The goal of the (((government))) after forcing everyone onto the currently weak and unsustainable electrical grid, is to nationalize it so they can turn off electricity to White areas.
Can't have people keep themselves warm when they're supposed to freeze to death by 2030.
Also propane isn't a very effective explosive. Energy density is too low. Improvised chemical explosives will always be the way to go if you can't find any unexploded munitions.
[ - ] prototype [op] 1 point 1.3 yearsJan 13, 2023 21:40:53 ago (+1/-0)
"Also propane isn't a very effective explosive."
No, but any sort of explosions scare the shit out of basic security forces. What it lacks in damage capability it makes up for in quantity and availability, and those are the two key logistic variables to focus on.
It's the same thinking that goes into arguments that 556 doesn't stand a chance against a standing army.
it's besides the point.
It's about the psychology of conflict. Look at what happened even with cops ostensibly on the right, during the blm/antifa riots. Massive sick outs.
It's also a propulsive gas, good for mortars, which is what the CIA taught the IRA during their campaign.
I would not at all be surprised if the gradual squeeze on natural gas is about exactly this.
While these are useful points generally you need to approach this with a one and done mentality as if one conducts a terrorist attack there is a good chance he's not going to be able to conduct act 2. This means focusing on high impact attacks not lower intensity weapons systems.
The purpose of terror is often psychological and to create sensations around spectacle and media attention though. That is true. Too many don't study terrorism, particularly dissidents, and have vague ideas about it being about killing everybody or summat if they even think about it at all. But it is absolutely essential that this body of knowledge be studied and discussed.
"White revolution doesn't start a thousand miles away. It starts with you."
Words to live by for those waiting around for the shooting to start without even so much as studying the mechanics of revolution.
You got lots of downvotes for this thread too. No surprise there. Expect lots more if you keep talking about the practical implementation of violence on the regular. Impotent tough guy posturing is ok though.
I have not at all discussed violence. I am an outright pacifist, and dedicated at that. Neither have I encouraged terrorism, nor instructed others. I have repeatedly and vehemently denounced violence and terrorism, and rightly so.
What has been discussed here is none other than the ruling regime's attempts to cut off the population's options against the occupation.
I am likewise uninterested in racial anything.
I do not condone violence. I do not think violence works. I do not think violence has a history of working. It does not work in otherwise hopeless situations, and it will not work now. I do not take anyone serious who discusses it, and I have dismissed every incident where I saw someone talk about it as an absurd joke.
I view talk of violence and terrorism as dumb jokes because of how many edgelords are out there. I make it a policy to dismiss anyone who talks of these things, and I ignore and do not contact those people any further whenever I encounter them online. I do not self-censor (and neither should you) just because the u.s. regime activily encourages and tactictly allows the planning of terrorism by its political supporters, while crushing dissent on the right.
I believe lone-wolfism is dumb, and ineffective at anything but the tactical level, and therefore a waste of time, like all violence and terrorism.
I believe you should not engage in discussion of these topics, and you should not attempt to contact anyone who does.
I know you are joking but you should in all honesty remain peaceful. I suggest you do not arm yourself. Do not stockpile weapons nor ammo. Do not engage with 'militias' who train small unit tactics. Do not pursue any methods other than peaceful protest.
And while you can suit yourself even the discussion of violence in the abstract - which you have done here with some knowledge and detail - is apt to get you watched. So your posture is basically a recipe to get all the baggage and none of the benefits along with the issue of people questioning your sincerity.
"Without violence nothing is ever accomplished in history." - Karl Marx
I want you to listen very closely about what I write next: Discouraging violence is not the same as 'discussing it in the abstract' is not a crime. And it cannot be converted into a crime. The proof I have discouraged violence is in the text itself.
The other thing you should read carefully is this: I never go to court unless I know I will win.
You can very easily 'encourage' violence and not have it be a crime. In the US anyway. It just gets a guy watched.
And it's not so much me you have to worry about - but people reading this 'non-violent' copy in general. People aren't going to believe you are genuinely non-violent - not if you're in this scene - least of all the kwaps. So it amounts really to a kind of intellectual limitation and even making you more vulnerable while looking, if I may so, rather cowardly and hypocritical. Not to mention wrong on an intellectual level.
There is little actual upside to this pose one is non-violent. Moreover, political dissidents have to be prepared for the possibility of ruin. Otherwise they should spend their time making sandwiches or something.
