I went digging, while fully clothed, not suggestive and probably off some basic consoom website, she is clearly underage and I say that as someone who tends to disagree with the consensus that women must look like hags or you're a muh pedo.
Only reason to post it is to get a reaction and play dumb.
I've been neutral on this for a while and even defended Blumen a couple of times but maybe I was wrong for that. He does seem to insist on walking an unnecessary line with the teen girl and pedo stuff and I'm tired of seeing those kinds of posts.
Its so fucking obvious, he's made hundreds of these "suggestive children" posts. I assume anyone who pretends its just "cute" to be full blown retarded if not a actual pedophile.
I remember the old voat being discovered by the pedos and flooded with pedo stuff until puttit started censoring them. Blumen seems to be more kind of an immature troll than a true pedo. In any case there is not much we can do other than deleting the material and ignoring his comments.
Here is the image referenced. There is no visible nudity, although they do have bare arms and shoulders. Woman on the right is in her 40s. Girl behind is in her 20s. All of the girls in front appear to be post-pubescent...
What's interesting about this campaign is it seems to have the goal of conflating sex with pre-pubescent children (pedophilia) and sex with post-pubescent teens up to 18 (ephebophilia, which is defined as a sexual attraction to post-pubescent adolescents and older teenagers).
Why exactly are we wanting sex with infants and up to age 12 to be seen as no different than sex with teens?
He normally posts naked girls in that "ittybittytitty" sub. Or something like that. When people made a fuss before, I looked and the youngest looked around 16. Pedophilia refers to ages 0 through puberty, which is around age 12.
I suspect he posted that to troll the retards who think sex with an infant and sex with a 17 yo are the same. Or who WANT it to be the same.
I see the second part all the time. I've argued with people who call me a pedo because I once dated a women when she was 17. I just assumed they were faggots or maybe a jealous incel. When people conflate something like this, it just weakens the word "pedo", which is something I imagine jews want, because they're pedos, actual ones (I already feel the need to clarify).
[ - ] HeyJames 1 point 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 18:00:50 ago (+1/-0)
Blumen has said before that the picture contains underage girls, but because they are not in a sexual post then it shouldn't be considered child pornography.
I never venture to any subs. I go to the front page for news, and that’s it. Accusations of this guys pedo posts make it to the front page everyday, but I’ve never seen any of these pedo images that gets everyone upset. Makes me wonder if it’s real.
Take a look and judge for yourself. This is the current image being screamed about. The image itself is 1950's work safe. The only possible reason for even the most prudish to balk is the text that comments about the nature of a race. https://files.catbox.moe/rbmo3y.png The previous thing I recall being screamed about was a child feeding an animal. Much like one would see at a petting zoo. Supposedly there is something horrible he keeps doing yet the most egregious ive seen is posting some fucked up cartoonish artworks.
That looks like two bitches ready to go to school. Although, I would never think that this image would be of such importance that I would burn calories to share it. He’s walking the razors edge of being a pedo.
I looked a few times and there was one girl who 'might' have been 16, but could have been a young appearing 18 too. The image this post is about contains no nudity, and is this: https://files.catbox.moe/fzj8x3.jpeg
What I'm seeing is an effort to make sex with infants seem no different than sex with a 17 yo.
As for me, that 'appropriate age formula' puts any potentials into their 40s.
In the end: the one who convinced me Blumen is a pedo was Blumen himself. Him posting picture after picture of young children and saying "SV would ban me for this meme teehee" dozens of times in a row is enough to believe the accusations must be accurate. That level of cope can only stem from someone finding your sore spot and exposing it.
I don't have anything against this particular post. It's not CP, there's no nudity, the girls aren't depicted in a sexual manner, and it's interesting to see how similar they look despite the difference in age. (assuming it is true)
Save the freak outs for when Blumenthal the hook-nosed Cheese Pizza merchant actually posts CP.
I went and looked at some of his recent posts, mostly random crap, some memes and some women.
The women aren't naked, but some are arguably suggestive, but I don't see any obvious underage girls. I'm not saying there aren't, but I don't see any.
I have to know, are the people who hate him all yanks? Cause women aren't supposed to be fat tranny looking 40 year olds. They're supposed to be thin, feminine and have soft features and you're supposed to find that attractive. Some people sound like faggots.
