[ - ] 2Drunk 1 point 1.4 yearsDec 17, 2022 17:54:16 ago (+1/-0)
Then does one ever talk? Talk about what exactly, niggerball? Greenwashing? The 6 grillion... I'm just going back to consuming massive amounts of CH3-CH2-OH.
a) GNOS'TIC, noun [Latin gnosticus; Gr. to know.] implies KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists". The deception represents suggested "gnosticism", because consenting to suggested (fiction) tempts one to ignore perceivable (reality).
Same shit with perceivable SCI'ENCE, noun [Latin scientia, from scio, to know.] and suggested "scientism".
b) the process of dying represents the source for everything living within, hence enacting (process of dying) generating reactions (living) aka ongoing natural order generating temporary chaos of living.
The few utilize multiple deceptions to trick the many to ignore this such as suggesting them to seek "order out of chaos" as the inversion of being temporary chaos within the ongoing natural order or even worse...suggesting creationism (implies out of nothing) as the inversion of perceivable transmutation (implies out of everything), hence partial (living) out of whole (process of dying).
As form (life) within flow (inception towards death)...transmutation implies flow to form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death) aka transmutation of temporary ingredient out of ongoing base...simple alchemy.
In short...noticed lies; looked for truth, only found contradictions until I allowed myself (life) to question ongoing change (inception towards death). There's no truth or lies within motion...unless one ignores the ongoing (perceivable inspiration) for the affixed (temporary information), then temporary information exists within the memory of those ignoring ongoing inspiration.
a) suggested "that is nothing" ignores "everything" perceivable.
b) do you think those within reality have the power to deny reality?
c) suggested questions represent ones quest for outcomes, which tempts one to ignore that living represents ones response-ability (choice) of adaptation to origin (process of dying). Furthermore; a quest that seeks answers from others gives others the power to direct one through suggestion. Nature doesn't direct by suggestion...it represents the perceivable direction (inception towards death) for everyone perceiving it (life).
d) what if you want from others (suggested information); while I adhere to the need to adapt to origin (perceivable inspiration)?
I will only respect
a) RE (response to) SPECIO (view)...what if one view is defined by ones choice in-between need (perceivable) and want (suggested)? Do you base your respect on what others are suggesting ?
b) "will" implies ones free will of choice aka a response to a balance based system perceived (need) or to suggested choices by others (want).
a simple response
SIM'PLE, adjective [Latin simplex; sine, without and plex, plica, doubling, fold] - "single; consisting of one thing; uncompounded"...the process of dying represents the compound (whole), while everyone living within represents the uncompounded single (partial).
Your consent to compound suggested information within your memory shapes complexity within your mind, hence burdening your growth of comprehension within a simple system. The parasitic few keep suggesting you endless information as to fill up your memory, hence information-warfare.
explanation
EX (out of) PLANE (level surface; hence within balance) -ATION (through action)...reacting choice out of (EX) and within the momentum (PLANE) of enacting motion (-ATION). In other words...one represents the expression (living) within impressing (process of dying).
Others suggesting explanations about reality to you, can only ever be a substitute (fiction) within perceivable origin (reality), yet they can tempt you to ignore one for the other. Ask yourself if everything comes out of the same origin; then why would you put values on what others are suggesting about what you can already perceive on your own?
[ + ]deleted
[ - ] deleted 8 points 1.4 yearsDec 17, 2022 11:17:18 ago (+10/-2)
[ + ] BushChuck
[ - ] BushChuck 4 points 1.4 yearsDec 17, 2022 14:25:11 ago (+4/-0)
Perfect normie retard take, buddy.
[ + ] Her0n
[ - ] Her0n 2 points 1.4 yearsDec 17, 2022 16:44:14 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] 2Drunk
[ - ] 2Drunk 1 point 1.4 yearsDec 17, 2022 17:54:16 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] TheYiddler
[ - ] TheYiddler 0 points 1.4 yearsDec 17, 2022 19:14:06 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] GrayDragon
[ - ] GrayDragon 0 points 1.4 yearsDec 17, 2022 12:29:42 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Doglegwarrior
[ - ] Doglegwarrior 3 points 1.4 yearsDec 17, 2022 13:18:51 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] PhantomXLII
[ - ] PhantomXLII 0 points 1.4 yearsDec 17, 2022 16:10:50 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] BushChuck
[ - ] BushChuck 0 points 1.4 yearsDec 17, 2022 17:48:58 ago (+0/-0)
I have zero patience for the incompetency that has run rampant through most of our society.