You are never going to hear me advocate violence or lawlessness, implicitly or explicitly. What others think is not only irrelevant, but only a schizo could take "don't be violent" or "don't break the law", and assume anything else. I am not responsible for other peoples misguided or intentionally malicious assumptions.
Nice try at entrapment though.
Long time ago, I used to wonder, how stupid would officials have to be to fall for reverse entrapment?
James Mason says don't do it, don't commit violent crimes, too. Then goes on into details of the methods and tactics of terrorism - as you have in this thread which prompted me to engage you in the first place.
Ultimately though Mason isn't a poseur trying an ineffective tack of avoiding police scrutiny. You though are very much open to that accusation.
"James Mason says don't do it, don't commit violent crimes, too. Then goes on into details of the methods and tactics"
I am not james mason and I am not responsible for his crimes, intents, or methods.
"Ultimately though Mason isn't a poseur "
If I were a violent terrorist, I would not be browsing or posting here at all dumbshit. There is no tactical advantage to posting online or communicating with anyone if someone is a terrorist or other sort of asshole.
"avoiding police scrutiny."
It's not about avoiding police scrutiny. It's about discussing topics that are PATENTLY NOT illegal to discuss, which they are trying to make verboten despite 1A. And so I DO discuss them. And I will not be slandered as a terrorist or a violent criminal because I choose to discuss a rational, sober topic, like any other american, just as the left engages in wantonly and without consequence. I will not be defamed as supporting the things I discuss because they happen to be interesting or complex topics WORTHY of being discussed in a free society, nor have aspersions about the content of my character or intent because of the topics which I have a LAWFUL right to talk about. I will not be censored by some chucklefuck leftwing union employee of israel, the cia, or the FBI, or sundry other law enforcement, willfully engaging in coercion and attempting to silence the public.
A law without equal enforcement is null and void. The left has been allowed to rampage openly and willfully, to not merely discuss the worthiness of violence, or resistance, and sundry other related topics--but to actively plan, train, and coordinate to commit such acts. Which they have. The right is banned so much, in practice, from the whisper thereof. And the regime acts to crush anyone that expresses an opinion that 'xyz should be hung/shot' etc. Not threatened mind you.
They have intentionally created a pressure cooker environment where repeated outrages are committed against half the populace, and then any verbal backlash is interpreted as terrorism or sundry other make-crimes. And whereupon this leads to blowouts from the occasional lunatics, who half the time we have seen were some sort of left/establishment radical, it is pinned on us, the right.
They call us all terrorists, murderers, racists, demonize, slander, and defame millions of people in the most strident, thorough campaigns of demonization, which boils over into things like Waukesha, the lynching of jake gardner, the setup of the J6, the mass censorship, mass spying, caving our people's heads in with bike locks in the street.
And all to justify this mass violence.
And you have the gall to come to me and say I'm the violent one, or I'm a poseur.
If you were serious, if you walked the very walk you demand of others, you wouldn't be online posting like a loud-mouth shit-talking faggot.
Try at what? We don't eat cooked foods a lot here, and use the wood/charcoal grill more than anything. This isn't like living in a house. I have a total of 800W on the arch.
It's all about control. Marxist government has for years been testing its limits to see how much Americans will tolerate without fighting back or rioting. They'll take down your statues, take down your flags, outlaw your words, limit your access to firearms, etc. And California is the largest, single testing grounds for the rest of the U.S. Everyone's watching California, and if they can get away with taking something away from those citizens, then other states try it, too, to see how much they can control. So far, we Americans have shown that we can easily be used as a doormat, and will not do anything violent in response to idiotic government bans and regulations.
And the most infuriating part is that they are testing these measures in an area where they are overwhelmingly not American and are being bought off for their silence.
You can still buy gunpowder, fertilizer, fireworks, gasoline, ammunition, and countless other things that go boom or burn very nicely... But yeah, ban gas stoves in case there's an uprising... Riiiiight.
[ + ] virge
[ - ] virge 8 points 1.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 10:12:10 ago (+8/-0)
Right now, you can turn off the power but a lot of the USSA still has heat and cooking fuel from gas lines.
It is in the best interest of the USSA hydra to maintain Continuity of Government by having single points of control.. and failure.
