bypass the monopoly government institutions have on information? Sure.
[ + ] observation1
[ - ] observation1 3 points 1.3 yearsJan 21, 2023 00:39:17 ago (+3/-0)
The intenet is like the sun. The sun is good too. Gives vitamin D. But too much of it will burn you.
Your brain is toast. Take a break. Get off the internet.
[ + ] ghetto_shitlord
[ - ] ghetto_shitlord 4 points 1.3 yearsJan 21, 2023 05:09:09 ago (+4/-0)
Just let them be deluded at this point.
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 1.3 yearsJan 21, 2023 11:32:20 ago (+0/-1)
Replace the word gravity with electro static acceleration. Heliocentrism is backwards engineered. They recognized a downward acceleration but needed to have it explaine how it could make shit stick to a ball. So they coined gravity and said it had the ability to attract matter based on mass. They later threw this out with Einstein's theory of relativity. With this theory, he gives You the bending of space and time which dictates the direction a moving object will move. He does not ever explain what makes the object move. For equations that require gravity acceleration, they simply use the average agreed upon. The truth is that the theory of relativity is rubbish and electrostatic acceleration is the downward force that creates the average downward force agreed upon that they call gravity acceleration.
This just creates another force that can either work with or against electrostatic acceleration. By force I mean pressure. If you drop a brick, the air around it does not contain enough pressure to sustain it. When a bird flaps it's wings, it pushes air against other air molecules condensing the air temporarily creating pressure under the wings.
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 1.3 yearsJan 21, 2023 00:44:02 ago (+1/-2)
A round earth has curvature. The zoom on a Nikon p900 can see objects beyond said curvature.
Are you saying that at some point we must shut it off and turn the TV back on So Bill Nye the science Guy and Niel degrasse Tyson can teach us how to think?
If I shut the internet off, it still doesn't stop a Niko P900 from seeing past the supposed cuveture dumb dumb.
[ + ] observation1
[ - ] observation1 2 points 1.3 yearsJan 21, 2023 02:00:29 ago (+2/-0)*
The very toys you admire for seeing beyond the horizon, also demonstrate that ships do eventually fall below the horizon, no matter how powerful the lens.
But you knew this already, didn't you?
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 1.3 yearsJan 21, 2023 02:53:06 ago (+1/-2)
You're not quite comprehending this so I'll walk you through this.
This is the earth curvature calculator.
https://www.omnicalculator.com/physics/earth-curvature
You can use this to find out exactly where the horizon should be on a globe earth.
If the calculation says the horizon is 3 miles from the viewer, then you shouldn't see anything beyond 3 miles due to the obstruction of the curvature. The horizon isn't where ships "fall below the horizon." The horizon on a globe is measurable. If you see a ship beyond where the supposed horizon is, it is because the calculation is not accurate. If the calculation is not accurate, then that means the globe is either a different size than what we are told, or it's a lie all together. If it were a different size, it completely destroys everything else about the heliocentric model because the model is dependent on the radius of the earth being exactly what they say it is.
So no, seeing a ship appear to "fall below the horizon" does not prove your thesis when that horizon the ship appears to fall below is beyond the calculated horizon.
I'll explain what you're really seeing by using repeatable evidence and experiments.
1-Angular degradation is when an object appears to get smaller as it moves further away. Eventually, all the angles will decrease so much as to be invisible to the human eye. The human eye cannot see anything below 2°.
2- atmospheric lensing is when the atmosphere bends light and produces a magnifying effect.
Here's an example of atmospheric lensing naturally occuring.
https://youtu.be/Y0bQm8sJwd4
You can see how the object will shrink when approaching it.
Here's an experiment anyone can do to demonstrate how atmospheric lensing can create the illusion of objects "falling below the horizon."
https://youtu.be/s-PhStb6mTQ
The combination of angular degradation and atmospheric lensing creates a situation where even though the object is appearing to shrink, the magnification will allow you to see an object long enough to also see the object get cut off my the same magnification effect.
As a bonus, here's a video of the sun not setting but traveling beyond it's capability to penetrate the atmosphere.
https://youtu.be/O5w8EetFwGo
I know that you're a dumbass for assuming the horizon on a ball is just wherever you stop seeing something.
[ + ] observation1
[ - ] observation1 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 21, 2023 19:31:00 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 1.3 yearsJan 21, 2023 23:56:45 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] observation1
[ - ] observation1 1 point 1.3 yearsJan 22, 2023 02:23:38 ago (+1/-0)
On the matter of seeing far past the spherical model horizon, then you dont believe light bends.
The only thing consistent about this religion is they are infinitely inconsistent.
