Sign into an existing account

Wait, help me out here, thats not a bee article?

WTF

Nigers have a different skeleton to other races.
That's how they know which race remains belong to in crime scenes

"Expert" is just a legal term.

It's not always so clear from bones/imaging. But the AI gets it right a lot more often than the humans do.

Thats why every cold logical AI got shoad.

FIFY

Because those networks don't factor in beliefs and feelings, they only utilize facts and legit data.

The way it happened was this:

We had an antagonistic relationship with those who were wrong.

We were downright hostile to those who were wrong.

So everyone became scared of being wrong.

So everyone stopped thinking for themselves or doing their own research.

They just took as gospel what the people who had by then become the unquestionable source of all correctness were saying.

It was safer than being punished for thinking independently and getting something wrong.

The experts that everyone was blindly accepting the words of were now taking advantage of this.

They could now just say whatever they wanted, and be sure that people will make it the truth.

In fashion true to how they were acting so far, the people would just enforce whatever the experts had said as unquestionable fact.

And you will be punished for refusing to listen and beleive.

Some of these "experts" would dissent from the rest, they would immediately be stripped of their status as truth-tellers when all of society turned on them, making them unto pariahs who knew nothing.

A Nobel prize winner could become someone who knew nothing of the exact field and sub-discipline that they had won their prize in overnight, a prize that they would be stripped of in the same time. Such a person was made into an example for the others.

The rest of the "experts" fell in line once they discovered none of them were safe from that fate, even the best of them.

Orthodoxy came from outside the scientific world, it came down from international bankers, and filtered through politicians, and lawyers, and corporations, and wealthy sponsors, and anyone else with money and power.

They step into the universities and tell the scientists what is or isn't true, their word trumps anything the evidence says.

These people aren't scientists themselves, hence why they are satisfied with keeping the foundations of X and Y in place, so long as part Z is changed to fit the party line, even in cases where it doesn't follow.

Professors look for the students who can point out the contradictions between the politically accepted narratives of science and the stuff they were learning was true.

Such a student is going to be one of the best in their field, able to spot the lie, that something else has to be true if the prior facts were true.

Such students will also be taken aside by their teachers and cautioned about speaking it outloud.

Yes, politics is interfering with science, and it leads to some facts being replaced in public with lies that only someone with knowledge and interest in the subject could spot, while within the community the truth of the matter is quietly accepted and used for their work.

I guarantee you the professor who teaches you biology in your University is not at all surprised by this article, only those on the outside of the field, who care more about social acceptance then truth, would be surprised by.

That makes me wonder how my pectus excavatum affects my swimming ability. I swim like a rock.