[ + ] Sunman_Omega
[ - ] Sunman_Omega 2 points 1.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 12:29:00 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] virge
[ - ] virge 1 point 1.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 12:33:55 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Freespeechplease
[ - ] Freespeechplease 1 point 1.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 22:39:24 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Spaceman84
[ - ] Spaceman84 6 points 1.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 11:32:11 ago (+6/-0)
Also propane isn't a very effective explosive. Energy density is too low. Improvised chemical explosives will always be the way to go if you can't find any unexploded munitions.
[ + ] FacelessOne
[ - ] FacelessOne 1 point 1.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 11:53:33 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] prototype
[ - ] prototype [op] 1 point 1.3 yearsJan 13, 2023 21:40:53 ago (+1/-0)
No, but any sort of explosions scare the shit out of basic security forces. What it lacks in damage capability it makes up for in quantity and availability, and those are the two key logistic variables to focus on.
It's the same thinking that goes into arguments that 556 doesn't stand a chance against a standing army.
it's besides the point.
It's about the psychology of conflict. Look at what happened even with cops ostensibly on the right, during the blm/antifa riots. Massive sick outs.
It's also a propulsive gas, good for mortars, which is what the CIA taught the IRA during their campaign.
I would not at all be surprised if the gradual squeeze on natural gas is about exactly this.
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 14, 2023 17:13:39 ago (+0/-0)*
Or strike hard, strike deep.
https://archive.is/htNml
The purpose of terror is often psychological and to create sensations around spectacle and media attention though. That is true. Too many don't study terrorism, particularly dissidents, and have vague ideas about it being about killing everybody or summat if they even think about it at all. But it is absolutely essential that this body of knowledge be studied and discussed.
"White revolution doesn't start a thousand miles away. It starts with you."
Words to live by for those waiting around for the shooting to start without even so much as studying the mechanics of revolution.
You got lots of downvotes for this thread too. No surprise there. Expect lots more if you keep talking about the practical implementation of violence on the regular. Impotent tough guy posturing is ok though.
[ + ] prototype
[ - ] prototype [op] 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 15, 2023 08:38:07 ago (+0/-0)*
I have not at all discussed violence. I am an outright pacifist, and dedicated at that. Neither have I encouraged terrorism, nor instructed others. I have repeatedly and vehemently denounced violence and terrorism, and rightly so.
What has been discussed here is none other than the ruling regime's attempts to cut off the population's options against the occupation.
I am likewise uninterested in racial anything.
I do not condone violence. I do not think violence works. I do not think violence has a history of working. It does not work in otherwise hopeless situations, and it will not work now. I do not take anyone serious who discusses it, and I have dismissed every incident where I saw someone talk about it as an absurd joke.
I view talk of violence and terrorism as dumb jokes because of how many edgelords are out there. I make it a policy to dismiss anyone who talks of these things, and I ignore and do not contact those people any further whenever I encounter them online. I do not self-censor (and neither should you)
just because the u.s. regime activily encourages and tactictly allows the planning of terrorism by its political supporters, while crushing dissent on the right.
I believe lone-wolfism is dumb, and ineffective at anything but the tactical level, and therefore a waste of time, like all violence and terrorism.
I believe you should not engage in discussion of these topics, and you should not attempt to contact anyone who does.
I know you are joking but you should in all honesty remain peaceful. I suggest you do not arm yourself. Do not stockpile weapons nor ammo. Do not engage with 'militias' who train small unit tactics. Do not pursue any methods other than peaceful protest.
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 15, 2023 17:04:56 ago (+0/-0)*
And while you can suit yourself even the discussion of violence in the abstract - which you have done here with some knowledge and detail - is apt to get you watched. So your posture is basically a recipe to get all the baggage and none of the benefits along with the issue of people questioning your sincerity.
"Without violence nothing is ever accomplished in history." - Karl Marx
[ + ] prototype
[ - ] prototype [op] 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 16, 2023 09:31:47 ago (+0/-0)
I want you to listen very closely about what I write next:
Discouraging violence is not the same as 'discussing it in the abstract' is not a crime. And it cannot be converted into a crime. The proof I have discouraged violence is in the text itself.
The other thing you should read carefully is this:
I never go to court unless I know I will win.
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 16, 2023 16:44:34 ago (+0/-0)
And it's not so much me you have to worry about - but people reading this 'non-violent' copy in general. People aren't going to believe you are genuinely non-violent - not if you're in this scene - least of all the kwaps. So it amounts really to a kind of intellectual limitation and even making you more vulnerable while looking, if I may so, rather cowardly and hypocritical. Not to mention wrong on an intellectual level.