Take a break from the internet. You probably have friends and family that would love to hear from you.
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 1.3 yearsJan 22, 2023 03:05:33 ago (+0/-1)
Yes. But it's not magical. It can be measured and reproduced. Refraction is the bending of light through a material. Like a pencil in a glass of water. The water bends the light creating a magnifying effect. This effect will cause the image in the glass to increase is size from the center of the lens being created. The lens is the entirety of the water in the glass. So if the pencil is not in the center, it will appear as if the pencil is broken. If it's on the edge, it will be partially cut off. If the pencil is in the center standing straight up, it will just look slightly bigger.
Here's an example:
https://files.catbox.moe/yzyz9b.jpg
Sure it bends, but refraction is the visible atmosphere creating a lens. It's scientifically impossible for an object beneath the curvature to be seen through this lens. The lens causes magnification. The apparent horizon is the bottom of the lens. Like the bottom of the glass. Any object that would naturally be at the edge of this lens would be cut off with any magnification because the image in the lens is now bigger and there is no room for the objects on the edge.
Here's an example of refraction occurring naturally:
https://youtu.be/Y0bQm8sJwd4
Notice that the "Shrinking Mill" is magnified then shrinks in size as it is approached. This is no different than holding a magnifying glass out in front of your face then bringing it closer to your face. As you pull it closer, objects will shrink leaving room in the lens to see more of the surrounding objects.
Now here's an example of how refraction actually works on a flat earth:
https://youtu.be/s-PhStb6mTQ
Objects further away with appear larger subsequently cutting off any objects located on the edge. It's just how refraction works. It's not magical.
When I'm ready to take advice from a retard that doesn't even know how refraction works, I'll let you know.
[ + ] SumerBreeze
[ - ] SumerBreeze 2 points 1.3 yearsJan 20, 2023 23:44:07 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 1.3 yearsJan 21, 2023 00:14:58 ago (+2/-3)
So jews make a magic camera that sees around a curve? Or are you saying everyone that bought a Nikon p900 is a jew? Because that's what is causing this flat earth thing to pick up a lot of momentum.
[ + ] SumerBreeze
[ - ] SumerBreeze 1 point 1.3 yearsJan 22, 2023 15:42:09 ago (+1/-0)*
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 1.3 yearsJan 22, 2023 18:57:39 ago (+0/-1)
Lol. No. But that's cute that it's obviously another illusion.
Because I don't believe it When kike institutions tell me that reality is an illusion?
Teach their own. If you like Believing kikes when they tell you everything you can observe in reality is an illusion, go for it.
[ + ] Sector7
[ - ] Sector7 1 point 1.3 yearsJan 21, 2023 10:29:48 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 1.3 yearsJan 21, 2023 11:02:41 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] Sector7
[ - ] Sector7 1 point 1.3 yearsJan 21, 2023 18:14:21 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 1.3 yearsJan 21, 2023 23:58:08 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] Sector7
[ - ] Sector7 1 point 1.3 yearsJan 22, 2023 12:46:18 ago (+1/-0)
You collect and assemble models of flat earth, then imagine all the adventures you'll have beyond the ice wall. (is there a nice ice girl waiting for you to find her?)
[ + ] Monica
[ - ] Monica 1 point 1.3 yearsJan 21, 2023 01:42:03 ago (+1/-0)
FYI: the earth doesn't exist
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 1.3 yearsJan 21, 2023 02:07:01 ago (+1/-2)
Weather conditions like atmospheric density along with angular degradation apply to vision no matter what shape the earth is.
[ + ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic
[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic 1 point 1.3 yearsJan 21, 2023 01:15:22 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] ghetto_shitlord
[ - ] ghetto_shitlord 1 point 1.3 yearsJan 21, 2023 05:15:28 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 1.3 yearsJan 21, 2023 11:40:32 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] Sector7
[ - ] Sector7 1 point 1.3 yearsJan 22, 2023 12:47:44 ago (+1/-0)
Classic.
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 1.3 yearsJan 22, 2023 14:45:45 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty [op] 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 21, 2023 01:28:56 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks 1 point 1.3 yearsJan 20, 2023 23:34:15 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 1.3 yearsJan 21, 2023 00:17:40 ago (+1/-2)
[ + ] boekanier
[ - ] boekanier 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 21, 2023 01:39:36 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty [op] 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 21, 2023 02:11:04 ago (+1/-1)
William Casey, former director of the CIA, upon being asked what the goal of the agency was (in 1981).
And you believe people were dumber prior to the creation of the CIA? That's some good shit.