Ignore them. They're morons. Half a century hiding under their desks and shitting their diapers over communism, suddenly it's "nazis" who are responsible for rampant marxism in the West. They're absolute brainwashed rejects.
Because they are all zionists so any threat is muh nazis. They will never call out jewish power. These are blackmailed and owned stooges. They all work for AIPAC and the WEF. Its a total loss. If the forefathers came back today they would demand a revolt.
Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by an idiots mistake, but always remember an idiot tries to make amends.
This isn't a motto to turn the other cheek, it's a guide to formally expose someone as acting maliciously.
Within regards to the question, I've already shown how a few times on here.
First you clearly define Nazism or Fascism within the framework of being an open ethno-centric dictatorship. Then you explain clearly why the other portion of Fascism, i.e. state controlled business, applies to literally every political ideology. To keep it brief, power is a hierarchy meaning only a few will be at the top, whoever controls the resources of a nation controls the nation and is it's government. So everything, from Capitalism to Communism ultimately will meet the final part of the definition of Fascism.
The establishment clearly does not meet the first two criteria of Nazism or Fascism, it only meets the last but everything meets the last criteria. So the establishment is not Fascist.
Once this is explained, you are now in a position where based on their response, you can determine whether they are just a brain washed idiot, or acting maliciously. If they're just an idiot, the conversation will remain relatively pleasant, and even if you didn't manage to fully undue their brainwashing, they will at least concede many points. If they are acting maliciously, the conversation will turn considerably more aggressive, and they will deny any points you make without reason for that denial. You can then use their response against them to show the audience that they are acting maliciously, and as such turn the audience against them.
We're American, it's Federalists Vs. States Rights. And more commonly, (propagandized)retards vs everyone else who wants to be left alone.
What we need is non-Americans out. Out of our Media(eyes and ears), of our government, out of our finances, out of our lives. America is for Americans with and by Americans. You can't be a jew and be an American.
This is happening because we have forgotten God. Everything not relating to that narrative is a distraction and/or misdirection.
[ + ] IfuckedYerMum
[ - ] IfuckedYerMum 1 point 2.5 yearsJan 1, 2023 23:57:20 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic
[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic 0 points 2.5 yearsJan 1, 2023 19:26:17 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] s23erdctfvyg
[ - ] s23erdctfvyg 0 points 2.5 yearsJan 1, 2023 18:55:25 ago (+0/-0)
This isn't a motto to turn the other cheek, it's a guide to formally expose someone as acting maliciously.
Within regards to the question, I've already shown how a few times on here.
First you clearly define Nazism or Fascism within the framework of being an open ethno-centric dictatorship.
Then you explain clearly why the other portion of Fascism, i.e. state controlled business, applies to literally every political ideology. To keep it brief, power is a hierarchy meaning only a few will be at the top, whoever controls the resources of a nation controls the nation and is it's government. So everything, from Capitalism to Communism ultimately will meet the final part of the definition of Fascism.
The establishment clearly does not meet the first two criteria of Nazism or Fascism, it only meets the last but everything meets the last criteria. So the establishment is not Fascist.
Once this is explained, you are now in a position where based on their response, you can determine whether they are just a brain washed idiot, or acting maliciously.
If they're just an idiot, the conversation will remain relatively pleasant, and even if you didn't manage to fully undue their brainwashing, they will at least concede many points.
If they are acting maliciously, the conversation will turn considerably more aggressive, and they will deny any points you make without reason for that denial.
You can then use their response against them to show the audience that they are acting maliciously, and as such turn the audience against them.
[ + ] PotatoWhisperer
[ - ] PotatoWhisperer 0 points 2.5 yearsJan 2, 2023 04:07:50 ago (+0/-0)
jews love to hide behind this one. Another favorite is plausible deniability, however twisted the word salad becomes.
[ + ] s23erdctfvyg
[ - ] s23erdctfvyg 0 points 2.5 yearsJan 4, 2023 00:00:58 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PhantomXLII
[ - ] PhantomXLII 0 points 2.5 yearsJan 1, 2023 18:32:43 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] AntiPostmodernist
[ - ] AntiPostmodernist [op] 0 points 2.5 yearsJan 1, 2023 20:29:25 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PhantomXLII
[ - ] PhantomXLII 1 point 2.5 yearsJan 1, 2023 20:38:05 ago (+1/-0)
They don't have the fucking privilege of dictating what is or is not. That is reserved for White Christians, and ultimately God.
They will die for their sins, and they will suffer eternally. I couldn't be fucking happier.
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 0 points 2.5 yearsJan 1, 2023 17:48:49 ago (+0/-0)
What we need is non-Americans out. Out of our Media(eyes and ears), of our government, out of our finances, out of our lives. America is for Americans with and by Americans. You can't be a jew and be an American.
This is happening because we have forgotten God. Everything not relating to that narrative is a distraction and/or misdirection.
[ + ] AntiPostmodernist
[ - ] AntiPostmodernist [op] 1 point 2.5 yearsJan 1, 2023 20:43:48 ago (+1/-0)