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 1 point 1.4 yearsDec 17, 2022 10:03:19 ago (+1/-0)
b) to be partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable) implies each one to represent "alone" aka ALL(in)ONE.
c) all represents one in energy.
[ + ] Pasty
[ - ] Pasty 3 points 1.4 yearsDec 17, 2022 10:39:32 ago (+3/-0)
Just curious.
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 1 point 1.4 yearsDec 17, 2022 11:35:39 ago (+2/-1)
Same shit with perceivable SCI'ENCE, noun [Latin scientia, from scio, to know.] and suggested "scientism".
b) the process of dying represents the source for everything living within, hence enacting (process of dying) generating reactions (living) aka ongoing natural order generating temporary chaos of living.
The few utilize multiple deceptions to trick the many to ignore this such as suggesting them to seek "order out of chaos" as the inversion of being temporary chaos within the ongoing natural order or even worse...suggesting creationism (implies out of nothing) as the inversion of perceivable transmutation (implies out of everything), hence partial (living) out of whole (process of dying).
As form (life) within flow (inception towards death)...transmutation implies flow to form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death) aka transmutation of temporary ingredient out of ongoing base...simple alchemy.
In short...noticed lies; looked for truth, only found contradictions until I allowed myself (life) to question ongoing change (inception towards death). There's no truth or lies within motion...unless one ignores the ongoing (perceivable inspiration) for the affixed (temporary information), then temporary information exists within the memory of those ignoring ongoing inspiration.
[ + ] Seymore_potatohead
[ - ] Seymore_potatohead 0 points 1.4 yearsDec 17, 2022 17:51:30 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 0 points 1.4 yearsDec 18, 2022 05:51:55 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Pasty
[ - ] Pasty 0 points 1.4 yearsDec 17, 2022 20:16:12 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 0 points 1.4 yearsDec 18, 2022 05:49:13 ago (+0/-0)
a) suggested "that is nothing" ignores "everything" perceivable.
b) do you think those within reality have the power to deny reality?
c) suggested questions represent ones quest for outcomes, which tempts one to ignore that living represents ones response-ability (choice) of adaptation to origin (process of dying). Furthermore; a quest that seeks answers from others gives others the power to direct one through suggestion. Nature doesn't direct by suggestion...it represents the perceivable direction (inception towards death) for everyone perceiving it (life).
d) what if you want from others (suggested information); while I adhere to the need to adapt to origin (perceivable inspiration)?
a) RE (response to) SPECIO (view)...what if one view is defined by ones choice in-between need (perceivable) and want (suggested)? Do you base your respect on what others are suggesting ?
b) "will" implies ones free will of choice aka a response to a balance based system perceived (need) or to suggested choices by others (want).
SIM'PLE, adjective [Latin simplex; sine, without and plex, plica, doubling, fold] - "single; consisting of one thing; uncompounded"...the process of dying represents the compound (whole), while everyone living within represents the uncompounded single (partial).
Your consent to compound suggested information within your memory shapes complexity within your mind, hence burdening your growth of comprehension within a simple system. The parasitic few keep suggesting you endless information as to fill up your memory, hence information-warfare.
EX (out of) PLANE (level surface; hence within balance) -ATION (through action)...reacting choice out of (EX) and within the momentum (PLANE) of enacting motion (-ATION). In other words...one represents the expression (living) within impressing (process of dying).
Others suggesting explanations about reality to you, can only ever be a substitute (fiction) within perceivable origin (reality), yet they can tempt you to ignore one for the other. Ask yourself if everything comes out of the same origin; then why would you put values on what others are suggesting about what you can already perceive on your own?
[ + ] Aze
[ - ] Aze -1 points 1.4 yearsDec 17, 2022 14:00:22 ago (+0/-1)
Take your meds blood.
[ + ] PhantomXLII
[ - ] PhantomXLII -1 points 1.4 yearsDec 17, 2022 16:11:07 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] Stonkmar
[ - ] Stonkmar 0 points 1.4 yearsDec 17, 2022 15:35:10 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] usedoilanalysis
[ - ] usedoilanalysis 0 points 1.4 yearsDec 17, 2022 14:27:29 ago (+0/-0)