For those that didnt bother to look the image is two fully clothed people viewed from the waist up. The most skin shown is some scandalously bare arms.
[ + ]deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 15:55:16 ago (+4/-4)
[ + ] AmalekTheZOG
[ - ] AmalekTheZOG 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 19:47:28 ago (+0/-0)
This faggot loves the razors edge because it's the best way to shave his taint, as far as he's concerned.
[ + ] HeyJames
[ - ] HeyJames 8 points 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 16:01:58 ago (+9/-1)
He caused a lot of drama with a picture of naked young girls on SVF. He promised both myself and system that he wouldn't post that here.
He decides to break his promise, lie about it, and post the exact same picture except slightly censored.
https://www.talk.lol/viewpost?postid=63a24d259547d
NOTE: the image I'm referring to is not the post, but a comment in the thread.
[ + ] DivineLight2
[ - ] DivineLight2 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 23:49:29 ago (+0/-0)
Only reason to post it is to get a reaction and play dumb.
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted -9 points 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 16:06:56 ago (+7/-16)
[ + ] shigeridoo
[ - ] shigeridoo 5 points 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 18:44:45 ago (+6/-1)
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted -3 points 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 19:07:59 ago (+2/-5)
[ + ] shigeridoo
[ - ] shigeridoo 3 points 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 19:50:18 ago (+4/-1)
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 20:00:32 ago (+3/-3)
[ + ] shigeridoo
[ - ] shigeridoo 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 20:12:38 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] AryanPrime
[ - ] AryanPrime 4 points 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 18:30:04 ago (+6/-2)
oy vey whatcha doin rabbi?
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted -4 points 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 19:58:05 ago (+1/-5)
[ + ] AmalekTheZOG
[ - ] AmalekTheZOG 3 points 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 16:35:33 ago (+4/-1)
[ + ] AmalekTheZOG
[ - ] AmalekTheZOG -2 points 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 16:09:36 ago (+1/-3)
[ + ] SecretHitler
[ - ] SecretHitler 15 points 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 16:21:41 ago (+16/-1)
[ + ] Her0n
[ - ] Her0n 9 points 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 17:15:06 ago (+10/-1)
Much akin to the edgy atheist teen being antagonistic at family holiday events for the sake of soaking up some much desired attention.
[ + ] AryanPrime
[ - ] AryanPrime 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 18:29:02 ago (+4/-4)
you've openly defended a kike pedophile, it's why people assume you yourself are a kike
Imagine thinking you are part of the solution when you defend kike filth on here lmfao
[ + ] PhantomXLII
[ - ] PhantomXLII 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 20:10:02 ago (+0/-0)
Where's our local feds at on here? I'd like to report a hostile.
[ + ] AmalekTheZOG
[ - ] AmalekTheZOG 2 points 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 16:36:31 ago (+5/-3)
You are all faggots...massive faggots.
[ + ] TheBigGuyFromQueens
[ - ] TheBigGuyFromQueens 5 points 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 16:45:43 ago (+5/-0)
[ + ] KeepPoal4fags
[ - ] KeepPoal4fags 1 point 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 17:29:51 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] bonghits4jeebus
[ - ] bonghits4jeebus 3 points 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 17:50:00 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 [op] 2 points 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 16:39:11 ago (+5/-3)
[ + ] TheBigGuyFromQueens
[ - ] TheBigGuyFromQueens 6 points 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 16:44:35 ago (+6/-0)
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted -1 points 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 19:11:11 ago (+1/-2)
[ + ] fritz_maurentod
[ - ] fritz_maurentod 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 16:56:56 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Sector7
[ - ] Sector7 2 points 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 17:07:25 ago (+4/-2)*
Here is the image referenced. There is no visible nudity, although they do have bare arms and shoulders. Woman on the right is in her 40s. Girl behind is in her 20s. All of the girls in front appear to be post-pubescent...
What's interesting about this campaign is it seems to have the goal of conflating sex with pre-pubescent children (pedophilia) and sex with post-pubescent teens up to 18 (ephebophilia, which is defined as a sexual attraction to post-pubescent adolescents and older teenagers).
Why exactly are we wanting sex with infants and up to age 12 to be seen as no different than sex with teens?
