It doesn't matter that it doesn't make sense. It doesn't matter that the argument is shallow. The only important thing is that "denier" is a trigger for them, which is why they keep using "election denier" against us.
The very implication of 'race denier' is that they are racists (anti-white jewish racists, but I digress). If they ask what this means then just repeat it "its obvious they deny the effects of race" (a meaningless phrase that could be interpreted in favor of either side).
The implications of "nazi denier" is that they are a nazi. If they claim they are jewish, leftwing, or other, just deny them it. "No dude, you're a nazi-denier." If they get clever and ask what that means, don't refer to the holocaust. The purpose of this exercise is to dilute and water down the power of this antichristian antiwhite progenocidal ADL invented slur against americans--a slure used to censor any dissent against the left and marxists. Take a page from them and accuse them of trying to water down the term 'nazi/antisemite' etc, WHILE you are doing the very same thing. If they try to talk, talk over them. Or do the liberal stare of contempt "really?" If you talk over them, it should be to ridicule and shut them down. "No dude, your done. The nazi card is done. Get out of here, walk!"
1. This works because its aggressive and could be taken as hostility
2. The "nazi card" comment creates confusion about where you stand. It basically says to onlookers, who you want to win over, that the use of the word itself is verboten because they don't know how to interpret it they just assume the word itself will provoke hostility.
This two-step denial bypasses critical thinking (which most don't engage in anyway) and directly trains the public to respond viscerally to "muh ebil nazis" labelling.
Always publicly censor marxists with this method, leftwing liberal jews, and pro-marxist tiktok street-level university indoctrinated trash.
This will also work for the "antivaxxer!" slur used by the DC juntas cult supporters.
Remember to remove any 'anti/pro' prefix from your comment though.
"Get lost vax-denier! The vax-card is done. You don't get to use that anymore. Your done. Walk."
There are plenty of moderates going all with the semi-coercive shame campaigns of the left, both endorsing them, and participating, out of fear that if they don't they too will be targets.
The target is not the person you're talking to, the target for convincing is all the bystanders.
This is also different than shaming, its more along the lines of aggressive and coercive ridiculing.
Breaking the bystander effect is the number one goal. Go look up the studies on it.
All it takes is ten percent of people that are willing to be as aggressive, hostile, and coercive as blm, antifa, and university marxists have been (short of doing anything illegal/violent), and their shit stops right in its tracks.
We can't help if they escalate into lawlessness/violence, but what we can do is be persistent and indefatigable, really hound them--hound them right out of public, out of their local watering holes, out of their favorite venues, out of their homes even.
Make the lemmings see it is safer and better for them to support us and our arguments, over the marxists and establishment uniparty supporters.
The one thing I've seen work really well is to call them anti-science. In a calm mild mannered way explain the actual science to them and when they deny it then ask them why they hate science.
Be as fucking gay as they are. (((Normalize their behavior by emulating it))). Suck a cock if you have to. Prove that point. what was the fucking point again??
using their language here is the equivalent to "accusing your opponent of what you do" while you do it. It's a cover for the expression of the idea in a hostile and aggressive manner. What you're doing is to instill fear in onlookers about even engaging with the idea at all, positive, or negative.
Train them to be afraid of participating or virtue signalling, thats what you want to do.
[ + ] rage
[ - ] rage 7 points 2.4 yearsJan 4, 2023 17:46:54 ago (+8/-1)
This kind of shaming appears to only work against those with morals.
[ + ] prototype
[ - ] prototype [op] 2 points 2.4 yearsJan 4, 2023 18:05:39 ago (+2/-0)
There are plenty of moderates going all with the semi-coercive shame campaigns of the left, both endorsing them, and participating, out of fear that if they don't they too will be targets.
The target is not the person you're talking to, the target for convincing is all the bystanders.
This is also different than shaming, its more along the lines of aggressive and coercive ridiculing.
Breaking the bystander effect is the number one goal. Go look up the studies on it.
All it takes is ten percent of people that are willing to be as aggressive, hostile, and coercive as blm, antifa, and university marxists have been (short of doing anything illegal/violent), and their shit stops right in its tracks.
We can't help if they escalate into lawlessness/violence, but what we can do is be persistent and indefatigable, really hound them--hound them right out of public, out of their local watering holes, out of their favorite venues, out of their homes even.
Make the lemmings see it is safer and better for them to support us and our arguments, over the marxists and establishment uniparty supporters.
The loudest most uncompromising side wins.
[ + ] Monica
[ - ] Monica 2 points 2.4 yearsJan 4, 2023 22:34:32 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] prototype
[ - ] prototype [op] 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 4, 2023 23:47:59 ago (+0/-0)
Ooh, thats fun.
[ + ] JewChipper
[ - ] JewChipper 1 point 2.4 yearsJan 4, 2023 18:45:16 ago (+1/-0)*
[ + ] prototype
[ - ] prototype [op] 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 4, 2023 20:27:43 ago (+0/-0)
Bark at them in their own language to normalize their fear response to their own virtue signalling.
Like pavlovs dogs. Call it non-violent 'terrorism' at the level of political discourse.
Gotta train the lemmings to know whats best.
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 1 point 2.4 yearsJan 4, 2023 20:02:41 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] prototype
[ - ] prototype [op] 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 4, 2023 20:20:59 ago (+0/-0)
If they ask what it means:
"Denying that trans are just men in drag."
using their language here is the equivalent to "accusing your opponent of what you do" while you do it. It's a cover for the expression of the idea in a hostile and aggressive manner. What you're doing is to instill fear in onlookers about even engaging with the idea at all, positive, or negative.
Train them to be afraid of participating or virtue signalling, thats what you want to do.
[ + ] 1234lkjh
[ - ] 1234lkjh 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 4, 2023 18:29:34 ago (+1/-1)
Sgt. Smooth Brain! You're on latrine duty for the next week!
[ + ] JewChipper
[ - ] JewChipper 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 4, 2023 18:49:07 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] prototype
[ - ] prototype [op] 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 4, 2023 20:25:23 ago (+1/-1)
On a scale of one to 你好, How slanty are your lizard eyes?
And does your pussy smell of stray israeli dogs or cupnoodles?
Gratefully I'm not within ten feet of you to find out.
[ + ] 1234lkjh
[ - ] 1234lkjh -1 points 2.4 yearsJan 5, 2023 01:05:21 ago (+0/-1)
Sgt. Smooth Brain! I already told you to get that black dick out of your mouth!
[ + ] ZyklonDryCleaners
[ - ] ZyklonDryCleaners 1 point 2.4 yearsJan 5, 2023 01:59:29 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] boekanier
[ - ] boekanier 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 5, 2023 00:44:49 ago (+0/-0)