The example of Roman Yushkov mentioned in the article was arrested and sent to trial for linking an article that, first of all, does not say the holohoax did not happen BUT said that the number of holohoax victims were not in the millions.
Roman Yushkov explained to reporters that he had no intent to commit any crime. According to him, he wanted to stimulate scientific and public discussion of the historical question of the number of Jews exterminated by the Nazis during World War II.
“In a jury trial, Roman never said that he questioned the results of the Nuremberg trials,” lawyer Ivan Khozyaykin said. “Only the prosecutor’s office talks about this, and this was the composition of the article“ Rehabilitation of Nazism ”. We proved that Roman did not deal with this and did not deny it. In the end, the jury acquitted him."
'In September 2018, Yushkov was acquitted by a jury in Perm . Lawyer Roman Akhmetov said that five jurors voted for the defendant's innocence, three decided that he was guilty. The prosecutor's office did not agree with this decision and sent a submission to the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, in which it demanded that the case be sent for a new trial with a new jury.'
I guess Yushkov was lucky because there weren't enough jews in the jury as 5 found him innocent and three found him guilty. So there was a chance for him to be charged but again, he was lucky because if the reverse was true, he would have been found guilty.
So do tell me, how does this exactly translate to holohoax denial not being illegal in Russia?
Other examples in Russia of people being on trial, and one being found guilty for holohoax denial;
In St. Petersburg, a trial has begun against a former university teacher who, in his lectures, denied the mass extermination of Jews by the Nazis during the Second World War. The court registered the criminal case of Vladimir Matveev, accused of committing a crime under Part 1 of Article 354.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (rehabilitation of Nazism). A preliminary hearing has been scheduled for the case," the ministry said.
The 45-year-old Ivanovite will be tried for Holocaust denial. Between July 2016 and January 2017, the man posted on the social network VKontakte posts denying the Holocaust, as well as the Nazi crimes established at the Nuremberg trials. The defendant agreed with the accusation of rehabilitation of Nazism and petitioned for consideration of the case in a special manner, the regional court reported.
The Supreme Court of Udmurtia sentenced a resident of Izhevsk to two years of probation for Holocaust denial, rehabilitation of Nazism and public calls for extremist activities, the press service of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation for Udmurtia reports. A 57-year-old man was also deprived of the right to engage in activities related to the placement of information in public information and telecommunication networks, including the Internet, for a period of 1 year.
In Russia they understand jews very well. They understand that a favored tactic of jews is to separate groups using divisive ethno-nationalist bullshit (even if actual ethno-nationalism itself is fine, it can still be used to agitate retards). They are aware that jews need "neo nazis" as enemies and fund them. As such, they ban any kind of agitation that is disruptive in this way.
You'll notice that in every case the person is PUBLICLY AGITATING using a position of authority. Each was using a front of holocaust denial to try and get people to behave in a certain way. That is what Russia is concerned with, not your particular beliefs.
[ + ] didyouknow
[ - ] didyouknow 2 points 2.3 yearsJan 8, 2023 17:38:38 ago (+3/-1)
The example of Roman Yushkov mentioned in the article was arrested and sent to trial for linking an article that, first of all, does not say the holohoax did not happen BUT said that the number of holohoax victims were not in the millions.
https://archive.ph/G351I
I guess Yushkov was lucky because there weren't enough jews in the jury as 5 found him innocent and three found him guilty. So there was a chance for him to be charged but again, he was lucky because if the reverse was true, he would have been found guilty.
So do tell me, how does this exactly translate to holohoax denial not being illegal in Russia?
Other examples in Russia of people being on trial, and one being found guilty for holohoax denial;
https://pobedarf.ru/2022/02/03/professora-budut-sudit-za-otriczanie-holokosta/
https://archive.ph/xEnsn
https://www.nakanune.ru/news/2022/09/09/22675871/
https://lechaim.ru/news/otritsatelya-holokosta-prigovorili-k-uslovnomu-sroku-lisheniya-svobody/
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 8, 2023 23:13:26 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Empire_of_the_Mind
[ - ] Empire_of_the_Mind 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 9, 2023 03:12:31 ago (+1/-0)
You'll notice that in every case the person is PUBLICLY AGITATING using a position of authority. Each was using a front of holocaust denial to try and get people to behave in a certain way. That is what Russia is concerned with, not your particular beliefs.
[ + ] Leveraction
[ - ] Leveraction 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 8, 2023 19:37:32 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Trickthegoyim
[ - ] Trickthegoyim 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 22, 2023 03:07:22 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Belfuro
[ - ] Belfuro 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 9, 2023 04:55:55 ago (+0/-0)
Well that is what the Ukraine war is about.
Russia stopped them conquering Syria.
2014 coup was reprisal.
But putin moved too fast and kept the all. Important Crimea.
So the enemy setups a massive Ukraine slave army while carving up their own private fiefdoms in Ukraine.
In comes 2022 counter attack.
Every reaction can be seen as a temper tantrum.