There is little actual upside to this pose one is non-violent. Moreover, political dissidents have to be prepared for the possibility of ruin. Otherwise they should spend their time making sandwiches or something.
[ + ] prototype
[ - ] prototype [op] 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 16, 2023 17:01:21 ago (+0/-0)*
What others think is not only irrelevant, but only a schizo could take "don't be violent" or "don't break the law", and assume anything else. I am not responsible for other peoples misguided or intentionally malicious assumptions.
Nice try at entrapment though.
Long time ago, I used to wonder, how stupid would officials have to be to fall for reverse entrapment?
Have a nice day.
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 16, 2023 17:21:13 ago (+0/-0)*
Ultimately though Mason isn't a poseur trying an ineffective tack of avoiding police scrutiny. You though are very much open to that accusation.
[ + ] prototype
[ - ] prototype [op] 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 21, 2023 21:29:46 ago (+0/-0)*
I am not james mason and I am not responsible for his crimes, intents, or methods.
"Ultimately though Mason isn't a poseur "
If I were a violent terrorist, I would not be browsing or posting here at all dumbshit.
There is no tactical advantage to posting online or communicating with anyone if someone is a terrorist or other sort of asshole.
"avoiding police scrutiny."
It's not about avoiding police scrutiny. It's about discussing topics that are PATENTLY NOT illegal to discuss, which they are trying to make verboten despite 1A. And so I DO discuss them. And I will not be slandered as a terrorist or a violent criminal because I choose to discuss a rational, sober topic, like any other american, just as the left engages in wantonly and without consequence.
I will not be defamed as supporting the things I discuss because they happen to be interesting or complex topics WORTHY of being discussed in a free society, nor have aspersions about the content of my character or intent because of the topics which I have a LAWFUL right to talk about. I will not be censored by some chucklefuck leftwing union employee of israel, the cia, or the FBI, or sundry other law enforcement, willfully engaging in coercion and attempting to silence the public.
A law without equal enforcement is null and void. The left has been allowed to rampage openly and willfully, to not merely discuss the worthiness of violence, or resistance, and sundry other related topics--but to actively plan, train, and coordinate to commit such acts. Which they have.
The right is banned so much, in practice, from the whisper thereof. And the regime acts to crush anyone that expresses an opinion that 'xyz should be hung/shot' etc. Not threatened mind you.
They have intentionally created a pressure cooker environment where repeated outrages are committed against half the populace, and then any verbal backlash is interpreted as terrorism or sundry other make-crimes. And whereupon this leads to blowouts from the occasional lunatics, who half the time we have seen were some sort of left/establishment radical, it is pinned on us, the right.
They call us all terrorists, murderers, racists, demonize, slander, and defame millions of people in the most strident, thorough campaigns of demonization, which boils over into things like Waukesha, the lynching of jake gardner, the setup of the J6, the mass censorship, mass spying, caving our people's heads in with bike locks in the street.
And all to justify this mass violence.
And you have the gall to come to me and say I'm the violent one, or I'm a poseur.
If you were serious, if you walked the very walk you demand of others, you wouldn't be online posting
like a loud-mouth shit-talking faggot.
[ + ]deleted
[ - ] deleted 5 points 1.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 10:38:00 ago (+5/-0)
[ + ] ghetto_shitlord
[ - ] ghetto_shitlord 1 point 1.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 14:38:32 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 14, 2023 00:43:50 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] ghetto_shitlord
[ - ] ghetto_shitlord 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 14, 2023 01:53:53 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 15, 2023 16:49:23 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] ghetto_shitlord
[ - ] ghetto_shitlord 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 15, 2023 17:20:51 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] ArmyGrunt1991
[ - ] ArmyGrunt1991 2 points 1.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 15:07:02 ago (+2/-0)
And California is the largest, single testing grounds for the rest of the U.S. Everyone's watching California, and if they can get away with taking something away from those citizens, then other states try it, too, to see how much they can control.
So far, we Americans have shown that we can easily be used as a doormat, and will not do anything violent in response to idiotic government bans and regulations.
[ + ] Gowithit
[ - ] Gowithit 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 16:32:27 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] AngryWhiteKeyboardWarrior
[ - ] AngryWhiteKeyboardWarrior 2 points 1.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 13:37:10 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] prototype
[ - ] prototype [op] 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 13, 2023 21:41:38 ago (+0/-0)
Don't worry, limitations on those are coming too.