[ + ] anthonylancer
[ - ] anthonylancer 3 points 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 18:01:47 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] Sector7
[ - ] Sector7 2 points 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 18:18:27 ago (+3/-1)
I suspect he posted that to troll the retards who think sex with an infant and sex with a 17 yo are the same. Or who WANT it to be the same.
[ + ] DivineLight2
[ - ] DivineLight2 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 23:57:01 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] HeyJames
[ - ] HeyJames 1 point 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 18:00:50 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted -3 points 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 19:09:38 ago (+1/-4)
[ + ] Laputois
[ - ] Laputois 4 points 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 20:02:02 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] 3starAgent
[ - ] 3starAgent 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 3, 2023 00:04:28 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] DivineLight2
[ - ] DivineLight2 1 point 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 23:52:56 ago (+1/-0)*
And it should be 19 if you're against sexual relations of all kinds with women under 20. As some are here. Not implying you are .
Edit: clarity.
[ + ] PearofAnguishJuniorManager
[ - ] PearofAnguishJuniorManager 1 point 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 17:07:36 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] oldblo
[ - ] oldblo 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 3, 2023 01:22:58 ago (+0/-0)*
The previous thing I recall being screamed about was a child feeding an animal. Much like one would see at a petting zoo.
Supposedly there is something horrible he keeps doing yet the most egregious ive seen is posting some fucked up cartoonish artworks.
[ + ] PearofAnguishJuniorManager
[ - ] PearofAnguishJuniorManager 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 4, 2023 16:40:29 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Sector7
[ - ] Sector7 -1 points 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 17:45:33 ago (+0/-1)
What I'm seeing is an effort to make sex with infants seem no different than sex with a 17 yo.
As for me, that 'appropriate age formula' puts any potentials into their 40s.
[ + ] AmalekTheZOG
[ - ] AmalekTheZOG 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 19:48:42 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Sector7
[ - ] Sector7 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 21:25:31 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Tobias_de_Treece
[ - ] Tobias_de_Treece 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 17:39:09 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted -1 points 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 19:12:41 ago (+1/-2)
[ + ] Tobias_de_Treece
[ - ] Tobias_de_Treece 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 21:55:31 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] StealthNinjaTaliban
[ - ] StealthNinjaTaliban 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 17:46:02 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] bonghits4jeebus
[ - ] bonghits4jeebus -1 points 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 17:46:58 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] bonghits4jeebus
[ - ] bonghits4jeebus 1 point 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 17:51:08 ago (+1/-0)
Oh I just realized I'm in a sub for this. Ok, bye fags
[ + ] HeyJames
[ - ] HeyJames 6 points 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 18:42:53 ago (+8/-2)
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted -4 points 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 19:09:08 ago (+2/-6)
[ + ] shigeridoo
[ - ] shigeridoo 1 point 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 20:15:08 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted 2 points 1.4 yearsJan 3, 2023 15:29:43 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] shigeridoo
[ - ] shigeridoo -1 points 1.4 yearsJan 3, 2023 19:09:56 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] Trumpman1488
[ - ] Trumpman1488 -1 points 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 19:27:46 ago (+1/-2)
[ + ] ScheduledSuicide
[ - ] ScheduledSuicide 2 points 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 19:53:52 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Laputois
[ - ] Laputois 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 20:06:23 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] TheGreatWhiteHope
[ - ] TheGreatWhiteHope 4 points 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 20:54:12 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] Smedleys_Butler
[ - ] Smedleys_Butler 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 22:15:01 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] AngryWhiteKeyboardWarrior
[ - ] AngryWhiteKeyboardWarrior 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 23:37:13 ago (+0/-0)
Save the freak outs for when Blumenthal the hook-nosed Cheese Pizza merchant actually posts CP.
[ + ] DivineLight2
[ - ] DivineLight2 1 point 1.4 yearsJan 2, 2023 23:45:59 ago (+1/-0)
The women aren't naked, but some are arguably suggestive, but I don't see any obvious underage girls. I'm not saying there aren't, but I don't see any.
I have to know, are the people who hate him all yanks? Cause women aren't supposed to be fat tranny looking 40 year olds. They're supposed to be thin, feminine and have soft features and you're supposed to find that attractive. Some people sound like faggots.
[ + ] oldblo
[ - ] oldblo 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 3, 2023 00:24:44 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] didyouknow
[ - ] didyouknow 1 point 1.4 yearsJan 3, 2023 00:27:04 ago (+1/-0)